Comparison of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury of C2 pedicle and transarticular screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature

The Incidence of Vertebral Artery Injury in Cervical Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Previously reported estimates of vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) during cervical spine surgery relied on self-reported survey studies and retrospective cohorts, which may not be reflective of national averages. The largest study to date reports an incidence of 0.07%; however, significant variation exists between different cervical spine procedures. This study aimed to identify the incidence of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine procedures for degenerative pathologies.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a national insurance database was used to access data from the period 2010-2020 of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior corpectomy, posterior cervical fusion (C3-C7), or C1-C2 posterior fusion for degenerative pathologies. Patients who experienced a VAI were identified, and frequencies for the different procedures were compared.

RESULTS

This study included 224,326 patients, and overall incidence of VAIs across all procedures was 0.03%. The highest incidence of VAIs was estimated in C1-C2 posterior fusion (0.12%-1.10%). The number of patients with VAIs after anterior corpectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and posterior fusion was 14 (0.06%), 43 (0.02%), and 26 (0.01%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to date to our knowledge that provides frequencies of VAIs in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery in the United States. The overall incidence of 0.03% is lower than previously reported estimates, but significant variability exists between procedures, which is an important consideration when counseling patients about risks of surgery.

Intraoperative Vertebral Artery Injury: Evaluation, Management, and Prevention

Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is a serious and potentially life-threatening injury that is encountered with trauma to the cervical spine and less frequently during surgery. VAI can occur during either anterior or posterior cervical approaches or instrumentation and often involves anomalous courses of the artery. Although the incidence is rare, serious consequences including fistula formation, thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm development, cerebral ischemia, hemorrhage, and death may occur. Management of VAI can be divided into prevention, including review of preoperative imaging with knowledge of the anatomic course, utilization of surgical landmarks intraoperatively, and prompt recognition and management when injury is encountered.

Clinical Trial for the Safety and Feasibility of Pedicle Screws Coated with a Fibroblast Growth Factor-2-Apatite Composite Layer for Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery

To solve the instrument loosening problem, we developed a fibroblast growth factor-2-calcium phosphate composite layer as a novel coating material to improve screw fixation strength. The primary aim of the present study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for posterior instrumented surgery of the cervical spine. The trial design was a single-arm, open-label, safety and feasibility study. Patients receiving fusion of the cervical spine from C2 (or C3) to C7 (or T1) were recruited. The primary endpoint to confirm safety was any screw-related adverse events. Seven patients who underwent posterior fusion surgery of the cervical spine were enrolled in the present study. The coated pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the lowest instrumented vertebrae. There was only one severe adverse event unrelated with the coated screw. Three out of the fourteen coated screws showed loosening. The present results prove the safety and feasibility of pedicle screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for fusion surgery in the cervical spine. This is the first step to apply this novel surface coating in the field of spine surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Goel-Harms Technique in Upper Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of implant-associated complications and fusion rates for the Goel-Harms technique (GHT) and to show potential factors affecting the complications and nonunion development.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed database according to PRISMA guidance was performed. The main inclusion criteria comprised description of fusion rate and/or implant-associated complications rate.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 86 articles focused on the results of surgery in 4208 patients. The rate of screw-related complications was as follows: 1) vertebral artery (VA) injury, 2.8%; 2) screw malposition in the direction of the VA, 5.8%; and 3) C2 nerve root irritation, 6.1%. The nonunion rate was 4.2%. Transpedicular screw insertion to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were the safest regarding VA injury and correlated with lower blood loss. For C1-C2 fusion, there was no statistical difference for the different bone graft localization. C2 nerve root irritation rate did not depend on screw insertion technique. The use of a freehand technique did not correlate with a high rate of screw-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Goel-Harms technique is a promising method of C1-C2 fusion, with a relatively low nonunion and VA injury rate. It can be performed safely without C-arm or navigation system assistance. Transpedicular screw insertion trajectories to the C1 and C2 vertebrae were safest regarding VA injury and blood loss volume. Further comparative studies of various C1-C2 stabilization methods with a high level of significance should be carried out to identify the optimal approach.

The Comparison Between Transarticular Screw Fixation and Segmental Screw-Rod Fixation for Posterior Fusion of the C1-2 Segment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Both transarticular screw fixation (TAS) and segmental screw-rod fixation (SF) have been widely performed for C1-2 fusion; however, just only small clinical studies and a few meta-analyses comparing the 2 surgical techniques for C1-2 posterior fusion have been reported.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases for articles comparing the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of TAS and SF for C1-2 posterior fusion with April 14, 2022, as the publication cutoff date. The odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference were used to analyze differences in outcomes between the 2 abovementioned surgical techniques. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 5101 publications were assessed, and 6 studies were finally included in the study. In terms of the fusion rate, SF produced significantly better outcomes than TAS did (OR = 2.96, P = 0.02). With respect to surgical outcomes, blood loss and operation times were significantly lower in the TAS group than those in the SF group (P = 0.008 and P < 0.00001, respectively). The rate of vertebral artery injury was significantly lower in the SF group than that in the TAS group (OR = 3.95, P = 0.04). However, other complications, such as screw malposition, infection, hardware failure, and nonunion, were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SF showed a greater fusion rate and lower risk of vertebral artery injury than TAS did, but TAS showed less blood loss and lower operation times than SF.

Design a novel integrated screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a finite element analysis

PURPOSE

To design a new type of screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw (AATS) fixation with a diameter that is significantly thicker than that of traditional screws, threaded structures at both ends, and a porous metal structure in the middle. The use of a porous metal structure can effectively promote bone fusion and compensate for the disadvantages of traditional AATSs in terms of insufficient fixation strength and difficulty of bone fusion. The biomechanical stability of this screw was verified through finite element analysis. This instrument may provide a new surgical option for the treatment of atlantoaxial disorders.

METHODS

According to the surgical procedure, the new type of AATS was placed in a three-dimensional atlantoaxial model to determine the setting of relevant parameters such as the diameter, length, and thread to porous metal ratio of the structure. According to the results of measurement, the feasibility and safety of the new AATS were verified, and a representative finite element model of the upper cervical vertebrae was chosen to establish, and the validity of the model was verified. Then, finite element-based biomechanical analysis was performed using three models, i.e., atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation, traditional atlantoaxial AATS fixation, and atlantoaxial AATS fixation with the new type of screw, and the biomechanical effectiveness of the novel AATS was verified.

RESULTS

By measuring the atlantoaxial parameters, the atlantoaxial CT data of the representative 30-year-old normal adult male were selected to create a personalized 3D printing AATS screw. In this case, the design parameters of the new screw were determined as follows: diameter, 6 mm; length of the head thread structure, 10 mm; length of the middle porous metal structure, 8 mm (a middle porous structure containing an annular cylinder ); length of the tail thread structure, 8 mm; and total length, 26 mm. Applying the same load conditions to the atlantoaxial complex along different directions in the established finite element models of the three types of atlantoaxial fusion modes, the immediate stability of the new AATS is similar with Atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation.They are both superior to traditional atlantoaxial anterior screw fixation.The maximum local stress on the screw head in the atlantoaxial anterior surgery was less than those of traditional atlantoaxial anterior surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

By measuring relevant atlantoaxial data, we found that screws with a larger diameter can be used in AATS surgery, and the new AATS can make full use of the atlantoaxial lateral mass space and increase the stability of fixation. The finite element analysis and verification revealed that the biomechanical stability of the new AATS was superior to the AATS used in traditional atlantoaxial AATS fixation. The porous metal structure of the new AATS may promote fusion between atlantoaxial joints and allow more effective bone fusion in the minimally invasive anterior approach surgery.

Comparison of Atlantoaxial Fusion with Transarticular Screws and C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Screws Using Intraoperative O-Arm Navigation

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the surgical outcomes of atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws (TASs) and C1 lateral mass-C2 screws (screw-rod constructs [SRCs]) using the intraoperative O-arm navigation system (O-arm).

METHODS

Among a total of 28 patients who underwent atlantoaxial fixation, 13 underwent TAS fixation and 15 underwent SRC fixation using the O-arm. All patients underwent Brooks procedure with iliac bone graft in addition to screw fixation. TAS fixation was performed for cases without high-riding vertebral artery (hVA). In the SRC group, pars or lamina screws were inserted for the side with a C2 hVA. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative complications, screw accuracy, and bone union were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in mean operative time between the 2 procedures (166 minutes in the TAS group vs. 212 minutes in the SRC group, P < 0.05) and in mean blood loss (80 vs. 185 mL, respectively; P < 0.01). Two patients developed temporary postoperative occipital neuralgia probably related to C2 nerve root in the SRC group. No screws violated the cortex in either group. Complete bone union was observed in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm-assisted TAS fixation had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and fewer screw insertion complications than O-arm-assisted SRC fixation. O-arm-assisted TAS fixation is preferable for atlantoaxial fusion in patients without hVA.

The C2 Cortical Screw, an Alternative Fixation Technique for the C2 Segment During High Cervical Spine Surgery: Technical Note

BACKGROUND

For posterior fixation of C2 vertebra (the axis), several fixation techniques such as pedicle screw, laminar screw, and pars screw have been reported. A pedicle screw (PS) is considered the strongest among the techniques, but certain situations make PS fixation impossible or difficult. These include patients with a narrow C2 pedicle or high-riding vertebral artery. We introduced an alternative screw technique for C2 that addressed the aforementioned problems with safely placing it, which we termed a cortical screw (CS) for C2.

METHODS

Among a total of 28 cases using C2 CS for high cervical spine surgery, 2 cases using C2 CS were described. One patient was a 76-year old woman with a gait disturbance and myelopathic symptoms and diagnosed with C1-C2 myelopathy and translational instability. The other case was 54-year old man with posterior neck pain after traffic accident and diagnosed with C1-C2 fracture-dislocation. We used the C2 CS as an alternative technique for high cervical spine surgery in these patients and describe the ideal entry point and trajectory.

RESULTS

A postoperative computed tomography scan confirmed proper positioning of the C1 posterior arch screw and C2 CS, with satisfactory reduction of the C2 dens and adequate restoration of the C1-C2 spinal canal. The patient experienced no screw-related postoperative complications, and postoperative 1-year computed tomography images showed that solid union and good alignment of C1-2 segment was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 CS can be suitable alternative for C2 screw fixation technique in posterior high cervical spine fusion surgery.

Outcomes of occipitocervical fixation using a spinous process screw in C2 as a third anchor point for occipitocervical fixation: a case presentation

BACKGROUND

Posterior occipitocervical fixation and fusion are often required to address occipitocervical instability. Safe, stable internal fixation with screws is vital for the success of such surgery. Thus, poor selection of an internal fixation technique may cause fixation and fusion failure, possibly leading to neurovascular injury. Hence, in certain cases, such as in patients with severe instability of an occipitocervical deformity or osteoporosis, we hypothesized that having a third anchor point (a screw in C2) could enhance the stability of the occipitocervical fixation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 31-year-old man with occipitocervical deformity and spinal cord edema underwent a traditional occipitocervical fixation procedure but with the addition of a spinous process screw in C2 as a third anchor point. The procedure included posterior internal fixation and fusion. The occipitocervical fixation was completed by inserting occipital screws, bilateral C2 pedicle screws, C3 lateral mass screws, and a spinous process screw in C2 as a third anchor point. There were no neurovascular complications or incision-site infections. Postoperatively, radiography and computed tomography showed that the occipitocervical reduction and internal fixation had resulted in good spinal alignment, and magnetic resonance imaging showed no obvious spinal cord compression. At 4 months after the surgery, fusion was observed, and the occipitocervical screws remained well positioned. The patient continued to be monitored for 24 months postoperatively. At the 24-month follow-up visit, the muscle strength of the limbs was grade 5, and the patient's sensation function had improved over his preoperative condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a C2 spinous process screw as a third anchor point may enhance the stability of occipitocervical fixation. Further biomechanical and clinical studies are needed to validate this result.

Surgical Results of Intraoperative C-arm Fluoroscopy Versus O-arm in Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the surgical results of transarticular screw (TAS) fixation for atlantoaxial instability between C-arm fluoroscopy and O-arm.

METHODS

Of 58 patients who underwent TAS fixation for atlantoaxial instability, 35 underwent C-arm-assisted surgery (C-group) and 23 underwent O-arm-assisted surgery (O-group). In total, 78 TASs were placed: 39 in the C-group and 39 in the O-group. Unilateral and bilateral TAS fixation was performed in 38 and 20 patients, respectively. All patients underwent Brook's procedure with TAS. TAS fixation accuracy on postoperative computed tomography, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative complications, and bone union were evaluated. Screw accuracy was assessed using Neo's classification: grade (G) 0, no perforation; G1, perforation <2 mm; G2, perforation 2-4 mm; G3, perforation >4 mm.

RESULTS

TAS fixation accuracy was greater in the O-group than the C-group: G0: 38, 97.4%; G1: 1, 2.6% (O-group) vs G0: 22, 56.4%; G1: 11, 28.2%; G2: 3, 7.7%; G3: 3, 7.7% (C-group) (P < 0.001). Median operative time and median blood loss were similar between both groups. Bone union rate was greater with bilateral than unilateral TAS fixation (P < 0.05). There were no complications regarding screw malposition. Deep wound infection was observed in 1 case in the C-group.

CONCLUSIONS

O-arm use improved TAS fixation accuracy. Blood loss was equivalent between the groups. O-arm-assisted TAS fixation did not prolong operative time despite the time required for setting and scanning. The O-arm is safe and useful for TAS fixation in atlantoaxial instability.

Atlantoaxial fixation using C1 posterior arch screws: feasibility study, morphometric data, and biomechanical analysis

OBJECTIVE

C1–2 is a highly mobile complex that presents unique surgical challenges to achieving biomechanical rigidity and fusion. Posterior wiring methods have been largely replaced with segmental constructs using the C1 lateral mass, C1 pedicle, C2 pars, and C2 pedicle. Modifications to reduce surgical morbidity led to the development of C2 laminar screws. The C1 posterior arch has been utilized mostly as a salvage technique, but recent data indicate that this method provides significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. The authors performed biomechanical testing of a C1 posterior arch screw (PAS)/C2 pars screw construct, collected morphometric data from a population of 150 CT scans, and performed a feasibility study of a freehand C1 PAS technique in 45 cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

Cervical spine CT scans from 150 patients were analyzed to determine the average C1 posterior tubercle thickness and size of C1 posterior arches. Eight cadavers were used to compare biomechanical stability of intact specimens, C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw, and C1 PAS/C2 pars screw constructs. Paired comparisons were made using repeated-measures ANOVA and Holm-Sidak tests. Forty-five cadaveric specimens were used to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the C1 PAS freehand technique.

RESULTS

Morphometric data showed the average craniocaudal thickness of the C1 posterior tubercle was 12.3 ± 1.94 mm. Eight percent (12/150) of cases showed thin posterior tubercles or midline defects. Average posterior arch thickness was 6.1 ± 1.1 mm and right and left average posterior arch length was 28.7 mm ± 2.53 mm and 28.9 ± 2.29 mm, respectively. Biomechanical testing demonstrated C1 lateral mass/C2 pars and C1 PAS/C2 pars constructs significantly reduced motion in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with intact specimens (p < 0.05). The C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct provided significant rigidity in lateral bending (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two constructs in flexion-extension, lateral bending, or axial rotation. Of the C1 posterior arches, 91.3% were successfully cannulated using a freehand technique with a low incidence of cortical breach (4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This biomechanical analysis indicates equivalent stability of the C1 PAS/C2 pars screw construct compared with a traditional C1 lateral mass/C2 pars screw construct. Both provide significant rigidity in flexion-extension and axial rotation. Feasibility testing in 45 cadaveric specimens indicates a high degree of accuracy with low incidence of cortical breach. These findings are supported by a separate radiographic morphometric analysis.

Potential intraoperative factors of screw-related complications following posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of several factors, including patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of screws and their parameters, on the frequency of intraoperative screw-associated complications in posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database between January 1986 and March 2018 was performed. The key inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and post-operative screw-associated complications.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 1041 abstracts, and a total of 54 abstracts were included in the present study. The overall number of operated patients was 2306. In this group, 4439 screws were inserted. The rate of screw-associated complications during the different time periods was estimated upon meta-analysis. Statistical analysis of the screw malposition rate, vertebral artery injury rate, screw breakage rate based on patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of implants and their parameters was also performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors that help reduce the rate of screw-associated complications include the intraoperative application of biplanar fluoroscopy or neuronavigation system, the use of 4 mm or thicker lag screws, and screw insertion through contraincisions using cannulated ported instruments. On the other hand, the potential risk factors of screw-associated complications include inadequate intraoperative head fixation using skeletal traction, uniplanar fluoroscopy-guided screw insertion, screw insertion using the posterior midline approach, and the use of 3.5 mm or thinner full-threaded screws. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Gallie technique versus atlantoaxial screw-rod constructs in the treatment of atlantoaxial sagittal instability: a retrospective study of 49 patients

Background

The objectives of this study are to investigate the clinical curative effect of Gallie technique and atlantoaxial screw-rod constructs (SRC) on atlantoaxial sagittal instability and determine the indication of Gallie technique.

Methods

Data of 49 patients with atlantoaxial sagittal instability from February 2008 to May 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale (VAS) score and the neck disability index (NDI) were used to evaluate the curative effect. Postoperative radiological outcomes were used to evaluate the stability of atlantoaxial joint and bone fusion. Perioperative parameters such as blood loss, operation time, radiographic exposure times, and hospital expense were also recorded and analyzed.

Results

Forty-nine patients (36 men and 13 women) were included in this study. The mean age was 41.4 ± 8.9 (range from 19 to 64). All patients were followed up for 24–67 months. Among these patients, 25 of these patients underwent Gallie surgery and 24 underwent SRC surgery. The pain in the occipitocervical area of all the patients has been relieved. NDI scores and VAS scores were lower in Gallie group than in SRC group in early postoperative period. The proportion of the patients who achieved good bone fusion within 3 months after operation was 88.0% (22/25) in the Gallie group and 100% (24/24) in the SRC group. The Gallie group is lower than the SRC group in blood loss, operation time, radiographic exposure times, and hospital expense. Statistical difference was observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

For patients with atlantoaxial instability who has (1) the atlantodental interval (ADI) which is bigger than 5 mm on lateral flexion-extension X-ray, or Anderson-D’Alonzo type II odontoid fracture, (2) no asymmetry between odontoid process and lateral mass on open-mouth anterior-posterior X-ray, and (3) no dislocation of lateral mass joint on the CT 3D reconstruction, Gallie technique can be chosen as a safe and effective method if atlantoaxial reduction can be achieved preoperatively. Compared with SRC, Gallie technique can relieve the pain in the occipitocervical area earlier and it can shorten operation time and reduce intraoperative bleeding, radiographic exposure times, and hospital expense effectively. However, for patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation, the Gallie technique should be used with caution.

Accuracy Assessment of Using Rapid Prototyping Drill Templates for Atlantoaxial Screw Placement: A Cadaver Study

Purpose. To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using rapid prototyping drill templates (RPDTs) for C1 lateral mass screw (C1-LMS) and C2 pedicle screw (C2-PS) placement. Methods. 23 formalin-fixed craniocervical cadaver specimens were randomly divided into two groups. In the conventional method group, intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to assist the screw placement. In the RPDT navigation group, specific RPDTs were constructed for each specimen and were used intraoperatively for screw placement navigation. The screw position, the operating time, and the fluoroscopy time for each screw placement were compared between the 2 groups. Results. Compared with the conventional method, the RPDT technique significantly increased the placement accuracy of the C2-PS (p < 0.05). In the axial plane, using RPDTs also significantly increased C1-LMS placement accuracy (p < 0.05). In the sagittal plane, although using RPDTs had a very high accuracy rate (100%) in C1-LMS placement, it was not statistically significant compared with the conventional method (p > 0.05). Moreover, the RPDT technique significantly decreased the operating and fluoroscopy times. Conclusion. Using RPDTs significantly increases the accuracy of C1-LMS and C2-PS placement while decreasing the screw placement time and the radiation exposure. Due to these advantages, this approach is worth promoting for use in the Harms technique.

Neurological outcomes following iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic vascular injury is a feared complication of posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation. A better understanding of clinical outcome and management options following this injury will allow surgeons to better care for these patients. The object of the study was to systematically review the neurologic outcomes after iatrogenic vascular injury during atlanto-axial posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the Medline database following PRISMA guidelines. In our analysis, we included any retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, case reports, cases series, or systematic reviews with patients who had undergone posterior atlanto-axial fusion via screw rod constructs (SRC) or transarticular screws (TAS) that reported a patient with an injury to an arterial vessel directly attributable to the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty cases of vascular injury were reported in 2078 (2.9%) patients over 27 publications. The average age for this patient population was 55.7+/-17.9. Vascular injury following posterior C1/2 instrumentation resulted in ipsilateral stroke in 10.0% (n=6/60) and non-persistent neurologic deficit in 6.7% (n=4/60) of cases with the deficit being permanent (not including death) in 1.7% (n=1/60) of cases. Four patients (6.7%) died. Arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm occurred in 8.3% (n=5/60) and 3.3% (n=2/60) of cases, respectively. Eight patients (13.3%) underwent endovascular repair of the injury with no permanent deficit.

CONCLUSION

Neurological morbidity after iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior C1/2 fixation is higher than previously reported in literature. Some patients may benefit from endovascular treatment. Surgeons should be aware of normal and anomalous vertebral artery anatomy to avoid this potentially catastrophic complication.

Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study

Study Design Case series of seven patients. Objective C2 stabilization can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the upper cervical vertebrae. We describe seven cases of C1-C2 fusion using intraoperative navigation to aid in the screw placement at the atlantoaxial (C1-C2) junction. Methods Between 2011 and 2014, seven patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion using intraoperative frameless stereotactic O-arm Surgical Imaging and StealthStation Surgical Navigation System (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). Outcome measures included screw accuracy, neurologic status, radiation dosing, and surgical complications. Results Four patients had fusion at C1-C2 only, and in the remaining three, fixation extended down to C3 due to anatomical considerations for screw placement recognized on intraoperative imaging. Out of 30 screws placed, all demonstrated minimal divergence from desired placement in either C1 lateral mass, C2 pedicle, or C3 lateral mass. No neurovascular compromise was seen following the use of intraoperative guided screw placement. The average radiation dosing due to intraoperative imaging was 39.0 mGy. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. All patients went on to solid fusion. Conclusion C1-C2 fusion using computed tomography-guided navigation is a safe and effective way to treat atlantoaxial instability. Intraoperative neuronavigation allows for high accuracy of screw placement, limits complications by sparing injury to the critical structures in the upper cervical spine, and can help surgeons make intraoperative decisions regarding complex pathology.

Cervical Spine Instrumentation in Children

Instrumentation of the cervical spine enhances stability and improves arthrodesis rates in children undergoing surgery for deformity or instability. Various morphologic and clinical studies have been conducted in children, confirming the feasibility of anterior or posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with modern implants. Knowledge of the relevant spine anatomy and preoperative imaging studies can aid the clinician in understanding the pitfalls of instrumentation for each patient. Preoperative planning, intraoperative positioning, and adherence to strict surgical techniques are required given the small size of children. Instrumentation options include anterior plating, occipital plating, and a variety of posterior screw techniques. Complications related to screw malposition include injury to the vertebral artery, neurologic injury, and instrumentation failure.

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion for patients with a high-riding vertebral artery

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To describe the technique and clinical results of percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 arthrodesis in patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

DESIGN SETTING

Zhejiang Spine Center, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Five patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and an upper cervical fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 wire fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Computed tomography scans were used to assess the high-riding vertebral artery and feasibility of anterior transarticular screw fixation preoperatively. A Philadelphia collar was used to immobilize the neck postoperatively. Anteroposterior (open-mouth) and lateral views were obtained at pre/postoperation and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation was performed successfully on all of the patients, and no intraoperative operation-related complications such as nerve injury, vertebral artery, and soft tissue complications occurred. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months (range: 24 to 58 months). No screw breakage, loosening, pullout, or cutout was observed. Bone union was achieved in all patients at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our small case series results suggested that percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion is a technically minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and useful method to treat patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

The radiological feature of anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation as it guides the screw trajectory on 3D printed models: a feasibility study on 3D images and 3D printed models

Anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation is more suitable than a posterior approach for some patients with a history of posterior surgery. The complex osseous anatomy between the occiput and the axis causes a high risk of injury to neurological and vascular structures, and it is important to have an accurate screw trajectory to guide anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation. Thirty computed tomography (CT) scans of upper cervical spines were obtained for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction. Cylinders (1.75 mm radius) were drawn to simulate the trajectory of an anterior occiput-to-axis screw. The imitation screw was adjusted to 4 different angles and measured, as were the values of the maximized anteroposterior width and the left-right width of the occiput (C0) to the C1 and C1 to C2 joints. Then, the 3D models were printed, and an angle guide device was used to introduce the screws into the 3D models referring to the angles calculated from the 3D images. We found the screw angle ranged from α1 (left: 4.99±4.59°; right: 4.28±5.45°) to α2 (left: 20.22±3.61°; right: 19.63±4.94°); on the lateral view, the screw angle ranged from β1 (left: 13.13±4.93°; right: 11.82±5.64°) to β2 (left: 34.86±6.00°; right: 35.01±5.77°). No statistically significant difference was found between the data of the left and right sides. On the 3D printed models, all of the anterior occiput-to-axis screws were successfully introduced, and none of them penetrated outside of the cortex; the mean α4 was 12.00±4.11 (left) and 12.25±4.05 (right), and the mean β4 was 23.44±4.21 (left) and 22.75±4.41 (right). No significant difference was found between α4 and β4 on the 3D printed models and α3 and β3 calculated from the 3D digital images of the left and right sides. Aided with the angle guide device, we could achieve an optimal screw trajectory for anterior occiput-to-axis screw fixation on 3D printed C0 to C2 models.

Biomechanical advantage of C1 pedicle screws over C1 lateral mass screws: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

The established technique for posterior C1 screw placement is via the lateral mass. Use of C1 monocortical pedicle screws is an emerging technique which utilizes the bone of the posterior arch while avoiding the paravertebral venous plexus and the C2 nerve root. This study compared the relative biomechanical fixation strengths of C1 pedicle screws with C1 lateral mass screws.

METHODS

Nine human C1 vertebrae were instrumented with one lateral mass screw and one pedicle screw. The specimens were subjected to sinusoidal, cyclic (0.5 Hz) fatigue loading. Peak compressive and tensile forces started from ±25 N and constantly increased by 0.05 N every cycle. Testing was stopped at 5 mm displacement. Cycles to failure, displacement, and initial and end stiffness were measured. Finally, CT scans were taken and the removal torque measured.

RESULTS

The pedicle screw technique consistently and significantly outperformed the lateral mass technique in cycles to failure (1,083 ± 166 vs. 689 ± 240 cycles), initial stiffness (24.6 ± 3.9 vs. 19.9 ± 3.2 N/mm), end stiffness (16.6 ± 2.7 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6 N/mm) and removal torque (0.70 ± 0.78 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09 N m). Only 33 % of pedicle screws were loose after testing compared to 100 % of lateral mass screws.

CONCLUSIONS

C1 pedicle screws were able to withstand higher toggle forces than lateral mass screws while maintaining a higher stiffness throughout and after testing. From a biomechanical point of view, the clinical use of pedicle screws in C1 is a promising alternative to lateral mass screws.