The Weil Osteotomy: A Refresher

The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Weil osteotomies are performed to surgically treat metatarsalgia, by shortening the metatarsal via either a single distal oblique cut with translation of the metatarsal head (flat-cut) or through the removal of a slice of bone (wedge-cut). The wedge-cut technique purportedly has functional and mechanical advantages over the flat-cut procedure; however, in vivo data and quality of evidence are currently lacking. This study aims to investigate whether wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to traditional flat-cut Weil is associated with increased pain relief and fewer complications up to 12 months postoperatively.

Methods

Patient, surgical and clinical data will be collected for 80 consecutive consenting patients electing to undergo surgical treatment of propulsive metatarsalgia in a randomised control trial, embedded within a clinical registry. The primary outcome is patient-reported pain as assessed by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) - Pain subscale, and the secondary outcome is the incidence of procedure-specific complications at up to 12 months postoperatively. The groups will be randomised using a central computer-based simple randomisation system, with a 1:1 allocation without blocking and allocation concealment. A mixed-effects analysis of covariance will be used to assess the primary outcome, with confounders factored into the model. A binary logistic regression will be used to assess the secondary outcome in a multivariable model containing the same confounders.

Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the trial will be the first to examine the clinical efficacy of the wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to the flat-cut technique with a prospective, randomised control design.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001251910. Registered on 23 November 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06591-4.

MIS Distal Metatarsal Metaphyseal Osteotomy in the treatment of metatarsalgia: MOXFQ patient reported outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this paper is to present validated patient reported outcomes for MIS Distal Metatarsal Metaphyseal Osteotomy (DMMO) in the treatment of metatarsalgia. The study aims to evaluate the DMMO procedure, report patient satisfaction with the operated foot and report any complications of this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2014 and 2016, patients who had failed conservative treatment for metatarsalgia were identified in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic. Twenty four consecutive patients requiring DMMO plus/minus toe straightening were prospectively studied. Patients requiring additional procedures at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients completed the validated Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) three weeks pre-operatively and 1 year postoperatively. The MOXFQ results were analysed using Paired t-tests. A supplementary question was asked regarding patient satisfaction with the operated foot.

RESULTS

There were 20 women and 4 men with a mean age of 64 years (sd 8.6). Statistically significant differences were found between the pre and postoperative MOXFQ. The postoperative MOXFQ score demonstrated a poorer result for two patients, no change for two patients and improvement in 20 patients, with four of these patients recording the lowest possible score. There was a 29.5 point improvement in mean metric MOXFQ Index score. Seventy-nine percent (n = 19) of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the operated foot. The average recoil of the metatarsal heads following DMMO was M2 4.01 mm, M3 4.55 mm, M4 4.16 mm. There was one delayed union and no non-unions. Further reported complications were a gastric bleed, pulmonary embolism (VTE), and one intra operative broken burr.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates a clinically important and statistically significant improvement in patient reported outcomes following DMMO, with 79% of patients satisfied or very satisfied with this procedure. The average recoil of the metatarsal heads following DMMO was M2 4.01 mm, M3 4.55 mm, M4 4.16 mm with one delayed union and no non-unions.