A New Stem Guide and a Tuberosity Anchoring "Lasso" System for Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Complex Proximal Humerus Fractures

Fracture-Dedicated Prosthesis Promotes the Healing Rate of Greater Tuberosity in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming popular in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). Greater tuberosity healing may influence functional outcomes and range of motion (ROM) of shoulder after RSA. In addition, the design of prosthesis may impact the healing rate of greater tuberosity. The purpose of this study is to know: (1) does the healing of greater tuberosity affect the functional outcomes and ROM of shoulder? and (2) does the design of prosthesis affect the healing rate of greater tuberosity? Materials and Methods: PubMed, Ovid/Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing the clinical outcomes between the healed groups and the non-healed groups after RSA. Results: For functional outcomes, the results showed that the healed group had better Constant scores (CSs) (p < 0.0001). For ROM, the healed group showed better flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.02), and external rotation (p < 0.00001) of shoulder. For the design of prosthesis, the mean healing rate of greater tuberosity (82.7%) in patients with fracture-dedicated prosthesis was higher than those (63.0%) in patients with standard prosthesis. Subgroup analyses showed that the CS (p = 0.12) and abduction (p = 0.96) of patients using fracture-dedicated prostheses were not different between the healed groups and the non-healed groups. Meta-regression showed that there was no significant relationship between the design of prosthesis and CS (p = 0.312), flexion (p = 0.422), or external rotation (p = 0.776). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed that the healed groups could obtain better functional outcomes and ROM than the non-healed groups. In addition, fracture-dedicated prostheses promoted the healing rate of greater tuberosity. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020157276, PROSPERO: CRD42020157276.

Cow-hitch-suture cerclage for fixation of the greater tuberosity in fracture RTSA

Background

The treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an established treatment option. Healing of the greater tuberosity (GT) is associated with better outcomes. It was the aim of this cadaver study to compare the stability of GT refixation obtained with the so-called “cow hitch” cerclage fixation with that of the recommended standard suture cerclage technique.

Methods

A 4-part proximal humerus fracture was created in 10 fresh-frozen, human cadaveric shoulders. A CT was performed preoperatively to ensure the comparability of bone density and fracture patterns. In the experimental group the GT was reattached to the stem of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage (CH) technique, the conventional (CON) technique recommended for the tested implant was used in the control group. Humeri were tested with a uniaxial material testing machine. In total, 5000 loading cycles with forces from 250 to 350N were applied while motion (in mm) of the tuberosities was recorded with a telecentric camera.

Results

After 5000 loading cycles, the CH group showed a significantly smaller displacement of the bone fragment (0.74 ± 0.31 mm) than the CON group [2.29 ± 1.08 mm (P < .05)]. After the first three cycles the mean displacement was 0.14 mm (±0.12) in the CH and 1.42 mm (±0.21) in the CON (P < .0001) groups.

Conclusions

GT reattachment with the “cow hitch” suture cerclage showed a significantly more stable fixation compared with the currently for the used prosthetic system recommended suture cerclage technique in an in vitro 4-part proximal humeral fracture model.

A biomechanical comparison of different tying techniques of a double-stranded looped suture

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the biomechanical performance of different tying techniques of a double-stranded looped suture (DSLS).

METHODS

Loop and knot security of DSLS tying techniques (nice knot (NK), modified nice knot (MNK), double-twist knot (DTK), and double-barrel knot (DBK)) were compared. The square knot of DSLS (SKD) and the square knot of single-stranded suture (SKS) had been used as references. Twenty-four loops of each configuration were created using No. 2 Fiberwire (Arthrex, Naples, Florida, USA) and tested with a material testing machine. Samples were loaded with 10 N preloads for loop security assessment. Knot security was subsequently evaluated. Twelve loops of each knot were loaded to failure. The rest were subjected to cyclic load testing and the elongation at the 50th and 1000th cycles were measured. Knot bulkiness was determined by measuring knot height before testing. Data were compared with analysis of variance and post hoc tests. Statistical significance was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

All knots showed no statistically significant difference in displacement with preload. The load-to-failure was highest in NK, followed by MNK, DTK, DBK, SKD, and SKS. The cyclic loading test at the 50th cycle and the 1000th cycle demonstrated that NK has significantly less displacement than the others except MNK. DTK provided a minimal average knot height followed by NK, SKS, DBK, MNK, and SKD.

CONCLUSION

The different tying techniques in DSLS provided the similar loop security but different knot security and knot bulkiness. NK and MNK are biomechanically superior to the other knots, whereas DTK is the least bulky. The findings in the present study may help set the guide for the surgeons to select the tying technique of DSLS to best suit their requirement.