Reconstruction of the thumb in Apert syndrome

Outcomes of Apert Syndrome Hand Reconstruction With Tilapia Skin: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Tilapia skin has already been used in various medical scenarios, but there are no studies showing the use of tilapia skin for hand reconstruction in Apert syndrome. The objective of this study is to determine whether the use of tilapia skin during graft bed preparation for children with Apert syndrome can shorten wound reepithelialization intervals, reduce the number of dressing changes, and decrease patient discomfort.

METHODS

This is a prospective study on consecutive patients with Apert syndrome who underwent hand reconstruction at our Hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) a control group consisting of patients who underwent conventional digit separation hand reconstruction surgery (2) an experimental group consisting of patients who underwent similar digit separation hand reconstruction surgery that commenced with the placement of a thin layer of tilapia skin at the raw commissures during a first operation, which was subsequently replaced by an autologous skin graft during a second operation staged 10 days postoperatively. Pain assessment was performed using the Visual Analog Scale. The number of dressing changes was also assessed. A T test compared the total number of dressings changes and pain data.

RESULTS

Experimental group patients (n = 8) required an average of 9.4 days of daily dressing changes, and control group patients (n = 5) required an average of 20.8 days of daily dressing changes ( P < 0.05) and tended to experience significantly less pain when compared with patients in the control group ( P = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

Tilapia skin can shorten wound reepithelialization intervals by reducing the total number of dressing changes.

Open-wedge osteotomy for thumb radial angulation in Apert syndrome using a bone-graft substitute

A short thumb with radial angulation causes loss of hand function in patients with Apert syndrome. Although past reports have described various procedures for the correction of the thumb, there has been no consensus on the best procedure. This study aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic results of a surgical technique for the correction of a thumb radial angulation deformity: open-wedge osteotomy using a bone-graft substitute. Ten patients (18 thumbs) who underwent open-wedge osteotomy on the proximal phalange using a bone-graft substitute were evaluated retrospectively. The open-wedge osteotomies had been performed at the center of the proximal phalanx. Thumb radial angles and thumb lengths were measured on radiographs, and the clinical results were investigated, including bone union and complications. The median patient age at the time of surgery was 5.8 years, and the average follow-up period was 6.7 years. The average thumb radial angle was 57.3° preoperatively, 6.5° immediately postoperatively, and 19.8° at the most recent follow-up. The average thumb length was 12.1 mm preoperatively, 18.1 mm immediately postoperatively, and 22.3 mm at the most recent follow-up, indicating an extension effect of more than 50% immediately postoperatively. In all cases, the artificial bone had been absorbed and developed into autologous bone, and there were no complications such as infection and skin necrosis. These findings suggest that open-wedge osteotomy with an artificial bone substitute is simple and effective for treating radial-angulation deformities in patients with Apert syndrome. Level of evidence: Level IV - retrospective case series.

Distraction Lengthening of the Apert Thumb

BACKGROUND

The thumbs of patients with Apert syndrome are characteristically short and radially deviated, contributing to functional hand impairment. The authors report a two-staged technique for distraction lengthening of the Apert thumb using a robust cohort of pediatric patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed medical records of pediatric patients with Apert syndrome who underwent thumb distraction lengthening between 1999 and 2019. The technique was two-staged: (1) application of uniplanar distractor and phalangeal osteotomy, followed by (2) distractor removal, bone grafting, and fixation. Clinical records, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and photographs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (41 thumbs) with Apert syndrome were identified and treated (mean age at initial distraction, 11.5 years). A mean distraction gap of 31.3 mm was achieved over a median time of 40.0 days. The mean healing index was 26.3 days per centimeter. The thumbnail complex was lengthened a median length of 3.0 mm. The median follow-up time was 5.0 years, with complications occurring in 36.4 percent (eight out of 22) of patients. A delayed bone union occurred in one patient, and rotational malunion occurred in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Although long-term outcomes data are needed, thumb distraction lengthening following syndactyly release in patients with Apert syndrome is safe and should be considered to augment the overall appearance and functionality of the hand.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Apert syndrome: A consensus on the management of Apert hands

INTRODUCTION

Apert Syndrome is a congenital condition characterised by primary craniosynostosis, midfacial malformations and complex symmetrical malformations of the hands and feet. The hands demonstrate one of the most complex collections of congenital upper limb deformities, posing a significant challenge for the paediatric hand surgeon. This study examines the extant literature and current practice of the four UK specialist craniofacial units regarding the management of Apert hands in order to provide a basis for guideline development.

METHODS

The current literature was reviewed. Survey-type questionnaires were distributed to the four UK specialist craniofacial units and responses analysed.

RESULTS

Management of the Apert hand is largely dictated by the degree of malformation present. Although all units aim to achieve a five digit hand, variation in the timing of surgery, operative protocols and mobilisation policies exist.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide an interesting snapshot of the current management of Apert hands across four UK craniofacial surgery units. The four UK units remain congruent on most areas surrounding the management of Apert hands although some minor inter-unit variation exists. A multidisciplinary approach to management remains fundamental in optimising the regain of function and aesthetically acceptable hands.

Correction of Brachymetatarsia and Medial Angulation of the Great Toe of Apert Foot By Distraction Osteogenesis: A Review of 7 Years of Experience

BACKGROUND

Apert foot anomalies may cause severe problems such as pain and development of callus formation related to weight redistribution, problems with footwear, and gait disturbances that may limit their daily activities. The main purpose of this study was to review our experience with distraction osteogenesis for the correction of brachymetatarsia and the great toe angulation of the patients with Apert syndrome.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 7 patients (14 extremities) followed up for Apert syndrome who underwent distraction for the correction of bilateral congenital brachymetatarsia and angulation of the great toe between 2004 and 2008. Correction of the metatarsal inclination angle, the medial angulation of the great toe, the percentage of lengthening, and lengthening rates of distracted bones were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients ranged in age from 4 to 8 years at the distraction operation, with a mean age of 5.4±1.3 years, and the average length of follow-up was 86.6±21.0 months. The length of the first metatarsal bone increased significantly from the average length of 32.6±5.7 mm to an average of 46.7±6.5 mm (P<0.001). The mean lengthening rate and lengthening percentages of distracted bones were 0.4%±0.1%/month and 30.2%±6.4%/month, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative metatarsal inclination angles were at a mean of 43.8±5.12 and 32.6±3.8, respectively, and the correction of metatarsal inclination was considered as statistically significant (P<0.001). The mean angulation of the great toe reduced significantly from 49.8±11.76 to 13.2±8.5 degrees after distraction (P<0.001). Minor complications such as pin loosening, pin-tract infection, and early union that required reoperation were observed in 5 extremities (35.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic features of Apert foot may lead to complaints that may limit patients' daily activities and require as much attention as associated hand and craniofacial anomalies. Distraction appears to be an effective and safe approach for the simultaneous correction of the shortness of the first ray and medial angulation of the great toe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.