Postless Hip Traction Table for Combined Femoral and Pelvic Fractures

Experimental assessment of pelvis slipping during postless traction for orthopaedic applications

BACKGROUND

The application of lower limb traction during hip arthroscopy and femur fractures osteosynthesis is commonplace in orthopaedic surgeries. Traditional methods utilize a perineal post on a traction table, leading to soft tissue damage and nerve neuropraxia. A postless technique, using high-friction pads, has been considered as a potential damage-free alternative. However, whether these pads sufficiently prevent patient displacement remains unknown. Thus, this study systematically assesses the efficacy of commercial high-friction pads (PinkPad and CarePad) in restraining subject displacement, for progressively increasing traction loads and different Trendelenburg angles.

METHODS

Three healthy male subjects were recruited and tested in supine and Trendelenburg positions (5° and 10°), using a customized boot-pulley system. Ten load disks (5 kg) were dropped at 15s intervals, increasing gradually the traction load up to 50 kg. Pelvis displacement along the traction direction was measured with a motion capture system. The displacement at 50 kg of traction load was analyzed and compared across various pads and bed inclinations. Response to varying traction loads was statistically assessed with a quadratic function model.

RESULTS

Pelvis displacement at 50 kg traction load was below 60 mm for all conditions. Comparing PinkPad and CarePad, no significant differences in displacement were observed. Finally, similar displacements were observed for the supine and Trendelenburg positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PinkPad and CarePad exhibited nearly linear behavior under increasing traction loads, limiting displacement to 60 mm at most for 50 kg loads. Contrary to expectations, placing subjects in the Trendelenburg position did not increase adhesion.

To Summarize and Analyze the Epidemiological Characteristics and Prognostic Risk Factors of Patients with Pelvic Fracture Complicated with Perineal Injury

This study is aimed at summarizing and analyzing the epidemiological characteristics and prognostic risk factors of patients with a pelvic fracture with perineal injury. The clinical data of 153 patients with pelvic fracture with perineal injury treated in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The data of sex, age, injury mechanism, pelvic fracture type, shock index (SI), perineal wound depth, concomitant injury, total hospital stay, and death were collected by the electronic medical record system. Among the 153 patients, there were 94 males and 59 females, with an average age of (43.2 ± 16.8) years. The cases were mainly concentrated into two age groups: 20-29 years old and 50-59 years old. In a year, pelvic fractures were mainly concentrated in 1-2 months and 11-12 months. In terms of injury time, there were mainly two periods of time in a day: 10 : 00～12 : 00 and 15 : 00～18 : 00. The MOTS-RTS scores of the patients in the undead group and the dead group were (7.12 ± 1.52), (2.69 ± 0.96), ISS scores were (27.36 ± 15.84), (61.32 ± 7.08), GCS scores were (12.84 ± 3.69), (4.13 ± 1.25), APACH II scores were (12.87 ± 8.84), (32.41 ± 6.98), and SOFA scores were (6.68 ± 5.87), (17.12 ± 3.12). The MOTS-RTS and GCS scores of the nondeath group were significantly higher, while the ISS score, APACH II score, SOFA score, and shock index were significantly lower. The overall mortality rate of 153 patients was 13.7%. The average area of perineal trauma in undead and dead patients was (54.5 ± 113.52) cm2 and (262.63 ± 300.84) cm2, respectively. The average depth of perineal trauma was (9.63 ± 7.22) cm and (16.23 ± 10.13) cm, respectively. The larger the area of perineal injury and the deeper the depth of perineal trauma, the worse their prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed that complications, MOTS-RTS score, ISS score, GCS score, perineal trauma area, and perineal trauma depth were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with pelvic fracture with perineal injury. Most of the patients with pelvic fracture complicated with perineal injury are 20-29 years old and 50-59 years old. The more serious the perineal injury is, the higher the mortality is. The main causes of death are refractory hemorrhagic shock and infection.

Nailing femoral shaft fracture with postless distraction technique: a new technique enabled by shape-conforming pad

BACKGROUND

Femoral shaft fractures are usually treated with nailing using a traction table and a perineal post, but this may occasionally result in various groin-related complications, including pudendal nerve neurapraxia. Although most of them are transient, complication rates of up to 26% are reported. Recently, postless distraction technique has been described for elective hip arthroscopy. In this study we compared post and postless distraction technique in femoral shaft fracture nailing in terms of (1) quality of reduction, (2) outcome, and (3) complications.

METHODS

We reviewed 50 patients treated with postless distraction nailing technique for femoral shaft fractures and compared them with our historical case series (95 patients). The following data were collected for all patients: age, gender, weight, height, diagnoses (fractures were classified according to the 2018 revision of AO classification), type and size of nail surgical timing, Trendelenburg angles during surgery, quality of reduction according to Baumgaertner and Thoresen classifications, Modified Harris Hip Scores at 6 months, and perineal complications.

RESULTS

Median age was 53 years, and median weight was 70 kg (range 50-103 kg). We found no significant difference in terms of quality of reduction (72 versus 74% "excellent" reduction for subtrochanteric fractures, while 81 versus 79% "excellent" reduction for femoral shaft fractures) and functional outcomes (Modified Harris Hip Score 74 versus 79). One patient in the control group had a failure of the fixation, and one patient in the postless group had a deep infection. Two patients in the control group reported pudendal nerve neurapraxia for 4 months, while none reported complication linked to the postless technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results using the postless distraction technique show a sufficient distraction to allow reduction and internal fixation of the femoral fracture with a standard femoral nail.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Safe Distraction Technique for Hip Arthroscopy in a Polytraumatized Patient with Pelvic, Acetabular, and Ankle Fractures: A Case Report

CASE

A healthy 41-year-old man presented after a motorcycle collision resulting in polytrauma and underwent hip arthroscopy for removal of loose bodies after initial stabilization of pelvic, acetabular, and ipsilateral ankle fractures. Given these injuries, a novel hip distraction technique with a combination of postless traction and skeletal traction was used.

CONCLUSION

Specific considerations for hip arthroscopy with concomitant acetabular fracture include alternate techniques for joint distraction, maintenance of low pump pressures, and technical pearls for clearing hemarthrosis. Orthopaedic surgeons familiar with hip arthroscopy can use these methods.