Subcutaneous implantable venous access device erosion through the skin in patients treated with anti-vascula endothelial growth factor therapy: a case series

Chemoport Insertion-Less Is More

Implantable chemoport is a very useful device for long-term venous access for infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs and other agents. There are few studies from resource poor countries reporting complications of chemoport. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of chemoport insertion without image guidance and by closed technique without direct visualisation of a major vein (mainly IJV) and to study the complications associated with the procedure. This was a prospective observational study which analysed 263 patients who underwent chemoport insertion. The medical records of these patients were analysed for the patient characteristics, diagnosis, port-related complications, and their management. A total of 263 patients who were harbouring either locoregionally advanced or metastatic tumour requiring either chemotherapy or targeted treatment or both were included in the study. In total, 133 (50.57%) were female patients and 130 were male patients (49.43%). A total of 236 patients (89.73%) underwent port insertion procedures under local anaesthesia. None of the patients had any major intra-operative complications. Postoperatively, 4 patients (1.52%) were found to have port catheter malposition; 3 out of this 4 were corrected under IITV guidance as a second procedure under local anaesthesia only. One patient (0.38%) required formal removal and replacement of port. Four patients (1.52%) developed IJV thrombosis requiring port removal and anti-coagulation. One patient (0.38%) developed thrombus in the right atrium. There were 2 port site infections (0.74%) requiring port removal (SSI cat. 5). Low complication rates of port insertion were observed in the present, large, prospective study. Complication rates may be further reduced by using a well-designed procedure, experienced surgeons, an aseptic environment, ultrasound-guided puncture, and fluoroscopy with contrast media.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-020-01265-6.

Evaluation of complications of totally implantable central venous port system insertion

The aim of the present study was to describe the procedure of totally implantable central venous port system (TICVPS) insertion performed at our center and investigate associated complications. The study retrospectively evaluated 827 patients who underwent a single-type TICVPS insertion from January 2013 to July 2015. The length of the procedure, long-term device function, angle (chamber-to-tip) and complications of TICVPS, including infection, skin erosion, occlusion, malposition and thrombosis, were analyzed from the patients' medical records. A total of 843 TICVPS insertions were performed in 827 patients. The TICVPS implantation was successful in all cases (100%). A total of 34 cases (4.0%) with complications were recorded. Complications at the chamber insertion site occurred in 11 patients (1.3%), including 5 infection (0.6%) and 6 erosion cases (0.7%). All patients with chamber insertion site infection were treated by administration of antibiotics and dressing. Of the patients in which chamber insertion site erosion occurred, 2 were subjected to TICVPS removal and reinsertion and 4 were treated with debridement, irrigation and resuture. The most common type of complication was catheter-associated (2.3%; n=19). Among these cases, 7 had catheter-associated infection (0.8%), 8 had catheter migration (1.0%) confirmed by chest radiography, 4 had catheter-associated thrombosis (0.5%) and 2 had chamber malposition (0.3%). The present retrospective study on TICVPS, which used a relatively large cohort, demonstrated a low complication rate (4.0%) compared with that reported in previous studies (5-20%). A well-designed procedure, experienced vascular surgeons, an aseptic operating room environment, ultrasound-guided puncture, a wide angle (chamber-to-tip) and the use of fluoroscopy with contrast agent may reduce the complication rate of TICVPS insertion.

Large Skin Ulcer Due to a Subcutaneous Orthopaedic Implant After Bevacizumab Therapy: A Case Report

CASE

Bevacizumab is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor that is involved in the inhibition of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. We report the case of a patient who developed a severe skin ulcer at the site of the surgical incision 5 years after clavicular fracture fixation with a titanium plate. This ulcer represents an adverse event of bevacizumab therapy for sigmoid colon cancer.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab therapy is widely used, particularly for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer and other solid tumors, although it is associated with several adverse events, including delayed wound-healing and skin ulcers. However, to our knowledge, orthopaedic-related adverse events have not previously been reported.

Chemoport-skin erosion: our experience

Chemoports are totally implantable venous access devices, which are retained over long periods of time to facilitate chemotherapy administration. Skin erosion is a rare complication wherein there is breach in the skin overlying the septum. This study reports the author's experience of skin erosion in three cases. Ports were explanted in all cases. Skin incision for port placement should be placed away from the access site and repeated access at the same point must be avoided to lessen the incidence of skin erosions.

Reduction of erosion risk in adult patients with implanted venous access ports

One of the most common venous access devices used in patients with cancer is the implanted venous access port. Although incidences of infection and thrombosis are the most commonly reported complications, erosion rates of venous access ports are estimated at almost 1%. This article describes how evidence-based interdisciplinary interventions decreased port erosions for a regional health center from 3.2% to less than 1%.

Wound healing and catheter thrombosis after implantable venous access device placement in 266 breast cancers treated with bevacizumab therapy

The aim of this study was to determine, in a population with metastatic breast cancer treated with bevacizumab therapy, the incidence of wound dehiscence after placement of an implantable venous access device (VAD) and to study the risk of catheter thrombosis. This study enrolled all VADs placed by 14 anesthetists between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2009: 273 VADs in patients treated with bevacizumab therapy and 4196 VADs in patients not treated with bevacizumab therapy. In the bevacizumab therapy group, 13 cases of wound dehiscence occurred in 12 patients requiring removal of the VAD (4.76%). All cases of dehiscence occurred when bevacizumab therapy was initiated less than 7 days after VAD placement. Bevacizumab therapy was initiated less than 7 days after VAD placement in 150 cases (13 of 150: 8.6%). The risk of dehiscence was the same from 0 to 7 days. In parallel, the VAD wound dehiscence rate in patients not receiving bevacizumab therapy was eight of 4197 cases (0.19%) (Fisher's test significant, P<0.001). No risk factors of dehiscence were identified: anesthetists, learning curves, and irradiated patients. VAD thrombosis occurred in four patients (1.5%). In parallel, VAD thrombosis occurred in 51 of 4197 patients (1.2%) not receiving bevacizumab therapy (Fisher's test not significant; P=0.43). Bevacizumab therapy was permanently discontinued in five patients related to wound dehiscence and in one patient due to extensive skin necrosis. These data suggest the need to observe an interval of at least 7 days between VAD placement and initiation of bevacizumab therapy to avoid the risk of a wound dehiscence requiring chest wall port explant. The risk of VAD thrombosis does not require any particular primary prevention.

Intraperitoneal administration of bevacizumab intraoperatively does not affect abdominal wound healing in rats

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to treat advanced colorectal cancer as well as other malignancies, but the ideal time point for its administration in patients scheduled for surgery is not well defined due to serious concerns regarding possible side effects on wound healing. Therefore, we conducted an experimental study in rats to clarify this issue.

METHODS

Four groups of 10 Wistar rats each underwent a 4-cm midline laparotomy and closure of the wound in 2 layers. In the treatment groups (A and B), bevacizumab (Avastin(®)) received a single dose of 5 mg/kg i.p., and an equal amount of saline was given to the control groups (C and D). Groups A and C were sacrificed on the 7th postoperative day, and groups B and D on the 14th postoperative day. Wounds were inspected by two independent observers upon sacrifice and results were recorded; wound tissues were sent for histology to assess the degree of fibrosis and measurement of tissue hydroxyproline levels. Serum levels of endothelin-1, C-reactive protein, pro-oxidant/antioxidant balance and carbonylated proteins were also determined. For statistical analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test was used.

RESULTS

Wound healing did not differ among groups both on the 7th and the 14th postoperative days, and there was also no significant difference regarding the degree of inflammation, fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis, as well as hydroxyproline and biochemical marker levels among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal bevacizumab administered intraoperatively does not significantly affect abdominal wound healing in rats.

Features and selection of vascular access devices

OBJECTIVE

To review venous anatomy and physiology, discuss assessment parameters before vascular access device (VAD) placement, and review VAD options.

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles, personal experience.

CONCLUSION

A number of VAD options are available in clinical practice. Access planning should include comprehensive assessment, with attention to patient participation in the planning and selection process. Careful consideration should be given to long-term access needs and preservation of access sites.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses are uniquely suited to perform a key role in VAD planning and placement. With knowledge of infusion therapy, anatomy and physiology, device options, and community resources, nurses can be key leaders in preserving vascular access and improving the safety and comfort of infusion therapy.

Indwelling central venous access port insertion during bevacizumab-based therapy

Indwelling central venous catheters and implantable port systems are widely used in the care of patients with cancer. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, significantly prolongs survival when added to intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. It has also been shown to be of value in a range of other malignant diseases. Some elements of the toxicity profile of bevacizumab, however, such as bleeding and impaired wound healing, could interfere with surgical procedures involved in the treatment of the diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible effect of bevacizumab in increasing the morbidity associated with an indwelling central venous access port in patients currently receiving the drug, or those who had received it in the preoperative run-up to surgery. An analysis of the medical records of 57 patients with a variety of cancers, who had received an indwelling central venous access port, either during the course of treatment with bevacizumab or in the 4-week period before the commencement of therapy was carried out, with particular emphasis on periprocedural complications. Eight of the patients also had diabetes mellitus. There were no instances of delay in wound healing, abnormal bleeding, or wound infection in any of the patients and no episodes of skin ulceration during bevacizumab treatment. Although this is a relatively small study, and no definitive conclusions can be drawn at this stage, our data suggest that an indwelling central venous access port insertion may be carried out shortly before or during bevacizumab treatment without increasing periprocedural morbidity.

Vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy in the perioperative setting: implications for patient care

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has become the standard of care in several solid tumours, including colorectal cancer, renal-cell carcinoma, breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and glioblastoma. VEGF is crucial in the process of angiogenesis and wound healing and, thus, its inhibition has the potential to affect wound healing in patients undergoing surgery. In this review, we summarise the data available on the use of VEGF-targeted therapies, and their effect on perioperative wound complications. Surgery in patients receiving VEGF-targeted therapies seems to be safe when an appropriate interval of time is allowed between surgical procedures and treatment. Recommendations regarding this interval are provided in a disease and agent site-specific manner. We also discuss complications arising from the use of VEGF-directed therapies that might require surgical intervention and the considerations important in their management. At this juncture, safety data on the use of VEGF-targeted therapies in the perioperative period are sparse, and investigators are urged to continue to study this issue prospectively in current and future clinical trials to establish firm guidelines.

Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of wound dehiscence or failure to heal after port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy. A hypothesis was tested that the mean interval between bevacizumab administration and port placement was shorter in patients who had dehiscence than in those who did not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients who had venous access ports placed from July 2006 through December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 195 ports were placed in 189 patients (106 men) who were treated with bevacizumab within 120 days of port placement. The incidence of wound dehiscence and the significance of dose timing relative to port placement in these patients were calculated.

RESULTS

Six of 195 ports (3.1%) were associated with wound dehiscence requiring port removal. The mean interval between bevacizumab dosing and port placement in patients without dehiscence (n = 189) was 16.9 days. The mean interval in patients with dehiscence (n = 6) was 10.8 days. A two-tailed Wilcoxon test was performed, which yielded a P value of .0150. A statistically significant difference in the mean interval between bevacizumab dosing and port placement exists between patients with dehiscence and those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound dehiscence after port placement was related to timing of bevacizumab therapy. Patients receiving bevacizumab within 10 days of port placement had a higher incidence of wound dehiscence.

Clinical use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most potent proangiogenic factor and has been identified as an important target of cancer therapy. Blocking endothelial cell VEGF activity inhibits tumor angiogenesis; normalizes tumor vasculature, facilitating improved chemotherapy delivery; and prevents the recruitment of progenitor cells from the bone marrow. Bevacizumab, the only United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF agent, is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the binding of VEGF to VEGF receptors. The addition of bevacizumab to standard first- and second-line chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer improves overall and progression-free survival times and increases the time to disease progression. Studies are evaluating bevacizumab as adjuvant therapy. The optimal bevacizumab dosage is unknown, but 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks is currently recommended for initial therapy. A surrogate efficacy marker is needed to optimize bevacizumab use, both for dose and patient selection; the clinical applicability of several surrogate efficacy markers is being evaluated. Generally, bevacizumab is well tolerated; however, several serious adverse effects that may occur (e.g., hypertensive crisis) can usually be appropriately prevented or managed. Although current recommendations suggest the administration of the first bevacizumab dose over 90 minutes to prevent infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions, recent study results show that 5 and 10 mg/kg can safely be administered over 10 and 20 minutes, respectively. Whether the addition of bevacizumab to metastatic colorectal cancer treatment regimens is a cost-effective treatment option is unknown; health economic studies are needed. When used for FDA-approved indications or for off-label indications being evaluated in select clinical trials, Medicare reimburses for bevacizumab therapy.