Clinical response of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung to perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy

Clinical characteristics and treatment management of combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, a subtype of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (CLCNEC) is a rare neuroendocrine carcinoma, accounting for approximately 10% of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Mainly composed of coexisting adenocarcinoma components, with strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. The treatment regimen for CLCNEC mainly refers to complete surgical resection as the first choice in the early stage, while patients with stage II or higher require adjuvant treatment. At present, research on CLCNEC is mostly small sample and retrospective, and there is no consensus on whether molecular typing and treatment should be carried out. There is considerable controversy over whether it should be managed as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, in order to solve the problem of confusion in the selection of treatment regimens for CLCNEC, while also considering the therapeutic effects, this article summarizes and analyzes previous studies, fully seeks evidence, and boldly proposes new therapeutic insights: the etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen serves as the basis for adjuvant therapy; In addition, SCLC/NSCLC-CLCNEC can be distinguished based on presence of RB1 and TP53 co-mutation, and targeted therapy or NSCLC type chemotherapy including platinum + gemcitabine or taxanes (NSCLC-GEM/TAX) can be used in combination or sequentially for NSCLC-CLCNEC.

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (pLCNEC) represents a rare malignancy characterized by its aggressive behavior and a notably high recurrence rate. Remarkably, there is currently no established standard treatment protocol for this condition.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In this report, we present an intriguing case of pLCNEC diagnosed at clinical-stage IIB. This case involves a 64-year-old man with a smoking history spanning four decades. In our approach, we initiated a course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab, administered for two cycles prior to surgical resection. This innovative treatment strategy resulted in a significant pathological response, culminating in a major pathological remission (MPR). As of the time of composing this report, the patient has been diligently monitored for 39 months post-surgery, exhibiting no indications of recurrence, and has demonstrated exceptional tolerance to the entire treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

We have first reported a clinically successful case of neoadjuvant combination chemotherapy with pembrolizumab in the treatment of pLCNEC. This case offers promising clinical insights and suggests that this therapeutic approach could be a viable option for managing pLCNEC.

Complete response in patient with locally advanced lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma under sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy: A case report

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an uncommon subtype of lung cancer with bleak prognosis. Its optimal treatment remains undetermined due to its malignancy. A 66-year-old man diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced LCNEC exhibited partial radiographic response to chemo-immunotherapy. He underwent salvage surgery after 4 rounds of docetaxel/nedaplatin (DP) regimen plus sintilimab, a highly selective monoclonal antibody which targets human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). In addition, the pathologic examination of the excision demonstrated that there were no viable residuary tumor cells. This case indicates that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy might benefit patients with locally advanced LCNEC, which deserves further investigation.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC): a population-based study addressing recent molecular-genetic advances and emerging therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is a rare, aggressive cancer most commonly found in the lungs but not exclusively, with a worse prognosis than non-small cell lung carcinomas. Currently, LCNEC patients are treated using small cell and non-small cell protocols. This study aims to use the SEER database to identify demographic, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic factors affecting the prognosis and survival of patients with LCNEC of the lung.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, and management data of patients with lung LCNEC were extracted from the SEER database for the period 2000-2018.

RESULTS

In the USA, LCNEC has a higher incidence in elderly white men: M:F ratio = 1.2:1, Caucasian: 83.3%, mean age: 67 ± 10.2 years. The most common treatment modality was chemotherapy only: 29.2%, followed by surgery: 21.5% (but in this group the statuses of chemotherapy were unknown), and combination surgery/chemotherapy: 8.8%. The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival was 17.5% (95% CI 16.3-18.8) and 21.9% (95% CI 20.5-23.4), respectively. By treatment, the best 5-year survival was for surgery alone (48%), followed by multimodality therapy (chemo + surgery + radiation) at 35% (95% CI 27-43). Age > 60 years, male gender, size > 7 cm, and nodal and liver metastasis were independent risk factors associated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Lung LCNEC is an aggressive neoplasm most common in older white males that presents at an advanced stage despite small primary tumors. Most patients die within 2 years. The best predictor of survival is surgery with chemotherapy. Given its dismal prognosis, new treatment guidelines are needed for this aggressive cancer.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUNDS

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rarely high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung with features of both small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we aim to construct a prognostic nomogram that integrates the clinical features and treatment options to predict disease-specific survival (DSS).

METHODS

A total of 713 patients diagnosed with LCNEC were from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2010-2016. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to choose the significant predictors of DSS. External validation was performed using 77 patients with LCNEC in the West China Hospital Sichuan University between 2010-2018. The predictive accuracy and discriminative capability were estimated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The clinical applicability of the nomogram was verified through the decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, we conducted a subgroup analysis of data available in the external cohort that may impact prognosis but was not recorded in the SEER database.

RESULTS

Six independent risk factors for DSS were identified and integrated into the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good C- indexes of 0.803 and 0.767 in the training and validation group, respectively. Moreover, the calibration curves for the probability of survival showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation in 1-, 3- and 5-year DSS. The ROC curves demonstrated the prediction accuracy of the established nomogram (all Area Under Curve (AUC) > 0.8). DCA exhibited the favorable clinical applicability of the nomogram in the prediction of LCNEC survival. A risk classification system was built which could perfectly classify LCNEC patients into high-, medium- and low-risk groups (p < 0.001). The survival analysis conducted on the West China Hospital cohort indicated that whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), surgical procedures, tumor grade, Ki-67, and PD-L1 expression were not significantly associated with DSS.

CONCLUSION

This study has effectively developed a prognostic nomogram and a corresponding risk stratification system, which demonstrate promising potential for predicting the DSS of patients with LCNEC.

Recurrence-Free Survival in Early and Locally Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung after Complete Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer with poor clinical outcomes. Data on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early and locally advanced pure LCNEC after complete resection (R0) are lacking. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in this subgroup of patients and to identify potential prognostic markers.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study including patients with pure LCNEC stage I-III and R0 resection. Clinicopathological characteristics, RFS, and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

39 patients (M:F = 26:13), with a median age of 64 years (44-83), were included. Lobectomy (69.2%), bilobectomy (5.1%), pneumonectomy (18%), and wedge resection (7.7%) were performed mostly associated with lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant therapy included platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in 58.9% of cases. After a median follow-up of 44 (4-169) months, the median RFS was 39 months with 1-, 2- and 5-year RFS rates of 60.0%, 54.6%, and 44.9%, respectively. Median DSS was 72 months with a 1-, 2- and 5-year rate of 86.8, 75.9, and 57.4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, age (cut-off 65 years old) and pN status were independent prognostic factors for both RFS (HR = 4.19, 95%CI = 1.46-12.07, p = 0.008 and HR = 13.56, 95%CI 2.45-74.89, p = 0.003, respectively) and DSS (HR = 9.30, 95%CI 2.23-38.83, p = 0.002 and HR = 11.88, 95%CI 2.28-61.84, p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After R0 resection of LCNEC, half of the patients recurred mostly within the first two years of follow-up. Age and lymph node metastasis could help to stratify patients for adjuvant therapy.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Case Series of 14 Cases

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of neuroendocrine tumor, presenting with very aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. The diagnosis is difficult and requires histological confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature by an immunohistochemical study on a biopsy sample. We retrospectively studied a series of 14 patients from the pneumology department of the Mohammed VI University Hospital of Oujda, Morocco, over a period of five years (from April 2017 to March 2021). The average age was 63.41 years (45-80 years). All our patients were male and smokers. The clinical signs were dominated by deterioration in general condition and dyspnea. Bronchoscopy was performed in 92% of patients, with neoplastic stenosis being the main found aspect, in 35% of cases. The histological diagnosis was obtained by bronchoscopy in 50% of cases. In the remaining cases, it was carried by CT-guided transparietal biopsy in 28% of cases, pleural biopsy in 7% of cases, biopsy of a metastatic site in 7% of cases and finally thoracoscopy with pleural biopsy in the remaining 7% of cases. Therapeutically, no patient received surgical treatment and three patients were put on palliative treatment. The positive diagnosis is often late, which makes the prognosis bad and the therapeutic possibilities limited. Hence the importance of strategies for the prevention of tobacco control and early detection in population at risk.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Current Understanding and Challenges

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive type of lung cancer, with a complex biology that shares similarities with both small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognosis of LCNEC is poor, with a median overall survival of 8-12 months. The diagnosis of LCNEC requires the identification of neuroendocrine morphology and the expression of at least one of the neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A, synaptophysin or CD56). In the last few years, the introduction of next-generation sequencing allowed the identification of molecular subtypes of LCNEC, with prognostic and potential therapeutic implications: one subtype is similar to SCLC (SCLC-like), while the other is similar to NSCLC (NSCLC-like). Because of LCNEC rarity, most evidence comes from small retrospective studies and treatment strategies that are extrapolated from those adopted in patients with SCLC and NSCLC. Nevertheless, limited but promising data about targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with LCNEC are emerging. LCNEC clinical management is still controversial and standardized treatment strategies are currently lacking. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical and molecular data about LCNEC to better understand the optimal management and the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of molecular subtypes.

Nationwide registry for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm of pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, bronchi, or thymus in Japan

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is a comparatively rare tumor that has been considered indolent. Due to these characteristics, detailed epidemiological data have not been analyzed in Japan. To elucidate the present status of NEN diagnosis and treatment in Japan, we started a registry cohort study in January 2015.

METHODS

Patients pathologically diagnosed with NENs of the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, bronchi, or thymus after January 2012 were enrolled in this registry after the date of ethics review committee approval in each hospital or institute. Follow-up was continued for enrolled patients.

RESULTS

During 5 years of enrollment between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 1526 participants from 63 departments were enrolled in this registry (mean, 305.2 participants/year), covering approximately 5.8% of the annual incidence of NENs in Japan. For pancreatic NEN, 41.9% of patients had metastasis and the dominant metastatic site was the liver, at twice the rate of lymph node metastasis in the current registry. In contrast, the frequency of lymph node metastasis from gastrointestinal (GI)-NEN was similar to that of the liver. The distribution of WHO 2019-based grades varied according to the primary site. Low-to-intermediate grade (G1-G2) was dominant for duodenal, jejunal/ileal, rectal, and pancreatic NENs, whereas high grade (G3 or NEC) was dominant for esophageal, stomach, and colon NENs. For PanNENs, G3 and NEC accounted only for 1.6% and 2.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These cohort data provide crucial information for clinical research to clarify the characteristics of NENs in Japan.

Adjuvant chemotherapy, extent of resection, and immunoistochemical neuroendocrine markers as prognostic factors of early-stage large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

Background

We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy, extent of resection, and immunoistochemical neuroendocrine markers affected survival of patients with the early stage of large‐cell neuroendocrine cancer.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing resection of node negative large‐cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Five‐year survival and disease‐free survival rate were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test in relation to adjuvant chemotherapy, extent of resection, and immunoistochemical neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neuron‐specific enolase).

Results

Our study population included 117 patients; 47 (40%) of these received adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival (74% vs. 45%, p = 0.002) and disease‐free survival (79% vs. 40%, p = 0.001) in all cases except patients with tumor <20 mm (79.5% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.43). Lobectomy compared to sublobar resection was associated with better survival (67% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.0001) and disease‐free survival (65% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.0001) also in patients with tumor <20 mm (79% vs. 28%, p = 0.001). Patients with triple‐positive neuroendocrine markers had better survival (79% vs. 35%, p = 0.0001) and disease‐free survival (69% vs. 42%, p = 0.0008). Regression analysis showed that tumor size <20 mm, lobectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and triple‐positive immunistochemical neuroendocrine markers were significant favorable prognostic factors for survival outcomes.

Conclusions

Lobectomy seems to be the management of choice in patients with large‐cell neuroendocrine cancer <20 mm while adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered only in patients with tumor >20 mm.

Management of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare, aggressive cancer with a dismal prognosis. The majority of cases occur in the lung and the gastrointestinal tract; however, it can occur throughout the body. Recently advances in the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of this disease have paved the way for additional novel promising therapies. This review will discuss the current best evidence for management of LCNEC and new directions in the classification and treatment of this rare disease.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search for "Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "High grade neuroendocrine carcinoma." All titles were screened for relevance to the management of LCNEC. Papers were included based on relevance to the management of LCNEC.

RESULTS

Papers were included reviewing both pulmonary and extra pulmonary LCNEC. We summarized the data driven best practices for the management of both early and advanced stage LCNEC. We describe emerging therapies with promising potential.

DISCUSSION

LCNEC are rare and aggressive neoplasms. In advanced disease, the historical regimen of platinum based therapy in combination with etoposide or irinotecan remains among the commonly used first line therapies, however for extra thoracic LCNEC regimens like FOLFOX, FOLFOIRI and CAPTEM can also be used. Further effective and safe treatment options are desperately needed. Recently, new advances including a new understanding of the genetic subcategories of LCNEC and immunotherapy agents may guide further treatments.

A nomogram prognostic model for large cell lung cancer: analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database

Background

Currently, there is no reliable method for predicting the prognosis of patients with large cell lung cancer (LCLC). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for accurately predicting the prognosis of patients with LCLC.

Methods

LCLC patients, diagnosed from 2007 to 2009, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and used as the training dataset. Significant clinicopathologic variables (P<0.05) in a multivariate Cox regression were selected to build the nomogram. The performance of the nomogram model was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), the area under the curve (AUC), and internal calibration. LCLC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 in the SEER database were selected as a testing dataset for external validation. The nomogram model was also compared with the currently used American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system (8^th edition) by using C-index and a decision curve analysis.

Results

Eight variables-age, sex, race, marital status, T stage, N stage, M stage, and treatment strategy-were statistically significant in the multivariate Cox model and were selected to develop the nomogram model. This model exhibited excellent predictive performance. The C-index and AUC value were 0.761 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.754 to 0.768] and 0.886 for the training dataset and 0.773 (95% CI, 0.765 to 0.781) and 0.876 for the testing dataset, respectively. This model also predicted three-year and five-year lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) in both datasets with good fidelity. This nomogram model performs significantly better than the 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system, with a higher C-index (P<0.001) and better net benefits in predicting LCSS in LCLC patients.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a prognostic nomogram model for predicting 3- and 5-year LCSS in LCLC patients with good discrimination and calibration abilities. The nomogram may be useful in assisting clinicians to make individualized decisions for appropriate treatment in LCLC.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Progresses and Future Approaches

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors, their treatment being challenging and requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Though the only curative treatment is surgery, up to 50% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease. In the last years, neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy has become part of the standard of care in the treatment of different cancer types. However, evidence of its efficacy and safety in NEN patients has not yet been confirmed in the literature. The aim of the present review is to perform an extensive review of the scientific evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic NENs.

Outcomes for Surgery in Stage IA Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Compared With Other Types of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

Background

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) is commonly classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even for stage I disease, after surgery the survival is always poor, but clinical research on LCNEC is scant and always with unsatisfying sample sizes. Thus, we conduct the first study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare survival after surgery between stage I LCNEC and other types of NSCLC.

Methods

From 2004 to 2016, 473 patients with stage IA LCNEC, 17,669 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and 8,475 patients with lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC), all treated with surgery were identified. In addition, 1:1 PSM was used, and overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups were compared.

Results

The 5-year OS rates and CSS rates for LCNEC were 52.5% and 81.5%, respectively. Overall, both OS and CSS were significantly superior for stage IA LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.568-0.712; for CSS: HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.561–0.842, LCNEC as reference), while comparable for LSCC with LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.869–1.091; for CSS: HR 0.907, 95% CI 0.738–1.115). PSM generated 471 pairs when LCNEC was compared with LADC and both OS and CSS were significantly better in LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.580, 95% CI 0.491–0.686; for CSS: HR 0.602, 95% CI 0.446–0.814). Of note, for the subgroup of patients ≤ 65 years old, HRs for both OS and CSS were lower (for OS: HR 0.470; for CSS: HR 0.482). As for comparison between LCNEC and LSCC, PSM generated 470 pairs. Differently, only CSS was significantly superior in LSCC than LCNEC (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.392–0.807), while OS was not. Further grouping by age showed only CSS between two groups for patients with age ≤ 65 years old was significantly different (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

We report the first survival comparison after surgery between stage IA LCNEC and other types of NSCLC by SEER database and PSM. Our results demonstrated after surgery, stage IA LCNEC was worse in survival, especially compared to LADC. Extra clinical care should be paid, especially for younger patients. More studies investigating adjuvant therapy are warranted.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (P-LCNEC) is a rare, poorly differentiated, non-small cell malignancy within the spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lung. Despite sharing several similarities with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in their clinical, immunohistopathological, genomic, and prognostic features, it is a distinct and biologically heterogeneous entity with challenging diagnostic and therapeutic requirements. Given the lack of prospective, randomized data to guide management, it is common practice to pursue thoracic surgery for resectable tumors according to the guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and implement systemic chemotherapy as early as at stage I, similar to the treatment of SCLC. However, important issues, such as the optimal timing and combination of therapeutic modalities, the most effective type of chemotherapy for advanced-stage disease, and the benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation, remain debated. Accumulating evidence from retrospective, molecular profiling studies supports the existence of at least two P-LCNEC subtypes, most notably a SCLC-like and a NSCLC-like phenotype, which presumably underlie the observed differential sensitivity to platinum-based regimens and warrant further validation as predictive biomarkers of efficacy. Furthermore, several potentially actionable, driver molecular alterations have been identified, offering implications for personalized treatment approaches, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy. The current review discusses open questions on the diagnosis and management of P-LCNEC, as well as recent advances in its genomic and transcriptomic characterization that create promising therapeutic opportunities.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Achieved Complete Response for Drug-Sensitive EGFR/ALK Mutation-Negative Metastatic Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with High Tumor Mutation Burden: A Case Report

Large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (LCNELC) is classified into lung neuroendocrine tumors according to WHO 2015 classification guidelines and represents approximately 3% of all lung cancer. Because of the rarity of LCNELC, there is a lack of prospective studies guiding treatment. Here, we report a case of a patient with pT2aN2M0 stage IIIA LCNELC (drug-sensitive EGFR/ALK mutation-negative, PD-L1-negative but tumor mutation burden (TMB) high), who progressed rapidly after surgery but achieved a complete response to subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The concentration of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following the treatment course strongly reflects the response to ICI therapy. This report highlights the efficacy of ICI treatment in metastatic LCNELC patients with a high TMB and suggests that ctDNA analysis in detecting molecular residual disease may facilitate the personalization of ICI therapy.

DLL3 expression is a predictive marker of sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy for pulmonary LCNEC

Background

The mammalian Notch family ligands delta‐like 3 (DLL3) is reported to be a potential therapeutic target for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC). The effect of DLL3 expression on LCNEC prognosis has not yet been elucidated.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 70 LCNEC patients undergoing surgical resection between 2001 and 2015 using a prospectively maintained database. We performed immunohistochemistry for DLL3 and investigated the correlation between the sensitivity of LCNEC to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

DLL3 expression was positive in 26 (37.1%) LCNEC patients. A total of 23 patients (32.9%) received platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive tumors, no difference was found in the five‐year overall survival (OS) or recurrence‐free survival (RFS) between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone, five‐year OS: 58.3% vs. 35.7% P = 0.36, five‐year RFS: 41.7% vs. 35.7% P = 0.74). In contrast, among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors, significantly greater five‐year OS and RFS rates were observed for patients with adjuvant chemotherapy than for those without it (surgery + chemotherapy vs. surgery alone: five‐year OS: 90.0% vs. 26.9% P<0.01, five‐year RFS: 80.0% vs. 21.7% P < 0.01). A multivariate analysis for the RFS revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor among patients with DLL3‐negative tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–0.41, P < 0.01), although it was not a factor among patients with DLL3‐positive tumors (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.23–2.27, P = 0.58).

Conclusions

Our results revealed that DLL3 is a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

DLL3 was a predictive marker of sensitivity to platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy for LCNEC. Among patients with DLL3 expression‐negative LCNEC, platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the OS and RFS, although it did not do so among patients with DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC.

What this study adds

Our results suggest that DLL3 expression‐positive LCNEC may be better treated with other types of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as the anti‐DLL3 therapies if these effects are confirmed by ongoing clinical research.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: clinicopathological and molecular features

In 1970, neuroendocrine tumors of the lung were classified into three categories: typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid (AC), and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). The third edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification in 1999 defined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) as a variant of large cell carcinomas, whereas the fourth edition of the WHO classification redefined LCNEC as a neuroendocrine tumor. Currently, neuroendocrine tumors of the lung are classified into four main categories: TC, AC, LCNEC, and SCLC. Although the treatments for TC, AC, and SCLC have not changed remarkably, the treatment strategy for LCNEC is not yet established because of its reclassification from a variant of "large cell carcinoma" to a new category of "neuroendocrine tumor". In this review article, we discuss the pathological findings, biological behavior, and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung.

Prognostic markers in resected large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective analysis

Background

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are rare pulmonary malignancies. Reported survival rates are heterogeneous and the optimal therapeutic strategy is still debated. The prognosis of LCNEC is generally inferior compared to other non-small lung cancers. In early stages, surgery is recommended but might not be sufficient alone.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive LCNEC patients operated at three institutions with curative intent between May 2005 and January 2017. Data retrieved from individual clinical databases were analyzed with the aim to identify prognostic parameters.

Results

A total of 251 patients with LCNEC underwent curative intent surgery during the observation period. The median age was 64 years, 156 patients (62.2%) were male and 88.4% were smokers. The pathologic AJCC stage was I in 136 patients, II in 77, III in 33, and IV in 5 patients. Median follow-up was 26 months. Lymphatic vessel invasion (P=0.031) was identified as significant prognostic factor by multivariable analysis. There was a trend towards decreased survival in patients with blood vessel invasion (P=0.067). Even in earlier tumor stages, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive effect on survival. The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 79.2%, 48.6% and 38.8% respectively.

Conclusions

Lymphatic invasion (L1) is an independent prognostic factor. Surgery in LCNEC is beneficial in early tumor stages and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy may help in achieving better long-term outcomes resulting in most obvious survival differences in stage Ib.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Tumor Size >3 cm Negatively Impacts Long-Term Outcomes After R0 Resection

BACKGROUND

Minimal knowledge exists regarding the outcome, prognosis and optimal treatment strategy for patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) due to their rarity. We aimed to identify factors affecting survival and recurrence after resection to inform current treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients who had undergone a curative resection for LCNEC in 8 centers between 2000 and 2015. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the factors influencing recurrence, disease-specific survival and overall survival. These included age, gender, previous malignancy, ECOG performance status, symptoms at diagnosis, extent of resection, extent of lymphadenectomy, additional chemo- and/or radiotherapy, tumor location, tumor size, pT, pleural invasion, pN and pStage.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 47 (95%CI 41-79) months; 5-year disease-specific and overall survival rates were 57.6% (95%CI 41.3-70.9) and 47.4% (95%CI 32.3-61.1). There were 22 systemic recurrences and 12 loco-regional recurrences. Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for systemic recurrence [HR: 1.20 (95%CI 1.01-1.41); p = 0.03] with a threshold value of 3 cm (AUC = 0.71). For tumors ≤3 cm and >3 cm, 5-year freedom from systemic recurrence was 79.2% (95%CI 43.6-93.6) and 38.2% (95%CI 20.6-55.6) (p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-specific survival was 60.7% (95%CI 35.1-78.8) and 54.2% (95%CI 32.6-71.6) (p = 0.31), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of patients with surgically resected LCNEC will develop systemic recurrence after resection. Patients with tumors >3 cm have a significantly higher rate of systemic recurrence suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered after complete resection of LCNEC >3 cm, even in the absence of nodal involvement.

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An Analysis of Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Database

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes in lung large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC).

Material/Methods

Patients diagnosed with lung LCNEC between 2000 and 2013 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database. Kaplan–Meier methods and univariate and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 2097 patients were identified. The total age-adjusted incidence rate of lung LCNEC was 0.3/100 000, with a rise in incidence over the study period. The 5-year lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were 20.7% and 16.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, male sex, advanced tumor stage, advanced nodal stage, not undergoing surgery. and not undergoing chemotherapy were independent adverse indicators for survival outcomes. After stratification by tumor stage, undergoing surgery was associated with more favorable LCSS and OS compared with those without surgery, regardless of tumor stage.

Conclusions

LCNEC is a rare lung cancer subtype with a dismal prognosis. Primary surgical treatment has significant survival benefits, even for stage IV patients. The optimal treatment strategies for lung LCNEC require further investigation.

Atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung: A rare entity

Carcinoids account for approximately 2% of all lung tumors, and the atypical carcinoids (ACs) are much rarer than typical carcinoid. Here, we report a rare case of AC tumor of the lung. A 50-year-old female patient presented with left-sided chest pain for 1 year, cough for 6 months, and loss of appetite for 6 months. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the thorax revealed an ill-defined heterogeneously enhancing soft-tissue attenuation lesion in the mediastinum following which transthoracic biopsy was done. Histomorphology and immunohistochemistry were consistent with AC, a neuroendocrine tumor. Combination chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and etoposide was administered as initial chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Early Large Cell Lung Neuroendocrine Cancer: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines do not routinely recommend adjuvant therapy for resected stage I large cell lung neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC). However, data regarding the role of adjuvant therapy in early LCNEC are limited. This National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis was performed to improve the evidence guiding adjuvant therapy for early LCNEC.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) of patients with pathologic T1-2a N0 M0 LCNEC who underwent resection in the NCDB from 2003 to 2015 was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Patients who died within 30 days of surgery and with more than R0 resection were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 2642 patients meeting study criteria, 481 (18%) received adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB patients was associated with a significant increase in OS (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.90). However, there was no significant difference in survival between adjuvant chemotherapy and no adjuvant therapy for stage IA LCNEC (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.11). Adjuvant radiotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy, was not associated with a change in OS. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after lobar resection for stage IB LCNEC had a significant survival benefit compared with patients not receiving adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage LCNEC, adjuvant chemotherapy appears to confer an additional overall survival advantage only in patients with completely resected stage IB LCNEC and not for patients with completely resected stage IA LCNEC.

Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are categorized as high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC). We analyzed the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for HGNEC and the prognostic factors.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent tumor resection and were diagnosed with HGNEC between January 2001 and December 2014. The overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the OS between the treatment groups. Multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional hazards model were performed to search for prognostic factors for HGNEC.

Results

We analyzed 146 HGNEC patients (LCNEC n=92, SCLC n=54) without synchronous multiple cancers, who underwent complete resection. Seventy patients (LCNEC n=31, SCLC n=32) received perioperative chemotherapy and all of them received a platinum-based anticancer drug. Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improved the 5-year OS rates of HGNEC patients (all stages: 74.5% vs. 34.7%, P<0.01, stage I: 88.5% vs. 40.0%, P<0.01). The efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy was similar between LCNEC and SCLC patients [LCNEC all stages: hazard ratio (HR) 0.27, P<0.01, LCNEC stage I: HR 0.27, P=0.01; SCLC all stages: HR 0.38, P=0.02, SCLC stage I: HR 0.34, P=0.06]. The survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for HGNEC patients was confirmed by propensity score matching analysis (HR 0.31, P<0.01). The multivariate analysis revealed that perioperative chemotherapy (HR 0.29, P<0.01), sublobar resection (HR 2.11, P=0.04), and lymph node metastasis (HR 3.34, P<0.01) were independently associated with survival.

Conclusions

Surgical resection combined with perioperative chemotherapy was considered to be effective even for stage I HGNEC patients. Sublobar resection might increase the risk of death in HGNEC patients.

Perioperative chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin for pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is associated with poor prognosis, and its treatment strategy is still controversial, especially regarding chemotherapy regimens.

Case report

We present the case of a 49-year-old Chinese male with primary pulmonary LCNEC treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed. A suspected quasi-circular mass in the left lower pulmonary lobe and an enlarged mediastinal lymph node were found. The patient was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation based on computerized tomography-guided percutaneous lung biopsy. An EGFR gene mutation test showed negative results. Cisplatin and pemetrexed were administered as the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The primary lesion had reduced markedly, and the enlarged mediastinal lymph node had disappeared after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A left lower lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed. The lesion was confirmed as LCNEC based on postoperative histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical results. The patient underwent four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and pemetrexed for a month postoperatively, followed by postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. The patient was still alive after a follow-up of 24 months, with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Cisplatin combined with pemetrexed is effective and safe for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Advances on systemic treatment for lung neuroendocrine neoplasms

Lung well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (also known as carcinoids) and large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor) are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms, which account for less than 4% of all lung neoplasms. Due to their low incidence, their systemic treatment is greatly influenced by therapeutic evidence derived from the more frequent gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and/or small cell lung carcinoma leading to significant bias. Currently, employed systemic therapies for lung carcinoids, aiming at controlling tumor growth include long acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy. In this review, each of those treatments is presented based upon available clinical evidence from retrospective and prospective studies particularly focused on the role of everolimus in the advanced setting and on ongoing clinical trials reflecting our expectations in the near future. In addition, we critically analyse currently employed treatment of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma where the appropriate chemotherapeutic regimen is still a matter of debate.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung cancers. Pathologic classification and optimal therapies are debated. We report the clinicopathologic features, treatment and survival of a series of patients with stage IV LCNEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases of pathologically-confirmed stage IV LCNEC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2006 to 2013 were identified. We collected demographic, treatment, and survival data. Available radiology was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with stage IV LCNEC were identified. The median age was 64 years, 63% of patients were male, and 88% were smokers. Twenty-three patients (n = 23/49; 47%) had brain metastases, 17 at diagnosis and 6 during the disease course. Seventeen LCNEC patients (35%) had molecular testing, of which 24% had KRAS mutations (n = 4/17). Treatment data for first-line metastatic disease was available on 37 patients: 70% (n = 26) received platinum/etoposide and 30% (n = 11) received other regimens. RECIST was completed on 23 patients with available imaging; objective response rate was 37% (95% confidence interval, 16%-62%) with platinum/etoposide, while those treated with other first-line regimens did not achieve a response. Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6-16.4 months) for the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IV LCNEC have a high incidence of brain metastases. KRAS mutations are common. Patients with stage IV LCNEC do not respond as well to platinum/etoposide compared with historic data for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer; however, the prognosis is similar. Prospective studies are needed to define optimum therapy for stage IV LCNEC.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: From Epidemiology to Therapy

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers representing approximately 20% of all lung cancers, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The frequency appears to be approximately 3% for LCNEC. Diagnosis of LCNEC requires attention to neuroendocrine features by light microscopy and confirmation by immunohistochemical staining for neuroendocrine markers. Both SCLC and pulmonary LCNEC are high-grade and poor-prognosis tumors, with higher incidence in males and smokers and peripheral localization. LCNEC is very rare, and the precise diagnosis on small specimens is very difficult, so we have still too few data to define a standard of treatment for pulmonary LCNECs. Data of literature, most based on retrospective analysis, indicated a poor 5-year overall survival, with a high incidence of recurrence after surgery, even in stage I disease. Primary surgery should be the first option in all operable patients because there is no validate therapeutic approach for LCNEC due to lack of clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens remain only an option for potentially resectable tumors. In advanced stages, SCLC-like chemotherapy seems the best option of treatment, with a good response rate but a poor overall survival (from 8 to 16 months in different case series). New agents are under clinical investigation to improve LCNEC patients' outcome. We reviewed all data on treatment options feasible for pulmonary LCNEC, both for localized and extensive disease.

Survival outcomes and incidence of brain recurrence in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung: Implications for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Among patients with advanced high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung, the optimal therapeutic management is much less established for large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) than for small cell lung cancers (SCLCs). We evaluated the survival outcomes and incidence of brain recurrence of advanced LCNECs, and compared them with those of a population of SCLCs matched by stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight unresected stage III HGNECs (16 LCNECs and 32 SCLCs) and 113 stage IV HGNECs (37 LCNECs and 76 SCLCs) were eligible for the analysis. The efficacy of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall response was significantly lower for LCNECs compared with SCLCs for both stage III (43.8% vs 90.6% respectively, P=0.004) and stage IV (43.3% vs 64.5%, respectively, P=0.04). Similarly, an inferior outcome was observed in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for LCNECs compared with SCLCs, which, however, reached significance only for stage III disease (median: 5.6 vs 8.9 months, P=0.06 and 10.4 vs 17.6 months, P=0.03 for PFS and OS, respectively). In the lack of PCI, LCNECs showed a high cumulative incidence of brain metastases, as 58% and 48% of still living stage III and IV patients, respectively, developed brain metastases at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced LCNECs are at high risk for brain recurrence. Unresected stage III LCNECs treated with platinum-etoposide with or without TRT bear a dismal prognosis, when compared indirectly with SCLC counterparts. Randomized trials should evaluate whether PCI could improve survival of advanced LCNECs.

A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of large cell carcinoma of the lung

The aim of the present study was to analyze and summarize the clinicopathological characteristics of large-cell lung carcinoma (LCLC) of the lung, in order to improve the definite diagnosis rate of LCLC. Clinicopathological data of 174 patients with LCLC, confirmed pathologically, were retrospectively reviewed. The 174 cases of LCLC accounted for 5.7% of the total lung cancer cases during the corresponding time period at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University (Tianjin, China), among which there were 131 males and 43 females with an average age of 61.4 years. The postoperative pathological diagnosis of the 174 cases showed 80 cases of classic LCLC, 64 cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), six cases of combined LCNEC, 19 cases of basaloid carcinoma, three cases of clear cell carcinoma and two cases of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Of the total 174 LCLC cases, 96 patients exhibited lymph node metastasis. LCLC is a highly aggressive malignancy with a high tendency of invasion and metastasis, although the incidence rate is low. A definite diagnosis of LCLC primarily relies on the pathological diagnosis. Each subtype of LCLC has its own pathomorphological and immunohistochemical characteristics.

Treatment options for patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung is categorized as a variant of large cell carcinomas, and LCNEC tumors display biological behaviors resembling those of small cell lung carcinomas and features of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. Because patients with LCNEC have a poor prognosis, surgery alone is not sufficient. Multimodality therapies, including adjuvant chemotherapy, appear promising for improved prognosis in patients with LCNEC. In this review article, we discuss treatment options for patients with LCNEC of the lung.

Focus on treatment of lung carcinoid tumor

Bronchial typical carcinoid tumors are neuroendocrine bronchopulmonary tumors with a low-grade malignancy, and an atypical carcinoid is an intermediate form of these tumors. There is a lack of knowledge on the optimal treatment for these tumors. The surgical treatment of choice consists of a lobectomy supplemented by dissection. The benefit of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is unclear. Targeted therapy could be used in this condition, but there is a lack of research recommending it.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the submandibular gland: case report and literature review

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the salivary gland is extremely rare. We report on a case of LCNEC in the submandibular gland. A 58-year-old male had a four-month history of an enlarging mass in his left submandibular region. He underwent lymph node resection and metastasis of LCNEC was suspected. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck showed a solid submandibular gland tumor with marginal blurring. Positron-emission tomography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed no evidence of malignancy other than in the left submandibular gland. He underwent left submandibular gland resection and left upper neck dissection. The final diagnosis was LCNEC of the submandibular gland; surgical margin was negative. Fourteen months later he is free of tumors. This is the first report of LCNEC of the submandibular gland. LCNEC of the salivary gland shows high-grade malignancy like that of the lung. According to past reports, two of four patients died despite multidisciplinary treatments. There are no standard treatments for LCNEC of the salivary glands. More studies are needed to define prognostic factors and establish therapeutic methods.

Systemic therapy of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung

SUMMARY Pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are normally included in trials comprising neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of different organs of origin. Typical and atypical carcinoids are regarded as low-grade NETs and show low proliferation rates and minor responses with classic chemotherapy regimens. Somatostatin analogs were traditionally applied in patients with carcinoid syndrome and recently also demonstrated tumor response. Recently, novel agents such as sunitinib and everolimus showed improved survival in randomized studies. These trials contained only low numbers of pNETs. Another promising field of targeted therapy in low-grade NETs includes peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. High-grade pNETs include large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer. We will discuss large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and will address small-cell lung cancer at the end of this review.

Treatment of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours: state of the art and future developments

The current classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours includes four subtypes: low-grade typical carcinoid tumour (TC), intermediate-grade atypical carcinoid tumour (AC), and two high-grade malignancies: large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Unfortunately, with the exclusion of SCLC, no large phase II and III trials for pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours have been published. Thus, several treatment approaches are available for their treatment but none of them has been validated in appropriately designed and adequately sized clinical trials. The main problem of the published studies is that they include neuroendocrine tumours from various sites of origin with different clinical behaviour. It is important that future studies consider these tumours separately. In this regard, increased awareness and referral of these patients to tertiary centres, in which a multidisciplinary management is available, may be of value. The aim of this review is to evaluate the state of the art and discuss future developments in the management of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumours excluding SCLC which we consider should be addressed in a different issue.

Chemotherapy for pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: similar to that for small cell lung cancer or non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding palliative chemotherapy for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). We evaluated whether advanced LCNEC should be treated similarly to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical reports and tumor specimens of 45 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with advanced LCNEC were reviewed. They were divided into SCLC (n=11) and NSCLC regimen groups (n=34) according to first-line chemotherapeutic regimens.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (96%) and smokers (93%) with a median age of 64 years. Neuroendocrine differentiation was established in 42 (93%) tumors by immunohistochemical analyses. Regarding the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in the SCLC and NSCLC regimen groups, the response rates were 73% and 50% (P=0.19), and the median progression-free survival times were 6.1 and 4.9 months (P=0.41), respectively. The difference in overall survival between the two treatment groups was 7.3 months (16.5 vs. 9.2 months, P=0.10). There was also a considerable difference in the type and efficacy of salvage chemotherapeutic regimens between the two groups: salvage regimens with irinotecan, platinum, or taxanes were commonly used with relatively high objective responses in the SCLC regimen group, whereas frequently used agents in the NSCLC regimen group such as pemetrexed, gefitinib, or erlotinib were associated with no objective response.

CONCLUSION

Regarding palliative chemotherapy for advanced LCNEC, treatment similar to SCLC is more appropriate than NSCLC.

Immunohistochemical studies of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a possible association between staining patterns with neuroendocrine markers and tumor response to chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare high-grade malignant tumor. Because large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare, the optimal treatment, including perioperative chemotherapy, has not been defined. We retrospectively analyzed the correlation among the effectiveness of perioperative chemotherapy in treating large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, pathologic stage, and immunoreactivity to neuroendocrine markers.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma undergoing surgical resection from 2001 to 2009 were included. The resected tumors were immunohistochemically stained with the 3 neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule. We categorized patients who were positive for all 3 markers as the triple-positive group and those who were negative for 1 or 2 markers as the non-triple-positive group.

RESULTS

Perioperative chemotherapy resulted in better overall survival than surgery alone (P = .042). Multivariate analysis of survival revealed that perioperative chemotherapy was a significant independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.323; 95% confidence interval, 0.112-0.934; P = .0371). Among the patients who received perioperative chemotherapy, the non-triple-positive group had a significantly greater 5-year survival rate than the triple-positive group (P = .0216). Moreover, among the non-triple-positive group, a significantly greater 5-year survival rate was observed for the patients who underwent surgery with chemotherapy than for those who underwent surgery without chemotherapy (P = .0081). In contrast, no difference was found in 5-year survival between patients with chemotherapy and those without chemotherapy when the tumors were triple positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that perioperative chemotherapy might benefit the survival of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, in particular when the tumors are not immunoreactive to all 3 neuroendocrine markers.

Clinical features of unresectable high-grade lung neuroendocrine carcinoma diagnosed using biopsy specimens

BACKGROUND

The overall clinicopathological features or the optimal therapy for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have yet to be defined, because LCNEC has not been studied in the same depth as had small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) in both clinical and biological standpoints. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical features of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC)-probable LCNEC diagnosed by biopsy, and compare therapeutic efficacy with patients with SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the chart of total of 25 patients who underwent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy as initial therapy for a histologic diagnosis of HGNEC-probable LCNEC, using biopsy samples and compared their data with those of 180 patients with SCLC. We analyzed their responses to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

In 25 patients with HGNEC-probable LCNEC, 18 patients initially received chemotherapy (17 (94%) of whom received platinum-based chemotherapy) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 61%. The remaining 7 patients received chemoradiotherapy with an ORR of 86%, and 12 of the 25 patients who received second-line chemotherapy had an ORR of 17%. A total of 101 patients with SCLC who initially received chemotherapy had an ORR of 63%, and 79 patients who initially received chemoradiotherapy had an ORR of 98%, and 102 of the 180 patients who received second-line chemotherapy had an ORR of 45%. The 1-year overall survival rate for patients with stage IV HGNEC-probable LCNEC (n=13) and those with ED-SCLC (n=80) was 34% and 49%, respectively (p=0.84).

CONCLUSION

The overall response rate to initial treatment and the survival outcomes of HGNEC-probable LCNEC were comparable to those of SCLC, but the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy appeared to differ between the 2 groups.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: prognostic factors and survival advantage with platinum chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (LCNEC) is a rare cervical neoplasm associated with poor survival. Our objective was to identify treatments associated with improved survival.

METHODS

Relevant data were abstracted from an English literature MEDLINE search, SEER database, and a patient treated at our institution. Multivariate analysis was performed by generating Cox proportional hazard ratios.

RESULTS

We identified 62 patients with LCNEC: 49 cases from the English literature, 12 patients in the SEER database and our patient. Out of the 62 women, median age was 37 (range, 21-75). FIGO stage was as follows: 58% had stage I disease, 16% had stage II, 2% had stage III, 8% had stage IV disease and 16% had no stage documented. Of all patients, 73% underwent primary surgery, 4.7% underwent primary radiation, 4.7% underwent chemotherapy, 8% had chemoradiation, and 9.6% had no primary treatment. Of all patients, 58% died of disease, 26% had no evidence of disease, 3% were alive with disease, and 13% had no survival data. The overall median survival was 16.5 months (0.5-151 months). Median overall survival for stage I, II, III, and IV cancers was 19, 17, 3, and 1.5 months, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, earlier stage (p<0.00001) and the addition of chemotherapy (p=0.04) were associated with improved survival. Both platinum agents (p=0.034) and platinum and etoposide together (p=0.027) were associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative chemotherapy, in particular platinum with or without etoposide, improves survival in the rare LCNEC.

Klotho is a novel biomarker for good survival in resected large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

BACKGROUND

In terms of prognosis, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) differs distinctively from other non-small cell lung cancers, with the prognosis of LCNEC being poor, even for early-stage disease. Improvements in survival require a biomarker capable of defining a subset of patients destined to do poorly so that these patients can be targeted for additional therapies, including chemotherapy. In this study, we focused on the Klotho gene, which is an anti-aging gene known to be a potential tumor suppressor. We investigated whether the immunohistochemical expression of Klotho can predict survival patients with resected LCNEC.

METHODS

The histological characteristics of patients receiving an initial diagnosis of LCNEC (n=30) at Tokyo Medical University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed, and multiple variables including stage, lymphangioinvasion, lymph node status and the expression of Klotho as identified using an immunohistochemical analysis, were assessed.

RESULTS

Immunostaining for Klotho was mostly cytoplasmic, and Klotho expression was seen in 10 patients (33.3%) but not in 20 patients (66.7%). The expression of Klotho was significantly associated with a good outcome of resected patients with LCNEC and Klotho(-) was associated with increased LCNEC risk by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 4.92, 95% confidence interval 1.04-23.24, p=0.044). Neither lymph node status nor lymphangioinvasion were significantly associated with a poor survival. However, among patients without lymph node metastasis or angioinvasion, the survival benefit of Klotho expression in the primary tumor was significantly higher, compared with that of patients without Klotho expression.

CONCLUSION

Klotho staining provides a new biomarker for a good outcome in patients with LCNEC, especially among patients without lymph node metastasis or lymphangioinvasion.