Bisphosphonates and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted drugs in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma metastatic to bone

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a review of pathogenesis hypothesis and therapy strategies

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), a severe side effect caused by antiresorptive antiangiogenic medication, particularly bisphosphonates (BPs), has become a challenging disease with serious and profound effects on the physical and mental health of patients. Although it occurs with high frequency and is harmful, the exact mechanism of MRONJ remains unknown, and systematic and targeted approaches are still lacking. Maxillofacial surgeons focus on the etiology of osteonecrosis in the mandible and maxilla as well as the appropriate oral interventions for high-risk patients. Adequate nursing care and pharmacotherapy management are also crucial. This review provides a current overview of the clinicopathologic feature and research of MRONJ caused by BPs, with an emphasis on the potential mechanisms and current therapy and prevention strategies of the disease. We are of the opinion that an in-depth comprehension of the mechanisms underlying MRONJ will facilitate the development of more precise and efficacious therapeutic approaches, resulting in enhanced clinical outcomes for patients.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Spinal Bone Metastases

Background

The prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) varies greatly. In this study, we aimed to define the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of RCC with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) in our center.

Methods

The clinical and medical records of RCC patients with sBMs were collected. The gender, age, time of BM, the extent of BM, the number of BMs, the presence or absence of visceral metastasis, and the pathological type of BM were investigated. All patients were followed up regularly. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of BMs diagnosis to death or last follow-up using Kaplan-Meier method and modelled with Cox regression analysis.

Results

Forty-three RCC patients with sBM were collected. sBM was found synchronously in 30 patients (70%) and metachronously in 13 patients (30%). The median survival time was 30 months in 13 patients (30%) with solitary sBM and 19 months in 30 patients (70%) with multiple sBMs (P = 0.002). Visceral metastasis occurred in 12 patients (28%) with the median survival time of 17 months, while the other 31 patients (72%) had no visceral metastasis with the median survival time of 29 months (P<0.001). En-block resection was done in 10 patients with median survival time of 40.1 months. Non-en-block resection were done in 33 patients with median survival time of 19.7 months (P<0.001). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that MSKCC score, number of BM, visceral metastasis, and en-block resection are the independent prognosis factors of RCC patients with sBM.

Conclusions

MSKCC risk stratification, number of sBM, visceral metastasis and en-block resection are significant prognostic factors for OS in RCC patients with spinal BM. Therefore, for selected patients who has solitary spinal BM with no visceral metastasis, en-block resection of spinal BM can potentially prolong survival and is the treatment of choice.

Clinical pharmacology of anti-angiogenic drugs in oncology

Abnormal vasculature proliferation is one of the so-called hallmarks of cancer. Angiogenesis inhibitor therapies are one of the major breakthroughs in cancer treatment in the last two decades. Two types of anti-angiogenics have been approved: monoclonal antibodies and derivatives, which are injected and target the extracellular part of a receptor, and protein kinase inhibitors, which are orally taken small molecules targeting the intra-cellular Adenosine Triphosphate -pocket of different kinases. They have become an important part of some tumors' treatment, both in monotherapy or in combination. In this review, we discuss the key pharmacological concepts and the major pitfalls of anti-angiogenic prescriptions. We also review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile of all approved anti-angiogenic protein kinase inhibitors and the potential role of surrogate markers and of therapeutic drug monitoring.

CheckMate 025 Randomized Phase 3 Study: Outcomes by Key Baseline Factors and Prior Therapy for Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 025 study of nivolumab (n=410) versus everolimus (n=411) in previously treated adults (75% male; 88% white) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate which baseline factors were associated with OS and ORR benefit with nivolumab versus everolimus.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Subgroup OS analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Hazard ratios were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

INTERVENTION

Nivolumab 3mg/kg every 2 wk or everolimus 10mg once daily.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The minimum follow-up was 14 mo. Baseline subgroup distributions were balanced between nivolumab and everolimus arms. Nivolumab demonstrated an OS improvement versus everolimus across subgroups, including Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups; age <65 and ≥65 yr; one and two or more sites of metastases; bone, liver, and lung metastases; number of prior therapies; duration of prior therapy; and prior sunitinib, pazopanib, or interleukin-2 therapy. The benefit with nivolumab versus everolimus was noteworthy for patients with poor MSKCC risk (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.70). The mortality rate at 12 mo for all subgroups was lower with nivolumab compared with everolimus. ORR also favored nivolumab. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events across subgroups was lower with nivolumab. Limitations include the post hoc analysis and differing sample sizes between groups.

CONCLUSION

The trend for OS and ORR benefit with nivolumab for multiple subgroups, without notable safety concerns, may help to guide treatment decisions, and further supports nivolumab as the standard of care in previously treated patients with aRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the impact of demographic and pretreatment features on survival benefit and tumor response with nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Survival benefit and response were observed for multiple subgroups, supporting the use of nivolumab as a new standard of care across a broad range of patients with previously treated aRCC. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01668784.

Bisphosphonates in patients with renal cell carcinoma and bone metastases: a sunitinib global expanded-access trial subanalysis

AIM

To investigate retrospectively the effects of bone metastases and bisphosphonates in sunitinib-treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Patients in Groups (Gp) 1 and 2, but not Gp3, had bone metastases. Gp2 received bisphosphonates following standard practice.

RESULTS

Gp2 had less favorable prognosis than Gp1. Gp3 had fewer metastases and the best prognosis. More serious adverse events occurred in Gp2 versus Gp1. The difference in overall survival between Gp1 and Gp2 was not significant after adjusting for covariates. Significantly shorter overall survival in Gp1 versus Gp3 persisted after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Bone metastases may have a negative prognostic impact in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bisphosphonates may have delayed early disease progression for prognostically worse sunitinib/bisphosphonate-treated patients.

A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: development and validation studies

BACKGROUND

The likelihood of tumour recurrence after nephrectomy in localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma is well characterised by clinical and pathological parameters. However, these assessments can be improved and personalised by the addition of molecular characteristics of each patient's tumour. We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic multigene signature to improve prediction of recurrence risk in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

In the development stage, we investigated the association between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 patients with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had undergone a nephrectomy at the Cleveland Clinic (OH, USA). 516 genes were associated with recurrence-free interval. 11 of these genes were selected by further statistical analyses, and were combined with five reference genes (ie, 16 genes in total), from which a recurrence score algorithm was developed. The recurrence score was then validated in an independent cohort of 626 patients from France with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had also undergone nephrectomy. The association between the recurrence score and the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific survival in the first 5 years after surgery was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression, stratified by tumour stage (stage I vs stage II vs III).

FINDINGS

In our primary univariate analysis, the continuous recurrence score (median 37, IQR 31-45) was significantly associated with recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio 3·91 [95% CI 2·63-5·79] for a 25-unit increase in score, p<0·0001). In multivariable analyses, the recurrence score was significantly associated with the risk of tumour recurrence (hazard ratio per 25-unit increase in the score 3·37 [95% CI 2·23-5·08], p<0·0001) after stratification by stage and adjustment for tumour size, grade, or Leibovich score. The recurrence score was able to identify a clinically significant number of both high-risk stage I and low-risk stage II-III patients. A heterogeneity study on separate samples showed little to no intratumoural variability among the 16 genes.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings validate the recurrence score as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma, providing a more accurate and individualised risk assessment beyond existing clinical and pathological parameters.

FUNDING

Genomic Health Inc and Pfizer Inc.

Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms on the clinical outcome of renal cell carcinoma patients

A cohort study was conducted to investigate the association between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphisms −2578C/A, −1154G/A and −634C/G and the clinical outcome of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as well as the interaction of VEGF polymorphisms with tumor stage, metastasis and size. A total of 310 RCC patients were recruited from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) between January 2006 and December 2007, and were followed up until December 2012. The association between the three single nucleotide polymorphisms and the overall survival of RCC patients was estimated using Cox’s proportional hazard regression model. The median follow-up duration was 34.7 months and 74 of the RCC patients succumbed due to cancer during the follow-up period. The frequency of the VEGF −2578 AA genotype was significantly higher in patients classed as tumor stages III–IV (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24–0.95) and larger tumors (longest diameter, >4 cm; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.89). Furthermore, the frequency of VEGF −634 GG was significantly higher in patients with larger tumors (longest diameter, >4 cm; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48–0.97). The VEGF −2578 AA genotype was correlated with a 2.96-fold increase in the risk of RCC-associated mortality and was associated with a five-year survival rate of ~25%. Therefore, the present study identified that the VEGF −2578C/A polymorphism may be associated with the prognosis of RCC patients, and may interact with the tumor stage and size.

Development of a realistic in vivo bone metastasis model of human renal cell carcinoma

About one-third of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have bone metastases. The incidence of RCC is increasing and bone metastatic RCC merits greater focus. Realistic preclinical bone metastasis models of RCC are lacking, hampering the development of effective therapies. We developed a realistic in vivo bone metastasis model of human RCC by implanting precision-cut tissue slices under the renal capsule of immunodeficient mice. The presence of disseminated cells in bone marrow of tissue slice graft (TSG)-bearing mice was screened by human-specific polymerase chain reaction and confirmed by immunohistology using human-specific antibody. Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of TSG-bearing mice derived from three of seven RCC patients were detected as early as 1 month after tissue implantation at a high frequency with close resemblance to parent tumors (e.g., CAIX expression and high vascularity). The metastatic patterns of TSGs correlated with disease progression in patients. In addition, TSGs retained capacity to metastasize to bone at high frequency after serial passaging and cryopreservation. Moreover, bone metastases in mice responded to Temsirolimus treatment. Intratibial injections of single cells generated from TSGs showed 100 % engraftment and produced X-ray-visible tumors as early as 3 weeks after cancer cell inoculation. Micro-computed tomography (μCT) and histological analysis revealed osteolytic characteristics of these lesions. Our results demonstrated that orthotopic RCC TSGs have potential to develop bone metastases that respond to standard therapy. This first reported primary RCC bone metastasis model provides a realistic setting to test therapeutics to prevent or treat bone metastases in RCC.

Use of Nanotechnology to Develop Multi-Drug Inhibitors For Cancer Therapy

Therapeutic agents that inhibit a single target often cannot combat a multifactorial disease such as cancer. Thus, multi-target inhibitors (MTIs) are needed to circumvent complications such as the development of resistance. There are two predominant types of MTIs, (a) single drug inhibitor (SDIs) that affect multiple pathways simultaneously, and (b) combinatorial agents or multi-drug inhibitors (MDIs) that inhibit multiple pathways. Single agent multi-target kinase inhibitors are amongst the most prominent class of compounds belonging to the former, whereas the latter includes many different classes of combinatorial agents that have been used to achieve synergistic efficacy against cancer. Safe delivery and accumulation at the tumor site is of paramount importance for MTIs because inhibition of multiple key signaling pathways has the potential to lead to systemic toxicity. For this reason, the development of drug delivery mechanisms using nanotechnology is preferable in order to ensure that the MDIs accumulate in the tumor vasculature, thereby increasing efficacy and minimizing off-target and systemic side effects. This review will discuss how nanotechnology can be used for the development of MTIs for cancer therapy and also it concludes with a discussion of the future of nanoparticle-based MTIs as well as the continuing obstacles being faced during the development of these unique agents.’