1
|
Scott BK, Singh J, Hravnak M, Everhart SS, Armaignac DL, Davis TM, Goede MR, Haranath SP, Kordik CM, Laudanski K, Pappas PA, Patel S, Rincon TA, Scruth EA, Subramanian S, Villanueva I, Williams LM, Wilson R, Pamplin JC. Best Practices in Telecritical Care: Expert Consensus Recommendations From the Telecritical Care Collaborative Network. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:1750-1767. [PMID: 39417998 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Telecritical care (TCC) refers to the delivery of critical care using telehealth technologies. Despite increasing utilization, significant practice variation exists and literature regarding efficacy remains sparse. The Telecritical Care Collaborative Network sought to provide expert, consensus-based best practice recommendations for the design and delivery of TCC. DESIGN We used a modified Delphi methodology. Following literature review, an oversight panel identified core domains and developed declarative statements for review by an expert voting panel. During three voting rounds, voters agreed or disagreed with statements and provided open-ended feedback, which the oversight panel used to revise statements. Statements met criteria for consensus when accepted by greater than or equal to 85% of voters. SETTING/SUBJECTS The oversight panel included 18 multidisciplinary members of the TCC Collaborative Network, and the voting panel included 32 invited experts in TCC, emphasizing diversity of discipline, care delivery models, and geography. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We identified ten core domains: definitions/terminology; care delivery models; staffing and coverage models; technological considerations; ergonomics and workplace safety; licensing, credentialing, and certification; trust and relationship building; quality, safety, and efficiency, research agenda; and advocacy, leading to 79 practice statements. Of 79 original statements, 67 were accepted in round 1. After revision, nine were accepted in round 2 and two in round 3 (two statements were merged). In total, 78 practice statements achieved expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS These expert consensus recommendations cover a broad range of topics relevant to delivery of TCC. Experts agreed that TCC is most effective when delivered by care teams with specific expertise and by programs with explicit protocols focusing on effective communication, technical reliability, and real-time availability. Interventions should be tailored to local conditions. Although further research is needed to guide future best practice statements, these results provide valuable and actionable recommendations for the delivery of high-quality TCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaspal Singh
- Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina & Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | - Theresa M Davis
- Inova Health System, High Reliability Center, Falls Church, VA
| | | | | | | | - Krzysztof Laudanski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Peter A Pappas
- University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL
| | | | - Teresa A Rincon
- Tan Chingfen Graduate School of Nursing, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester MA and Blue Cirrus Consulting, Greenville, SC
| | - Elizabeth A Scruth
- Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Clinical Quality Programs, Data Analytics and Tele Critical Care, Oakland, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeremy C Pamplin
- The Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, MD
- Department of Medicine, The Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Armaignac DL, Ramamoorthy V, DuBouchet EM, Williams LM, Kushch NA, Gidel L, Badawi O. Descriptive Comparison of Two Models of Tele-Critical Care Delivery in a Large Multi-Hospital Health Care System. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:1465-1475. [PMID: 36827094 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Tele-Critical Care (TCC) Committee has identified the need for rigorous comparative research of different TCC delivery models to support the development of best practices for staffing, application, and approaches to workflow. Our objective was to describe and compare outcomes between two TCC delivery models, TCC with 24/7 Bedside Intensivist (BI) compared with TCC with Private Daytime Attending Intensivist (PI) in relation to intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), cost, and complications across the spectrum of routine ICU standards of care. Methods: Observational cohort study at large health care system in 12 ICUs and included patients, ≥18, with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IVa scores and predictions (October 2016-June 2019). Results: Of the 19,519 ICU patients, 71.7% (n = 13,993) received TCC with 24/7 BI while 28.3% (n = 5,526) received TCC with PI. ICU and Hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.0001; 12.6% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001); and ICU and Hospital LOS (3.2 vs. 2.4 days, p < 0.001; 9.8 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.001) were significantly higher among 24/7 BI compared with PI. The APACHE observed/expected ratios (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]) for ICU mortality (0.62; 0.58-0.67) vs. (0.53; 0.46-0.61) and Hospital mortality (0.95; 0.57-1.48) vs. (0.77; 0.70-0.84) were significantly different for 24/7 BI compared with PI. Multivariate mixed models that adjusted for confounders demonstrated significantly greater odds of (OR; 95% CI) ICU mortality (1.58; 1.28-1.93), Hospital mortality (1.52; 1.33-1.73), complications (1.55; 1.18-2.04), ICU LOS [3.14 vs. 2.59 (1.25; 1.19-1.51)], and Hospital LOS [9.05 vs. 7.31 (1.23; 1.21-1.25)] among 24/7 BI when compared with PI. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for ICU admission within 24 h of hospital admission, receiving active ICU treatments, nighttime admission, sepsis, and highest third acute physiology score indicated significantly higher odds for 24/7 BI compared with PI. Conclusion: Our comparison demonstrated that TCC delivery model with PI provided high-quality care with significant positive effects on outcomes. This suggests that TCC delivery models have broad-ranging applicability and benefits in routine critical care, thus necessitating progressive research in this direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Lee Armaignac
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Tele-Critical Care, Telehealth Center, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Eduardo Martinez DuBouchet
- Tele-Critical Care, Telehealth Center, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Wertheim School of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lisa-Mae Williams
- Tele-Critical Care, Telehealth Center, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Wertheim School of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Louis Gidel
- Center for Advanced Analytics, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Tele-Critical Care, Telehealth Center, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Omar Badawi
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laudanski K, Huffenberger AM, Scott MJ, Williams M, Wain J, Jablonski J, Hanson CW. Operation analysis of the tele-critical care service demonstrates value delivery, service adaptation over time, and distress among tele-providers. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:883126. [PMID: 35991667 PMCID: PMC9388902 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.883126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Our study addresses the gaps in knowledge of the characterizations of operations by remote tele-critical care medicine (tele-CCM) service providers interacting with the bedside team. The duration of engagements, the evolution of the tele-CCM service over time, and the distress during interactions with the bedside team have not been characterized systematically. These characteristics are critical for planning the deployment of teleICU services and preventing burnout among remote teleICU providers. Methods REDCap self-reported activity logs collected engagement duration, triggers (emergency button, tele-CCM software platform, autonomous algorithm, asymmetrical communication platform, phone), expediency, nature (proactive rounding, predetermined task, response to medical needs), communication modes, and acceptance. Seven hospitals with 16 ICUs were overseen between 9/2020 and 9/2021 by teams consisting of telemedicine medical doctors (eMD), telemedicine registered nurses (eRN), and telemedicine respiratory therapists (eRT). Results 39,915 total engagements were registered. eMDs had a significantly higher percentage of emergent and urgent engagements (31.9%) vs. eRN (9.8%) or eRT (1.7%). The average tele-CCM intervention took 16.1 ± 10.39 min for eMD, 18.1 ± 16.23 for eRN, and 8.2 ± 4.98 min for eRT, significantly varied between engagement, and expediency, hospitals, and ICUs types. During the observation period, there was a shift in intervention triggers with an increase in autonomous algorithmic ARDS detection concomitant with predominant utilization of asynchronous communication, phone engagements, and the tele-CCM module of electronic medical records at the expense of the share of proactive rounding. eRT communicated more frequently with bedside staff (% MD = 37.8%; % RN = 36.8, % RT = 49.0%) but mostly with other eRTs. In contrast, the eMD communicated with all ICU stakeholders while the eRN communicated chiefly with other RN and house staff at the patient's bedside. The rate of distress reported by tele-CCM staff was 2% among all interactions, with the entity hospital being the dominant factor. Conclusions Delivery of tele-CCM services has to be tailored to the specific beneficiary of tele-CCM services to optimize care delivery and minimize distress. In addition, the duration of the average intervention must be considered while creating an efficient workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Laudanski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Leonard Davis Institute for Healthcare Economics, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Krzysztof Laudanski
| | - Ann Marie Huffenberger
- Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael J. Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Maria Williams
- Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Justin Wain
- Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC, United States
| | - Juliane Jablonski
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - C. William Hanson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A Survey of Tele-Critical Care State and Needs in 2019 and 2020 Conducted among the Members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10081445. [PMID: 36011102 PMCID: PMC9408319 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The study’s objective was to assess facilitators and barriers of Tele-Critical Care (TCC) perceived by SCCM members. By utilizing a survey distributed to SCCM members, a cross-sectional study was developed to analyze survey results from December 2019 and July 2020. SCCM members responded to the survey (n = 15,502) with a 1.9% response rate for the first distribution and a 2.54% response rate for the second survey (n = 9985). Participants (n = 286 and n = 254) were almost equally distributed between non-users, providers, users, and potential users of TCC services. The care delivery models for TCC were similar across most participants. Some consumers of TCC services preferred algorithmic coverage and scheduled rounds, while reactive and on-demand models were less utilized. The surveys revealed that outcome-driven measures were the principal form of TCC performance evaluation. A 1:100 (provider: patients) ratio was reported to be optimal. Factors related to costs, perceived lack of need for services, and workflow challenges were described by those who terminated TCC services. Barriers to implementation revolved around lack of reimbursement and adequate training. Interpersonal communication was identified as an essential TCC provider skill. The second survey introduced after the onset pandemic demonstrated more frequent use of advanced practice providers and focus on performance measures. Priorities for effective TCC deployment include communication, knowledge, optimal operationalization, and outcomes measurement at the organizational level. The potential effect of COVID-19 during the early stages of the pandemic on survey responses was limited and focused on the need to demonstrate TCC value.
Collapse
|
5
|
Krupp A, Di Martino M, Chung W, Chaiyachati K, Agarwal AK, Huffenberger AM, Laudanski K. Communication and role clarity inform TeleICU use: a qualitative analysis of opportunities and barriers in an established program using AACN framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:277. [PMID: 33766010 PMCID: PMC7992609 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06287-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the use of tele-intensive care unit (ICU) services is an essential component in evaluating current practice and informing future use as the adoption and application of teleICU services expands. We sought to explore if novel ways to utilize teleICU services can emerge within an established, consulting-style teleICU model considering the program’s flexible, provider-driven operation. Methods This was a qualitative study of one teleICU/hospital dyad using semi-structured interviews from a convenience sample of ICU (n = 19) and teleICU (n = 13) nurses. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis to identify themes that describe their experiences with teleICU using a deductive codebook developed from an expert consensus (American Association of Critical Care Nurses) AACN statement on teleICU nursing. Results Three themes were identified through the qualitative content analysis: [1] nurses described unique teleICU knowledge, including systems thinking and technological skills, [2] the teleICU partnership supported quality improvement initiatives, and [3] elements of the work environment influenced perceptions of teleICU and its use. When elements of the work environment, such as effective communication and role clarity, were not present, teleICU use was variable. Conclusions Flexible, provider-driven approaches for integrating teleICU services into daily practice may help define the future use of the teleICU model’s applicability. Future work should focus on the importance of effective communication and role clarity in integrating the emerging teleICU services into teleICU/ICU practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06287-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Krupp
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Michael Di Martino
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, 249 South 36th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Wesley Chung
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Krisda Chaiyachati
- The Department of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Anish K Agarwal
- The Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ann Marie Huffenberger
- Penn Medicine Center for Connected Care, The Clinical Practices of the University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Krzysztof Laudanski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care; University of Pennsylvania, JMB 127, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA. .,Leonard Davis Institute for Healthcare Economics , JMB 127, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19146, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: As the demand for critical care beds rises each year, hospitals must be able to adapt. Delayed transfer of care reduces available critical care capacity and increases occupancy. The use of mathematic modeling within healthcare systems has the ability to aid planning of resources. Discrete-event simulation models can determine the optimal number of critical care beds required and simulate different what-if scenarios. Design: Complex discrete-event simulation model was developed using a warm-up period of 30 days and ran for 30 trials against a 2-year period with the mean calculated for the runs. A variety of different scenarios were investigated to determine the effects of increasing capacity, increasing demand, and reduction of proportion and length of delayed transfer of care out of the ICU. Setting: Combined data from two ICUs in United Kingdom. Patients: The model was developed using 1,728 patient records and was validated against an independent dataset of 2,650 patients. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: During model validation, the average bed utilization and admittance rate were equal to the real-world data. In the what-if scenarios, we found that increasing bed numbers from 23 to 28 keeping the arrival rate stable reduces the average occupancy rate to 70%. We found that the projected 4% yearly increase in admissions could overwhelm even the 28-bedded unit, without change in the delayed transfer of care episodes. Reduction in the proportion of patients experiencing delayed transfer of care had the biggest effect on occupancy rates, time spent at full capacity, and average bed utilization. Conclusions: Using discrete-event simulation of commonly available baseline patient flow and patient care data produces reproducible models. Reducing the proportion of patients with delayed transfer of care had a greater effect in reducing occupancy levels than simply increasing bed numbers even when demand is increased.
Collapse
|