Fluid, Fluid Everywhere, and All the Organs Did Not Shrink; Fluid, Fluid Everywhere, Administered Without a Think

Fluid Therapy: Friend or Foe?

Many questions surround fluid bolus therapy and subsequent fluid management in neonatal critical care as they do in pediatric and adult critical care. This review explores the known key clinical aspects of fluid bolus therapy and fluid balance in the first 7 days of life and provides suggestions for further work in this area. It draws on the pediatric and adult critical care literature to provide thought-provoking data around the potential harms of excessive intravenous fluids, which may prove relevant to neonatology. Current data suggest that fluid bolus therapy and early-life positive fluid balance in neonates may be associated with harm.

From a pressure-guided to a perfusion-centered resuscitation strategy in septic shock: Critical literature review and illustrative case

PURPOSE

To support a paradigm shift in the management of septic shock from pressure-guided to perfusion-centered, expected to improve outcome while reducing adverse effects from vasopressor therapy and aggressive fluid resuscitation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Critical review of the literature cited in support of vasopressor use to achieve a predefined mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg and review of pertinent clinical trials and studies enabling deeper understanding of the hemodynamic pathophysiology supportive of a perfusion-centered approach, accompanied by an illustrative case.

RESULTS

Review of the literature cited by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign revealed lack of controlled clinical trials supporting outcome benefits from vasopressors. Additional literature review revealed adverse effects associated with vasopressors and worsened outcome in some studies. Vasopressors increase MAP primarily by peripheral vasoconstriction and in occasions by a modest increase in cardiac output when using norepinephrine. Thus, achieving the recommended MAP of 65 mmHg using vasopressors should not be presumed indicative that organ perfusion has been restored. It may instead create a false sense of hemodynamic stability hampering shock resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose focusing the hemodynamic management of septic shock on reversing organ hypoperfusion instead of attaining a predefined MAP target as the key strategy for improving outcome.