Moderate-Intensity Insulin Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay in Critically Ill Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State

A Comparison of Variable Versus Fixed Insulin Infusion Rate on Resolution of Diabetic Ketoacidosis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a well-known, potentially fatal complication of diabetes. The American Diabetes Association hyperglycemic crises guidelines suggest the use of intravenous insulin in patients presenting with DKA, along with a recommended rate of glucose reduction of 50-75 mg/dL/h. However, no specific guidance is provided regarding how to best achieve this rate of glucose decline.

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a difference in time to DKA resolution between a variable intravenous insulin infusion strategy and a fixed infusion strategy in the absence of an institutional protocol?

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study of DKA patient encounters in 2018.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Insulin infusion strategy was considered to be variable if the infusion rate changed within the first 8 hours of therapy or was considered fixed if the rate remained unchanged for the same period. The primary outcome was time to resolution of DKA. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, hypoglycemia, mortality, and DKA recurrence.

RESULTS

The median time to resolution of DKA was 9.3 hours in the variable infusion group compared with 7.8 hours in the fixed infusion group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.43-1.5, P = 0.5360). Severe hypoglycemia was observed in 13% of patients in the variable infusion group and in 50% of patients in the fixed infusion group (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, insulin infusion strategy (variable vs. fixed) was not associated with a significant difference in the time to resolution of DKA in the absence of an institutional protocol. The fixed infusion strategy was associated with a higher incidence of severe hypoglycemia.

Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia During Treatment of Hyperglycemic Crises

Objective

Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state are life-threatening hyperglycemic crises often requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management. Treatment includes intravenous (IV) insulin with a transition to subcutaneous (SC) insulin upon resolution. Hypoglycemia is a common complication associated with treatment of hyperglycemic crises, but risk factors have not been well established. This study aimed to assess risk factors associated with hypoglycemia during treatment for hyperglycemic crises.

Methods

This case-control study included ICU patients admitted with hyperglycemic crises at a single Veterans Affairs health system from 1 January 2013 to 31 March 2020. Patients who developed hypoglycemia during insulin treatment were compared with a control group. Odds of hypoglycemia were assessed based on risk factors, including BMI, comorbidities, and type of SC insulin used.

Results

Of the 216 cases of hyperglycemic crises included, hypoglycemia occurred in 61 cases (44 on SC insulin, 11 on IV insulin, and 6 on both). Odds for hypoglycemia were significantly higher for underweight patients (odds ratio 4.52 [95% CI 1.05-19.55]), type 1 diabetes (4.02 [2.09-7.73]), chronic kidney disease (1.94 [1.05-3.57]), those resumed on the exact chronic SC insulin regimen following resolution (2.91 [1.06-7.95]), and patients who received NPH versus glargine insulin (5.13 [1.54-17.06]). No significant differences were seen in the other evaluated variables.

Conclusion

This study found several factors associated with hypoglycemia during hyperglycemic crises treatment, many of which are not addressed in consensus statement recommendations. These findings may help ICU clinicians prevent complications related to hyperglycemic crisis management and generate hypotheses for future studies.

Can Clinical Outcomes Be Improved, and Inpatient Length of Stay Reduced for Adults With Diabetes? A Systematic Review

AIM

To examine the efficacy of clinical practice strategies in improving clinical outcomes and reducing length of hospital stay for inpatients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND

People living with diabetes are at increased risk of being admitted to hospital and to stay in hospital longer than those who do not have the condition. Diabetes and its complications cause substantial economic loss to those living with the condition, their families, to health systems and national economies through direct medical costs and loss of work and wages. Length of stay is a major factor driving up hospitalisation costs relating to those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes with suboptimal blood glucose management, hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and co-morbidities shown to considerably impact upon length of stay. The identification of attainable evidence-based clinical practice strategies is necessary to inform the knowledge base and identify service improvement opportunities that could lead to improved clinical outcomes for these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

METHODS

A systematic search of CINAHL, Medline Ovid, and Web of Science databases was carried out to identify research papers reporting on interventions that have reduced length of hospital stay for inpatients living with diabetes for the period 2010-2021. Selected papers were reviewed, and relevant data extracted by three authors. Eighteen empirical studies were included.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies spanned the themes of clinical management innovations, clinical education programmes, multidisciplinary collaborative care and technology facilitated monitoring. The studies demonstrated improvements in healthcare outcomes such as glycaemic control, greater confidence with insulin administration and reduced occurrences of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia and decreased length of hospital stay and healthcare costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical practice strategies identified in this review contribute to the evidence base for inpatient care and treatment outcomes. The implementation of evidence-based research can improve clinical practice and show that appropriate management can enhance clinical outcomes for the inpatient with diabetes, potentially leading to reductions in length of stay. Investment in and commissioning of practices that have the potential to afford clinical benefits and reduce length of hospital stay could influence the future of diabetes care.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=204825, identifier 204825.

Safety and Efficacy of Various Intravenous Insulin Infusion Rates in Patients With and Without Diabetes Presenting With Hypertriglyceridemia

Background

The use of IV insulin infusions in the acute management of hypertriglyceridemia has only been evaluated in small observational studies and case reports.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV insulin infusions in the acute management of hypertriglyceridemia.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients who received an IV insulin infusion for the acute management of hypertriglyceridemia. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the number of patients who achieved a triglyceride level <500 mg/dL and experienced hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), respectively. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without diabetes, in addition to the IV insulin infusion rate received.

Results

In the total population (n = 51), there were no statistically significant differences between the insulin intensity groups in the number of patients who achieved TG levels <500 mg/dL. Compared to patients with a past medical history of diabetes, more patients without a past medical history of diabetes achieved triglyceride levels <500 mg/dL (14% vs 53%, respectively, P < 0.001). The number of hypoglycemic events observed in patients with and without a past medical history of diabetes were 5 (14%) and 4 (27%), respectively ( P = 0.023).

Conclusion and Relevance

Our findings suggest that patients who present with lower initial TG levels are more likely to achieve TG levels <500 mg/dL. To minimize the risk of hypoglycemia providers should consider prescribing a concomitant dextrose infusion and limiting IV insulin infusion rates ≤ 0.075 units/kg/h.

Extremely hypo-osmolar intravenous solutions to treat hypernatremia: The time has come to stop

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Hospital care: improving outcomes in type 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Caring for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the hospital presents unique challenges. This review provides an update on significant issues relevant to the inpatient management of T1D. Topics include trends in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hypoglycemia, and adapting ambulatory technologies for inpatient use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rates of DKA in the United States are rising. Although socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and hemoglobin A1c are persistently associated with DKA in individuals with T1D, newer risk factors have also emerged. These include the off-label use of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitor medications, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes, and infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Hypoglycemia is common among hospitalized patients with T1D. Use of validated hypoglycemia risk prediction models and multidisciplinary care initiatives can reduce the risk of inpatient hypoglycemia. Finally, continuous glucose monitoring is being adapted for use in the hospital setting and has shown promise during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

SUMMARY

Evidence-based treatment algorithms, risk prediction calculators, multidisciplinary interventions, and wearable technology hold promise for improved outcomes in hospitalized patients with T1D.