Diabetes Insipidus After Discontinuation of Vasopressin Infusion for Treatment of Shock

Adverse Clinical Effects Associated With Non-catecholamine Pharmacologic Agents for Treatment of Vasoplegic Syndrome in Adult Cardiac Surgery

Vasoplegic syndrome is a relatively common complication that can happen during and after major adult cardiac surgery. It is associated with a higher rate of complications, including postoperative renal failure, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit stay, as well as increased mortality. The underlying pathophysiology of vasoplegic syndrome is that of profound vascular hyporesponsiveness, and involves a complex interplay among inflammatory cytokines, cellular surface receptors, and nitric oxide (NO) production. The pharmacotherapy approaches for the treatment of vasoplegia include medications that increase vascular smooth muscle contraction via increasing cytosolic calcium in myocytes, reduce the vascular effects of NO and inflammation, and increase the biosynthesis of and vascular response to norepinephrine. Clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of non-catecholamine pharmacologic agents in the treatment of vasoplegic syndrome. With an increase in their use today, it is important for clinicians to understand the adverse clinical outcomes and patient risk profiles associated with these agents, which will allow better-tailored medical therapy.

Transient diabetes insipidus in critically ill COVID19 patients

PURPOSE

Vasopressin has become an important vasopressor drug while treating a critically ill patient to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure. Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a rare syndrome characterized by the excretion of a large volume of diluted urine, inappropriate for water homeostasis. We noticed that several COVID19 patients developed excessive polyuria suggestive of DI, with a concomitant plasma sodium-level increase and/or low urine osmolality. We noticed a temporal relationship between vasopressin treatment cessation and polyuria periods. We reviewed those cases to better describe this phenomenon.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected COVID19 ECMO patients' (from July 6, 2020, to November 30, 2021) data from the electronic medical records. By examining urine output, urine osmolality (if applicable), plasma sodium level, and plasma osmolality, we set DI diagnosis. We described the clinical course of DI episodes and compared baseline characteristics between patients who developed DI and those who did not.

RESULTS

Out of 37 patients, 12 had 18 episodes of DI. These patients were 7 years younger and had lower severity scores (APACHE-II and SOFA). Mortality difference was not seen between groups. 17 episodes occurred after vasopressin discontinuation; 14 episodes were treated with vasopressin reinstitution. DI lasted for a median of 21 h, with a median increase of 14 mEq/L of sodium.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary DI prevalence after vasopressin discontinuation in COVID19 ECMO patients might be higher than previously described for vasopressin-treated patients.

Transient diabetes insipidus after vasopressin discontinuation in cystic fibrosis with septic shock

Central diabetes insipidus (DI) is an uncommon condition caused by reduced or lack of vasopressin secretion from the posterior pituitary gland, typically caused by gland destruction. Several other causes for central DI have also been proposed. Here we present a case of transient central DI after discontinuation of vasopressin used for septic shock without evidence of overt pituitary damage in a cystic fibrosis patient. The serum sodium concentration peaked at 137 mmol/L in the setting of polyuria within 3 days of vasopressin discontinuation without other identified alternative etiologies. Sodium levels and urine output trended down dramatically with desmopressin administration.

Diabetes Insipidus after Vasopressin Withdrawal: A Scoping Review

Objectives

The objective of this study is to synthesize the current literature about the relationship between the occurrence of diabetes insipidus (DI), its diagnosis criteria, and management after withdrawal of vasopressin (VP) in critically ill.

Data sources

This scoping review followed the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). The search literature was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, until March 2022. A manual search was also conducted in order to include articles that were not identified in the initial search performed in the databases.

Study selection and data extraction

The selection of studies and extraction of data were carried out in a paired and independent manner. There was no restriction regarding the language of publication of the included manuscripts.

Data synthesis

The analysis included 17 studies (16 case reports and one retrospective cohort). All studies used VP, with a median time of drug infusion of 48 hours (IQR: 16-72) and DI incidence of 1.53%. The diagnosis of DI was based on diuresis output and concomitant hypernatremia or changes in serum sodium concentration, with median time to symptoms onset after discontinuation of VP of 5 hours (IQR: 3-10). The treatment of DI consisted mainly of fluid management and the use of desmopressin.

Conclusions

DI after VP withdrawal was present in 51 patients described in 17 studies, but diagnosis and management varied among each report. Using the available data, we propose a diagnosis suggestion and a flowchart for managing patients with DI after withdrawal of VP in the Intensive Care Unit. Multicentric collaborative research is urgently needed to obtain more quality data on this topic.

How to cite this article

Pérsico RS, Viana MV, Viana LV. Diabetes Insipidus after Vasopressin Withdrawal: A Scoping Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(7):846-852.

Sudden Vasopressin Withdrawal Causing Transient Central Diabetes Insipidus: A Case Report

Vasopressin is a peptide hormone produced by the hypothalamus and stored in the posterior pituitary. It is secreted in response to hypotension and hyperosmolarity. Vasopressin and its analogs have been widely used in vasodilatory shocks such as septic shock and cardiogenic shock. The sudden withdrawal of vasopressin after its prolonged use can lead to polyuria and rising sodium levels, which is concerning for the diagnosis of diabetic insipidus (DI); likely central rather than nephrogenic in origin. We present a case of diabetic insipidus following the sudden discontinuation of a prolonged vasopressin infusion for septic shock, which responded to tapering doses of desmopressin.

Diabetes Insipidus After Discontinuation of Vasopressin Infusion for Treatment of Shock

OBJECTIVES

Vasopressin has achieved common usage for the treatment of catecholamine-requiring and catecholamine-resistant shock. Diabetes insipidus is a syndrome characterized by excretion of abnormally large volumes of dilute urine. To date, very few reports of diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion have been published; the majority of previous reports describe neurosurgical patients. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the occurrence rate of diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion among patients treated with vasopressin infusion for shock.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of electronic health records of patients receiving continuous vasopressin infusion for the treatment of shock within a 5-year period (2012-2016).

SETTING

Medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic ICUs within one academic medical center.

PATIENTS

One-thousand eight-hundred ninety-six patients received vasopressin infusion for the treatment of shock.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The occurrence rate of diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion was 1.53% among all patients. Sixteen of 29 patients with diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion had undergone cardiothoracic intervention, such as coronary artery bypass graft and valve replacement surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and placement of ventricular assist devices. No neurosurgical patients were identified in our cohort. In a control group of patients receiving norepinephrine but not vasopressin infusion for treatment of shock, criteria for diabetes insipidus were observed in two of 1,320 subjects (0.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a paucity of published reports, diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion appears not to be a rare phenomenon, and is likely to be encountered by intensivists who regularly employ vasopressin for the treatment of vasoplegic shock. Previous reports consisted predominantly of neurosurgical patients. Our findings demonstrate the occurrence of diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion among patients with septic shock as well as vasoplegic shock after cardiothoracic intervention. The mechanism of diabetes insipidus after discontinuation of vasopressin infusion remains to be elucidated but may involve transient downregulation of V2 receptors induced by exposure to supraphysiological doses of vasopressin.