1
|
Davies TW, Kelly E, van Gassel RJJ, van de Poll MCG, Gunst J, Casaer MP, Christopher KB, Preiser JC, Hill A, Gundogan K, Reintam-Blaser A, Rousseau AF, Hodgson C, Needham DM, Schaller SJ, McClelland T, Pilkington JJ, Sevin CM, Wischmeyer PE, Lee ZY, Govil D, Chapple L, Denehy L, Montejo-González JC, Taylor B, Bear DE, Pearse RM, McNelly A, Prowle J, Puthucheary ZA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinimetric properties of the core outcome measurement instruments for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness (CONCISE). Crit Care 2023; 27:450. [PMID: 37986015 PMCID: PMC10662687 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04729-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONCISE is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the clinimetric properties of these instruments and understand any limitations to ensure valid and reliable research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the measurement instruments identified in CONCISE. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2022 (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, CINAHL via Healthcare Databases Advanced Search, CENTRAL via Cochrane). Studies were included if they examined at least one clinimetric property of a CONCISE measurement instrument or recognised variation in adults ≥ 18 years with critical illness or recovering from critical illness in any language. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures was used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in line with COSMIN guidance. The COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of clinimetric properties. Overall certainty of the evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis was performed and where possible, meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS A total of 4316 studies were screened. Forty-seven were included in the review, reporting data for 12308 participants. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score and Physical Functioning), sit-to-stand test, 6-m walk test and Barthel Index had the strongest clinimetric properties and certainty of evidence. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Katz Index and handgrip strength had less favourable results. There was limited data for Lawson Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. The risk of bias ranged from inadequate to very good. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS Variable evidence exists to support the clinimetric properties of the CONCISE measurement instruments. We suggest using this review alongside CONCISE to guide outcome selection for future trials of nutrition and metabolic interventions in critical illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42023438187). Registered 21/06/2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T W Davies
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.
| | - E Kelly
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - R J J van Gassel
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M C G van de Poll
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Gunst
- Clinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - M P Casaer
- Clinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - K B Christopher
- Division of Renal Medicine, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J C Preiser
- Medical Direction, Erasme University Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Hill
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH, 52074, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - K Gundogan
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - A Reintam-Blaser
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - A-F Rousseau
- Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - C Hodgson
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 3/553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - D M Needham
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - S J Schaller
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CVK, CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T McClelland
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - J J Pilkington
- Centre for Bioscience, Manchester Metropolitan University, John Dalton Building, Chester Street, Manchester, UK
| | - C M Sevin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - P E Wischmeyer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC, Box 3094 Mail # 41, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 5692 HAFS27710, USA
| | - Z Y Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Cardiac, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - D Govil
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta: The Medicty, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - L Chapple
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - L Denehy
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Allied Health, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J C Montejo-González
- Instituto de Investigación I+12, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Taylor
- Department of Research for Patient Care Services, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - D E Bear
- Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R M Pearse
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - A McNelly
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - J Prowle
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | - Z A Puthucheary
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kenji Nawa R, Luiz Ferreira De Camillis M, Buttignol M, Machado Kutchak F, Chaves Pacheco E, Rodrigues Gonçalves LH, Correa Garcia LM, Tavares Timenetsky K, Forgiarini LA. Clinimetric properties of the Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score -a multicenter study for minimum important difference and responsiveness analysis. Colomb Med (Cali) 2023; 54:e2005580. [PMID: 38089826 PMCID: PMC10714681 DOI: 10.25100/cm.v54i3.5580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of instruments in clinical practice with measurement properties tested is highly recommended, in order to provide adequate assessment and measurement of outcomes. Objective To calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and responsiveness of the Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score (Perme Score). Methods This retrospective, multicentric study investigated the clinimetric properties of MCID, estimated by constructing the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). Maximizing sensitivity and specificity by Youden's, the ROC curve calibration was performed by the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Additionally, we established the responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and predictive validity of the Perme Score. Results A total of 1.200 adult patients records from four mixed general intensive care units (ICUs) were included. To analyze which difference clinically reflects a relevant evolution we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98), and the optimal cut-off value of 7.0 points was established. No substantial floor (8.8%) or ceiling effects (4.9%) were observed at ICU discharge. However, a moderate floor effect was observed at ICU admission (19.3%), in contrast to a very low incidence of ceiling effect (0.6%). The Perme Score at ICU admission was associated with hospital mortality, OR 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), and the predictive validity for ICU stay presented a mean ratio of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98). Conclusion Our findings support the establishment of the minimum clinically important difference and responsiveness of the Perme Score as a measure of mobility status in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Monique Buttignol
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital Municipal da Vila Santa Catarina Dr. Gilson de Cássia Marques de Carvalho;São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Machado Kutchak
- Universidade Vale dos Sinos, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil:
| | | | | | | | | | - Luiz Alberto Forgiarini
- Universidade Católica de Pelotas - UCPel, Medicine Course, Postgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|