1
|
Amado F, Quintairos A, Salluh JIF. Case-Mix and the Limitations of Standardized Mortality Ratios for ICU Performance and Benchmarking. Crit Care Med 2024; 52:e216-e217. [PMID: 38483238 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe Amado
- Department of Critical Care and Postgraduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Athena Health Network, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Amanda Quintairos
- Department of Critical Care and Postgraduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Critical and Intensive Care Medicine, Academic Hospital Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Jorge I F Salluh
- Department of Critical Care and Postgraduate Program in Translational Medicine, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Research and Development, Epimed Solutions, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guidet B, Jung C, Flaatten H, Fjølner J, Artigas A, Pinto BB, Schefold JC, Beil M, Sigal S, van Heerden PV, Szczeklik W, Joannidis M, Oeyen S, Kondili E, Marsh B, Andersen FH, Moreno R, Cecconi M, Leaver S, De Lange DW, Boumendil A. Increased 30-day mortality in very old ICU patients with COVID-19 compared to patients with respiratory failure without COVID-19. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:435-447. [PMID: 35218366 PMCID: PMC8881896 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06642-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The number of patients ≥ 80 years admitted into critical care is increasing. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) added another challenge for clinical decisions for both admission and limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LLST). We aimed to compare the characteristics and mortality of very old critically ill patients with or without COVID-19 with a focus on LLST. Methods Patients 80 years or older with acute respiratory failure were recruited from the VIP2 and COVIP studies. Baseline patient characteristics, interventions in intensive care unit (ICU) and outcomes (30-day survival) were recorded. COVID patients were matched to non-COVID patients based on the following factors: age (± 2 years), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (± 2 points), clinical frailty scale (± 1 point), gender and region on a 1:2 ratio. Specific ICU procedures and LLST were compared between the cohorts by means of cumulative incidence curves taking into account the competing risk of discharge and death. Results 693 COVID patients were compared to 1393 non-COVID patients. COVID patients were younger, less frail, less severely ill with lower SOFA score, but were treated more often with invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) and had a lower 30-day survival. 404 COVID patients could be matched to 666 non-COVID patients. For COVID patients, withholding and withdrawing of LST were more frequent than for non-COVID and the 30-day survival was almost half compared to non-COVID patients. Conclusion Very old COVID patients have a different trajectory than non-COVID patients. Whether this finding is due to a decision policy with more active treatment limitation or to an inherent higher risk of death due to COVID-19 is unclear. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-022-06642-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Guidet
- UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Equipe: épidémiologie hospitalière qualité et organisation des soins, Medical Intensive Care, Sorbonne Universités, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. .,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, service de réanimation médicale, 75012, Paris, France.
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Hans Flaatten
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Anaestesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jesper Fjølner
- Department of Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Antonio Artigas
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Corporacion Sanitaria Universitaria Parc Tauli, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | | | - Joerg C Schefold
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Universitätsspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Beil
- Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sviri Sigal
- Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Peter Vernon van Heerden
- General Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Wojciech Szczeklik
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Michael Joannidis
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sandra Oeyen
- Department of Intensive Care 1K12IC, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eumorfia Kondili
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School University of Crete, Giofirakia, Greece
| | - Brian Marsh
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Finn H Andersen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ålesund Hospital, Alesund, Norway.,Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Rui Moreno
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Lisboa, Nova Médical School, Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Neurocríticos e Trauma. Hospital de São José, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anaesthesia IRCCS, Instituto Clínico Humanitas, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Susannah Leaver
- General Intensive Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dylan W De Lange
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ariane Boumendil
- UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Equipe: épidémiologie hospitalière qualité et organisation des soins, Medical Intensive Care, Sorbonne Universités, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, service de réanimation médicale, 75012, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Critical care registries are synonymous with measurement of outcomes following critical illness. Their ability to provide longitudinal data to enable benchmarking of outcomes for comparison within units over time, and between units, both regionally and nationally is a key part of the evaluation of quality of care and ICU performance as well as a better understanding of case-mix. This review aims to summarize literature on outcome measures currently being reported in registries internationally, describe the current strengths and challenges with interpreting existing outcomes and highlight areas where registries may help improve implementation and interpretation of both existing and new outcome measures. RECENT FINDINGS Outcomes being widely reported through ICU registries include measures of survival, events of interest, patient-reported outcomes and measures of resource utilization (including cost). Despite its increasing adoption, challenges with quality of reporting of outcomes measures remain. Measures of short-term survival are feasible but those requiring longer follow-ups are increasingly difficult to interpret given the evolving nature of critical care in the context of acute and chronic disease management. Furthermore, heterogeneity in patient populations and in healthcare organisations in different settings makes use of outcome measures for international benchmarking at best complex, requiring substantial advances in their definitions and implementation to support those seeking to improve patient care. SUMMARY Digital registries could help overcome some of the current challenges with implementing and interpreting ICU outcome data through standardization of reporting and harmonization of data. In addition, ICU registries could be instrumental in enabling data for feedback as part of improvement in both patient-centred outcomes and in service outcomes; notably resource utilization and efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abi Beane
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Oxford University, UK
| | - Jorge I.F. Salluh
- D’Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Postgraduate program, Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Rashan Haniffa
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Oxford University, UK
| |
Collapse
|