Neuromonitoring in Critically Ill Patients

Multimodal monitoring in patients with acute brain injury - A survey from critical care providers

BACKGROUND

Multimodal neuromonitoring (MMM) aims to improve outcome after acute brain injury, and thus admission in specialized Neurocritical Care Units with potential access to MMM is necessary. Various invasive and noninvasive modalities have been developed, however there is no strong evidence to support monitor combinations nor is there a known standardized approach. The goal of this study is to identify the most used invasive and non-invasive neuromonitoring modalities in daily practice as well as ubiquitousness of MMM standardization.

METHODS

In order to investigate current availability and protocolized implementation of MMM among neurocritical care units in US and non-US intensive care units, we designed a cross-sectional survey consisting of a self-administered online questionnaire of 20 closed-ended questions disseminated by the Neurocritical Care Society.

RESULTS

Twenty-one critical care practitioners responded to our survey with a 76% completion rate. The most commonly utilized non-invasive neuromonitoring modalities were continuous electroencephalography followed by transcranial doppler. The most common invasive modalities were external ventricular drain followed by parenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. MMM is most utilized in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and there were no differences regarding established institutional protocol, 24-h cEEG availability and invasive monitor placement between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. MMM is considered standard of care in 28% of responders' hospitals, whereas in 26.7% it is deemed experimental and only done as part of clinical trials. Only 26.7% hospitals use a computerized data integration system.

CONCLUSION

Our survey revealed overall limited use of MMM with no established institutional protocols among institutions. Ongoing research and further standardization of MMM will clarify its benefit to patients suffering from severe brain injury.

An Update on Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria since the World Brain Death Project

The World Brain Death Project (WBDP) is a 2020 international consensus statement that provides historical background and recommendations on brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination. It addresses 13 topics including: (1) worldwide variance in BD/DNC, (2) the science of BD/DNC, (3) the concept of BD/DNC, (4) minimum clinical criteria for BD/DNC determination, (5) beyond minimum clinical BD/DNC determination, (6) pediatric and neonatal BD/DNC determination, (7) BD/DNC determination in patients on ECMO, (8) BD/DNC determination after treatment with targeted temperature management, (9) BD/DNC documentation, (10) qualification for and education on BD/DNC determination, (11) somatic support after BD/DNC for organ donation and other special circumstances, (12) religion and BD/DNC: managing requests to forego a BD/DNC evaluation or continue somatic support after BD/DNC, and (13) BD/DNC and the law. This review summarizes the WBDP content on each of these topics and highlights relevant work published from 2020 to 2023, including both the 192 citing publications and other publications on BD/DNC. Finally, it reviews questions for future research related to BD/DNC and emphasizes the need for national efforts to ensure the minimum standards for BD/DNC determination described in the WBDP are included in national BD/DNC guidelines and due consideration is given to the recommendations about social and legal aspects of BD/DNC determination.

Neuromonitoring in the ICU - what, how and why?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We selectively review emerging noninvasive neuromonitoring techniques and the evidence that supports their use in the ICU setting. The focus is on neuromonitoring research in patients with acute brain injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Noninvasive intracranial pressure evaluation with optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, transcranial Doppler waveform analysis, or skull mechanical extensometer waveform recordings have potential safety and resource-intensity advantages when compared to standard invasive monitors, however each of these techniques has limitations. Quantitative electroencephalography can be applied for detection of cerebral ischemia and states of covert consciousness. Near-infrared spectroscopy may be leveraged for cerebral oxygenation and autoregulation computation. Automated quantitative pupillometry and heart rate variability analysis have been shown to have diagnostic and/or prognostic significance in selected subtypes of acute brain injury. Finally, artificial intelligence is likely to transform interpretation and deployment of neuromonitoring paradigms individually and when integrated in multimodal paradigms.

SUMMARY

The ability to detect brain dysfunction and injury in critically ill patients is being enriched thanks to remarkable advances in neuromonitoring data acquisition and analysis. Studies are needed to validate the accuracy and reliability of these new approaches, and their feasibility and implementation within existing intensive care workflows.

Mastering the brain in critical conditions: an update

Acute brain injuries, such as traumatic brain injury and ischemic and hemorragic stroke, are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. While characterized by clearly distict primary events-vascular damage in strokes and biomechanical damage in traumatic brain injuries-they share common secondary injury mechanisms influencing long-term outcomes. Growing evidence suggests that a more personalized approach to optimize energy substrate delivery to the injured brain and prognosticate towards families could be beneficial. In this context, continuous invasive and/or non-invasive neuromonitoring, together with clinical evaluation and neuroimaging to support strategies that optimize cerebral blood flow and metabolic delivery, as well as approaches to neuroprognostication are gaining interest. Recently, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine organized a 2-day course focused on a practical case-based clinical approach of acute brain-injured patients in different scenarios and on future perspectives to advance the management of this population. The aim of this manuscript is to update clinicians dealing with acute brain injured patients in the intensive care unit, describing current knowledge and clinical practice based on the insights presented during this course.

Case report: Invasive neuromonitoring in status epilepticus induced hypoxic ischemic brain injury

Objectives

Literature on invasive neuromonitoring and bilateral decompressive craniectomies (BDC) in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE)-mediated hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) is limited. Neuromonitoring can guide decision making and treatment escalation.

Methods and results

We report a case of a 17 years-old male who was admitted to our hospital's intensive care unit for RSE. HIBI was detected on neuroimaging on this patient's second day of admission after he developed central diabetes insipidus (DI). Invasive neuromonitoring revealed raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain hypoxia as measured by reduced brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2). Treatments were escalated in a tiered fashion, including administration of hyperosmolar agents, analgesics, sedatives, and a neuromuscular blocking drug. Eventually, BDC was performed as a salvage therapy as a means of controlling refractory ICP crisis in the setting of diffuse cerebral edema (DCE) following HIBI.

Discussion

SE-mediated HIBI can result in refractory ICP crisis. Neuromonitoring can help identify secondary brain injury (SBI), guide treatment strategies, including surgical interventions, and may lead to better outcomes.