Defibrillation delivered during the upstroke phase of manual chest compression improves shock success

Evaluating the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department by Real-Time Video Recording System

Objectives

To compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality between manual CPR and miniaturized chest compressor (MCC) CPR. To improve CPR quality through evaluating the quality of our clinical work of resuscitation by real-time video recording system.

Methods

The study was a retrospective observational study of adult patients who experienced CPR at the emergency department of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital from March 2013 to August 2014. All the performance of CPR were checked back by the record of “digital real-time video recording system”. Average chest compression rate, actual chest compression rate, the percentage of hands-off period, time lag from patient arrival to chest compression, time lag from patient arrival to manual ventilation, time lag from patient arrival to first IV establish were compared. Causes of chest compression hands-off time were also studied.

Results

112 cases of resuscitation attempts were obtained. Average chest compression rate was over 100 compression per minute (cpm) in the majority of cases. However, indicators such as percentage of hands-off periods, time lag from patient arrival to the first manual ventilation and time lag from patient arrival to the first IV establish seemed to be worse in the manual CPR group compared to MCC CPR group. The saving of operators change time seemed to counteract the time spent on MCC equipment. Indicators such as percentage of hands-off periods, time lag between patient arrival to the first chest compression, time lag between patient arrival to the first manual ventilation and time lag from patient arrival to the first IV establish may influence the survival.

Conclusion

Our CPR quality remained to be improved. MCC may have a potentially positive role in CPR.

The effects of a newly developed miniaturized mechanical chest compressor on outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model*

OBJECTIVE

When the duration of cardiac arrest is prolonged, reperfusion of the vital organs by effective chest compression is the most important intervention for successful resuscitation. We investigated the effects of a newly developed miniaturized chest compressor on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled experimental study.

SETTING

University-affiliated animal research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Thirty male domestic pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 30 male domestic pigs weighing 35 ± 2 kg. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated after 7 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation. The animals were randomized to receive mechanical chest compression with a miniaturized chest compressor, a LUCAS device or a Thumper device. After 5 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a 150-J defibrillation was delivered. If resuscitation was not successful, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was continued for 2 mins before the next defibrillation. The protocol was continued until successful resuscitation or for a total of 15 mins of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The animals were observed for 72 hrs after resuscitation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The miniaturized chest compressor generated significantly greater coronary perfusion pressure, end-tidal PCO2, carotid blood flow, and intrathoracic negative pressure, with significantly lower compression depth and fewer rib fractures when compared with both the LUCAS and Thumper devices. Both the miniaturized chest compressor and LUCAS devices required lower numbers of defibrillation for successful resuscitation when compared with the Thumper device. This was associated with lower prevalence of recurrent ventricular fibrillation and better postresuscitation myocardial and neurological function when compared with the Thumper device.

CONCLUSIONS

The miniaturized chest compressor improves hemodynamic efficacy and the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with significantly less injury, which is as effective as the LUCAS device. It may provide a new option for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.