Surgical approach for soft tissue sarcoma: standard of care and future approaches

Positive Margins Following Excision of Primary Bone & Soft Tissue Tumours in a Tertiary Centre and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

Background

Primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma treatment includes surgical resection, with or without peri-operative chemoradiotherapy. The aim of surgery is to achieve complete excision, to prevent localised recurrence and achieve cure. For various reasons, excision with adequate margins is not always possible. Our aim is to assess the occurrence of unexpected positive margins following primary excision within a tertiary centre and the impact on patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 567 patients discussed at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting with positive margins between 1999-2020 was performed. Exclusion criteria included: excisions performed externally and lesions treated with curettage. Information gathering from electronic records highlighted 23 cases with unexpected positive margins following primary excision.

Results

All patients pre-operatively expected to achieve complete primary resection. The median age was 60 years (8-92), 10M:13F. Tumour location included lower limb (12), upper limb (six), pelvis (two) and trunk (three); eight bone tumours and 15 soft tissue. The overall recurrence rate was 30.4% (7/23). In those recommended for re-excision (n=16), the recurrence rate was 31.25% (5/16). Of the patients not initially recommended for re-excision (n=7), four proceeded to surveillance alone with 50% recurrence (2/4), both with metastatic disease not surviving to follow-up. A further three patients underwent post-operative radiotherapy alone with no recurrences at follow-up, one patient not surviving for further treatment due to stroke. The mean follow-up for patients was 3.1 years.

Conclusion

When positive margins do occur unexpectedly, the impact due to the need for further treatment and ultimately increased risk of recurrence can be significant. Results can be compared to those for unplanned excisions. Therefore, surgeons should be aware of the different circumstances in which positive margins occur to help guide treatment planning and managing patient expectations.

Surgical and oncologic outcomes following arterial resection and reconstruction for advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although arterial involvement for advanced tumors is rare, vascular resection may be indicated to achieve complete tumor resection. Given the potential morbidity of this approach, we sought to evaluate perioperative outcomes, vascular graft patency, and survival among patients undergoing tumor excision with en bloc arterial resection and reconstruction.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, we identified nine patients with tumors encasing or extensively abutting major arterial structures for whom en bloc arterial resection and reconstruction was performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53 ± 20 years, and 89% were females. Diagnoses were primary sarcomas (5), recurrent gynecologic carcinomas (3), and benign retroperitoneal fibrosis (1). Tumors involved the infrarenal aorta (2), iliac arteries (6), and superficial femoral artery (1). Three patients (33%) had severe perioperative morbidity (Grade III + ) with no mortality. At a median follow-up of 23 months, eight patients (89%) had primary graft patency, and five patients (56%) had no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial resection and reconstruction as part of the multimodality treatment of regionally advanced tumors is associated with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes, including excellent graft patency. In appropriately selected patients, involvement of major arterial structures should not be viewed as a contraindication to attempted curative surgery.

A Nomogram Model to Predict Prognosis of Patients With Genitourinary Sarcoma

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate the significant factors influencing the overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) and make an attempt to develop a nomogram for predicting the prognosis of patients with genitourinary sarcoma (GS).

Methods

Data on adult GS from 1985 to 2010 were collected. The impact of clinical factors on OS and RFS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis, and differences between groups were analyzed by the log-rank test. To establish a nomogram, all patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 125) and a testing set (n = 63). Cox proportion hazard model was utilized to assess the prognostic effect of variables. Then, a nomogram was established to estimate 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS based on Cox regression model. Subsequently, the nomogram was validated by a training set and a validation set.

Results

A total of 188 patients were enrolled into our study. Male patients with bladder sarcoma had better OS rather than RFS when stratified by gender (P = 0.022). According to histological subtypes, patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) undergoing chemotherapy were associated with favorable OS (P = 0.024) and RFS (P = 0.001). Furthermore, LMS in kidney sarcoma were associated with lower recurrence rate in comparison to rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (P = 0.043). Margin status after surgical excision markedly influenced the OS and RFS of GS patients and negative margins presented optimal prognosis. Chemotherapy was associated with improved OS for patients without surgery (P = 0.029) and patients with positive margins (P = 0.026). Based on the multivariate analysis of the training cohort, age, gender, surgery status, histological subtype, and chemotherapy were included in our nomogram for prediction of OS. The nomogram had sufficient power with concordance index (C-index) of OS: 0.770, 95%CI: 0.760–0.772 and area under curve (AUC) of OS: 0.759, 95%CI: 0.658–0.859 in the training set and with C-index of OS: 0.741, 95%CI: 0.740–0.765, and AUC of OS: 0.744, 95%CI: 0.576–0.913 in the validation set.

Conclusions

Adults GS is a group of extremely rare tumors with poor prognosis. Of all histological types, LMS is sensitive to chemotherapy. We highlighted the cardinal role of surgical resection and the importance of achieving negative margins. We identified the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with positive margins and those without surgery as well. A nomogram is validated as an effective tool predicting short-term outcomes.

Fluorescence-Guided Visualization of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas by Targeting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A: A Phase 1 Single-Center Clinical Trial

Resection of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is accompanied by a high rate of tumor-positive surgical margins (14%-34%), which potentially lead to decreased disease-free survival. Vascular endothelial growth factor A is overexpressed in malignant tumors, including STS, and can be targeted with bevacizumab-800CW during fluorescence-guided surgery for real-time tumor detection. In this phase 1 clinical trial, we determined the feasibility, safety, and optimal dose of bevacizumab-800CW for fluorescence-guided surgery in STS for in vivo and ex vivo tumor detection. Methods: Patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of STS were included. In the dose-escalation phase, patients received bevacizumab-800CW intravenously 3 d before surgery (10, 25, and 50 mg; n = 8). In the subsequent dose-expansion phase, 7 additional patients received bevacizumab-800CW at the optimal dose. Fluorescence images were obtained in vivo and ex vivo during all stages of standard care. The optimal dose was determined by calculating in vivo and ex vivo tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) and correlating these results with histopathology. Results: Fifteen patients with STS completed this study. All tumors could be visualized during in vivo and ex vivo imaging. The optimal bevacizumab-800CW dose proved to be 10 mg, with a median in vivo TBR of 2.0 (±0.58) and a median ex vivo TBR of 2.67 (±1.6). All 7 tumor-positive margins could be observed in real time after surgical resection. Conclusion: GS using 10 mg of bevacizumab-800CW is feasible and safe for intraoperative imaging of STS, potentially allowing tumor detection and margin assessment during surgery. An additional follow-up phase 2 study is needed to confirm the diagnostic accuracy.

Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma care is highly litigated in medical malpractice claims. Understanding the reasons for litigation and legal outcomes in sarcoma care may help physicians deliver more effective and satisfying care to patients while limiting their legal exposure. However, few studies have described malpractice litigation in sarcoma care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What percentage of sarcoma malpractice cases result in a defendant verdict? (2) What is the median indemnity payment for cases that result in a plaintiff verdict or settlement? (3) What are the most common reasons for litigation, injuries sustained, and medical specialties of the defendant physicians? (4) What are the factors associated with plaintiff verdicts or settlements and higher indemnity payments?

METHODS

The national medicolegal database Westlaw was queried for medical malpractice cases pertaining to sarcomas that reached verdicts or settlements. Cases from 1982 to 2018 in the United States were included in the study to evaluate for trends in sarcoma litigation. Demographic and clinical data, tumor characteristics, reasons for litigation, injuries, and legal outcomes were recorded for each case. A univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with plaintiff verdicts or settlements and higher indemnity payments, such as tumor characteristics, defendant's medical or surgical specialty, reason for litigation, and injuries sustained. A total of 92 cases related to sarcomas were included in the study, of which 40 were related to bone sarcomas and 52 were related to soft-tissue sarcomas. Eighty-five percent (78 of 92) of cases involved adult patients (mean age ± SD: 40 ± 15 years) while 15% (14 of 92) of cases involved pediatric patients (mean age ± SD: 12.5 ± 5 years).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight percent (35 of 92) of the included cases resulted in a defendant verdict, 30% (28 of 92) resulted in a plaintiff verdict, and 32% (29 of 92) resulted in a settlement. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) indemnity payment for plaintiff verdicts and settlements was USD 1.9 million (USD 0.5 to USD 3.5 million). Median (IQR) indemnity payments were higher for cases resulting in a plaintiff verdict than for cases that resulted in a settlement (USD 3.3 million [1.1 to 5.7 million] versus USD 1.2 million [0.4 to 2.4 million]; difference of medians = USD 2.2 million; p = 0.008). The most common reason for litigation was delayed diagnosis of sarcoma (91%; 84 of 92) while the most common injuries cited were progression to metastatic disease (51%; 47 of 92) and wrongful death (41%; 38 of 92). Malpractice claims were most commonly filed against primary care physicians (26%; 28 of 109 defendants), nononcology-trained orthopaedic surgeons (23%; 25 of 109), and radiologists (15%; 16 of 109). Cases were more likely to result in a ruling in favor of the plaintiff or settlement if a delay in diagnosis occurred despite suspicious findings on imaging or pathologic findings (80% versus 51%; odds ratio 3.84 [95% CI 1.34 to 11.03]; p = 0.02). There were no differences in indemnity payments with the numbers available in terms of tumor type, tumor location, defendant specialty, reason for litigation, and resulting injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Many lawsuits were made against primary care physicians, nononcology-trained orthopaedic surgeons, or radiologists for a delayed diagnosis of sarcoma despite the presence of imaging or histologic findings suspicious for malignancy. Although previous studies of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas have not shown a consistent association between time to diagnosis and decreased survival, our study suggests that physicians are still likely to lose these lawsuits because of the perceived benefits of an early diagnosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Physicians can mitigate their malpractice risk while reducing delays in diagnosis of sarcomas by carefully reviewing all existing diagnostic studies, establishing closed-loop communication protocols to communicate critical findings from diagnostic studies, and developing policies to facilitate second-opinion consultation, particularly for imaging studies, with an experienced sarcoma specialist. Musculoskeletal oncologists may be able to help further reduce the rates of malpractice litigation in sarcoma care by helping patients understand that delays in diagnosis do not necessarily constitute medical malpractice.

The modified frailty index to predict morbidity and mortality for retroperitoneal sarcoma resections

BACKGROUND

The modified frailty index (mFI) is an important method to risk-stratify surgical patients and has been validated for general surgery and selected surgical subspecialties. However, there are currently no data assessing the efficacy of the mFI to predict acute morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2007 to 2012, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of primary malignant retroperitoneal neoplasm who underwent surgical resection. The mFI was calculated according to standard published methods. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses including χ² and logistic regression were used to identify predictors of 30-d overall morbidity, 30-d severe morbidity (Clavien III/IV), and 30-d mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 846 patients with the diagnosis of primary malignant retroperitoneal neoplasm who underwent surgical resection. The distribution mFI scores was 0 (48.5%) or 1 (36.3%), with only 4.5% of patients presenting with a score ≥3. Rates of 30-d overall morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were 22.6%, 12.9%, and 1.2%, respectively. Only selected mFI scores were associated with serious morbidity and overall morbidity on multivariate analysis (P < 0.05), and mFI did not predict 30-d mortality (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that the majority of patients undergoing retroperitoneal sarcoma resections have few, if any, comorbidities. The mFI was a limited predictor of overall and serious complications and was not a significant predictor of mortality. Better discriminators of preoperative risk stratification may be needed for this patient population.

Adult genitourinary sarcoma: Clinical characteristics and survival in a series of patients treated at a high-volume institution

OBJECTIVES

To report our institutional experience in the management of adult genitourinary sarcoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of data on adult genitourinary sarcoma treated at the West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China from 1985 to 2010. Clinicopathological parameters were analyzed to determine their impact on overall, recurrence-free and metastasis-free survivals.

RESULTS

A total of 46 women and 142 men were included, with a median age of 42 years. Of these, 152 cases were high-grade. The most common site was the paratesticular region. Surgical resection was carried out in 155 patients (82.4%), with negative margin in 106. After a minimum follow up of 5 years, 20 patients (11.6%) survived disease-free, 14 (8.1%) were alive with disease and 138 (80.2%) died of disease. Survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 91.3%, 64.0% and 47.7%. In univariate analyses, liposarcoma, high grade, metastasis at diagnosis, a lack of surgical resection and positive margin were predictive of unfavorable survival. In multivariate analyses, high grade, a lack of surgical resection and chemotherapy were independent predictors of poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult genitourinary sarcoma is an aggressive malignancy, usually presenting at advanced stage, with a high incidence of recurrence and metastasis. Complete resection and selective combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy might constitute the optimal treatment for this disease.

Targeted therapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adolescents and young adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the mesenchyme. Even though they affect individuals in all age groups, the prevalence of subtypes of STSs changes significantly from childhood through adolescence into adulthood. The mainstay of therapy is surgery, with or without the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. These treatment modalities are associated, in many cases, with significant morbidity and, given the heterogeneity of tumor histologies encompassed by the term "STS", have not uniformly improved outcomes. Moreover, some subgroups of STSs appear to be more, and others less, responsive to conventional chemotherapy agents. Over the last two decades, our understanding of the biology of STSs is slowly increasing, allowing for the development of more targeted therapies. We review the new treatment modalities that have been tested on patients with STSs, with a special focus on adolescents and young adults, a group of patients that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and has not received the dedicated attention it deserves, given the significant differences in biology and treatment response in comparison to children and adults.

Delayed phlegmon with gallstone fragments masquerading as soft tissue sarcoma

Complications from lost gallstones after cholecystectomy are rare but varied from simple perihepatic abscess to empyema and expectoration of gallstones. Gallstone complications have been reported in nearly every organ system, although reports of malignant masquerade of retained gallstones are few. We present the case of an 87-year-old woman with a flank soft tissue tumor 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The initial clinical, radiographic and biopsy findings were consistent with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), but careful review of her case in multidisciplinary conference raised the suspicion for retained gallstones rather than STS. The patient was treated with incisional biopsy/drainage of the mass, and gallstones were retrieved. The patient recovered completely without an extensive resectional procedure, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary sarcoma care to optimize outcomes for potential sarcoma patients.