A challenging frontier - the genomics and therapeutics of nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma

Pattern of care and treatment outcomes of metastatic non-clear cell kidney cancer: a single centre experience from India

Background

Non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) refers to a rare diverse heterogeneous group of tumours; usually treated with immune check point inhibitors and or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Prospective large-scale data from Asian countries is limited.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients with metastatic nccRCC treated at Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India, from 2012 to 2022. Demographic profiles, histologic subtypes, treatment details, response to therapy (by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST v1.1)) and survival status were captured from electronic medical records (EMRs) of hospitals up till May 2023. Kaplan Meier methods were estimated to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 89 consecutive patients were screened for this study, 24 were excluded due to inadequate data in EMR. 65 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age at diagnosis of 59 years (range 20-84) of which 81% were male. Histologic subtypes comprised of 43% papillary, 31% clear cell with mixed histology, 3% sarcomatoid and 23% others including chromophobe, mucinous-tubular, spindle cell, oncocytic, medullary, poorly differentiated and rhabdoid). The most common site of metastasis was the lung 62% (n = 40) followed by non-regional nodes 32%, bone 26% and liver 14%. 15% patients presented with haematuria and 62% underwent nephrectomy prior to systemic therapy. The majority received pazopanib 46% (n = 30), chemotherapy 20% (n = 13) including bevacizumab plus erlotinib, sunitinib 15% (n = 10) or cabozantinib 14% (n = 9). Only 3(5%) patients received nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination. Response to treatment showed complete response in 1.5%, partial response in 20%, stable disease in 51% and progressive disease in 23% as per RECIST v1.1. 17 patients required dose reduction and interruption due to adverse effects and 33% (n = 22) received second-line therapy with nivolumab 18% (n = 4), axitinib and everolimus among others. After a median follow up of 44 months, the median PFS was 13 months (95%CI 7.2-18.9) and the median OS was 17 months (95%CI 12.1-22.1) for the entire cohort.

Conclusion

The overall response and survival for metastatic nccRCC was relatively better in comparison with published data, despite the limited number of patients treated with ICIs due to cost and access barriers.

The stratification and prognostic importance of molecular and immune landscapes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The aim of our research is to explore the various characteristics and genetic profiles of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in order to discover possible predictors of prognosis and targets for treatment. By utilizing ssGSEA scores, we categorized patients with ccRCC into groups based on their phenotype, distinguishing between low and high. This categorization revealed significant variations in the expression of crucial immune checkpoint genes and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genes, suggesting the presence of a potential immune evasion tactic in different subtypes of ccRCC. A predictive model was built using genes that are expressed differently and linked to cell death, showing strong effectiveness in categorizing patient risk. Furthermore, we discovered a noteworthy correlation among risk scores, infiltration of immune cells, the expression of genes related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and diverse clinical features. This indicates that our scoring system for risk could function as a comprehensive gauge of the severity of the disease. The examination of the mutational terrain further highlighted the predominance of particular genetic changes, including VHL and PBRM1 missense mutations. Finally, we have discovered the function of DKK1 in facilitating cell death in ccRCC, presenting an additional possibility for therapeutic intervention. The results of our study suggest the possibility of incorporating molecular information into clinical prediction, which could lead to personalized treatment approaches in ccRCC.

Systemic Treatment for Advanced and Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Examining Modern Therapeutic Strategies for a Notoriously Challenging Malignancy

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous group of malignancies that represents 25% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases. Treatment for non-clear cell histologies is mostly based on evidence from small phase II clinical trials or extrapolated from successful therapies in clear cell RCC because of the low incidence of non-clear cell pathology. Advances in genomic profiling have improved clinicians' understanding of molecular targets for nccRCC, such as altered mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene status and fumarate hydratase (FH) gene inactivation, but patient outcomes remain poor and optimal management of this disease remains unclear. This review assesses outcomes by histologic subtype from 27 prospective and 13 ongoing clinical trials to identify therapeutic strategies for advanced or metastatic nccRCC. Vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as sunitinib, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as everolimus, have demonstrated efficacy and remain viable treatment options, with a preference for sunitinib. However, everolimus is preferred in patients with chromophobe RCC because folliculin (FLCN) gene mutations upregulate the mTOR pathway. Novel TKIs, such as cabozantinib, show improved outcomes in patients with papillary RCC because of targeted MET inhibition. Platinum-based chemotherapy continues to be the recommended treatment strategy for collecting duct and medullary RCC. Clinically meaningful antitumor activity has been observed across all non-clear cell histologies for immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and ipilimumab. Ongoing trials are evaluating novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combination regimens, with an emphasis on the promising MET-inhibitor cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib.

The roaring 2020s: a new decade of systemic therapy for renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The genomic and immunologic profiling of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has provided the impetus for advancements in systemic treatments using combination therapy - either with immune check point inhibitor (ICI) + ICI or with ICI + targeted therapy. This approach has been examined in several landmark trials, treating both clear cell (ccRCC) and nonclear cell (nccRCC) histologies. In this review, we highlight systemic therapy advancements made in this new decade, the 2020s.

RECENT FINDINGS

Targeting the programmed death receptor 1/PD-L1 pathway has created more tolerable and effective immunotherapy regimens, expanding the applications of ICIs. These new applications, paired with trial data, include ICI monotherapy in nccRCC and adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected, high-risk RCC. In addition, ICI + ICI and ICI + TKI combination therapy have demonstrated oncologic efficacy in advanced ccRCC and sarcomatoid RCC. Similar progress has been noted regarding new targeted therapies. Along the hypoxia inducible factor pathway, belzutifan has received FDA approval in von Hippel-Lindau-associated RCC. In addition, in papillary RCC, agents such as cabozantinib target the MET proto-oncogene pathway and have demonstrated impressive oncologic outcomes.

SUMMARY

The 2020s utilize the molecular profiling of advanced RCC as a scaffold for recent trials in immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Going forward, emphasizing patient-reported outcomes and careful clinical trial construction remain critical to improve systemic therapy in RCC.

Pharmacologic Therapies for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current and Future Treatments

Bladder cancer is the sixth most common malignancy in the United States and 70% of cases are non-muscle invasive at the time of diagnosis. Effective treatment is crucial to prevent progression, which occurs in about 30% of patients. The American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and chemotherapy. However, ongoing shortages and high rates of BCG unresponsiveness creates a major need for novel therapies. In this narrative review, we discuss the evolving landscape of therapeutic options for NMIBC. Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 antibody, was the first systemic therapy to be FDA-approved for BCG-unresponsive, high-risk disease. Promising new agents under investigation include various other checkpoint inhibitors and adenovirus-based therapies including CG0070 and nadofaragene firadenovec (rAd-IFNa/Syn3). Finally, new mechanisms of drug delivery are under investigation, including delivery with the GemRIS (TAR-200) device and delivery of intravesical chemotherapy at higher temperatures. With the promise of novel therapies on the horizon, we can expect the role of urologists in the management of NMIBC to evolve and expand.