The influence of nursing in head and neck cancer management

Psychosocial adjustment and its influencing factors among head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Psychosocial adjustment is an important issue in patients' long-term survival. Understanding psychosocial adjustment and its influencing factors in head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy is essential to help them return to society and lead a normal life. The purpose of this study was to describe the level of psychosocial adjustment and explore its influencing factors in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and May 2022, 253 head and neck cancer survivors at a tertiary hospital in northeast China were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. The research instruments comprised the Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Questionnaire, the Self-report Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS-SR), the General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES), the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS) and the M.D. Anderson Symptom Survey-head and neck Questionnaire (MDASI-H&N).

RESULTS

The mean PAIS-SR score was 42.31 ± 16.70 (moderate). The multiple regression model revealed that 73.2% of the variance in psychosocial adjustment was explained by marital status (β = -0.114, P = 0.005), return to work or not (β = -0.275, P < 0.01), self-efficacy (β = -0.327, P < 0.01), subjective support (β = -0.106, P = 0.043), utilization of support (β = -0.172, P < 0.01), and trouble with symptoms in daily life (β = 0.138, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The psychosocial adjustment of head and neck cancer survivors after radiotherapy is an issue that needs to be addressed, and medical staff should develop effective, individualized interventions to improve their psychosocial adjustment by increasing their social support, improving their self-efficacy and strengthening symptom management according to their actual situation.

Swallowing exercises for head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

Extensive surgery and chemo/radiation therapy (C/RT) to manage head and neck cancer (HNC) patients affects their ability to swallow food and liquids, risk of aspiration and greatly influences their quality of life (QOL).

OBJECTIVES

Ascertain the effectiveness of swallowing exercises on improving swallowing function, performance status, mouth opening, risk of aspiration/penetration and QOL in HNC patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid-Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science and included all available RCTs.

REVIEW METHODS

We followed the PRISMA guidelines and standard methods for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 using the random effects model was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 19 RCTs with 1100 participants were identified and included in the current review. Swallowing exercises had significant small effect on swallowing function 0.33 (95%CI = 0.00-0.65) and moderate effect on mouth opening 0.60 (95%CI = 0.21-0.99) immediately after intervention and small effect at 6-month follow-up 0.46 (95%CI = 0.11-0.81). However, non-significant effects were observed on risk of aspiration/penetration, performance status and all domains of QOL.

CONCLUSION

Swallowing exercises demonstrated effectiveness in improving swallowing function and mouth opening in HNC patients undergoing multimodal treatment. This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the effect of swallowing exercises in HNC patients undergoing multimodal treatment. Nurses can play an important role in assisting the delivery of oropharyngeal swallowing exercises including jaw exercises, tongue exercises and swallowing maneuvers with assistance and guidance from speech pathologists to help improve HNC complications and QOL for HNC survivors.

Long-term effect of a nurse-led psychosocial intervention on health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are prone to have a poor health-related quality of life after cancer treatment. This study investigated the effect of the nurse counselling and after intervention (NUCAI) on the health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms of HNC patients between 12 and 24 months after cancer treatment.

METHODS

Two hundred and five HNC patients were randomly allocated to NUCAI (N=103) or usual care (N=102). The 12-month nurse-led NUCAI is problem-focused and patient-driven and aims to help HNC patients manage with the physical, psychological and social consequences of their disease and its treatment. Health-related quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ H&N35. Depressive symptoms were evaluated with the CES-D.

RESULTS

At 12 months the intervention group showed a significant (P<0.05) improvement in emotional and physical functioning, pain, swallowing, social contact, mouth opening and depressive symptoms. At 18 months, global quality of life, role and emotional functioning, pain, swallowing, mouth opening and depressive symptoms were significantly better in the intervention group than in the control group, and at 24 months emotional functioning and fatigue were significantly better in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

The NUCAI effectively improved several domains of health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms in HNC patients and would seem a promising intervention for implementation in daily clinical practice.

Shoulder pain, functional status, and health-related quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience treatment-related complications that may interfere with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to describe the symptom experience (shoulder pain) and functional status factors that are related to global and domain-specific HRQOL at one month after HNC surgery. In this exploratory study, we examined 29 patients. The outcome variables included global HRQOL as well as physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being. Symptom experience and functional status factors were the independent variables. In the symptom experience variables, shoulder pain distress was negatively associated with physical well-being (R (2) = 0.24). Among the functional status variables, eating impairment was negatively related to global HRQOL (R (2) = 0.18) and physical well-being (R (2) = 0.21). Speaking impairment and impaired body image explained a large amount of the variance in functional well-being (R (2) = 0.45). This study provided initial results regarding symptom experience and functional status factors related to poor HRQOL in the early postoperative period for HNC patients.

Longitudinal quality of life in Turkish patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the quality of life and to define its determinants in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy.

METHOD

This prospective study was performed in an outpatient clinic of radiation oncology with a sample of 54 consecutive patients. Interview forms-European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and Head and Neck Module to measure quality of life, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria to determine radiation toxicity, and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment to assess nutritional status-were used to obtain personal and disease-related data before, at the end of radiotherapy, and 1 and 3 months post-therapy.

RESULTS

It was determined that various subscales of functional and symptom scales of quality of life were deteriorated at the end of radiotherapy and started to improve at 1 month after treatment. However, dry mouth and sticky saliva symptom scales did not follow the same pattern, and they took more time to improve. Quality of life (QoL) was found to be worse in younger age, higher education, higher income level, type of cancer, advanced stage, presence of tracheostomy, chemoradiation, higher dose of RT, bad nutritional status, and radiation toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the vital need of support for head and neck cancer patients during radiotherapy, especially during the first month.