Adrenergic blockers and the risk for common solid cancers: a case-control study

Increased sympathetic nervous system impairs prognosis in lung cancer patients: a scoping review of clinical studies

Aim

To summarize current knowledge, gaps, quality of the evidence and show main results related to the role of the autonomic nervous system in lung cancer.

Methods

Studies were identified through electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library) in October 2023, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Twenty-four studies were included, and most were observational.

Results

Our data indicated an increased expression of β-2-adrenergic receptors in lung cancer, which was associated with poor prognosis. However, the use of β-blockers as an add-on to standard treatment promoted enhanced overall survival, recurrence-free survival and reduced metastasis occurrence.

Conclusion

Although the results herein seem promising, future research using high-quality prospective clinical trials is required to draw directions to guide clinical interventions.

Reverse Onco-Cardiology: What Is the Evidence for Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent significant global health challenges, with CVD being the leading cause of mortality and breast cancer, showing a complex pattern of incidence and mortality. We explore the intricate interplay between these two seemingly distinct medical conditions, shedding light on their shared risk factors and potential pathophysiological connections. A specific connection between hypertension (HTN), atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction (MI), and breast cancer was evaluated. HTN is explored in detail, emphasizing the role of aging, menopause, insulin resistance, and obesity as common factors linking HTN and breast cancer. Moreover, an attempt is made to identify the potential impact of antihypertensive medications and highlight the increased risk of breast cancer among those women, with a focus on potential mechanisms. A summary of key findings underscores the need for a multisystem approach to understanding the relationship between CVD and breast cancer is also explored with a highlight for all the gaps in current research, such as the lack of clinical observational data on MI and breast cancer in humans and the need for studies specifically designed for breast cancer. This paper concludes that there should be a focus on potential clinical applications of further investigation in this field, including personalized prevention and screening strategies for women at risk. Overall, the authors attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the intricate connections between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases, emphasizing the importance of further research in this evolving field of cardio-oncology.

Impact of Beta Blockers on Breast Cancer Incidence and Prognosis

Several studies have investigated the link between beta blockers (BB) and breast cancer outcomes but have reported mixed results. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between BB and breast cancer outcomes. Literatures investigating the relationship between BB and breast cancer outcomes were searched through PubMed and Embase. A total 43 articles were included by meta-analysis. We found BB increased breast cancer risk (n = 22, RR: 1.169, 95% CI: 1.063-1.285). We also found BB were associated with a lower overall survival (OS, n = 19, RR: 1.125, 95% CI: 1.078-1.173) and a higher recurrence risk (n = 8, RR: 1.130, 95% CI: 1.040-1.227) for breast cancer. Interestingly, subgroup analyses found only selective BB increased breast cancer risk (n = 5, RR: 1.766, 95% CI: 1.148-2.718) and recurrence risk (n = 2, RR: 1.168 -, 95% CI: 1.026-1.328) while only nonselective BB were associated with a lower OS (n = 4, RR: 1.135, 95% CI: 1.073-1.202) for breast cancer. Moreover, we found BB were associated with a significantly lower OS (n = 3, RR: 2.751, 95% CI: 1.213-6.238) and higher recurrence (n = 2, RR: 1.284, 95% CI: 1.102-1.497) only in luminal breast cancer while with a higher PFS (n = 2, RR: 0.585, 95% CI: 0.343-0.997) in Her2+ breast cancer. No significant differences in terms of CSM (n = 19, RR: 1.009, 95% CI: 0.947-1.077), PFS (n = 4, RR: 0.932, 95% CI: 0.616-1.305), and DFS (n = 2, RR: 0.776, 95% CI: 0.512-1.176) were observed. Our results provide evidence of the relationship between BB and breast cancer incidence and prognosis.

Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs Use on Risk and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 37 Observational Studies

Background: Antihypertensive drugs might play a key role in the risk and poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, current epidemiologic evidence remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to quantify the association between antihypertensive drugs and colorectal cancer. Methods: To identify available studies, we systematically searched electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library. The risk estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected and analyzed by using random-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results: Overall, 37 observational studies were included in this analysis (26 studies with cohort design, three studies with nested case-control design, and 8 studies with case-control design). Antihypertensive drugs did not present a significant effect on the risk or overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer [Risk ratio (RR) = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.04; Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.84-1.02]. In the subgroup analysis, diuretics use was significantly associated with a worse overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.40). However, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers was associated with improved progression-free survival of patients who suffered from colorectal cancer (HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.95). Conclusion: Antihypertensive drug usage did not influence the risk and overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer in general. Further investigation reminded us that diuretics use might reduce the overall survival time in colorectal cancer patients, whereas those who took Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers had a longer progression-free survival.

Association Between Antihypertensive Medication Use and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The prevalence rate of hypertension and breast cancer increases with advancing age. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics are widely used to treat patients with hypertension. Although, the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and breast cancer has been highly debated, recent evidence supporting this association remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the association between the use of antihypertensive medication and the risk of breast cancer and its prognosis. Methods: This study was conducted using data from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases retrieved for the period from January 2000 to April 2021. Articles and their references were checked and summary effects were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Results: This meta-analysis included 57 articles, which were all related to breast cancer risk or prognosis. Assessment of breast cancer risk using the pooled data showed that the use of BBs or CCBs or diuretics was associated with increased cancer risk [BB: relative risk (RR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-1.32; CCBs: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08; diuretics: RR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11]. Long-term use of diuretic increased the risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20), whereas long-term RASIs treatment reduced the risk (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.91). In addition, we found that diuretic users may be related to elevated breast cancer-specific mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.33], whereas using other antihypertensive medications was not associated with this prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Conclusion: Using CCBs, BBs, and diuretics increased the risk of breast cancer. In addition, diuretics may elevate the risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. The long-term use of RASIs was associated with a significantly lower breast cancer risk, compared with non-users. Thus, this analysis provides evidence to support the benefits of the routine use of RASIs in patients with hypertension, which has important public health implications.

Beta-Blockers Use and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The risk of breast cancer among hypertensive patients who use beta-blockers has attracted attention. However, the evidence is inconsistent and investigation of the dose-specific associations for subtypes of beta-blockers is limited.

METHODS

By incorporating Swedish national registers, breast cancer risk was estimated in women with hypertension who used nonselective beta-blockers and beta-1 selective blockers compared with propensity score-matched nonusers. The cumulative defined daily dose was used to study the dose-response association. Test of interaction between beta-blocker use and other antihypertensive medications was performed.

RESULTS

Hypertensive patients taking beta-1 selective blockers (metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol) had an increased risk of breast cancer with a HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.39 (1.95-2.94), 2.31 (1.46-3.64), and 3.02 (2.09-4.36), respectively. All of the observed associations were dose-dependent (P _trend < 0.0001). No significant association was found for the nonselective beta-blocker (propranolol) except that among users of agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system, those who used propranolol had increased breast cancer risk. Modification of agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system on breast cancer risk was also observed for atenolol.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased risk of breast cancer associates with the use of beta-1 selective blockers in a dose-response manner.

IMPACT

Breast cancer surveillance is recommended for hypertensive female patients using beta-1 selective blockers.

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System-based Antihypertensive Agents and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Biologic evidence suggests that angiotensin II may play a role in tumor progression or growth. We compared the short-term colorectal cancer (CRC) risk among initiators of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) versus guideline-recommended clinical alternatives (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers [CCB], and thiazides).

METHODS

We conducted a new-user cohort study on U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged over 65 years, who initiated antihypertensive monotherapy during 2007-2013 and were free of cancer diagnosis before drug initiation. Follow-up began 6 months postinitiation to allow time for the diagnostic delay. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using propensity score weighted Cox regression, overall and stratified by time since drug initiation, and 5-year cumulative risk differences (RD) using Kaplan-Meier estimator. We assessed the potential for unmeasured confounding using supplemental data from Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

RESULTS

For analyses without censoring for treatment changes, we observed 532 CRC events among 111,533 ACEI/ARB initiators. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range: 1.0-3.7), CRC risk was similar between ACEI/ARB and active comparators, with adjusted HRs of 1.0 (95% CI = 0.85, 1.1) for ACEI/ARB versus beta blockers, 1.2 (95% CI = 0.97, 1.4) for ACEI/ARB versus CCB and 1.0 (95% CI = 0.80, 1.3) for ACEI/ARB versus thiazide. Five-year RDs and as-treated analyses, which censored follow-up at medication changes, produced similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world antihypertensive utilization patterns in Medicare beneficiaries, our study suggests no association between ACEI/ARB initiation and the short-term CRC risk.

Agonist Effects of Propranolol on Non-Tumor Human Breast Cells

The β-blocker propranolol (PROP) has been proposed as a repurposed treatment for breast cancer. The similarity of action between β-agonists and antagonists found on breast cells encouraged us to compare PROP and isoproterenol (ISO, agonist) signaling pathways on a human breast cell line. Cell proliferation was measured by cell counting and DNA-synthesis. Cell adhesion was measured counting the cells that remained adhered to the plastic after different treatments. Changes in actin cytoskeleton were observed by fluorescence staining and Western Blot. ISO and PROP caused a diminution of cell proliferation and an increase of cell adhesion, reverted by the pure β-antagonist ICI-118551. ISO and PROP induced a reorganization of actin cytoskeleton increasing F-actin, p-COFILIN and p-LIMK. While ISO elicited a marked enhancement of cAMP concentrations and an increase of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation, PROP did not. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibition or β-arrestin1 dominant-negative mutant abrogated PROP-induced cell adhesion and COFILIN phosphorylation. The fact that PROP has been proposed as an adjuvant drug for breast cancer makes it necessary to determine the specific action of PROP in breast models. These results provide an explanation for the discrepancies observed between experimental results and clinical evidence.

Use of non-selective β-blockers is associated with decreased tumor proliferative indices in early stage breast cancer

Previous studies suggest beta-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) antagonists (β-blockers) decrease breast cancer progression, tumor metastasis, and patient mortality; however the mechanism for this is unknown. Immunohistochemical analysis of normal and malignant breast tissue revealed overexpression of β1-AR and β3-AR in breast cancer. A retrospective cross-sectional study of 404 breast cancer patients was performed to determine the effect of β-blocker usage on tumor proliferation. Our analysis revealed that non-selective β-blockers, but not selective β-blockers, reduced tumor proliferation by 66% (p < 0.0001) in early stage breast cancer compared to non-users. We tested the efficacy of propranolol on an early stage breast cancer patient, and quantified the tumor proliferative index before and after treatment, revealing a propranolol-mediated 23% reduction (p = 0.02) in Ki67 positive tumor cells over a three-week period. The anti-proliferative effects of β-blockers were measured in a panel of breast cancer lines, demonstrating that mammary epithelial cells were resistant to propranolol, and that most breast cancer cell lines displayed dose dependent viability decreases following treatment. Selective β-blockers alone or in combination were not as effective as propranolol at reducing breast cancer cell proliferation. Molecular analysis revealed that propranolol treatment of the SK-BR-3 breast cancer line, which showed high sensitivity to beta blockade, led to a reduction in Ki67 protein expression, decreased phosphorylation of the mitogenic signaling regulators p44/42 MAPK, p38 MAPK, JNK, and CREB, increased phosphorylation of the cell survival/apoptosis regulators AKT, p53, and GSK3β. In conclusion, use of non-selective β-blockers in patients with early stage breast cancer may lead to decreased tumor proliferation.

The impact of perioperative β blocker use on patient outcomes after primary cytoreductive surgery in high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of perioperative β blocker use on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-center retrospective study of all women who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer (2000-2010). One institution had routinely used perioperative β blockers for patients "at risk" for coronary events. The other institution did not routinely use perioperative β blockers. Demographic, operative, and follow up data were collected. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of β blockers on progression-free interval (PFI) as well as overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Out of 185 eligible patients, 70 received β blockers and 115 underwent cytoreductive surgery without perioperative β blockers. Both groups were similar in demographics. A history of hypertension was present more often in the β blocker group compared to the group that did not receive β blockers (22% and 6%, p=0.002). PFI in β blocker group was greater at 18.2 vs. 15.8months (p=0.66). The OS in the β blocker group was significantly higher at 44.2 vs. 39.3months (p=0.01). In multivariate analysis, perioperative β blocker use was associated with significant improvement in OS (HR 0.68 (0.46-0.99); p=0.046).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an association between perioperative β blocker use and longer overall survival in patients undergoing primary ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. A prospective randomized clinical trial in this population would further validate these results.