Cervical morbidity in Alsace, France: results from a regional organized cervical cancer screening program

Prevalence and Description of High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesions of Cervical Mucosa Cells in a Screening Programme for Cervical Cancer in Isère, France

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyse high-grade intraepithelial lesions (LIEHG) observed in a screening programme from 2010 to 2018 to more accurately describe them and formulate recommendations for best practices in the context of screening evolution following the introduction of an HPV test in primary cervical cancer screening in 2020.

METHODS

This study included 305,940 asymptomatic women aged 25-65 years. The eligible population was invited to undergo a screening cervico-uterine-smear every 3 years. If this smear was normal, the woman received a new invitation. In the case of a positive screen, the patient underwent further diagnostic procedures, such as colposcopy and biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. Only those diagnosed with LIEHG and above proceeded to treatment. The diagnoses associated with LIEHG were those related to the WHO Classification of tumours of the uterine cervix.

RESULTS

Positive smears led to the diagnosis of 3230 LIEHG. The prevalence of LIEHG in the screened population was 0.4%. The LIEHG distribution varied significantly according to the age of the women. The probability of diagnosing LIEHG in young women was 12.2% at 25-29 years. This probability decreased by half after 50 years. We observed that the type of smear was significantly associated with LIEHG detection. The positive predictive value for diagnosing LIEHG was 70.3% for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) smears and 35.1% for atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) smears.

CONCLUSION

In the study population, the prevalence of LIEHG was high in women under 35 years. Low-grade smears were correlated with the risk of LIEHG and should prompt screening facilities to allocate resources to ensure active follow-up of LSIL and ASC-US smears. Adherence to cytological screening recommendations was associated with a reduced risk of LIEHG in multivariate analysis.

Cervical cancer screening uptake: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters to non-adherent women combined with sending their general practitioners a list of their non-adherent patients (study protocol)

Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer among women. It can be cured if diagnosed at an early stage and treated promptly. The World Health Organization suggests that 70% of women should be screened with a high-performance test by the age of 35. This paper reports a protocol to assess the effect of two modalities of organized CC screening programmes on CC screening uptake.

Methods and analysis

Design and setting: The design involves a 3-arm randomized controlled study performed in a French geographic area on the west coast. A total of 1,395 general practitioners will be randomized, depending on their general practice surgeries. Participants: The design is based on a total of 94,393 women aged 40 to 65 years who are eligible for CC screening. Intervention: In the "optimized cancer screening" group, the intervention will combine sending invitation letters to non-adherent women with sending general practitioners (GPs) a list of their non-adherent patients. In the "standard cancer screening" group, the intervention will be limited to sending invitation letters to non-adherent women. In the "usual care" group, no letter will be sent either to women or to their GPs. Primary endpoint: CC screening test uptake will be assessed after a 6-month follow-up period. Statistical analysis: The percentage of women who are up-to-date with their screening at 6 months after the intervention will be compared across arms using a generalized mixed linear model.

Discussion

A large-scale randomized trial of this nature is unprecedented. The study will enable us to assess a strategy relying on GPs, identified as the coordinators in this screening strategy. The study results should help policy makers to implement organized CC screening programs in the future.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was approved was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National College of Teaching General practitioners (IRB00010804). It was recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov on the number NCT04689178 (28 December 2020). The study findings will be used for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations in scientific meetings.