Lepper TW, Ferreira Prigol R, Ferrares Espinosa AL, Guedes IC, Maciel Rönnau M, Daroit NB, Haas AN, Visioli F, Menezes de Oliveira Neto M, Rados PV. Oral cancer screening using cytopathology: An advanced proposal with the Bethesda classification.
Cytopathology 2025;
36:41-49. [PMID:
39164925 DOI:
10.1111/cyt.13427]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Oral cancer screening requires analysis capable of detecting changes preceding the clinical manifestation. Oral cytopathology studies as an oral cancer screening have shown promising results. This study aims to evaluate the use of cytopathology in a quali-quantitative analysis using Papanicoloau staining.
METHODS
Four experimental groups were evaluated: control (CG), exposed to carcinogens (EG), potentially malignant disorder with and without epithelial dysplasia (D-OPMDG and ND-OPMDG) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCCG). Oral smears were collected using a Cytobrush® and conventional exfoliative cytology.
RESULTS
Oral Papanicolaou smears from 143 individuals were analysed in 8100 images. Qualitatively, non-lesional groups exhibited minimal suspected cases (20% in CG and 5% in EG), in the OPMD groups the ability to identify altered cells was low (40% in D-OPMDG and 0% in ND-OPMDG). Conversely, a notable 100% accuracy was achieved in the OSCCG. Quantitatively, a higher percentage of anucleated and a lower percentage of intermediate cells were observed in the OPMDG; a higher proportion of parabasal/suspicious cells was observed in OSCCG. The optimal threshold for improved accuracy in detecting suspected malignancies occurs when the count of parabasal/suspicious cells exceeds 8/100 cells examined. Cytomorphometric analysis revealed a higher nucleus/cytoplasm ratio (N/C) in OSCCG, with a best cutoff point indicating enhanced accuracy in discerning suspected malignancies when exceeding 17% of cells exhibiting this elevated ratio.
CONCLUSION
It is possible to suggest updates in cytomorphometric and quantitative analysis in the modified Bethesda system for the oral cavity including objective criteria in the risk classification, therefore improving oral cancer screening.
Collapse