Equal prevalence of severe cervical dysplasia by HPV self-sampling and by midwife-collected samples for primary HPV screening: a randomised controlled trial

Cervical screening with self-sampling for postmenopausal women with molecular triage using extended genotyping and methylation

OBJECTIVE

With the transition from cytology to human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in cervical cancer screening, it is possible to use self-sampling instead of professionally collected samples. Most studies have included women between 20 and 60 years age. Here we aimed to study postmenopausal women and investigate whether vaginal self-sampling is equally effective as professional sampling for detection of HSIL and the possibility to use a method for molecular triage directly on the screening sample.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women in Örebro county, Sweden, were invited (n = 7835) during 2018-2020 to participate in the study including both professional and self-sampling. In total 2258 women returned both sample types, that were analyzed for HPV followed by triage for cytology, HPV genotyping and methylation and clinical follow-up according to national guidelines.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HPV was 3.4 % in the professionally collected samples and 12.6 % in the self-collected. All women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were HPV-positive in both professionally and self-collected samples. For self-collected samples, we compared different triage strategies. Cytology was the most efficient strategy. Among the molecular triage methods, the combination of methylation and genotyping was most efficient but resulted in twice as many colposcopy referrals as cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, HPV self-sampling with molecular triage detects HSIL to the same extent as professional screening with cytological triage. The specificity of molecular triage is, however, unacceptably low, and to avoid overtreatment other triage methods following primary self-sampling need to be developed.

High-risk HPV mRNA testing on self-samples offered to those who do not attend for organised cervical screening - real world data from the Dumfries and Galloway region in Scotland

BACKGROUND

HPV self sampling can act as a tool to engage women in cervical screening and population based studies can inform optimal implementation of this approach.

METHODS

Self sampling kits were mailed to women who had defaulted from routine screening resident in an entire territorial health board in Scotland. Kit return rates and compliance to colposcopy follow up in those who were HPV mRNA positive were assessed. Concordance of the self-sample with samples taken later at colposcopy was measured alongside PPV of an mRNA positive result for CIN2+.

RESULTS

Of 4173 women invited to participate, 20.5 %, returned their kit and a greater return rate with increasing age was observed. HPV mRNA positivity was 12.0 %, and invalidity rate was approximately 3 %. Compliance to colposcopy follow up was 88.3 % and the PPV for an mRNA test for CIN2+ on a self sample was 25.6 %. hr-HPV concordance on the initial swab and the follow up swab and liquid based cytology (LBC) sample taken at colposcopy was 67.1 % and 30 % respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV self sampling using a "mail to all" approach is feasible in Scotland although only 1 in 5 actively responded to the offer. Future work to monitor screening behaviours in those who were invited but did not engage initially will help quantify any additional benefit(s) incurred.

A comparison of the carbon footprint of alternative sampling approaches for cervical screening in the UK: A descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To understand whether self-sampling can reduce carbon emissions (CO2 e) from the NHS cervical screening programme (NHSCSP) by comparing the carbon footprint of three sampling strategies: routine cervical sampling, vaginal self-sampling and first-void (FV) urine collection.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

National Health Service (NHS), United Kingdom (UK).

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Patients aged 25-64 years eligible for cervical screening in the UK.

METHODS

A carbon footprint analysis was undertaken for three cervical screening sampling approaches, from point of invitation to screening through to preparation for transport to the laboratory for HPV testing. A combination of primary and secondary data were used, with a bottom-up approach applied to collection of primary data.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We report CO2 e per sampling approach, which is the unit used to express carbon footprint and harmonise the contributions of greenhouse gases with different global warming potentials.

RESULTS

The total carbon footprint of routine cervical sampling is 3670 g CO2 e. By comparison, vaginal self-sampling had a total carbon footprint of 423 g CO2 e, and FV urine sampling 570 g CO2 e. The largest share of emissions for routine sampling was attributable to the carbon footprint associated with an appointment in a primary care setting, which totalled 2768 g CO2 e.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine cervical sampling is up to 8.7-fold more carbon-intensive than self-sampling approaches with equivalent effectiveness. We found negligible differences in the carbon footprint of alternative self-sampling methods, supporting the need for an informed choice of screening options for participants, which includes sharing information on their environmental impacts.

Older women's perceptions of HPV self-sampling and HPV-sampling performed by a midwife - a phenomenographic study

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is a global disease and it is well established that cervical cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In Sweden self-sampling for HPV is now used as a complement to sampling performed by a midwife. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how older women perceive the self-sampling compared to the sampling performed by a midwife. Therefore, the aim of the study was to describe how women, aged 64 years and older, perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife for HPV-testing.

METHODS

Eighteen women were included in a qualitative interview study, and a phenomenographic approach was used for the analysis of the interviews.

RESULTS

Three descriptive categories emerged: Confidence in sampling, Facilitating participation and Being informed. Within the categories, eight conceptions emerged describing the variation relating to how the women perceived the process of self-sampling and sampling performed by a midwife.

CONCLUSIONS

Women in this study describe confidence in self-sampling for HPV-testing and that the self-sampling was saving time and money, both for themselves and for society. Information in relation to an HPV-positive test result is of importance and it must be kept in mind that women affected by HPV may feel guilt and shame, which health care professionals should pay attention to. This knowledge can be used in education of health care staff.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://researchweb.org/is/fourol/project/228071 . Reg. no 228,071.

Cervical cancer in Region Skåne, Sweden 2017-2020 after the implementation of primary HPV screening: A quality assurance audit

INTRODUCTION

Primary human papilloma virus (HPV) screening to detect cervical cancer and dysplastic lesions was implemented in Region Skåne 2017 for women aged 30-70. The aim of this study was to characterize the screening history of women diagnosed with cervical cancer to evaluate the performance of the screening program, as well as to assess the cancer treatments given and shortcomings in the follow-up of women with cervical dysplasia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a quality assurance audit. The data was collected from the National Cervical Cancer Prevention Registry, Region Skåne Labmedicin database and the Melior Journal system in 2017-2020.

RESULTS

We identified 247 women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer in Region Skåne in 2017-2020. Of these, 35 (14.2%) had a screening history over at least two screening rounds before diagnosis. There were 25 (10.1%) women diagnosed with cervical cancer in between screening intervals, i.e., interval cancer. The most common screening history in women with cervical cancer was irregular screening (143, 57.9%), followed by women being above screening age (44, 17.8%). HPV was detected in 96% of the cases, either in cervical cytology or in the tumor tissue. The screening program detected the disease in 96 (38.9%) of the patients, 149 (60.3%) were diagnosed through symptoms and two (0.80%) as a result of incidental findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The most powerful tool in the prevention of cervical cancer is screening program attendance. Prolongation with HPV screening among elderly women will also reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. Today, such cancers are usually discovered when symptoms appear.

Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials

Objectives

A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of HPV self-sampling proposal on cervical cancer screening (CCS) uptake when compared with an invitation to have a clinician to collect the sample. Secondary outcomes were acceptability and preference of self-sampling compared to clinician-collected samples.

Methods

The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies examining the CCS uptake comparing self-sampling over invitation to be sampled by an healthcare professional and examining the proportion of women accepting or preferring self-sampling vs. clinician-collected sampling were included. The CCS uptake was also explored according to strategy of self-samplers' distribution, collection device type and screening status. Peters' test and Funnel Plot inspection were used to assess the publication bias. Quality of the studies was assessed through Cochrane Risk of Bias and NIH Quality Assessment tools.

Results

One hundred fifty-four studies were globally identified, and 482,271 women were involved. Self-sampling procedures nearly doubled the probability (RR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.7-2.0) of CCS uptake when compared with clinician-collected samples. The opt-out (RR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.9-2.4) and the door-to-door (RR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.6-2.0) did not statistically significant differ (p = 1.177) in improving the CCS uptake. A higher relative uptake was shown for brushes (RR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.5-1.7) and swabs (RR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.9-3.1) over clinician-collected samples. A high between-studies variability in characteristics of sampled women was shown. In all meta-analyses the level of heterogeneity was consistently high (I 2 > 95%). Publication bias was unlikely.

Conclusions

Self-sampling has the potential to increase participation of under-screened women in the CCS, in addition to the standard invitation to have a clinician to collect the sample. For small communities door-to-door distribution could be preferred to distribute the self-sampler while; for large communities opt-out strategies should be preferred over opt-in. Since no significant difference in acceptability and preference of device type was demonstrated among women, and swabs and brushes exhibited a potential stronger effect in improving CCS, these devices could be adopted.

Human papillomavirus self-sampling with mRNA testing benefits routine screening

High risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) based screening provides the possibility of vaginal self-sampling as a tool to increase screening attendance. In order to evaluate the impact and feasibility of opt-in self-sampling in the Finnish setting, we invited a randomized population of 5350 women not attending screening after age group invitation or after reminder, to attend HPV self-sampling-based screening in the autumn of 2018 in Helsinki. Out of those, 1282 (24.0%) expressed their interest and ordered the sampling package. Eventually 787 women (14.7% of the total invited population) took part in screening, 770 women by providing a vaginal sample within 2 months from invitation and 17 by providing a pap smear in the laboratory. Self-taken samples were collected in Aptima Multitest vials and tested using the Aptima HPV mRNA assay. A high proportion, 158/770 (20.5%) of the samples were positive in the Aptima HPV assay. One hundred and forty-one samples were further submitted to Aptima HPV Genotyping and extended genotyping by a Luminex based assay. Of those, 23 samples (16.3%) were HPV 16 positive and 7 (5.0%) were positive for HPV 18/45; extended genotyping revealed multiple high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes. At follow-up seven cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were diagnosed, which represents 4.4% of HPV positive women and 0.9% of screened women, whereas the rate was 0.5% in routine screening. Our findings suggest that self-sampling with HPV mRNA testing is a feasible approach to improve screening efficacy in a high-risk population among original nonattendees.