Evaluation of a Novel Communication Application From Nurses' Perspectives

Usability Testing of an iPad Communication Application for Mechanically Ventilated Patients

BACKGROUND

Patient communication challenges during mechanical ventilation can negatively impact symptom management and psychological recovery. Alternative communication (AC) aids have the potential to improve mechanically ventilated (MV) patient experiences.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the feasibility and usability of a communication application on a tablet (iPad).

METHOD

A single-group pilot study was guided by the augmentative and alternative communication acceptance model. We recruited patients from 1 medical intensive care unit. Existing communication application software (Proloquo2Go) was tailored to MV patients' needs. Usability testing included patient communication of 5 messages with data collected on success, message completion time, and patient feedback.

RESULTS

Ten patients with a mean age of 50 years (SD, 16.7) were enrolled. Of the 7 patients able to complete usability testing, 85.7% found the device easy to use, and 100% wanted the iPad available for their use when on the ventilator. Three patients were extubated immediately after usability testing. Two patients preferred other modes of communication (writing). Two patients used the iPad as their primary mode of communication during the remainder of their time on the ventilator. Nurse feedback on the communication application was positive.

DISCUSSION

Tablet-based communication applications can be successfully used by MV patients and should be considered as 1 tool to support effective patient communication during mechanical ventilation. Future research is needed to identify which patients may be most likely to benefit from the availability of these devices.

The Arthur App: Designing an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Method for Use With Hospitalized Patients

An innovative augmentative and alternative communication method consisting of a mobile application (app) on an Apple iPad®, such as the Arthur app, can provide patients with barriers to verbal communication an easy means to express their needs, feelings, and questions. When using this technology, it is important to consider the right patient population at the right time, as well as the proper quantity and quality of information.

Barriers to and facilitators for the use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative strategies for adults with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit: A scoping review

PURPOSE

To identify barriers and facilitators for the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorative strategies for adult patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit (ICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Scoping review searching five databases between 1990 and 2019. We screened 13, 167 citations and included all study types reporting barriers and/or facilitators to using communication strategies in an ICU setting. Two authors independently extracted and coded reported barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains.

RESULTS

Of the 44 studies meeting inclusion criteria 18 (44%) used qualitative, 18 (44%) used quantitative, and 8 (18%) used mixed methods. In total, 39 unique barriers and 46 unique facilitators were identified and coded to the domains of the TDF. Barriers were most frequently coded to the Skills, Environmental Context and Resources, and Emotion domains. Facilitators were most frequently coded to Reinforcement, Environmental Context and Resources, and Social and Professional Roles/Identity domains. Thematic synthesis produced four potentially modifiable factors: context, emotional support, training, and decisional algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

Identified barriers (skills, environment, resources, emotions) and facilitators (reinforcement, resources, roles) to ICU communication strategy use in the literature may be modified through formal training and role support.