Development and validation of radiomics model built by incorporating machine learning for identifying liver fibrosis and early-stage cirrhosis

Role of radiomics in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis has important pathoetiological and prognostic roles in chronic liver disease. This study evaluates the role of radiomics in staging liver fibrosis.

METHOD

After literature search in electronic databases (Embase, Ovid, Science Direct, Springer, and Web of Science), studies were selected by following precise eligibility criteria. The quality of included studies was assessed, and meta-analyses were performed to achieve pooled estimates of area under receiver-operator curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of radiomics in staging liver fibrosis compared to histopathology.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (3718 patients; age 47 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 42, 53]; 69% [95% CI: 65, 73] males) were included. AUROC values of radiomics for detecting significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), and cirrhosis (F4) were 0.91 [95%CI: 0.89, 0.94], 0.92 [95%CI: 0.90, 0.95], and 0.94 [95%CI: 0.93, 0.96] in training cohorts and 0.89 [95%CI: 0.83, 0.91], 0.89 [95%CI: 0.83, 0.94], and 0.93 [95%CI: 0.91, 0.95] in validation cohorts, respectively. For diagnosing significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis the sensitivity of radiomics was 84.0% [95%CI: 76.1, 91.9], 86.9% [95%CI: 76.8, 97.0], and 92.7% [95%CI: 89.7, 95.7] in training cohorts, and 75.6% [95%CI: 67.7, 83.5], 80.0% [95%CI: 70.7, 89.3], and 92.0% [95%CI: 87.8, 96.1] in validation cohorts, respectively. Respective specificity was 88.6% [95% CI: 83.0, 94.2], 88.4% [95% CI: 81.9, 94.8], and 91.1% [95% CI: 86.8, 95.5] in training cohorts, and 86.8% [95% CI: 83.3, 90.3], 94.0% [95% CI: 89.5, 98.4], and 88.3% [95% CI: 84.4, 92.2] in validation cohorts. Limitations included use of several methods for feature selection and classification, less availability of studies evaluating a particular radiological modality, lack of a direct comparison between radiology and radiomics, and lack of external validation.

CONCLUSION

Although radiomics offers good diagnostic accuracy in detecting liver fibrosis, its role in clinical practice is not as clear at present due to comparability and validation constraints.

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI based radiomics combined with clinical variables in stratifying hepatic functional reserve in HBV infected patients

PURPOSES

To evaluate radiomics from Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR combined with clinical variables for stratifying hepatic functional reserve in hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients.

METHODS

Our study included 279 chronic HBV patients divided 8:2 for training and test cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) MR images. Radiomics features were selected to construct a Rad-score which was combined with clinical parameters in two models differentiating hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh A vs. B/C. Performances of these stratifying models were compared using area under curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Rad-score alone discriminated hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A with AUC = 0.890, 0.914 and Child-Pugh A vs. B/C with AUC = 0.862, 0.865 for the training and test cohorts, respectively. Model 1 [Rad-score + clinical parameters for hepatitis vs. Child-Pugh A] showed AUC = 0.978 for the test cohort, which was higher than ALBI [albumin-bilirubin] and MELD [model for end-stage liver disease], with AUCs of 0.716, 0.799, respectively (p < 0.001, < 0.001). Model 2 [Rad-score + clinical parameters for Child-Pugh A vs. B/C] showed AUC of 0.890 in the test cohort, which was similar to ALBI (AUC = 0.908, p = 0.760), and higher than MELD (AUC = 0.709, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Rad-score combined with clinical variables stratifies hepatic functional reserve in HBV patients.

Artificial Intelligence in Liver Diseases: Recent Advances

Liver diseases cause a significant burden on public health worldwide. In spite of great advances during recent years, there are still many challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases. During recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used for the diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostic prediction of various diseases based on clinical datasets and medical images. Accumulative studies have shown its performance for diagnosing patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis and assessing their severity, and for predicting treatment response and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, outcomes of liver transplantation recipients, and risk of drug-induced liver injury. Herein, we aim to comprehensively summarize the current evidence regarding diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic role of AI in these common liver diseases.

Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

Background and Objectives: The development of liver fibrosis as a consequence of continuous inflammation represents a turning point in the evolution of chronic liver diseases. The recent developments of artificial intelligence (AI) applications show a high potential for improving the accuracy of diagnosis, involving large sets of clinical data. For this reason, the aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current AI applications and analyze the accuracy of these systems to perform an automated diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Materials and Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and WILEY databases using predefined keywords. Articles were screened for relevant publications about AI applications capable of diagnosing liver fibrosis. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, case reports, abstracts, letters to the editor, conference presentations, pediatric studies, studies written in languages other than English, and editorials. Results: Our search identified a total of 24 articles analyzing the automated imagistic diagnosis of liver fibrosis, out of which six studies analyze liver ultrasound images, seven studies analyze computer tomography images, five studies analyze magnetic resonance images, and six studies analyze liver biopsies. The studies included in our systematic review showed that AI-assisted non-invasive techniques performed as accurately as human experts in detecting and staging liver fibrosis. Nevertheless, the findings of these studies need to be confirmed through clinical trials to be implemented into clinical practice. Conclusions: The current systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of the performance of AI systems in diagnosing liver fibrosis. Automatic diagnosis, staging, and risk stratification for liver fibrosis is currently possible considering the accuracy of the AI systems, which can overcome the limitations of non-invasive diagnosis methods.

Radiomics nomograms based on R2* mapping and clinical biomarkers for staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of R2* mapping-based radiomics nomograms in staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2020, 151 patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomly divided into training (n = 103) and validation (n = 48) cohorts. From January to February 2021, 58 patients were included in a test cohort. Radiomics features were selected using the interclass correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Three radiomics nomograms, combining the radiomics score (Radscore) derived from R2* mapping and clinical variables, were used for staging significant and advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Performance of the model was evaluated using the AUC. The utility and clinical benefits were evaluated using the continuous net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The Radscore calculated by 12 radiomics features and independent factors (laminin and platelet) of advanced fibrosis were used to construct the radiomics nomograms. In the test cohort, the AUCs of the radiomics nomograms for staging significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.738 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.604-0.872), 0.879 (95% CI: 0.779-0.98), and 0.952 (95% CI: 0.878-1), respectively. NRI, IDI, and DCA confirmed that radiomics nomograms demonstrated varying degrees of clinical benefit and improvement for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, but not for significant fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics nomograms combined with R2* mapping-based Radscore, laminin, and platelet have value in staging advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis but limited value for staging significant fibrosis.

KEY POINTS

• Laminin and platelets were independent predictors of advanced fibrosis. • Radiomics analysis based on R2* mapping was beneficial for evaluating advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. • It was difficult to distinguish significant fibrosis using a radiomics nomogram, which is possibly due to the complex pathological microenvironment of chronic liver diseases.

Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Subcutaneous Melanoma

Simple Summary

The non-surgical treatment of cutaneous and/or subcutaneous melanoma lesions involves a multitude of local treatments, including radiotherapy. This is often used when other local methods fail, and there are currently no clear guidelines or evidence-based recommendations to support its use in this setting. This review, collecting the retrospective and prospective experiences on radiotherapy alone or in combination with other methods, aims to provide a scenario of the possible advantages and disadvantages related to its use in the treatment of skin/subcutaneous melanoma lesions.

Abstract

Malignant melanoma frequently develops cutaneous and/or subcutaneous metastases during the course of the disease. These may present as non-nodal locoregional metastases (microsatellite, satellite, or in-transit) included in stage III or as distant metastases in stage IV. Their presentation is heterogeneous and associated with significant morbidity resulting from both disease-related functional damage and treatment side effects. The standard treatment is surgical excision, whereas local therapies or systemic therapies have a role when surgery is not indicated. Radiotherapy can be used in the local management of ITM, subcutaneous relapses, or distant metastases to provide symptom relief and prolong regional disease control. To increase the local response without increasing toxicity, the addition of hyperthermia and intralesional therapies to radiotherapy appear to be very promising. Boron neutron capture therapy, based on nuclear neutron capture and boron isotope fission reaction, could be an alternative to standard treatments, but its use in clinical practice is still limited. The potential benefit of combining radiotherapy with targeted therapies and immunotherapy has yet to be explored in this lesion setting. This review explores the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions, its impact on outcomes, and its association with other treatment modalities.