1
|
Huang Y, Guo Y. Quality of life among people with eye cancer: a systematic review from 2012 to 2022. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:3. [PMID: 38185647 PMCID: PMC10773080 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02219-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eye cancer is a serious eye disease that threatens patients' lives. In the past decade, there have been more and more studies on eye cancer. From the recently published eye cancer literature review, it can be seen that the two most popular research hotspots are retinoblastoma (RB) and uveal melanoma (UM) [1, 2]. Although several studies have assessed QOL in different types of eye cancer patients, a study that synthesizes the factors influencing QOL in eye cancer patients is yet to be undertaken. This study aimed to review and evaluate the literature related to the QOL of RB and UM survivors, and provide a synthesis of the current evidence on the impact of the two types of eye cancer on the overall QOL of patients. METHODS Eight databases (APA Psych Articles, CINAHL Complete, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE Complete, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Registers (Clinicaltrials.gov.)) were searched between January 2012 and December 2022 for English, peer-reviewed quantitative original studies within this review. All publications were screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. The findings were summarised and tabulated accordingly. RESULTS Seventeen articles were analysed. Among them, 14 articles on patients with UM, and three articles on patients with RB using 18 different types of measurement tools were included. Eight researchers claimed that the overall QOL of patients with eye cancer was better than or similar to that of the general healthy population. However, nine studies indicated that these patients had poorer QOL than others. Many factors affect QOL, including treatment, sex, and age. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified the QOL levels and several factors that influence the QOL of ocular cancer patients worldwide, due to the variability in quality of the studies, it also showed the need for further research to assess factors affecting long-term QOL outcomes in RB and UM survivors. Simultaneously, it clarified the necessity and importance of developing standardized and complete assessment tools to compare QOL in different countries. Early interventions can be developed to improve the survivors' QOL by identifying potential deficits in specific areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghui Huang
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Eye Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China.
| | - Yunfei Guo
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Eye Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazzini C, Vicini G, Di Leo L, Massi D, Rizzo S, Giansanti F. Anatomical and Functional Outcomes after Endoresection and Adjuvant Ruthenium Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:902. [PMID: 37109431 PMCID: PMC10146230 DOI: 10.3390/life13040902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of endoresection and adjuvant ruthenium (Ru)-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma (UM). METHODS Retrospective case series of 15 UM patients (15 eyes) treated at our center (Careggi University Hospital, Florence). RESULTS Six patients (40%) were male and nine were female (60%). The mean age of patients at the time of treatment was 61.6 years (±19.41). The mean BCVA at baseline was 20/50. In all cases UM originated from the choroid. The mean tumor thickness at baseline was 7.14 mm (±2.05), and the mean largest basal diameter was 11.2 mm (±1.92). A concurrent retinal detachment was diagnosed in 11 patients (73.3%). Two patients (13.3%) showed vitreous seeding at baseline. Eleven patients (73.3%) were treated with primary endoresection, while four patients (26.7%) were treated with a "salvage endoresection" after primary treatment failure (previous radiation treatment). The mean follow-up time was 28.9 months (±10.6). Thirteen out of fifteen patients were alive and showed no evidence of local recurrence or distance metastasis at the last follow-up visit. The treatment achieved local control of the disease in 14 out of 15 cases (93.3%). In one case, the patient underwent enucleation for disease recurrence. The overall survival rate at the end of the follow-up was 93.3%. The mean BCVA at last follow-up visit was 20/40. Treatment was well tolerated, without significant complications. CONCLUSIONS Endoresection and adjuvant Ru-106 brachytherapy is a valuable conservative option for selected UM patients and can be used both as a primary treatment and as a salvage therapy. It can control melanoma and avoid enucleation, reduce radiation-related complications, and provide tumor tissue for chromosomal analysis and prognostic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Mazzini
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Vicini
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Di Leo
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Massi
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Stanislao Rizzo
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Giansanti
- Unit of Ocular Oncology, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Eye Clinic, Neuromuscular and Sense Organs Department, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Predictors of emotional distress in uveal melanoma survivors: a systematic review. Eye (Lond) 2022; 37:907-924. [PMID: 35941183 PMCID: PMC10049992 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02193-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) survivors can experience significant emotional distress, although the factors underpinning this are poorly understood. Systematic reviews of distress in UM only include cross-sectional studies, thereby limiting our understanding of causal factors. This review identified prospective clinical, demographic, social and psychological predictors of distress in UM survivors. A systematic search of the literature for English language prospective studies was conducted. Thirteen papers, reporting data from seven unique datasets were included in a narrative synthesis of the results. Younger age (3 studies from 3 datasets), physical health (including visual impairment, ocular symptoms, and other UM-related factors; 3 studies from 3 datasets), and psychological factors (mainly baseline distress; 3 studies from 3 datasets and worry about recurrence; 2 studies from 2 datasets), significantly predicted distress. There was no consistent evidence for other demographic, clinical or social variables (significant in <50% of datasets). Generally, the quality of the papers was adequate. However, attrition rates were high or not reported in over half of the included studies. The findings of this review emphasise the importance of attempts to prevent and recognise distress immediately post-diagnosis of UM. Particular focus should be given to younger patients, those with physical and psychological health difficulties at the time of diagnosis, and those who develop adverse treatment symptoms during survivorship. More research into potential social and psychological variables and their role in predicting distress in survivors is recommended.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gollrad J, Rabsahl C, Riechardt AI, Heufelder J, Stroux A, Goerling U, Joussen A, Budach V, Boehmer D. Quality of life and treatment-related burden during ocular proton therapy: a prospective trial of 131 patients with uveal melanoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:174. [PMID: 34496895 PMCID: PMC8425039 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01902-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton beam therapy is a well-established treatment option for patients with uveal melanoma (UM). The treatment procedure, in general, includes placing radiopaque clips to ensure exact eye-positioning during radiotherapy, followed by the delivery of proton irradiation. The short-term burden associated with proton therapy in patients with UM has rarely been addressed. In this prospective study, we investigated the physiological and psychological aspects of proton therapy that might affect the well-being of patients during the different stages of treatment. METHODS During the treatment procedure, we conducted longitudinal assessments of the Quality of life (QOL), organ-specific symptoms, and psychological aspects in patients with UM with three questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-OPT30, and GAD-7). Patients completed questionnaires before clip surgery (T0), before proton therapy (T1), after completing treatment (T2), and three months after treatment completion (T3). We also collected data on tumor characteristics and socio-demographics to identify potential risk factors associated with high treatment burdens. RESULTS We prospectively included 131 consecutive patients. Questionnaire data showed a significant, temporary decline in global QOL and an increase in eye-related symptoms, as a result of the clip surgery (T0-T1). After treatment completion (T2), global QOL improved gradually, and none of the eye-related symptoms significantly deteriorated over the course of proton therapy. The global QOL returned to baseline levels three months after treatment (T3). We identified baseline anxiety as an independent risk factor for experiencing an acute treatment-related burden. Furthermore, we found interactions between GAD7 and patient sex showing that anxiety had a more pronounced effect on QOL outcome in female patients. CONCLUSION The short-term treatment-related burden of ocular proton therapy appeared to be largely associated with the preceding clip surgery, rather than the irradiation procedure. We found that anxiety was strongly associated with experiencing QOL issues during the treatment procedure. Our findings could contribute to the development of future strategies for improving the treatment process and psycho-oncologic patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Gollrad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christopher Rabsahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Heufelder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Stroux
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Department of Psycho-Oncology, CCCC, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia Joussen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Boehmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clinical outcomes and secondary glaucoma after gamma-knife radiosurgery and Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: a single institution experience. Melanoma Res 2021; 31:38-48. [PMID: 32826711 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed data from records of 48 patients (48 eyes) treated with gamma-knife (n = 18) or Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy (n = 30) for uveal melanoma, in our Ocular Oncology Unit between December 2013 and September 2019, with the aim to evaluate treatment outcomes, and incidence and risk factors for secondary glaucoma. Patients demographics and tumor characteristics at diagnosis were recorded. Follow-up data were collected regarding local tumor control, treatment complications, enucleation need, metastases occurrence and survival status. The median follow-up period was 33.7 months in the gamma-knife group and 26.2 months in the brachytherapy group. The mean tumor thickness, the largest basal diameter and the tumor volume were significantly higher in the gamma-knife group than in the brachytherapy group. The local tumor control rate was 100% in the brachytherapy group and 77.8% in the gamma-knife group. In the gamma-knife group, six patients were enucleated, no patient treated with brachytherapy underwent enucleation. The overall survival rate was 96.7% in the brachytherapy group and 94.44% in the gamma-knife group. Secondary glaucoma occurred in 10 patients after gamma-knife and in one patient after brachytherapy: it should be emphasized that larger lesions were treated with gamma-knife, whereas smaller tumors were selected for brachytherapy. We found a significative correlation of tumor thickness (P value = 0.043) and volume (P value = 0.040) with secondary glaucoma occurrence after gamma-knife treatment. Moreover, secondary glaucoma significantly correlated with radiation retinopathy in the gamma-knife group (P value = 0.009). This study shows preliminary clinical results that could be useful for further studies with more patients and longer follow-up.
Collapse
|
6
|
Biltekin F, Yazici G. Dosimetric comparison and secondary malignancy risk estimation for linac-based and robotic stereotactic radiotherapy in uveal melanoma. Med Dosim 2021; 46:364-369. [PMID: 34011456 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
It was aimed to investigate the dosimetric differences among linac-based and robotic stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) techniques for the treatment of uveal melanoma and to evaluate secondary malignancy risks for these different SRT techniques. Ten patients who received robotic SRT with CyberKnife were retrospectively included in this study. A total dose of 54 Gy in three fractions was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). For each patient, non-coplanar micro-multileaf collimator based dynamic conformal arc (DCA), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and circular cone based DCA (cDCA) plans were generated. During the analysis dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, homogeneity index, new conformity index, the volume received more than or equal to 30% and 50% of the prescribed dose were compared. Additionally, secondary malignancy risk for each technique was estimated using the risk factors recommended by The International Commission on Radiological Protection. Robotic SRT plans provided a high degree of conformity within the PTV and better normal tissue sparing compared to linac-based treatment plans. However, dose distribution was more heterogeneous in robotic SRT plans than that in linac-based techniques. Estimated secondary malignancy risk was also found as 3.4%, 1.4%, 1.4% and 1.6% for robotic SRT and linac-based IMRT, DCA, cDCA plans, respectively. Treatment parameters of uveal melanoma patients planned with robotic SRT had superior conformity and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing compared with those planned with the linac-based system. However, estimated secondary malignancy risk was almost two-times higher in robotic SRT than that in linac-based techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatih Biltekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reichstein DA, Brock AL. Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2021; 32:183-190. [PMID: 33770014 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Radiation therapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of uveal melanoma. We intend to outline the current radiation therapy methods that are employed to treat uveal melanoma. We will outline their relative benefits over one another. We will also provide some background about radiation therapy in general to accustom the ophthalmologists likely reading this review. RECENT FINDINGS Four main options exist for radiation therapy of uveal melanoma. Because the eye is a small space, and because melanomas are relatively radioresistant, oncologists treating uveal melanoma must deliver highly focused doses in high amounts to a small space. Therapies incorporating external beams include proton beam therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Stereotactic radiosurgery comes in two forms, gamma knife therapy and cyberknife therapy. Radiation may also be placed directly on the eye surgically via plaque brachytherapy. All methods have been used effectively to treat uveal melanoma. SUMMARY Each particular radiotherapy technique employed to treat uveal melanoma has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The ocular oncologist can choose amongst these therapies based upon his or her clinical judgment of the relative risks and benefits. Availability of the therapy and cost to the patient remain significant factors in the ocular oncologist's choice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Klingenstein A, Samel C, Garip-Kuebler A, Priglinger SG, Foerster PI. Screening for Predictive Parameters Requiring Psycho-Oncological Intervention via the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer in the Follow-Up of Uveal Melanoma Patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:3813-3819. [PMID: 33204061 PMCID: PMC7665508 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s276848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To assess a profile of uveal melanoma patients at risk of requiring active psycho-oncological intervention by employing the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer. Methods Multivariate correlation and multiple linear regression analysis of data collected retrospectively from 106 consecutive patients suffering from uveal melanoma. Results Distress levels correlated with practical (p = 0.01), emotional (p = 0.003) and physical problems (p = 0.001) as well as the total number of issues reported (p < 0.001; ANOVA, respectively). Emotional issues added up to 39% of influence on distress levels. Nervousness, worry and sadness as the most important emotional issues tested correlated significantly with anatomic stage, tumor T-category, metastatic status and time after primary diagnosis and were present more frequently in patients with higher distress levels (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.004, respectively, Fisher’s exact test). Pre-existing psycho-oncological support was more frequent in metastatic patients and patients with higher anatomic stage tumors (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003; Fisher’s exact test). Conclusion The distress thermometer proved to be useful for rapid assessment of patients requiring active intervention. A higher number of distress items recorded correlated with elevated distress levels. Emotional issues were responsible for the majority of problems. A typical patient profile at risk of developing distress requiring close attention of caregivers includes high anatomic stage, high T-category, presence of metastases and early follow-up. Correct diagnosis and interpretation of distress-levels should help improve the quality of life of uveal melanoma survivors. Trial Registration Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Samel
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Paul I Foerster
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anchouche S, Liu J, Zaguia F, Nassrallah G, Deschênes J. Quality of life considerations in uveal melanoma patients: a systematic review. Can J Ophthalmol 2020; 55:413-423. [PMID: 32649871 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine the quality of life (QOL) outcomes of patients undergoing different uveal melanoma (UM) treatments and to appraise the literature on the topic. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS A systematic review was conducted to address the study objective. Patients undergoing UM treatment with or without metastasis were eligible for inclusion in this review. METHODS A literature search was performed using National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Embase, Ovid online, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. We included all English, original retrospective or prospective studies published between January 1998 to September 2019 in which the primary outcome was the QOL of patients with treated UM. RESULTS Our search strategy yielded 101 articles. Of these, 18 articles met all our inclusion criteria. The majority of included articles (61%) are cross-sectional studies. On average, each study employed 2 different QOL assessment tools. Overall, physical functioning and mental well-being are impaired in patients with UM after treatment compared with the general population. The severity of the impairment decreases as early as 3 months post-treatment; 8 of 12 studies comparing treatment options reported no statistical difference in physical functioning between treatments; 4 of 12 studies reported better visual function with radiation therapy compared with enucleation, 2 of which described no difference between the 2 options at long-term. Anxiety is more prevalent than depression, and both decrease to less than 10% at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Overall, there is no significant difference in long-term QOL in patients with UM from different treatment groups past 1-year follow-up. This work underscores the need for and importance of developing a standardized, complete assessment tool tailored to the challenges inherent to the diagnosis of UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Anchouche
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jiaru Liu
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fatma Zaguia
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Georges Nassrallah
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jean Deschênes
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Klingenstein A, Samel C, Garip‐Kuebler A, Miller C, Liegl RG, Priglinger SG, Foerster PI. The national comprehensive cancer network distress thermometer as a screening tool for the evaluation of quality of life in uveal melanoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol 2020; 98:e381-e387. [PMID: 31654488 DOI: 10.1111/aos.14277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess quality of life (QoL) status via the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer as a psychooncological screening tool in uveal melanoma patients. METHODS One hundred and six consecutive patients suffering from uveal melanoma completed the distress thermometer between 04/2018 and 12/2018. Practical, emotional, family concerned, spiritual, physical and overall distress levels, distribution of distress and subgroup analyses defining groups of potential high distress levels in need of intervention were assessed. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, chi-square and Fisher's exact test as well as correlation coefficients (Spearman's rho) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used for analysis. RESULTS Patients with higher T-category had significantly more emotional problems and spiritual concerns (p = 0.046 and p = 0.023, respectively). Female patients accounted for higher rates of physical issues (p = 0.034). Lower best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was correlated with higher distress levels (p = 0.037). Patients resulting in loss of BCVA of ≥3 lines reported higher distress levels (p = 0.029). A distress threshold of 5 on the basis of ROC analysis showed a corresponding sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSION The NCCN distress thermometer could be integrated well into our clinical routine and proved to be a rapid, yet sensible screening tool for emotional and physical distress in patients with uveal melanoma. Special attention should be paid to patients with higher T-category and patients resulting in lower levels of BCVA. As in patients with different tumour entities, the established distress threshold of ≥5 proposing intervention proved to be adequate for uveal melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Samel
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology Faculty of Medicine University of Cologne Cologne Germany
| | | | - Christina Miller
- Department of Ophthalmology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
| | - Raffael G. Liegl
- Department of Ophthalmology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
| | | | - Paul I. Foerster
- Department of Ophthalmology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lieb M, Tagay S, Breidenstein A, Hepp T, Le Guin CHD, Scheel J, Lohmann DR, Bornfeld N, Teufel M, Erim Y. Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in uveal melanoma patients: a controlled prospective clinical observational study. BMC Psychol 2020; 8:8. [PMID: 32005293 PMCID: PMC6995105 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-020-0371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of metastases in uveal melanoma can accurately be estimated through genetic analysis of the tumor. A growing number of patients decide to receive information on their prognosis, although this can be extremely burdensome. Studies on the psychosocial impact of testing are sparse. The objective of this study was to examine traits of patients opting for prognostication, to investigate its psychosocial impact and the use of psycho-oncological services over time. We further examined characteristics of patients utilizing these services and risk factors of prolonged psychological distress. DESIGN AND METHODS This study is a non-randomized controlled prospective clinical observational trial. Patients availing for prognostication formed the test group, while those who opted out constituted the observational group. The psychosocial impact of genetic testing was assessed with the following variables: resilience, social support, fear of tumor progression, depression, general distress, health-related quality of life, estimation of the perceived risk, and the utilization of psycho-oncological interventions. Data were assessed at five different time points over a period of 12 months. We applied binary logistic regression analysis, multiple linear regressions and a mixed model. RESULTS Of 175 patients, 63 decided to obtain prognostic information. Treatment method (enucleation > brachytherapy), lower social support and higher general distress could significantly predict patient's choice for prognostic testing. After result announcement, perceived risk of metastases was significantly increased in patients with poor prognosis, while it decreased in those with good prognosis. Overall, a significant decrease over time appeared concerning fear of progression, general distress, depression and anxiety. Mental quality of life increased over time. The utilization of psycho-oncological interventions increased significantly after prognostication; however, this was equivalent in the test and observational groups. Female sex, higher general distress and higher anxiety predicted greater use of psycho-oncological interventions. DISCUSSION Availing of prognostic testing is not associated with poorer subsequent psychological well-being. It rather may help to alleviate distress and promote a more realistic risk perception. However, psychological support should be available to all patients, independent of prognosis and treatment, especially considering that patients with low social support and high distress increasingly opt for prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marietta Lieb
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sefik Tagay
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Applied Social Sciences, University of Technology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Breidenstein
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Hepp
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claudia H. D. Le Guin
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jennifer Scheel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Center for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich- Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dietmar R. Lohmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Norbert Bornfeld
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Yesim Erim
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bazire L, Darmon I, Calugaru V, Costa É, Dumas JL, Kirova YM. [Technical aspects and indications of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:447-458. [PMID: 30064828 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy has developed considerably in recent years and is now an important part of the therapeutic alternatives to be offered to patients with cancer. It offers opportunities that have progressively led physicians to reconsider the therapeutic strategy, for example in the case of local recurrence in irradiated territory or oligometastatic disease. The literature on the subject is rich but, yet, there is no real consensus on therapeutic indications. This is largely due to the lack of prospective, randomized studies that have evaluated this technique with sufficient recoil. We propose a review of the literature on the technical aspects and indications of extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bazire
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - I Darmon
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - É Costa
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - J-L Dumas
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y M Kirova
- Département de radiothérapie oncologie, institut Curie, 25, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frenkel S, Rosenne H, Briscoe D, Hendler K, Bereket R, Molcho M, Pe'er J. Long-term uveal melanoma survivors: measuring their quality of life. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96:e421-e426. [PMID: 29369538 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with uveal melanoma (UM) undergo lifelong follow-up as metastases can occur more than 20 years after diagnosis. Little is known about the quality of life (QoL) of UM survivors over such an extended period. To investigate their QoL, we used various estimating factors. METHODS A cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for UM with regularly scheduled follow-up visits was asked to fill in a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire comprised of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OPT30 modules. An additional open question examined other changes in the patients' lifestyle since diagnosis. Independent demographic and medical data were collected from patient records. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-two of 294 patients agreed to complete the questionnaire. General QoL correlated highly with the eye-related QoL. Statistically significant higher QoL was associated with tumours not involving the ciliary body, and with better best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). A subgroup of 39% of the patients reported severe disability affecting eye-related tasks. Thirty-three per cent were highly concerned about various aspects of their future health. Patients who underwent enucleation reported lower eye-related QoL and described problems related to body image in response to the open question. CONCLUSION General QoL of UM patients is only slightly affected by their malignancy. However, body image and psychosocial adjustment are major issues involved in evaluating QoL. Continuous long-term psychosocial treatment is needed from the time of diagnosis in a subgroup of patients suffering from eye-related disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahar Frenkel
- Department of Ophthalmology; Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center; Jerusalem Israel
| | - Hadas Rosenne
- Department of Social Work; Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center; Jerusalem Israel
| | - Daniel Briscoe
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ha'emek Medical Center; Afula Israel
| | - Karen Hendler
- Department of Ophthalmology; Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center; Jerusalem Israel
| | - Ronen Bereket
- Department of Ophthalmology; Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center; Jerusalem Israel
| | - Michal Molcho
- National University of Ireland Galway; School of Health Sciences; Galway Ireland
| | - Jacob Pe'er
- Department of Ophthalmology; Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center; Jerusalem Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Siedlecki J, Reiterer V, Leicht S, Foerster P, Kortüm K, Schaller U, Priglinger S, Fuerweger C, Muacevic A, Eibl-Lindner K. Incidence of secondary glaucoma after treatment of uveal melanoma with robotic radiosurgery versus brachytherapy. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95:e734-e739. [PMID: 28387434 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Different modalities of radiation therapy nowadays allow for effective treatment of uveal melanoma combined with the advantage of eye preservation. However, this advantage can secondarily be impaired by radiation-related side effects. After local recurrence, secondary glaucoma (SG) has been described as second most frequent complication leading to need of enucleation. This study compares the incidence of SG after conventional Ruthenium (Ru)-106 brachytherapy (BT) versus CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery (RRS) which has been gaining importance lately as an efficient treatment option offering improved patient comfort. METHODS Medical records of all patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma in the Eye Clinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. A total of 268 eyes of 268 patients treated with Ru-106 BT or CyberKnife-RRS as monotherapy were entered in this retrospective cohort study. Incidence of SG was correlated with treatment modality and baseline tumour characteristics. RESULTS Fifty-three patients (19.8%) developed SG. At 5 years, SG was significantly more frequent after RRS (46.7%) than BT (11.1%); however, tumour thickness (maximum apical height) as a marker of tumour progress was more pronounced in the RRS group. Subgroup analysis of 178 patients for tumours amenable to both BT and RRS (thickness ≤6 mm) revealed comparable results at 3 years (RRS: 13.8 versus BT: 11.2%), but a trend towards increased incidence after RRS beyond year three. However, this difference was not significant at 5 years (28.2% versus 11.2%, p = 0.138). Tumour thickness was significantly associated with incidence of SG. CONCLUSION In tumours ≤6 mm thickness, RRS and BT seem to offer a comparable safety profile in terms of SG. Beyond year three, SG was tendentially, but not significantly more frequent after RRS. Increasing tumour thickness is associated with risk of SG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Siedlecki
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | - Veronika Reiterer
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | - Simon Leicht
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | - Paul Foerster
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | - Karsten Kortüm
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | - Ulrich Schaller
- Department of Ophthalmology; Ludwig Maximilians University; Munich Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mor JM, Semrau R, Baus W, Koch KR, Schaub F, Cursiefen C, Marnitz S, Heindl LM. [CyberKnife®: new treatment option for uveal melanoma]. Ophthalmologe 2017; 115:302-308. [PMID: 28849326 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0560-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CyberKnife® stereotactic radiosurgery is a new treatment option for uveal melanoma. OBJECTIVE This review outlines the technique of robot-assisted CyberKnife® therapy, as well as the pros and cons in the treatment of uveal melanoma. METHODS The study provides a PubMed literature review and own preliminary clinical experiences. RESULTS CyberKnife® therapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanomas shows comparable results concerning local tumor control and overall survival matching those of conventional therapies. With only low complication rates, a high level of quality of life can be conserved by possible preservation of visual acuity as well as the ocular globe. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery using CyberKnife® seems to be an efficient and safe therapeutic option for malignant melanomas affecting the choroid and ciliary body. Comparative studies with conventional radiation strategies are now a high priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Mor
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland
| | - R Semrau
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - W Baus
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - K R Koch
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland
| | - F Schaub
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland
| | - C Cursiefen
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland
| | - S Marnitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.,Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Köln-Bonn, Köln, Deutschland
| | - L M Heindl
- Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. .,Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO) Köln-Bonn, Köln, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Erim Y, Scheel J, Breidenstein A, Metz CH, Lohmann D, Friederich HC, Tagay S. Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in the care of uveal melanoma patients: protocol of a controlled prospective clinical observational study. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:408. [PMID: 27386847 PMCID: PMC4936050 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2479-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uveal melanoma patients with a poor prognosis can be detected through genetic analysis of the tumor, which has a very high sensitivity. A large number of patients with uveal melanoma decide to receive information about their individual risk and therefore routine prognostic genetic testing is being carried out on a growing number of patients. It is obvious that a positive prediction for recidivism in the future will emotionally burden the respective patients, but research on the psychosocial impact of this innovative method is lacking. The aim of the current study is therefore to investigate the psychosocial impact (psychological distress and quality of life) of prognostic genetic testing in patients with uveal melanoma. Design and methods This study is a non-randomized controlled prospective clinical observational trial. Subjects are patients with uveal melanoma, in whom genetic testing is possible. Patients who consent to genetic testing are allocated to the intervention group and patients who refuse genetic testing form the observational group. Both groups receive cancer therapy and psycho-oncological intervention when needed. The psychosocial impact of prognostic testing is investigated with the following variables: resilience, social support, fear of tumor progression, depression, general distress, cancer-specific and general health-related quality of life, attitude towards genetic testing, estimation of the perceived risk of metastasis, utilization and satisfaction with psycho-oncological crisis intervention, and sociodemographic data. Data are assessed preoperatively (at initial admission in the clinic) and postoperatively (at discharge from hospital after surgery, 6–12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after initial admission). Genetic test results are communicated 6–12 weeks after initial admission to the clinic. Discussion We created optimal conditions for investigation of the psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing. This study will provide information on the course of disease and psychosocial outcomes after prognostic genetic testing. We expect that empirical data from our study will give a scientific basis for medico-ethical considerations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2479-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesim Erim
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jennifer Scheel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Anja Breidenstein
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr.174, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Claudia Hd Metz
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Dietmar Lohmann
- Department of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Hans-Christoph Friederich
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr.174, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Sefik Tagay
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Virchowstr.174, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eibl-Lindner K, Fürweger C, Nentwich M, Foerster P, Wowra B, Schaller U, Muacevic A. Robotic radiosurgery for the treatment of medium and large uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res 2016; 26:51-7. [DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
18
|
Klingenstein A, Fürweger C, Mühlhofer AK, Leicht SF, Schaller UC, Muacevic A, Wowra B, Hintschich C, Eibl KH. Quality of life in the follow-up of uveal melanoma patients after enucleation in comparison to CyberKnife treatment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 254:1005-12. [PMID: 26573389 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3216-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Revised: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare quality of life (QoL) in patients with uveal melanoma after enucleation and stereotactic radiosurgery to that in an age-matched patient collective. METHODS QoL was assessed in a cross-sectional survey and compared among 32 uveal melanoma patients after enucleation, 48 patients after stereotactic radiosurgery (CyberKnife(®); Accuray(®) Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and an age-matched control group of 35 patients, using the SF-12 Health Survey. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, one-way ANOVA analysis, Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney test), and ordered logistic regression for multivariate analysis. RESULTS There was no significant difference in QoL between patients treated by stereotactic radiosurgery and the age-matched control group. After enucleation, patients presented significantly lower values in Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Role Emotional (RE) compared to the radiosurgery and control group. To control for the overall QoL lowering effect of visual loss, the QoL of the patients who underwent enucleation was compared with the QoL of patients suffering severe functional loss after CyberKnife radiosurgery in a subgroup analysis, which showed no statistically significant difference. The number of comorbidities had a significant impact on QoL in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Superior performance in PF, RP, and RE suggests that CyberKnife represents a suitable first-line therapy for uveal melanoma. In cases with painful amaurosis or vast tumor recurrence, enucleation can be performed with an acceptable QoL outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Klingenstein
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
| | - C Fürweger
- European CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany
| | - A K Mühlhofer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany
| | - S F Leicht
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany
| | - U C Schaller
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany
| | - A Muacevic
- European CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany
| | - B Wowra
- European CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany
| | - C Hintschich
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany
| | - K H Eibl
- Department of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Francis JH, Abramson DH. Update on Ophthalmic Oncology 2013: Retinoblastoma and Uveal Melanoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2014; 3:241-56. [PMID: 26107765 DOI: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to discuss the clinical and translational content of the literature as well as advancement in our knowledge pertaining to retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma that were published from January to December 2013. DESIGN This study is a literature review. METHODS The search terms retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma were used in a MEDLINE literature search. Abstracts were studied, and the most relevant articles were selected for inclusion and further in-depth review. RESULTS In retinoblastoma, fewer eyes are lost because of the expanded use of ophthalmic artery chemosurgery and intravitreal melphalan, and the past year marks a deepening in our understanding of these modalities. Knowledge on the genetic underpinnings of uveal melanoma has broadened to include genes associated with a favorable prognosis. This is accompanied by promising results in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. CONCLUSIONS This past year, there were important advancements in our knowledge of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine H Francis
- From the Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|