Multiple primary melanomas versus single melanoma of the head and neck: a comparison of genetic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications

CD117 immunoexpression in oral and sinonasal mucosal melanoma does not correlate with somatic driver mutations in the MAPK pathway

BACKGROUND

Mutations on KIT and downstream genes of MAPK pathway that overstimulate cellular proliferation have been associated with primary oral and sinonasal melanomas (POSNM), but there is limited information that allows the use of personalized therapy. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine a possible association between the C-KIT immunohistochemical expression with the presence of somatic driver mutations in NRAS, BRAF, KIT, MITF and PTEN on POSNM.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 62 tumour samples of an oncological reference centre in Mexico City (17-year period). Immunohistochemistry stain of C-KIT was carried out. Genomic DNA was obtained and used to assess hotspot mutations of KIT, NRAS, BRAF, MITF and PTEN through qPCR. Chi-square, Fisher's exact and the Mann-Whitney U tests were applied when necessary. The significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Sixty-two cases were included, 74% were positive for C-KIT immunoexpression, all exhibited moderate/strong intensity. Ten (16.1%) samples harboured at least one mutation, 6.4% and 6.6% for NRAS^{Q 61R} and BRAF^{V 600E} , respectively, followed by KIT^K624E (3.2%). No KIT^{L 576P} , MITF or PTEN mutations were identified. No significant correlation was observed between mutations and immunostaining (rs = -0.057, P = 0.765).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the high immunoexpression of C-KIT, there was no association with the MAPK mutations among POSNM samples. Thus, C-KIT immunohistochemistry is not a reliable tool to detect POSNM candidates for biological therapy.

Frequency and characteristics of familial melanoma in Spain: the FAM-GEM-1 Study

INTRODUCTION

Familial history of melanoma is a well-known risk factor for the disease, and 7% melanoma patients were reported to have a family history of melanoma. Data relating to the frequency and clinical and pathological characteristics of both familial and non-familial melanoma in Spain have been published, but these only include patients from specific areas of Spain and do not represent the data for the whole of Spain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational study conducted by the Spanish Group of Melanoma (GEM) analyzed the family history of patients diagnosed with melanoma between 2011 and 2013 in the dermatology and oncology departments.

RESULTS

In all, 1047 patients were analyzed, and 69 (6.6%) fulfilled criteria for classical familial melanoma (two or more first-degree relatives diagnosed with melanoma). Taking into account other risk factors for familial melanoma, such as multiple melanoma, pancreatic cancer in the family or second-degree relatives with melanoma, the number of patients fulfilling the criteria increased to 165 (15.8%). Using a univariate analysis, we determined that a Breslow index of less than 1 mm, negative mitosis, multiple melanoma, and a history of sunburns in childhood were more frequent in familial melanoma patients, but a multivariate analysis revealed no differences in any pathological or clinical factor between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to that observed in other countries, familial melanoma accounts for 6.6% of melanoma diagnoses in Spain. Although no differences in the multivariate analysis were found, some better prognosis factors, such as Breslow index, seem more frequent in familial melanoma, which reflect a better early detection marker and/or a different biological behavior.