Metastatic area ratio can help predict nonsentinel node positivity in melanoma patients

Investigation of prognostic factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous malignant melanoma: Experience from a reference centre in Turkey

BACKGROUND

In the light of the results of recent randomised controlled trials regarding the role of nodal observation and completion lymph node dissection (CLND), studies from different populations are needed. The aim of our study was to present our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and CLND and the clinical and histopathological factors associated with a positive non-sentinel node.

METHODS

In this single-centre, retrospective study, we reviewed histopathological reports of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB and CLND over a period of 7 years. The primary outcomes were the positivity rates of SLNBs and CLNDs. Secondary outcomes were metastatic tumour burden in positive sentinel nodes and presence of perinodal invasion.

RESULTS

Among the 110 participants who underwent SLNB (53 females, 57 males), the mean Breslow thickness of the primary tumour was 4.1 (0.3-41) mm. Ulceration appeared in 62.7% of lesions. The SLNBs were positive in 38 patients (34.5%), with 35 (92.1%) undergoing CLND, among which 9 (25.7%) showed metaNBstasis. Positive SLNB was linked to a higher Breslow thickness (p = 0.022), whereas CLND results lacked such an association (p = 0.76). Perinodal invasion (p = 0.006) and sentinel lymph node metastasis exceeding 1 mm (p = 0.017) was associated with a higher probability of non-sentinel node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

To adapt the results of the new cohort study on SLNB and melanoma to different populations, studies with different patient groups highlighting the problems and suggested solutions are needed.

Sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma: current state and future directions

Assessment of sentinel lymph node status is an important step in the evaluation of patients with melanoma for both prognosis and therapeutic management. Pathologists have an important role in this evaluation. The methodologies have varied over time, from the evaluation of dimensions of metastatic burden to determination of the location of the tumour deposits within the lymph node to precise cell counting. However, no single method of sentinel lymph node tumour burden measurement can currently be used as a sole independent predictor of prognosis. The management approach to sentinel lymph node-positive patients has also evolved over time, with a more conservative approach recently recognised for selected cases. This review gives an overview of past and current status in the field with a glimpse into future directions based on prior experiences and clinical trials.

The efficacy of 99mTc-rituximab as a tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma patients

Background

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is a vital prognostic factor for malignant melanoma (MM) patients. There is increasing evidence that a radioactive agent, rather than its combination with blue dye, is sufficient for a SLN biopsy (SLNB). Thus, we discussed the efficacy of ^99mTc-rituximab as a tracer in MM patients.

Methods

A total of 502 consecutive patients with MM who underwent SLNB were enrolled in this study. All participants were peritumorally injected with ^99mTc-rituximab before imaging, and scanned with single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) to detect the number and location of the SLN. A gamma detection probe was employed to detect radioactive SLNs in operation. Follow up was conducted to observe whether nodal or distant recurrence occurred.

Results

The SLNs were successfully imaged via SPECT-CT and harvested from all 502 participants. No drainage tube was indwelled and 32 (6.3%) participants experienced the following complications: seroma (n=26, 5.2%), wound infections or lymphangitis (n=6, 1.2%), sensory nerve injuries (n=4, 0.8%). There were 380 patients who were diagnosed as SLN-negative and 122 (24.2%) were SLN-positive. A total of 85 SLN-positive patients received complete lymph node dissection, and 28 (32.9%) had additional positive lymph nodes. During a median follow-up of 24 months, 28 participants were found to have a false negative (FN) SLN. The FN rate was 18.7%. A higher T stage was a predictive factor for FN [odds ratio (OR) 1.77; P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the positive or FN rate between the acral and cutaneous groups.

Conclusions

The radiopharmaceutical ^99mTc-rituximab could be employed as a simple and safe tracer in acral and cutaneous melanoma SLN biopsies.

Predictors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is not routinely performed for a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) anymore, adjuvant therapy depends on the risk factors available from SLN biopsy, including the risk of nonsentinel node metastases (NSNM). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in an attempt to identify risk factors that could be used to predict the risk of NSNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for articles discussing predictive factors for NSNM. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and RevMan software was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

Fifty publications were suitable for additional analysis. The clinical and primary tumor factors that were consistently identified as risk factors for NSNMs were: age >50, T stage 3 or 4, Clark level IV/V, ulceration, microsatellitosis, lymphovascular invasion, nodular histology, and extremity versus trunk primary tumor location. SLN factors that predicted NSNMs were >1 positive SLN, SLN micrometastatic tumor burden, diameter >2 mm, extracapsular extension, nonsubcapsular location (Dewar), and Rotterdam > 1 mm or ≥ 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this study support that many clinical and pathologic risk factors that can be assessed with SLN biopsy alone can be used to predict the risk of NSNMs. The factors identified in this review should be evaluated in clinical prediction models to predict the risk of NSNMS, a prediction that may be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma.