1
|
Bliley R, Avant A, Medina TM, Lanning RM. Radiation and Melanoma: Where Are We Now? Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:904-914. [PMID: 38822928 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01557-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes the current role of radiotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma in the definitive, adjuvant, and palliative settings, and combinations with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. RECENT FINDINGS Definitive radiotherapy may be considered for lentigo maligna if surgery would be disfiguring. High risk, resected melanoma may be treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, but the role is poorly defined since the advent of effective systemic therapies. For patients with metastatic disease, immunotherapy and targeted therapies can be delivered safely in tandem with radiotherapy to improve outcomes. Radiotherapy and modern systemic therapies act in concert to improve outcomes, especially in the metastatic setting. Further prospective data is needed to guide the use of definitive radiotherapy for lentigo maligna and adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk melanoma in the immunotherapy era. Current evidence does not support an abscopal response or at least identify the conditions necessary to reliably produce one with combinations of radiation and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Bliley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Adam Avant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Theresa M Medina
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ryan M Lanning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheraghlou S, Pahalyants V, Jairath NK, Doudican NA, Carucci JA. High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316:86. [PMID: 38349538 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02817-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine skin cancer with a high rate of mortality. While still relatively rare, the incidence of MCC has been rapidly rising in the US and around the world. Since 2017, two immunotherapeutic drugs, avelumab and pembrolizumab, have been FDA-approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC and have revolutionized outcomes for MCC. However, real-world outcomes can differ from clinical trial data, and the adoption of novel therapeutics can be gradual. We aimed to characterize the treatment practices and outcomes of patients with metastatic MCC across the US. A retrospective cohort study of adult cases of MCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019 was performed. Multivariable logistic regressions to determine the association of a variety of patient, tumor, and system factors with likelihood of receipt of systemic therapies were performed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox survival regressions were performed. We identified 1017 cases of metastatic MCC. From 2017 to 2019, 54.2% of patients received immunotherapy. This increased from 45.1% in 2017 to 63.0% in 2019. High-volume centers were significantly more likely to use immunotherapy (odds ratio 3.235, p = 0.002). On univariate analysis, patients receiving systemic immunotherapy had significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 47.2% (standard error [SE] 1.8%), 21.8% (SE 1.5%), and 16.5% (SE 1.4%), respectively, for patients who did not receive immunotherapy versus 62.7% (SE 3.5%), 34.4% (SE 3.9%), and 23.6% (SE 4.4%), respectively, for those who did (Fig. 1). In our multivariable survival regression, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with an approximately 35% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.665, p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.548-0.808). Our results demonstrate that the real-world survival advantage of immunotherapy for metastatic MCC is similar to clinical trial data. However, many patients with metastatic disease did not receive this guideline-recommended therapy in our most recent study year, and use of immunotherapy is higher at high-volume centers. This suggests that regionalization of care to high-volume centers or dissemination of their practices, may ultimately improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vartan Pahalyants
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil K Jairath
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole A Doudican
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - John A Carucci
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- NYU Dermatologic Surgical Associates, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cai S, Li W, Deng C, Tang Q, Zhou Z. Predicting cutaneous malignant melanoma patients' survival using deep learning: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17103-17113. [PMID: 37755576 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) has the worst prognosis among skin cancers, especially metastatic CMM. Predicting its prognosis accurately could direct clinical decisions. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was screened to collect CMM patients' data. According to diagnosed time, patients were subdivided into three cohorts, train cohort (diagnosed between 2010 and 2013), validation cohort (diagnosed in 2014), and test cohort (diagnosed in 2015). Train cohort was used to train deep learning survival model for cutaneous malignant melanoma (DeepCMM). DeepCMM was then evaluated in train cohort and validation cohort internally, and validated in test cohort externally. RESULTS DeepCMM showed 0.8270 (95% CI, confidence interval, CI 0.8260-0.8280) as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in train cohort, 0.8274 (95% CI 0.8286-0.8298) AUC in validation cohort, and 0.8303 (95% CI 0.8289-0.8316) AUC in test cohort. Then DeepCMM was packaged into a Windows 64-bit software for doctors to use. CONCLUSION Deep learning survival model for cutaneous malignant melanoma (DeepCMM) can offer a reliable prediction on cutaneous malignant melanoma patients' overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Cai
- Dermatology Department, General Hospital of Western Theater Command PLA, No. 270, Rongdu Avenue, Chengdu, 610083, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Li
- Cancer Research Center, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, No. 9 Beiguan Street, Tongzhou District, Beijing, 101149, China
| | - Cong Deng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, General Hospital of Western Theater Command, No. 270 Rongdu Avenue, Chengdu, 610083, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiao Tang
- Dermatology Department, Medical Center Hospital of Qionglai City, No. 172 Xinglin Road, Qionglai City, Chengdu, 611500, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhou Zhou
- Dermatology Department, General Hospital of Western Theater Command PLA, No. 270, Rongdu Avenue, Chengdu, 610083, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheraghlou S, Doudican NA, Criscito MC, Stevenson ML, Carucci JA. Defining and quantifying histopathologic risk factors for regional and distant metastases in a large cohort of vulvar squamous cell carcinomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89:1022-1030. [PMID: 37054818 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (vSCC) is a rare tumor with a good prognosis when treated at a localized stage. However, once regional/distant metastasis occurs, vSCC can be rapidly fatal. Thus, it is important to identify tumor prognostic features so that high-risk cases can be prioritized for further diagnostic workup and treatment. OBJECTIVE To estimate the risk of regional/distant metastasis at presentation and sentinel lymph node status for vSCC based on histopathologic characteristics. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of 15,188 adult vSCC cases from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2012 to 2019. RESULTS We provide specific estimates of the risk of clinically positive nodes and metastatic disease at presentation and sentinel lymph node positivity according to tumor size, moderate/poor tumor differentiation, and lymph-vascular invasion. These histopathologic factors were all significantly associated with the tested clinical outcomes in a multivariable analysis. Moderate (hazard ratio, 1.190; P < .001) and poor differentiation (hazard ratio, 1.204; P < .001) and lymph-vascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.465; P < .001) were also associated with significantly poorer overall survival. LIMITATIONS Data on disease-specific survival not available in the data set. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate the association of the histopathologic characteristics of vSCC with clinically important outcomes. These data may provide individualized information when discussing diagnostic/treatment recommendations, particularly regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy. These data may also guide future staging and risk stratification efforts for vSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Nicole A Doudican
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Maressa C Criscito
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Mary L Stevenson
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - John A Carucci
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cheraghlou S, Doudican NA, Criscito MC, Stevenson ML, Carucci JA. Overall Survival After Mohs Surgery for Early-Stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:1068-1075. [PMID: 37610773 PMCID: PMC10448369 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.2822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignant neoplasm with increasing incidence and high mortality. Although it is accepted that the optimal treatment for localized tumors is surgical, the data surrounding the optimal surgical approach are mixed, and current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines state that Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE) can both be used. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines do not advocate a preference for MMS or WLE and suggest that they can be used interchangeably. Objective To evaluate the association of surgical approach with overall survival after excision of localized T1/T2 MCC. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database to assess adults with T1/T2 MCC who were diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, with pathologically confirmed, negative regional lymph nodes and treated with surgery. The National Cancer Database includes all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to May 2023. Exposure Surgical approach. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results A total of 2313 patients (mean [SD] age, 71 [10.6] years; 1340 [57.9%] male) were included in the study. Excision with MMS had the best unadjusted survival, with mean (SE) survival rates of 87.4% (3.4%) at 3 years, 84.5% (3.9%) at 5 years, and 81.8% (4.6%) at 10 years vs 86.1% (0.9%) at 3 years, 76.9% (1.2%) at 5 years, and 60.9% (2.0%) at 10 years for patients treated with WLE. Patients treated with narrow-margin excision had similar survival as those treated with WLE, with mean (SE) survival rates of 84.8% (1.4%) at 3 years, 78.3% (1.7%) at 5 years, and 60.8% (3.6%) at 10 years. On multivariable survival analysis, excision with MMS was associated with significantly improved survival compared with WLE (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P = .04). High-volume MCC centers were significantly more likely to use MMS over WLE compared with other centers (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.63-2.44; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, the use of MMS (compared with WLE) was associated with significantly improved survival for patients with localized MCC with pathologically confirmed negative lymph nodes treated with surgery. These data suggest that Mohs surgery may provide a more effective treatment for MCC primary tumors than conventional WLE, although the lack of randomization and potential for selection bias in this study highlight the need for future prospective work evaluating this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Nicole A. Doudican
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Maressa C. Criscito
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - Mary L. Stevenson
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| | - John A. Carucci
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheraghlou S, Doudican NA, Criscito MC, Stevenson ML, Carucci JA. Evaluating Rates of Positive Margins After Standard Excision of Cutaneous Adnexal Malignancies. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:907-913. [PMID: 37768201 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is recommended to excise adnexal neoplasms with standard local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), although many occur on high-risk sites such as the head and neck (H&N) and exhibit subclinical extension. Minimal evidence exists on the efficacy of standard excisions for these tumors. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rate of positive surgical margins after standard excision of adnexal tumors. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of cutaneous adnexal malignancies from the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. RESULTS The authors identified a total of 4,402 cases treated with standard excision. Tumors on the H&N were approximately twice as likely as those on the trunk and extremities (T&E) to be excised with positive margins (odds ratio 2.146, p < .001), with the highest estimated rate for eccrine adenocarcinoma (12.1%, SE: 2.3%). The subtype with the highest positive margin rate on the T&E was microcystic adnexal carcinoma (8.0%, SE: 2.9). Positive margins were associated with poorer overall survival on multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio 1.299, p = .015). CONCLUSION The authors present subtype- and site-specific positive margin rates for adnexal tumors treated with standard excision, which suggest that tumors on the H&N and some T&E subtypes, should be considered for MMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- All authors are affiliated with the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leong TW, McCook G, Frampton CM, Robinson BA, James ML. Adjuvant nodal field radiation in resected Stage III melanoma: A single-centre retrospective study in Christchurch, New Zealand. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:1003-1013. [PMID: 35642730 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stage III melanoma is associated with poor outcomes. We studied the characteristics and outcomes of patients with resected Stage III melanoma before the routine use of adjuvant immunotherapy. Some of these patients received adjuvant nodal radiation with modern radiation techniques. METHODS We retrieved data of patients with resected Stage III melanoma treated in Christchurch over 10 years. Overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and nodal recurrence-free rate (NRFR) were determined, and the association of these outcomes with tumour and treatment factors was investigated. RESULTS We identified 178 patients (110 male and 68 female), of whom 61 received adjuvant radiation. The median age was 66.6 years, and the median follow-up was 2.7 years. First recurrences occurred in 108 (61%) patients. There were 42 (24%) nodal field relapses and 103 (58%) distant relapses. One-half of nodal relapses in patients treated with adjuvant radiation were infield. The 5-year OS, RFS, MSS and NRFR were 46.4%, 26.8%, 53.7% and 69.6%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved RFS and no OS benefit. T4 disease and extranodal spread were associated with poorer OS, while extranodal spread and >3 involved nodes were associated with worse RFS. CONCLUSION Patients treated with adjuvant radiation remain at moderate risk of regional and high risk of distant relapse, despite the use of modern radiation techniques. Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved local control but infield recurrence rates remained a problem. The role of combined adjuvant radiation and immunotherapy in improving these outcomes requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Weng Leong
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - George McCook
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Bridget A Robinson
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Melissa L James
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Microbeam Radiation Therapy controls local growth of radioresistant melanoma and treats out-of-field locoregional metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:478-493. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
9
|
Drescher NR, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Shaw CM, Dziegielewski PT, Mendenhall WM. Postoperative Radiotherapy for Cutaneous Melanoma in Patients at High Risk of Local-Regional Recurrence after Surgery Alone. Cancer Invest 2022; 40:348-353. [PMID: 35100059 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2033986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated outcomes in 131 patients with cutaneous melanoma (median follow-up, 3.6 years) considered at high risk of recurrence after surgery alone treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Eligible patients had one or more of the following: recurrence after surgery, positive lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, incomplete regional node dissection, microscopically positive margins, gross residual disease, or in-transit metastases. 102 patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy and 29 had conventional fractionation. 10-year outcomes were: in-field local-regional control, 87%; local regional control, 72%; distant metastasis-free survival, 48%; cause-specific survival, 44%; and overall survival, 31%. Three patients experienced acute toxicities while 6 experienced late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette R Drescher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert J Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christiana M Shaw
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter T Dziegielewski
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wolfe AR, Chablani P, Siedow MR, Miller ED, Walston S, Kendra KL, Wuthrick E, Williams TM. BRAF mutation correlates with worse local-regional control following radiation therapy in patients with stage III melanoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:181. [PMID: 34537078 PMCID: PMC8449455 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01903-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with stage III melanoma, the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after lymph node dissection (LND) may be currently considered in selected high-risk patients to improve tumor control. Melanomas harbor BRAF mutations (BRAF+) in 40–50% of cases, the majority of which are on the V600E residue. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes after RT between patients with BRAF+ and BRAF− melanoma. Methods This was a retrospective review of 105 Stage III melanoma patients treated at our institution with LND followed by adjuvant RT from 2006 to 2019. BRAF mutational status was determined on the primary skin or nodal tissue samples from all patients. We compared characteristics of the BRAF+ and BRAF− groups using Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test and performed univariate and multivariate analysis using Kaplan–Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards modeling with the clinical outcomes of local–regional lymph node control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Fifty-three (50%) patients harbored a BRAF mutation (92%, pV600E). BRAF+ patients were younger and had primary tumors more commonly found in the trunk vs head and neck compared to BRAF- patients (p < 0.05). The 5 year local–regional control in the BRAF + patients was 60% compared to 81% in the BRAF- patients (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3–15.5, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in 5-year DMFS, RFS, and OS rates between the two BRAF patient groups. The presence of 4 or more positive LNs remained a significant prognostic factor for local–regional lymph node control, RFS, and OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Stage III melanoma patients with BRAF mutation treated with adjuvant RT had > 4 times increased risk of local recurrence or regional lymph node recurrence. These results could be useful for adjuvant RT consideration in lymph node positive melanoma patients and supports other data that BRAF mutation confers radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R Wolfe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, The Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Priyanka Chablani
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael R Siedow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Steve Walston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kari L Kendra
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Evan Wuthrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheraghlou S, Christensen SR, Leffell DJ, Girardi M. Association of Treatment Facility Characteristics With Overall Survival After Mohs Micrographic Surgery for T1a-T2a Invasive Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:531-539. [PMID: 33787836 PMCID: PMC8014201 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance Early-stage melanoma, among the most common cancers in the US, is typically treated with wide local excision. However, recent advances in immunohistochemistry have led to an increasing number of these cases being excised via Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Although studies of resections for other cancers have reported that facility-level factors are associated with patient outcomes, it is not yet established how these factors may affect outcomes for patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Objective To evaluate the association of treatment center academic affiliation and case volume with long-term patient survival after MMS for T1a-T2a invasive melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants In a retrospective cohort study, 4062 adults with nonmetastatic, T1a-T2a melanoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 and treated with MMS in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were identified. The NCDB includes all reportable cases from Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities and is estimated to capture approximately 50% of all incident melanomas in the US. Multivariable survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Data analysis was conducted from February 27 to August 18, 2020. Exposures Treatment facility characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results The study population included 4062 patients (2213 [54.5%] men; median [SD] age, 60 [16.3] years) treated at 462 centers. Sixty-two centers were top decile-volume facilities (TDVFs), which treated 1757 patients (61.9%). Most TDVFs were academic institutions (37 of 62 [59.7%]). On multivariable analysis, treatment at an academic center was associated with a nearly 30% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio, 0.730; 95% CI, 0.596-0.895). In a separate analysis, treatment at TDVFs was also associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.648-0.977). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, treatment of patients with T1a-T2a invasive melanoma excised with MMS at academic and top decile-volume (≥8 cases per year) facilities was associated with improved long-term survival compared with those excised by MMS at nonacademic and low-volume facilities. Identification and protocolization of the practices of these facilities may help to reduce survival differences between centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - David J. Leffell
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael Girardi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang D, Xu T, Zhu H, Dong J, Fu L. Primary malignant melanomas of the female lower genital tract: clinicopathological characteristics and management. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:4017-4037. [PMID: 33414983 PMCID: PMC7783736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The female lower genital tract melanomas mainly include vulvar, vaginal and cervical melanoma. There is little clinical data on the melanomas thus making them highly lethal with their prognosis being worse than for cutaneous melanoma and other gynecological malignancies. Surgery is still the primary treatment for gynecological melanomas with wide local resection (WLE) of tumors with adequate margins being preferred for early-stage vulvar melanoma while complete resection of the primary tumor is the standard treatment for early-stage cervical and vaginal melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy seems to avoid unnecessary complete regional lymphadenectomy. However, it should be chosen cautiously. Recently discovered molecular changes have provided new hopes for effective systemic treatment of female genital tract melanomas. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis and clinicopathological characteristics of these rare melanomas with particular emphasis on new therapies and clinical management methods that may affect prognosis. The review aims to provide a viable direction for clinicians to diagnose and treat female lower genital tract melanomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Tianmin Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - He Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| | - Junxue Dong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection BiologyBerlin, Germany
| | - Li Fu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchun, Jilin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goepfert RP, Myers JN, Gershenwald JE. Updates in the evidence-based management of cutaneous melanoma. Head Neck 2020; 42:3396-3404. [PMID: 33463835 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of cutaneous melanoma is changing with significant developments over the past several years that promise to reshape the field of melanoma surgical oncology. Modifications to the staging system based on analysis of a large international dataset, the timing and extent of regional lymphadenectomy, the emergence of effective systemic therapies in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, and the role of adjuvant radiation are all undergoing a data-driven evolution. Surgeon engagement in multidisciplinary decision making remains an essential component of contemporary management for patients across all stages of melanoma and demands specific involvement of head and neck surgical oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Department of Melanoma Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chowdhary M, Chowdhary A, Sen N, Zaorsky NG, Patel KR, Wang D. Does the addition of chemotherapy to neoadjuvant radiotherapy impact survival in high-risk extremity/trunk soft-tissue sarcoma? Cancer 2019; 125:3801-3809. [PMID: 31490546 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of chemotherapy in extremity/trunk soft-tissue sarcoma (ET-STS) is controversial, even for patients at high risk for distant recurrence and death (those with high-grade tumors ≥5 cm in size). This study examines the impact of integrating chemotherapy with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival (OS) for patients with high-risk ET-STS. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for adult patients with high-risk ET-STS who received neoadjuvant RT and limb salvage surgery between 2006 and 2014. Patients were stratified into RT and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) cohorts. OS for the RT and CRT cohorts was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to account for a potential treatment selection bias between the cohorts. RESULTS A total of 884 patients were identified: 639 (72.3%) in the RT cohort and 245 (27.7%) in the CRT cohort. The unadjusted 5-year Kaplan-Meier OS rate was significantly higher in the CRT cohort: 72.0% versus 56.1% (P < .001). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in univariate and multivariable analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.78; P < .001). PSM identified 2 evenly matched cohorts of 212 patients each. The 5-year matched Kaplan-Meier OS rates were 69.8% and 55.4% for the CRT and RT cohorts, respectively (P = .002). The addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained prognostic for OS on PSM (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS The addition of chemotherapy to neoadjuvant RT was associated with improved OS for patients with high-risk ET-STS. In the absence of randomized data evaluating CRT versus RT, these findings warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Akansha Chowdhary
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Neilayan Sen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hersey, Pennsylvania
| | - Kirtesh R Patel
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Immortal Time Bias in National Cancer Database Studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 106:5-12. [PMID: 31404580 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In studies evaluating the benefit of adjuvant therapies, immortal time bias (ITB) can affect the results by incorrectly reporting a survival advantage. It does so by including all deceased patients who may have been planned to receive adjuvant therapy within the observation cohort. Given the increase in National Cancer Database (NCDB) analyses evaluating postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) as an adjuvant therapy, we sought to examine how often such studies accounted and adjusted for ITB. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic review was undertaken to search MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2014 until May 2019 for NCDB studies evaluating PORT. After appropriate exclusion criteria were applied, 60 peer-reviewed manuscripts in which PORT was compared with postoperative observation or maintenance therapy were reviewed. The manuscripts were reviewed to evaluate whether ITB was accounted for, the method with which it was adjusted for, impact factor, year of publication, and whether PORT was beneficial. RESULTS Of the 60 publications reviewed, 23 studies (38.3%) did not include an adjustment for ITB. Most studies that did adjust for ITB employed a single landmark (LM) time (n = 31), 4 used a sequential landmark analyses, and 2 used a time-dependent Cox model. In 23 of 31 studies (74.2%) that did adjust for ITB via a single LM time, the rationale behind why the specified LM time was chosen was not clearly explained. There was no relationship between adjusting for ITB and year of publication (P = .074) or whether the study was published in a high-impact journal (P = .55). CONCLUSIONS Studies assessing adjuvant radiation therapy by analyzing the NCDB are susceptible to ITB, which overestimates the effect size of adjuvant therapies and can provide misleading results. Adjusting for this bias is essential for accurate data representation and to better quantify the impact of adjuvant therapies such as PORT.
Collapse
|
16
|
Couty E, Vallard A, Sotton S, Ouni S, Garcia MA, Espenel S, Rancoule C, Ben Mrad M, Biron AC, Perrot JL, Langrand-Escure J, Magné N. Safety assessment of anticancer drugs in association with radiotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma: a real-life report : Radiation/systemic drug combo in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019; 83:881-892. [PMID: 30806760 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03806-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the safety of the association of radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments for patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (mMM). METHODS A retrospective analysis included consecutive patients treated with palliative RT, and at least one line of systemic therapy for mMM between 2001 and 2016. Treatments were defined as sequential or concomitant when RT and the systemic drug were administered, respectively, at more or less than five half-lives from each other. RESULTS 92 patients were included. They had 110 palliative RT treatments. RT was delivered with a "conventional" chemotherapy (mainly fotemustine and/or dacarbazine) and a "modern" systemic therapy (BRAF inhibitors, association of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, immunotherapy), respectively, in 88 (80%) and 22 (20%) cases. Systemic treatments and RT were mainly concurrently performed (n = 61, 55.5%). Regarding acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity, no difference was reported between sequential and concomitant groups either in the whole cohort (p = 1) or in the subgroup of patients receiving "modern" systemic therapies (p = 1). Acute and late grade ≥ 3 toxicities only occurred with vemurafenib. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced more severe infield adverse events than other associations (p = 0.001) with two deaths. CONCLUSION In our series, compared to sequential administration, concomitant association of systemic anticancer drugs and palliative RT did not increase toxicity in mMM patients. BRAF inhibitors and RT produced severe infield toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the toxicity of each association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Couty
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital Nord Saint Etienne, 42270, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Alexis Vallard
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Sandrine Sotton
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Sarra Ouni
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Max-Adrien Garcia
- Public Health Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Sophie Espenel
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
- Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Chloe Rancoule
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
- Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Majed Ben Mrad
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Anne-Catherine Biron
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital Nord Saint Etienne, 42270, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Jean-Luc Perrot
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital Nord Saint Etienne, 42270, St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Julien Langrand-Escure
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271, St Priest en Jarez cedex, France.
- Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chowdhary M, Lee A, Gao S, Wang D, Barry PN, Diaz R, Bagadiya NR, Park HS, Yu JB, Wilson LD, Moran MS, Higgins SA, Knowlton CA, Patel KR. Is Proton Therapy a "Pro" for Breast Cancer? A Comparison of Proton vs. Non-proton Radiotherapy Using the National Cancer Database. Front Oncol 2019; 8:678. [PMID: 30693271 PMCID: PMC6339938 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited data exists demonstrating the clinical benefit of proton radiotherapy (PRT) in breast cancer. Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated predictors associated with PRT use for patients with breast cancer. An exploratory analysis also investigates the impact of PRT on overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy from 2004 to 2014 were identified. Patients were stratified based on receipt of PRT or non-PRT (i.e., photons ± electrons). A logistic regression model was used to determine predictors for PRT utilization. For OS, Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 724,492 patients were identified: 871 received PRT and 723,621 received non-PRT. 58.3% of the PRT patients were group stage 0–1. Median follow-up time was 62.2 months. On multivariate logistic analysis, the following factors were found to be significant for receipt of PRT (all p < 0.05): academic facility (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50), South (OR = 2.01) and West location (OR = 12.43), left-sided (OR = 1.21), ER-positive (OR = 1.59), and mastectomy (OR = 1.47); pT2-T4 disease predicted for decrease use (OR = 0.79). PRT was not associated with OS on MVA for all patients: Hazard Ratio: 0.85, p = 0.168. PRT remained not significant on MVA after stratifying for subsets likely associated with higher heart radiation doses, including: left-sided (p = 0.140), inner-quadrant (p = 0.173), mastectomy (p = 0.095), node positivity (p = 0.680), N2-N3 disease (p = 0.880), and lymph node irradiation (LNI) (p = 0.767). Conclusions: Receipt of PRT was associated with left-sided, ER+ tumors, mastectomy, South and West location, and academic facilities, but not higher group stages or LNI. PRT was not associated with OS, including in subsets likely at risk for higher heart doses. Further studies are required to determine non-OS benefits of PRT. In the interim, given the high cost of protons, only well-selected patients should receive PRT unless enrolled on a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Anna Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Sarah Gao
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Parul N Barry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Roberto Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Neeti R Bagadiya
- Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Henry S Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Lynn D Wilson
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Meena S Moran
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Susan A Higgins
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Christin A Knowlton
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kirtesh R Patel
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McKean MA, Amaria RN. Multidisciplinary treatment strategies in high-risk resectable melanoma: Role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 70:144-153. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
19
|
Trofymenko O, Bordeaux JS, Zeitouni NC. Survival in patients with primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: National Cancer Database analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 78:1125-1134. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
20
|
Melanoma of the lower genital tract: Prognostic factors and treatment modalities. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:180-189. [PMID: 29728261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Primary melanomas originating from the gynecological tract are rare and aggressive cancers. The vulva is the most frequent site (70%), followed by vagina and more rarely by cervix. The clinical outcome of patients with female genital tract melanoma is very poor, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 37-50% for vulvar, 13-32% for vaginal, and approximately 10% for cervical melanoma. In this systematic review, we analyzed the pathogenesis and the different factors influencing the prognosis of melanomas of the lower genital tract, with particular emphasis on biologic variables that may influence new therapeutic approaches. We evaluated the different treatment modalities described in the literature, in order to offer a possible algorithm that may help the clinicians in diagnosing and treating patients with these uncommon malignancies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Kirwan J, Shaw C, Dziegielewski PT. Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for cutaneous melanoma. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:495-496. [PMID: 28256960 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1295168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Mendenhall
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert J. Amdur
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Kirwan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christiana Shaw
- Departments of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter T. Dziegielewski
- Departments of Otolaryngology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chowdhary M, Patel KR, Danish HH, Lawson DH, Khan MK. BRAF inhibitors and radiotherapy for melanoma brain metastases: potential advantages and disadvantages of combination therapy. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9:7149-7159. [PMID: 28003758 PMCID: PMC5161425 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s119428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy that frequently spreads to the brain, resulting in rapid deterioration in both quality and quantity of life. Historically, treatment options for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have predominantly consisted of surgery and radiotherapy. While these options can help provide local control, the majority of patients still develop intracranial progression. Indeed, novel therapeutic options, including molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy, have improved outcomes and are now changing the role of radiotherapy. Up to 50% of melanomas contain an activating BRAF mutation, resulting in hyperactive cellular proliferation and survival. Drugs that target BRAF have been introduced for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and offer hope in improving disease outcomes; however, many of these trials either excluded or had a limited amount of patients with MBM. Recent studies have revealed that melanoma cell lines become more radiosensitive following BRAF inhibition, thus providing a potential synergistic mechanism when combining BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and radiotherapy. However, neurotoxicity concerns also exist with this combination. This article reviews the efficacy and limitations of BRAFi therapy for MBM, describes current evidence for combining BRAFis with radiation, discusses the rationale and evidence for combination modalities, and highlights emerging clinical trials specifically investigating this combination in MBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mudit Chowdhary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Kirtesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hasan H Danish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - David H Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mohammad K Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|