Immune-related pancreatitis associated with checkpoint blockade in melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic enzyme elevation in melanoma patients: Incidence, management and therapy-A multicentre analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are considered standard-of-care in the systemic treatment of melanoma. However, management of certain ICI-associated adverse events (AE) can be challenging. Incidence, course and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury (ICIPI) are not well-documented and specific diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are lacking. Current management includes serological monitoring of pancreatic enzymes, radiographic imaging and corticosteroid or further immunosuppressive treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Based on previous data regarding adjuvant ICI treatment, we suspected that elevation of pancreatic enzymes may occur more frequently than reported while the clinical relevance of-particularly asymptomatic-ICIPI is still unclear.

METHODS

A collaboration of eight Austrian and Swiss dermato-oncology centres was established to retrospectively analyse a large cohort of ICI-treated patients regarding incidence and management of ICIPI. Additionally, a questionnaire-based survey concerning ICIPI-management was conducted.

RESULTS

Among 1516 melanoma patients receiving ICI therapy, 204 patients exhibited ≥CTCAE II° lipase elevation. Of these patients, 41 (20.1%) had symptoms suggestive of pancreatitis. Immunotherapy was interrupted or discontinued due to pancreatic AE in almost half of the patients. Systemic corticosteroids were administered in 103 patients (50.5%), with higher doses reported in symptomatic cases. Six per cent of asymptomatic patients had radiographically proven pancreatitis. Maximum lipase elevation was >5xULN in all of these patients.

CONCLUSION

Routine lipase monitoring was conducted in all participating centres, although not recommended in respective guidelines. Elevation of serum lipase was observed more frequently than recently reported. Although radiographic findings indicating pancreatitis were rare in asymptomatic patients, ICI treatment was frequently paused or discontinued and systemic steroids were administered. To reduce the existing uncertainty in routine clinical practice reflected by our findings, we provide an algorithm to guide the monitoring and management of potential pancreatic adverse events. Lipase measurement should be limited to symptomatic patients and/or those with radiographic findings indicative of pancreatic injury.

Analysis of immune-related adverse events in gastrointestinal malignancy patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are becoming an increasingly common treatment for advanced gastrointestinal cancer, but the possibility of immune-related adverse events has raised concerns. This study aimed to evaluate the risks of immune-related adverse events between patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and those who received chemotherapy among different types of gastrointestinal cancer. The study utilized data from the multicenter TriNetX database in the United States covering the period between 2015 and 2022. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe the relative hazard of immune-related adverse events based on comparing time-to-event rates. Our study revealed that the incidence of immune-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy compared to those who received chemotherapy only in treating gastrointestinal cancer. CTLA-4 inhibitors tended to have a higher rate of immune-related adverse events compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Our study found a lower mortality rate among patients who developed immune-related adverse events compared to those who did not after propensity score matching (HR, 0.661; 95% CI 0.620-0.704; p < .01). We provide important real-world data on the incidence and impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our study's results support clinicians in making informed decisions about the potential benefits and risks of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Pancreatitis with Pancreatic Enlargement Mimicking Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

A 61-year-old woman was administered 35 cycles of pembrolizumab for the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer, achieving a complete response. She presented with asymptomatic pancreatic enlargement and elevated hepatobiliary enzymes, but amylase and lipase levels were within the normal ranges. Intrapancreatic bile duct stenosis due to pancreatic enlargement was present, mimicking autoimmune pancreatitis on computed tomography performed before the onset of clinical manifestations. A histological examination of a biopsy specimen showed lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration with dense fibrosis in the stroma. The patient was successfully treated with oral prednisolone. There were no manifestations of recurrent pancreatitis after tapering the prednisolone dose.

Pancreatic involvement due to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a proposed classification

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) is uncommon and pancreatic involvement due to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in published reports relied on the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE definition of AP differs from the revised Atlanta classification diagnostic criteria. This study aims to classify the spectrum of pancreatic involvement in patients receiving ICI therapy into categories built on the revised Atlanta classification.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of cancer patients receiving cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors between 2011 and 2020. Pancreas-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were categorized into AP and pancreatic injury.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients on ICI therapy met selection criteria. Twenty patients (43%) had AP, while 27 (57%) had pancreatic injury. Fifteen patients (75%) developed mild AP. Five patients progressed to pancreatic atrophy, and two patients (4%) developed exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. In both groups, most patients received nivolumab therapy (70% vs. 67%, p = 0.08) with no difference in mean number of nivolumab doses (9 vs. 10, p = 0.69). There was no correlation between the mean number of nivolumab or pembrolizumab doses and AP events (OR 0.94, p = 0.26, and OR 0.98, p = 0.86), but the duration of ICI therapy was significantly related to pancreatic atrophy (OR 1.01, p = 0.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.02).

CONCLUSION

Based on the novel classification, majority of pancreatic irAEs were classified as asymptomatic pancreatic injury but with some risk of pancreatic atrophy. This classification can help in assessing patterns of pancreatic involvement, pathogenesis, and treatment decisions.

Pancreatic injury following immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Pancreatic injury (pancreatitis, amylase/lipase elevation) is a rare adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). With the high number of clinical studies on ICIs, the incidence and characteristics of associated pancreatic injury (PI) need to be reevaluated.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the incidence of PI in cancer patients who received ICIs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, the ASCO, ESMO, and AACR conference proceedings before 1 April 2022, were investigated for relevant research.

Results: 50 RCTs involving 35,223 patients were included. The incidence of ICIs-PI was 2.22% (95% CI = 1.94%–2.53%). The incidence of PI was 3.76% (95% CI = 1.84–7.67%) when combining two ICIs, which was higher than single ICIs [2.25% (95% CI = 1.91–2.65%)]. The ICIs were ranked from high to low based on PI incidence: PD-L1 inhibitors 3.01% (95% CI = 1.86–4.87%), CTLA-4 inhibitors 2.92% (95% CI = 0.99–8.65%) and PD-1 Inhibitor 2% (95% CI = 1.67–2.39%). The ICI with the highest rate of PI was pembrolizumab 7.23.% (95% CI = 1.69–30.89%). In addition, the incidence of severe ICIs-PI was 2.08% (95% CI = 1.76–2.46%); and the incidence of severe PI was 2.32% (95% CI = 1.76–3.06%) when combining two ICIs, which was higher than single ICI [1.95% (95% CI = 1.58–2.41%)]. The ICIs were ranked from high to low according to the incidence of severe PI: PD-L1 inhibitors 3.1% (95% CI = 1.7–5.64%), CTLA-4 inhibitors 2.69% (95% CI = 0.76–9.49%), PD-1 inhibitors 1.80% (95% CI = 1.41–2.29%).

Conclusion: Treatment with multiple ICIs result in a higher incidence of PI compared to single ICIs, irrespective of the grade of pancreatic injury. The incidence of PI caused by PD-L1 inhibitors is higher than that of CTLA-4 inhibitors and PD-1 Inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab has the highest rate of ICIs-PI. Although the incidence of ICIs-PI is not high, they are usually severe (≥ grade 3 events).

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Adverse Events

The expanded approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of multiple cancer types has offered patients more opportunities in treatment selection and survival.Hepatotoxicity is a well-recognized immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with treatment with ICI. It is considered a type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Depending on the specific ICI and whether the patient receives single- or dual-drug therapy, the incidence of hepatotoxicity in general could be as high as 30%. As more patients receive treatment with ICI, more cases of hepatotoxicity are expected to occur. Clinicians must exercise close pharmacovigilance to recognize liver-related irAEs early.ICI-mediated hepatobiliary toxicity (or "IMH") generally presents as asymptomatic elevations of alanine transaminase and aspartate transaminase, with or without alkaline phosphatase elevation. Some patients may present with jaundice, fever, or malaise. Rarely, it may cause liver failure and death. The diagnosis of IMH is made after careful exclusion of other causes of acute hepatitis based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, imaging, and liver histological findings. In clinically significant cases of IMH, the management involves discontinuation of ICI followed by close monitoring and the initiation of immunosuppression. Current society guidelines, which are not based on robust evidence, specify treatment recommendations depending on the grade of liver injury, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. However, our clinical experience suggests possible alternatives, including lower corticosteroid dosing with adjunct therapies. Whereas current guidelines endorse permanent cessation of future ICI treatment in patients diagnosed with grades 3-4 IMH, published clinical experience suggests potential for flexibility when assessing for candidacy of resuming ICI.Because histologic bile duct injury has been observed in cases ascribed to IMH, ICI-mediated cholangiopathic disease probably exists on a spectrum within IMH. Even extrahepatic bile duct involvement has been observed. This phenotype warrants special considerations in treatment and surveillance.ICI-related cholecystitis has been rarely reported in the literature. Management follows current standards of care for typical cases of cholecystitis. No relationship with ICI-mediated cholangiopathic disease has been observed.Assessing for and managing ICI-associated pancreatic injury remain challenging to the clinician. Many cases of asymptomatic serum lipase elevation are detected on routine labs without clinical signs or symptoms of typical acute pancreatitis. However, symptomatic patients should be initially managed like traditional cases of acute pancreatitis requiring hospitalization for evaluation and inpatient management.

Fatal Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Pancreatitis

We herein report a case of fatal pancreatitis induced by an immune checkpoint inhibitor. A 62-year-old man with cancer of unknown primary was treated with pembrolizumab. After 12 cycles, immune-related pneumonitis developed and was treated with prednisolone. Three months later, pancreatitis developed, which was successfully treated with hydration and protease inhibitors. Eight months later, another attack of pancreatitis occurred, which did not respond to therapy, including high-dose corticosteroids, and he eventually died. This is the first report describing fatal immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pancreatitis. Despite the rarity of this complication, attention should be paid to its potential severity and treatment.

Organ-Specific Immune-Related Adverse Events for PD-1 Antibodies in Lung Cancer Treatment

Anti-PD-1 therapy has revolutionized the clinical treatment of lung cancer. With the increasing number of lung cancer patients being treated, there is also an increase in the number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) being reported. These irAEs involve multiple organs and systems, mainly manifest as inflammatory side effects, and are different from the adverse events observed with traditional lung cancer treatment. These effects are often mild and treatable and reversible; however, in a few cases the side effects can be severe and lead to termination of immunotherapy. Management involves glucocorticoid-based related immunomodulators, which should be carefully prescribed to balance the efficacy and side effects of the PD-1 antibody treatment. This review will describe the characteristics and mechanisms of irAEs in specific organs, and will serve as a guide to help optimize treatment plans and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical-radiological characteristics and intestinal microbiota in patients with pancreatic immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

The pancreatic immune-related adverse event (irAE) is a rare but increasingly occurrence disease with limited knowledge, which was associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

In this case series study of pancreatic irAE patients, clinical and radiological manifestations are summarized. Baseline and post-treatment fecal microbiota of immune-related acute pancreatitis (irAP) patients were analyzed by the 16 s rDNA amplicon sequencing method.

RESULTS

A total of six patients were enrolled into the study, and the onset of pancreatic irAEs occurred a median of 105 days after a median of 4.5 cycles with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). All patients had an effective response to ICIs. Abdominal pain was the main clinical manifestation. Serum amylase (sAMY) and lipase (sLIP) had dynamic changes parallel to clinical severity. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) did not accurately reveal the level of inflammation. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was a sensitive imaging method which showed decreased and increased signal intensity of pancreatic parenchyma in T1-weighted fat-saturated and diffusion-weighted imaging, respectively. Glucocorticoids were the main treatment with a rapid initial effect followed by a slow improvement. After reinitiation of ICI therapy, pancreatic irAEs either deteriorated, remained stable or the patient developed severe pancreatic β-cell destruction without irAP recurrence. The baseline microbiota of irAP had low Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio at phylum level, low relative abundance of Alistipes, Bacteroides and high Lachnospiraceae at genus level, compared to levels of pancreatic β-cell destruction and post-treatment of irAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic irAE patients had corresponding abdominal pain and increase in sAMY/sLIP. MRI was found to be an ideal imaging modality. Treatment with glucocorticoids were the main approach. The microbiota showed relative changes at baseline and during treatment.

Immunotherapy-Associated Pancreatic Adverse Events: Current Understanding of Their Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies, are involved in T cell-mediated immune response augmentation and promote anti-tumor immunity. Cancer patients treated with combination of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy exhibit superior clinical outcomes and tolerance compared with patients treated with monotherapies. However, immutherapy is associated with several concomitant immune-related adverse events (irAEs). For instance, IrAEs interferes with function of gastrointestinal tract, endocrine, dermatological, nervous system and musculoskeletal systems. ICIs-associated pancreatic injury might causes decrease in endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, resulting in metabolic and nutritional disorders. Clinicians who administer immune checkpoint inhibitors to cancer patients are diagnosed with hyperglycemia, abdominal pain and steatorrhea. Currently, the precise mechanism of ICIs-associated pancreatic injury has not been fully explored. This paper summarizes incidence, diagnosis, clinical characteristics, potential mechanisms, and treatment management patterns of ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs based on previous studies. In addition, possible management approaches of these adverse effects are presented in this paper. in the findings summarized in this paper lay a basis for management of ICIs-associated pancreatic AEs and expanding future immunotherapy applications.

Imaging spectrum of adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a form of immunotherapy, are increasingly used for a variety of malignancies and have been linked to numerous treatment-related side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). IrAEs can affect multiple organ systems and are important to recognise in order to avoid misinterpretation as progressive tumour and to ensure appropriate management. In this pictorial review, we will briefly discuss radiological response criteria of immunotherapy and describe the imaging appearances of the wide spectrum of these ICI-associated toxicities.

Abdominal CT manifestations of adverse events to immunotherapy: a primer for radiologists

Immunotherapy is a rapidly growing field within oncology and is being increasingly used in the management of several malignancies. Due to their unique mechanism of action on the immune system and neoplastic cells, the response pattern and adverse events of this novel therapy are distinct from conventional systemic therapies. Accordingly, the imaging appearances following immunotherapy including adverse events are unique and at times perplexing. Imaging is integral to management of patients on immunotherapeutic agents and a thorough understanding of its mechanism, response patterns and adverse events is crucial for precise interpretation of imaging studies. This review provides a description of the mechanism of action of current immunotherapeutic agents and the organ-wise description of their side effects.

Imaging of acute abdomen in cancer patients

The pattern of disease causing acute abdominal pain has changed over last few decades, some of this has been attributed to intraabdominal cancers. The most common acute abdominal complaints in cancer patients are related to the gastrointestinal system. Abdominal emergencies in cancer patients can result from the underlying malignancy itself, cancer therapy and/or result from the standard pathologies causing acute abdomen in otherwise healthy population. Therapy-related or disease-related immunosuppression or high dose analgesics often blunt many of the findings which are usually expected in non-cancer general population. This complicates the clinical picture rendering the clinical exam less reliable in many cancer patients, and resulting in different pathologies which clinicians and the radiologists should remain aware of. This article focuses on imaging illustrations with differential diagnosis for various emergency scenarios related to acute abdomen specifically in oncologic settings.

Hepatobiliary Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used for multiple cancer types. Hepatotoxicity is a reported adverse event of ICI treatment. It can present as asymptomatic elevation of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase or symptomatic hepatitis with fever, malaise, and even death in rare cases. The diagnosis of ICI-induced hepatitis is made after exclusion of other etiologies based on medical history, laboratory evaluation, and imaging and histological findings. Treatment of ICI-induced hepatitis consists of ICI discontinuation and immunosuppression in severe cases. Pancreatic injury as asymptomatic lipase elevation or acute pancreatitis-like disease with abdominal pain and evidence on imaging has been documented as a toxicity of ICI therapy. Appropriate treatment of pancreatitis still needs further investigation. Few cases, reports, and series documented cholecystitis and cholangitis as possible adverse events related to ICI therapy as well.

Workup and Management of Immune-Mediated Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Toxicities That Develop During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of a wide range of cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Workup and management of immune-mediated hepatitis, pancreatitis, or cholangitis that develops during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment can be challenging. Immune-mediated hepatitis can be particularly challenging if patients have underlying viral hepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis. Patients with positive hepatitis B virus DNA should be referred to a hepatologist for antiviral therapy prior to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. With untreated hepatitis C virus (HCV) and elevated liver enzymes, a liver biopsy should be obtained to differentiate between HCV infection and immune-mediated hepatitis due to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. If autoimmune serologies are negative, then this supports a case of immune-mediated hepatitis secondary to anti-PD-1 therapy, rather than autoimmune hepatitis. In this case, an empiric steroid therapy is reasonable; however, if the patient does not respond to steroid therapy in 3-5 days, then liver biopsy should be pursued. The incidence of immune checkpoint-induced pancreatitis is low, but when it does occur, diagnosis is not straightforward. Although routine monitoring of pancreatic enzymes is not generally recommended, when pancreatitis is suspected, serum levels of amylase and lipase should be checked. Once confirmed, a steroid or other immunosuppressant (if steroids are contraindicated) should be administered along with close monitoring, and a slow tapering dosage once the pancreatitis is under control. Patients should then be monitored for recurrent pancreatitis. Finally, immune therapy-related cholangitis involves elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase and, once diagnosed, is managed in the same way as immune-mediated hepatitis. KEY POINTS: Immune-mediated hepatitis, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are found in patients receiving or who have previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors. To work up immune-mediated hepatitis, viral, and autoimmune serologies, liver imaging will help to differentiate immune-mediated hepatitis from hepatitis of other etiology. Hepatology consult may be considered in patients with a history of chronic liver disease who developed hepatitis during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Liver biopsy should be considered to clarify the diagnosis for case in which the hepatitis is refractory to steroid or immunosuppressant treatment. Immune-mediated pancreatitis is treated with steroid or other immunosuppressant with a slow tapering and should be monitored for recurrence.

Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy and is now the standard treatment for several different types of cancer, supported by favorable outcomes and good tolerance. However, it is linked to multiple immune manifestations, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events frequently affect the skin, colon, endocrine glands, lungs, and liver. The gastrointestinal system is one of the most commonly affected organ systems and is responsible for the most frequent emergency visits resulting from irAEs. However, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are a recent addition to our arsenal of cancer drugs, many health-care providers remain unfamiliar with the management of irAEs. Gastroenterologists involved in the treatment of oncology patients who have received checkpoint inhibitors are currently encountering cases of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other nonspecific symptoms that may be challenging to manage. This article reviews the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and provides an approach to their diagnosis and recommended workup. It also highlights the management of irAEs according to their toxicity grading and specifically discusses the instances in which corticosteroids should be administered and/or the immune checkpoint inhibitors should be withheld.