1
|
Mattila KE, Vihinen H, Heervä E, Nuotio MS, Vihinen P. The impact of prognostic factors and comorbidities on survival in older adults with stage I - III cutaneous melanoma in Southwest Finland: A register study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101701. [PMID: 38219332 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite being diagnosed with thicker and more often ulcerated melanomas, cancer-specific survival (CSS) is not necessarily inferior in older adults with melanoma compared to younger patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our aim was to evaluate the impact of baseline melanoma-specific prognostic factors and comorbidities on recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and overall survival (OS) in patients aged 70-79 (n = 474) and ≥ 80 years (n = 286) with resected stage I - III cutaneous melanoma in Southwest Finland between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Patients were restaged according to the 8th edition of TNM classification, and comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS Patients aged ≥80 years had thicker and more commonly ulcerated melanomas: 43.0%, 40.9%, and 16.1% of patients aged ≥80 and 56.5%, 25.3%, and 18.1% of patients aged 70-79 years were diagnosed with stage I, II, and III melanoma, respectively. Multiple comorbidities (CCI ≥2) were more common and sentinel lymph node biopsy less frequently performed in patients aged ≥80 years. RFS and CSS were similar in patients aged 70-79 years and ≥ 80 years: median RFS 13.8 years vs not reached, with the hazard ratio of melanoma recurrence or death from melanoma 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.71); median CSS was not reached, with the hazard ratio of death from melanoma 1.12 (95%CI: 0.81-1.75). The proportion of patients who were alive with melanoma recurrence or had died from melanoma was similar in both age groups. In multivariable analysis, higher pathological stage was the only independent risk factor for short RFS regardless of age group, sex, CCI, and tumor ulceration. Higher stage and male sex were associated with short CSS. Age ≥ 80 years, stage III disease, and CCI ≥ 2 were associated with short OS and female sex with long OS in multivariable analysis. DISCUSSION Pathological stage was the most influential factor determining RFS and CSS in older adults with resected stage I - III melanoma. Concerning OS, age ≥ 80 years, stage III disease, and multiple comorbidities had a significant negative impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle E Mattila
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland; InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Finland.
| | - Helmi Vihinen
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland; Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland
| | - Eetu Heervä
- InFLAMES Research Flagship Center, University of Turku, Finland
| | - Maria S Nuotio
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland
| | - Pia Vihinen
- Department of Oncology, Fican West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Safety of combining dabrafenib plus trametinib in elderly BRAF V600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma patients: real-world data analysis of Spanish patients (ELDERLYMEL). Melanoma Res 2022; 32:343-352. [PMID: 35762583 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in metastatic melanoma have been demonstrated in two-phase III and one-phase I/II clinical trials. However, patients at least 75 years old (y.o.) were largely underrepresented. Additionally, the safety profile of dabrafenib and trametinib based on age is unknown. ELDERLYMEL is a retrospective noninterventional multicenter study, describing the effectiveness and safety of at least 75 y.o. patients compared with less than 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or dabrafenib monotherapy. A total of 159 patients were included, 130 less than 75 y.o. and 29 at least 75 y.o. Clinical features were similar between the groups, except in the number of comorbidities, number of metastatic sites, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and BRAF V600-mutation type. Five patients per group received dabrafenib monotherapy. There were no differences in adverse events (AEs) rate or grade between the groups. However, AE profiles were different between the groups, being pyrexia infrequent in patients at least 75 y.o. (13.8% vs. 42.3%; P = 0.005). Dabrafenib and trametinib dose intensities were lower in at least 75 y.o. patients (P = 0.018 and P = 0.020), but there were no differences in effectiveness between the groups. Finally, in a multivariate analysis, sex (female) was the only variable independently associated with an increased risk of AE grade ≥3. Data from the ELDERLYMEL study demonstrate that dabrafenib plus trametinib is safe and effective in at least 75 y.o. patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutated melanoma without increasing toxicity. Additionally, we describe a different safety profile depending on age and sex.
Collapse
|
4
|
Adams R, Coumbe JEM, Coumbe BGT, Thomas J, Willsmore Z, Dimitrievska M, Yasuzawa-Parker M, Hoyle M, Ingar S, Geh J, MacKenzie Ross A, Healy C, Papa S, Lacy KE, Karagiannis SN. BRAF inhibitors and their immunological effects in malignant melanoma. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:347-362. [PMID: 35195495 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2044796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of cutaneous melanoma has been revolutionised by the development of small molecule inhibitors targeting the MAPK pathway, including inhibitors of BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK (MEKi), and immune checkpoint blockade antibodies, occurring in tandem. Despite these advances, the 5-year survival rate for patients with advanced melanoma remains only around 50%. Although not designed to alter immune responses within the tumour microenvironment (TME), MAPK pathway inhibitors (MAPKi) exert a range of effects on the host immune compartment which may offer opportunities for therapeutic interventions. AREAS COVERED We review the effects of MAPKi especially BRAFi, on the TME, focussing on alterations in inflammatory cytokine secretion, the recruitment of immune cells and their functions, both during response to BRAFi treatment and as resistance develops. We outline potential combinations of MAPKi with established and experimental treatments. EXPERT OPINION MAPKi in combination or in sequence with established treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, or new therapies such as adoptive cell therapies, may augment their immunological effects, reverse tumour-associated immune suppression and offer the prospect of longer-lived clinical responses. Refining therapeutic tools at our disposal and embracing "old friends" in the melanoma treatment arsenal, alongside new target identification, may improve the chances of therapeutic success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Adams
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Jack E M Coumbe
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Ben G T Coumbe
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Thomas
- The Royal Marsden, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Zena Willsmore
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Marija Dimitrievska
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Monica Yasuzawa-Parker
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Hoyle
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Suhaylah Ingar
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Geh
- Department of Plastic Surgery at Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair MacKenzie Ross
- Department of Plastic Surgery at Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ciaran Healy
- Department of Plastic Surgery at Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Papa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,ImmunoEngineering, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katie E Lacy
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Sophia N Karagiannis
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.,Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Guy's Cancer Centre, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|