Differentiation of melanoma and benign nevi by fluorescence in-situ hybridization

Evolving Therapeutic Strategies to Exploit Chromosome Instability in Cancer

Cancer is a devastating disease that claims over 8 million lives each year. Understanding the molecular etiology of the disease is critical to identify and develop new therapeutic strategies and targets. Chromosome instability (CIN) is an abnormal phenotype, characterized by progressive numerical and/or structural chromosomal changes, which is observed in virtually all cancer types. CIN generates intratumoral heterogeneity, drives cancer development, and promotes metastatic progression, and thus, it is associated with highly aggressive, drug-resistant tumors and poor patient prognosis. As CIN is observed in both primary and metastatic lesions, innovative strategies that exploit CIN may offer therapeutic benefits and better outcomes for cancer patients. Unfortunately, exploiting CIN remains a significant challenge, as the aberrant mechanisms driving CIN and their causative roles in cancer have yet to be fully elucidated. The development and utilization of CIN-exploiting therapies is further complicated by the associated risks for off-target effects and secondary cancers. Accordingly, this review will assess the strengths and limitations of current CIN-exploiting therapies, and discuss emerging strategies designed to overcome these challenges to improve outcomes and survival for patients diagnosed with cancer.

Practical application of new technologies for melanoma diagnosis: Part II. Molecular approaches

The criterion standard for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma continues to be histologic examination. However, classifying some melanocytic lesions by conventional microscopy can be problematic if they exhibit some architectural or morphologic characteristics of both nevus and melanoma. Moreover, histologic appearance does not always predict biologic behavior. There is therefore a need and opportunity to develop new technologies that can facilitate the histologic diagnosis of melanoma and potentially help distinguish lesions with a lesser or greater risk of metastasis. In part II of this 2-part continuing medical education article, we will review the molecular technologies currently available for facilitating melanoma diagnosis, including comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and epidermal genetic retrieval. Our goal is to provide the clinician with an up to date understanding of these molecular approaches so that they can be applied to their management of challenging melanocytic lesions.

Molecular pathology of melanocytic tumors

Genetic and genomic analyses of melanocytic tumors have yielded new opportunities for improvements in diagnostic accuracy for the distinction of nevus from melanoma and better selection of patients affected by melanoma for targeted treatment. Since chromosomal copy number changes are commonly found in malignant melanoma, but rare in melanocytic nevi, cytogenetic assays have emerged as a promising ancillary study for the workup of melanocytic tumors with ambiguous light microscopic features. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) permits assessment of the full set of chromosomes, but requires a significant amount of lesional tissue, and may fail to detect aberrations in a minor subpopulation of tumor cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the cytogenetic assay of choice for limited amounts of tissue. FISH targets only specific chromosomes, with inherent limitations in test sensitivity and specificity. FISH analysis is also heavily dependent on individual experience. Molecular studies have identified distinct sets of mutations in melanoma and/or nevi. These mutations have become clinically relevant for targeted therapy of patients with advanced disease, especially for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma carrying the BRAF(V600) or KIT mutations. However, mutation analysis can on occasion also be used for diagnostic purposes.

Diagnostic role of chromosomal instability in melanoma

Early diagnosis gives melanoma patients the best chance for long term survival. However discrimination of an early melanoma from an unusual/atypical benign nevus can represent a significant challenge. There are no current pathological markers to definitively define malignant potential in these indeterminate lesions. Thus, there is a need for improved diagnostic tools. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer and is markedly prevalent in melanoma. Advances in genomics have opened the door for the development of molecular tools to better segregate benign and malignant lesions. This paper focuses on CIN in melanoma and the role of current diagnostic approaches.

Cytogenetic and mutational analyses of melanocytic tumors

Analyses of genetic and genomic alterations of melanocytic tumors have not only led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of melanocytic tumors but also created new opportunities for improvements in diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing nevus from melanoma, and more effective treatments for patients affected by melanoma. Cytogenetic tests have emerged as a promising ancillary method for the workup of diagnostically problematic melanocytic tumors with ambiguous light microscopic features. Mutation analysis not only is important in treatment decision making but also can be used for improved diagnostic accuracy, staging, and prognosis.

Molecular testing in melanoma

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and is increasing in incidence. Recent treatment advances have been made, but there remains a need for continued development of effective therapy options, as treatment rarely leads to cure. Many melanomas contain somatic mutations involved in tumor pathogenesis. Accurate identification of these mutations is necessary to stratify patients for the purpose of treatment and potential for clinical trials, given the absence or presence of a specific mutation. There are a number of techniques available that will identify genetic mutations and genomic aberrations present within melanoma tumor samples which are reviewed here. The type of mutation and sample number will drive selection of a given mutation detection strategy. The strengths and weaknesses, along with limitations, of the various methods will also be discussed. The discovery of somatic mutations integral in melanoma will increase our understanding of tumor pathogenesis and should facilitate identification of mutations relevant to clinical treatment decisions, advancing progress toward personalized medicine.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Analysis of Melanocytic Nevi and Melanomas

A 4-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, using probes to chromosomes 11q, 6p, 6q, and 6 cent, has recently been proposed as an ancillary tool for the diagnosis of melanoma. The authors report herein their experience with this assay. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the assay for histopathologically unequivocal cases, they analyzed 50 melanocytic nevi, 50 primary melanomas, and 15 metastatic melanomas. Of 50 melanocytic nevi, 47 were FISH negative on initial readout (test sensitivity, 94%); 49 were FISH negative after correction for tetraploidy (test specificity, 98%). Of 50 primary melanomas, 41 were FISH positive (test sensitivity, 82%). Of 15 metastatic lesions, 13 were FISH positive (test sensitivity, 85%). Of the 9 FISH-negative melanomas, 6 metastasized. The tumors of the 5 patients who had survived thick primary melanoma for more than 5 years without recurrence were all FISH positive. Half of the patients whose primary melanoma was tested by FISH had undergone sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. When the authors compared the FISH results of those 25 melanomas with the SLN status, no statistically significant correlation was found. These findings document limitations of the current FISH assay. A rare nevus may be FISH positive. Some primary metastasizing melanomas are FISH negative. Even metastatic melanomas can be FISH negative. Awareness of the limitations in test sensitivity and specificity of the FISH assay is important to avoid an erroneous diagnosis by overreliance on cytogenetic findings. Correlation with clinical and histopathological findings is paramount for accurate diagnosis.