Myasthenia Symptom Burden, Fatigue, and Sleep: Are They Related?

Short-term changes in serum miRNA levels and patient-reported clinical outcomes in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p have been suggested as potential biomarkers for myasthenia gravis (MG); however, the relationships between short-term natural changes of the miRNAs and patient-reported MG outcome scores have not been well-studied. We assessed the short-term fluctuations in miRNA levels and patient-reported outcome measures in MG.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 39 MG patients with regular follow-ups and unchanged medications at the Neurology outpatient clinic at Uppsala University Hospital. Patients had weekly follow-up visits for 1 month, at which blood samples were drawn, and scores from MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL), MG quality-of-life-15 (MG-QoL15), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were assessed. Serum levels of miRNA miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR.

RESULTS

Intra-individual levels of miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were stable, whereas a significant reduction in miR-21-5p was observed from week 1 to week 2 (p = .0024) and from week 2 to week 3 (p < .0001). There were intra-individual differences over a short time in MG-ADL, with higher scores in female patients (p = .0281) and a significant reduction from the first to the second weeks (p = .0281), whereas MG-QoL15 and FSS scores were stable.

DISCUSSION

The suggested MG biomarkers miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were more stable than miR-21-5p over a short time, indicating their short-term stability as biomarkers. Prospective multi-center studies with longer periods of follow-up and matched controls are needed to validate these miRNAs as biomarkers in MG.

Expert consensus recommendations for improving and standardising the assessment of patients with generalised myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Regular and consistent disease assessment could provide a clearer picture of burden in generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) and improve patient care; however, the use of assessment tools in practice lacks standardisation. This modified Delphi approach was taken to review current evidence on assessment tool use in gMG and develop expert-derived consensus recommendations for good practice.

METHODS

A European expert panel of 15 experienced gMG neurologists contributed to development of this consensus, four of whom formed a lead Sub-committee. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes) framework was used to define six clinical questions on gMG assessment tools, a systematic literature review was conducted, and evidence-based statements were developed. According to a modified Delphi voting process, consensus was reached when ≥70% of the experts rated agreement with a statement as ≥8 on a scale of 1-10.

RESULTS

Eighteen expert- and evidence-based consensus statements based on six themes were developed. Key recommendations include: consistent use of the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score (MG-ADL) across clinical settings, followed by a simple question (e.g., Patient Acceptable Symptom State [PASS]) or scale to determine patient satisfaction in clinical practice; use of a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis [QMG] or quality of life [QoL] assessment when the MG-ADL indicates disease worsening; and consideration of symptom state to determine the timing and frequency of recommended assessments. Expert panel consensus was reached on all 18 statements after two voting rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This process provided evidence- and expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of objective and subjective assessment tools across gMG research and care to improve management and outcomes for patients.

The influence of symptom severity and fatigue on sleep quality in patients with myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis is a rare and chronic autoimmune disease. The study aimed to evaluate the influence of symptom severity and fatigue on sleep quality in patients with myasthenia gravis.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study, and the population consisted of patients with MG throughout Turkey. The study was completed with 163 patients on 1 April and 31 July 2022.

RESULTS

 It was found that the mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living Scale score was 6.32 ± 3.9, the Fatigue Severity Scale score was 37.01 ± 23.26, and the total Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score was 9.04 ± 2.69. The variables affecting the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were age, Body Mass Index, Fatigue Severity Scale ≥ 4, Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living Scale ≥ 5.5, duration of diagnosis, and income level; a multiple regression model was created with these variables, and the variables in the resulting model explained 26.4% of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores. In addition, those with clinically significant symptom severity (MG-ADL ≥5.5) in daily living and those with severe fatigue (FSS ≥4) explained 17.2% of the PSQI scores, and the model was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study determined that the participants had clinically significant symptom severity in daily living, severe fatigue, and poor sleep quality. The participants with clinically significant severe symptoms in daily living and fatigue had higher sleep disturbances, daytime dysfunction, and poor sleep quality.

The Burden Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Experience in Terms of Breathing, Fatigue, Sleep, Mental Health, Discomfort and Usual Activities in Comparison to the General Population

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disorder marked by a variable combination of weakness of eye, bulbar, respiratory, axial, and limb muscles. This study compared the experience of people with MG regarding breathing, fatigue, sleep, pain/discomfort, mental health, and usual activities with the general population.

METHODS

The MyRealWorld-MG digital, multinational study enrolled patients with MG and collected demographics, PROMIS-Dyspnea, PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance, FACIT-Fatigue, EQ-5D-5L, Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and MG-Quality-of-Life (MG-QoL-15r). Comparisons with the general population were based on PROMIS population norms, published literature, or on data from a digital, multinational, observational study which enrolled a representative sample of the general population (POPUP).

RESULTS

In MyRealWorld-MG (N = 2074), patients experienced higher intensity, frequency, and duration of PROMIS shortness of breath than a US population (p < 0.0001). Patients with MG had higher PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance scores than POPUP (53.7 vs 50.0, p < 0.0001), and 54.9% of patients had clinically severe FACIT-Fatigue scores vs 6.8% in POPUP (p < 0.0001). Among patients with MG, 69.6% and 18.5% had moderate-to-severe HADS-Anxiety and HADS-Depression compared to 20.3% and 6.9% in POPUP (p < 0.001). Statistically significant and strong associations were found between fatigue, sleep, dyspnea, usual activities, and emotions. All outcomes worsened with more severe disease.

CONCLUSION

A considerable burden was observed in this comparison of breathing, sleep, fatigue, mental health, and usual activities between patients with MG and the general population, using data from two international studies and published population norms. Even mildly affected patients had significantly worse outcomes than the general population.