Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in the Management of Gynecologic Malignancies

Stereotactic Body Reirradiation in Gynaecological Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicities from a Single Institution Experience

AIMS

To report toxicity profile, outcomes and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients' folders were retrospectively extracted, focusing on the primary neoplasm, previous systemic therapies and previous radiotherapy. Concerning SBRT, the total dose (five daily fractions) was delivered with a linear accelerator using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. Acute and late toxicities were assessed by the CTCAE 4.03 scale. QoL was evaluated according to the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS1 (fatigue), CLAS2 (energy level), CLAS3 (daily activities)].

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and August 2021, 23 patients (median age 71 years, range 48-80) with 27 lesions were treated. Most patients had endometrial (34.8%), ovarian (26.1%) and cervical cancer (26.1%) as the primary tumour. The most common SBRT schedules in five fractions were 30 Gy (33.3%), 35 Gy (29.6%) and 40 Gy (29.6%). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 3-128). There were no patients reporting acute or late toxicities higher than grade 2, except for a bone fracture. One- and 2-year local control was 77.9% and 70.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival was 82.6% and 75.1%, respectively. The overall response rate was 96.0%. Regarding QoL, no statistically significant difference was identified between the baseline and follow-up values: the median CLAS1, CLAS2 and CLAS3 scores for each category were 6 (range 4-10) at baseline and 6 (range 3-10) 1 month after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience suggests that SBRT retreatment for recurrent gynaecological cancer is a highly feasible and safe treatment with limited side-effects and no short-term QoL impairment.

R0 Resection in Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancy: Pelvic Exenteration and Beyond

OPINION STATEMENT

Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery, but oftentimes, it is the last curative option for patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies who have exhausted more conservative therapies. Mortality and morbidity outcomes have improved over time, but there are still significant peri-operative risks. Considerations before pursing pelvic exenteration must include the likelihood of oncologic cure and patients' fitness to undergo such a procedure, particularly given the high rate of surgical morbidity. Pelvic sidewall tumors have been a traditional contraindication for pelvic exenteration due to the difficulty in obtaining negative margins, but the use of laterally extended endopelvic resection and intra-operative radiation therapy allows for more radical resection of recurrent disease. We believe that these procedures to achieve R0 resection can expand the use of curative-intent surgery in recurrent gynecologic cancer, but require the surgical expertise of colleagues in orthopedic and vascular surgery and collaboration with plastic surgery for complex reconstruction and optimization of post-operative healing. Surgery of recurrent gynecologic cancer including pelvic exenteration, requires careful patient selection, pre-operative medical optimization and prehabilitation, and thorough counseling to optimize outcomes, both oncologic and peri-operative. We believe the creation of a well-developed team, including surgical teams and supportive care services, can lead to the best patient outcomes and improved professional satisfaction amongst providers.

Validation of Monte Carlo-based calculations for megavolt electron beams for IORT and FLASH-IORT

In Intra-Operative Radiation Therapy (IORT) the tumour site is surgically exposed and normal tissue located around the tumour may be avoided. Electron applicators would require large surgical incisions; therefore, the preferred mechanism for beam collimation is the IORT cone system. FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) involves the treatment of tumours at ultra-high dose rates and the IORT cone system can also be used. This study validates the Monte Carlo-based calculations for these small electron beams to accurately determine the dose characteristics of each possible cone-energy combination as well as custom-built alloy cutouts attached to the end of the IORT cone. This will contribute to accurate dose distribution and output factor calculations that are essential to all radiation therapy treatments. A Monte Carlo (MC) model was modelled for electron beams produced by a Siemens Primus LINAC and the IORT cones. The accelerator was built with the component modules available in the BEAMnrc code. The phase-space file generated by the BEAM simulation was used as the source input for the subsequent DOSXYZnrc simulations. Percentage Depth Dose (PDD) data and profiles were extracted from the dose distributions obtained with the DOSXYZnrc simulations. These beam characteristics were compared with measured data for 6, 12, and 18 MeV electron beams for the IORT open cones of diameters 19, 45, and 64 mm and irregularly shaped cutouts. The MC simulations could replicate electron beams within a criterion of 3%/3 mm. Applicator factors were within 0.7%, and cone factors showed good agreement, except for the 9 mm cone size.

Based on the successful comparisons between measurement and MC-calculated dose distributions, output factors for the open cones and for small irregularly shaped IORT beams, it may be concluded that the Monte Carlo based dose calculation could replicate electron beams used for IORT and FLASH-IORT.

Feasibility and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy with Low Energy X-ray Photon Therapy for Recurrent Gynecological Cancer: A Case Series

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of low energy X-ray photon intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as an adjuvant therapy for recurrent gynecological cancer.Methods: Medical records of all recurrence gynecological cancer patients who underwent IORT were reviewed. Results: Between January 2018 and December 2021, five women (including cervical cancer (n = 2), endometrial cancer (n = 2), and uterine leiomyosarcoma (n = 1)), who underwent IORT and surgical resection for recurrent gynecologic cancer were reviewed. A median dose of 15.62 Gy (range, 12 to 20 Gy) was used for IORT. Repeated IORT and surgical resection was performed in two women. Three women experienced local recurrence, and three women died during follow-up. The 1-year local control rate was 60%. The 2-year overall survival rate was 30%. There was no Clavien–Dindo classification grade III–V complication. Conclusion: IORT using low energy X-ray photon therapy seems to be feasible and safe as an adjuvant therapy in women who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent gynecologic cancer. However, large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate its efficacy.

Radical Extirpation With Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Recurrent Gynecologic Cancer: An Institutional Review

Objective

To report survival outcomes in patients with locally recurrent gynecologic cancers managed with curative-intent radical extirpation, perioperative external beam radiotherapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 44 patients with locally recurrent gynecologic cancer treated at a single tertiary-care center (Mayo Clinic in Arizona) over a 15-year period (January 1, 2004, to July 31, 2019). This cohort included patients with uterine (n=21, 47.7%), ovarian (n=3, 6.8%), cervical (n=11, 25.0%), vaginal (n=2, 4.5%), vulvar (n=1, 2.3%), and unknown primary (n=6, 13.6%) cancer. Curative-intent radical extirpation included pelvic exenteration (n=13, 29.5%), laterally extended endopelvic resection (n=22, 50.0%), excision of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (n=8, 18.2%), and radical vaginectomy (n=1, 2.3%). Of the 44 patients in our cohort, 37 (84.1%) received IORT and 7 (15.9%) had intended to receive IORT but did not receive it.

Results

The median follow-up for the 44 patients was 12 months (range, 1 to 161 months). For patients who received IORT, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13 and 21 months, respectively, and the 3-year cumulative incidence of central, locoregional, and distant recurrence was 27.0% (10 of 37), 40.5% (15 of 37), and 37.8% (14 of 37), respectively. Surgical margins were classified as negative (28 of 44, 63.6%), microscopic (11 of 44, 25.0%), or macroscopic (5 of 44, 11.4%). Negative, microscopic, and macroscopic surgical margins resulted in 3-year PFS of 51.8%, 20.5%, and 0%, respectively (P=.01) and 3-year OS of 62.9%, 20.0%, and 0%, respectively (P=.035). Progression-free survival (P=.69) and OS (P=.88) were not different between patients with negative surgical margins who received (n=21) and did not receive (n=7) IORT. Ten of 37 patients (27.0%) had development of grade 3 or higher toxicities, with 1 death due to sepsis.

Conclusion

Complete tumor resection at the time of curative-intent radical extirpation achieved higher rates of PFS and OS regardless of IORT administration.

The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement on intraoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Although radiation therapy has traditionally been delivered with external beam or brachytherapy, intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) represents an alternative that may shorten the course of therapy, reduce toxicities, and improve patient satisfaction while potentially lowering the cost of care. At this time, there are limited evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians with patient selection for IORT. As such, the American Brachytherapy Society presents a consensus statement on the use of IORT.

METHODS

Physicians and physicists with expertise in intraoperative radiation created a site-directed guideline for appropriate patient selection and utilization of IORT.

RESULTS

Several IORT techniques exist including radionuclide-based high-dose-rate, low-dose-rate, electron, and low-energy electronic. In breast cancer, IORT as monotherapy should only be used on prospective studies. IORT can be considered in the treatment of sarcomas with close/positive margins or recurrent sarcomas. IORT can be considered in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcomas. IORT can be considered for colorectal malignancies with concern for positive margins and in the setting of recurrent gynecologic cancers. For thoracic, head and neck, and central nervous system malignancies, utilization of IORT should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present guidelines provide clinicians with a summary of current data regarding IORT by treatment site and guidelines for the appropriate patient selection and safe utilization of the technique. High-dose-rate, low-dose-rate brachytherapy methods are appropriate when IORT is to be delivered as are electron and low-energy based on the clinical scenario.

Intraoperative radiation therapy in uterine cervical cancer: A review

Locally advanced uterine cervical cancer continues to present a high number of pelvic relapses. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows a precise therapeutic intensification in the surgical area in cases in which removal of the tumour recurrence is feasible. At the same time, IORT excludes the radiosensitive organs from the field of irradiation. While the first gynecological IORT took place in 1905, procedures have been limited over the years and the series are retrospective, including few patients. At the same, time recurrences are located at different pelvic areas. Both heterogeneity and the long recruiting time make it difficult to correctly interpret the published results. Despite this, we have reviewed the most relevant publications. Some institutions indicated IORT as a boost on the surgical bed of the excised tumor recurrence. In others, IORT permits an extra radiation dose after radical surgery of the primary tumor, usually in stage IIB. Most studies conclude that the addition of IORT increases the local control but probably with little impact on survival. On the other hand, there is a controversy in the indication of IORT in surgically resectable primary tumours. No clear advantage over the usual scheme of chemoradiation and brachytherapy has been detected. Randomized studies that allow a breakthrough in the conclusions are highly unlikely to be performed in this area.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: review of techniques and results

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a technique that involves precise delivery of a large dose of ionising radiation to the tumour or tumour bed during surgery. Direct visualisation of the tumour bed and ability to space out the normal tissues from the tumour bed allows maximisation of the dose to the tumour while minimising the dose to normal tissues. This results in an improved therapeutic ratio with IORT. Although it was introduced in the 1960s, it has seen a resurgence of popularity with the introduction of self-shielding mobile linear accelerators and low-kV IORT devices, which by eliminating the logistical issues of transport of the patient during surgery for radiotherapy or building a shielded operating room, has enabled its wider use in the community.

Electrons, low-kV X-rays and HDR brachytherapy are all different methods of IORT in current clinical use. Each method has its own unique set of advantages and disadvantages, its own set of indications where one may be better suited than the other, and each requires a specific kind of expertise.

IORT has demonstrated its efficacy in a wide variety of intra-abdominal tumours, recurrent colorectal cancers, recurrent gynaecological cancers, and soft-tissue tumours. Recently, it has emerged as an attractive treatment option for selected, early-stage breast cancer, owing to the ability to complete the entire course of radiotherapy during surgery. IORT has been used in a multitude of roles across these sites, for dose escalation (retroperitoneal sarcoma), EBRT dose de-escalation (paediatric tumours), as sole radiation modality (early breast cancers) and as a re-irradiation modality (recurrent rectal and gynaecological cancers).

This article aims to provide a review of the rationale, techniques, and outcomes for IORT across different sites relevant to current clinical practice.

Intraoperative radiotherapy in gynaecological and genito-urinary malignancies: focus on endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of a single radiation dose to a limited volume of tissue during a surgical procedure. A literature review was performed to analyze the role of IORT in gynaecological and genito-urinary cancer including endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers.

Literature search was performed by Pubmed and Scopus, using the words “intraoperative radiotherapy/IORT”, “gynaecological cancer”, “uterine/endometrial cancer”, “cervical/cervix cancer”, “renal/kidney cancer”, “bladder cancer” and “prostate cancer”. Forty-seven articles were selected from the search databases, analyzed and briefly described.

Literature data show that IORT has been used to optimize local control rate in genito-urinary tumours mainly in retrospective studies. The results suggest that IORT could be advantageous in the setting of locally advanced and recurrent disease although further prospective trials are needed to confirm this findings.