Phase I Study of Amrubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Advanced Solid Organ Malignancies: HOG LUN 07-130

Exploring gene-drug interactions for personalized treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

Introduction

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a mental disorder that can develop after experiencing traumatic events. The aim of this work is to explore the role of genes and genetic variations in the development and progression of PTSD.

Methods

Through three methodological approaches, 122 genes and 184 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with PTSD were compiled into a single gene repository for PTSD. Using PharmGKB and DrugTargetor, 323 drug candidates were identified to target these 122 genes. The top 17 drug candidates were selected based on the statistical significance of the genetic associations, and their promiscuity (number of associated genestargets) and were further assessed for their suitability in terms of bioavailability and drug-like characteristics. Through functional analysis, insights were gained into the biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions involved in PTSD. This formed the foundation for the next aspect of this study which was to propose an efficient treatment for PTSD by exploring drug repurposing methods.

Results

The main aim was to identify the drugs with the most favorable profile that can be used as a pharmacological approach for PTSD treatment. More in particular, according to the genetic variations present in each individual, the relevant biological pathway can be identified, and the drug candidate proposed will specifically target said pathway, accounting for the personalized aspect of this work. The results showed that the drugs used as off-label treatment for PTSD have favorable pharmacokinetic profiles and the potential drug candidates that arose from DrugTargetor were not very promising. Clozapine showed a promising pharmacokinetic profile and has been linked with decreased psychiatric symptoms. Ambrucin also showed a promising pharmacokinetic profile but has been mostly linked with cancer treatment.

Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted

Simple Summary

Phase I clinical trials are a cornerstone of pharmaceutical development in oncology. Many studies have now attempted to incorporate pharmacogenomics into phase I studies; however, many of these studies have fundamental flaws that that preclude interpretation and application of their findings. Study populations are often small and heterogeneous with multiple disease states, multiple dose levels, and prior therapies. Genetic testing typically includes few variants in candidate genes that do no encapsulate the full range of phenotypic variability in protein function. Moreover, a plurality of these studies do not present scientifically robust clinical or preclinical justification for undertaking pharmacogenomics studies. A significant amount of progress in understanding pharmacogenomic variability has occurred since pharmacogenomics approaches first began appearing in the literature. This progress can be immediately leveraged for the vast majority of Phase I studies. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature pertaining to Phase I incorporation of pharmacogenomics studies, analyze potential flaws in study design, and suggest approaches that can improve design of future scientific efforts.

Abstract

While over ten-thousand phase I studies are published in oncology, fewer than 1% of these studies stratify patients based on genetic variants that influence pharmacology. Pharmacogenetics-based patient stratification can improve the success of clinical trials by identifying responsive patients who have less potential to develop toxicity; however, the scientific limits imposed by phase I study designs reduce the potential for these studies to make conclusions. We compiled all phase I studies in oncology with pharmacogenetics endpoints (n = 84), evaluating toxicity (n = 42), response or PFS (n = 32), and pharmacokinetics (n = 40). Most of these studies focus on a limited number of agent classes: Topoisomerase inhibitors, antimetabolites, and anti-angiogenesis agents. Eight genotype-directed phase I studies were identified. Phase I studies consist of homogeneous populations with a variety of comorbidities, prior therapies, racial backgrounds, and other factors that confound statistical analysis of pharmacogenetics. Taken together, phase I studies analyzed herein treated small numbers of patients (median, 95% CI = 28, 24–31), evaluated few variants that are known to change phenotype, and provided little justification of pharmacogenetics hypotheses. Future studies should account for these factors during study design to optimize the success of phase I studies and to answer important scientific questions.