Seven-Year Outcomes Following Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Stratified by ASTRO Consensus Groupings

DCIS: When is accelerated partial breast irradiation an option? A meta-analysis on outcomes and eligibility

BACKGROUND

The natural history of DCIS may not be progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC). Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has emerged as an alternative to whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of APBI on DCIS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible studies from 2012 to 2022 were identified in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, and ICTRP. A meta-analysis was done comparing recurrence rates, breast-related mortality rates, and adverse events of APBI versus WBRT. A subgroup analysis of 2017 ASTRO Guidelines "Suitable" and "Unsuitable" groups was performed. Forest plots and quantitative analysis were done.

RESULTS

Six studies were eligible (3 on APBI versus WBRT, 3 on APBI suitability). All had a low risk of bias and publication bias. The cumulative incidence was the following for APBI and WBRT respectively: IBTR was 5.7% and 6.3% with odds ratio of 1.09, 95% CI [0.84, 1.42], mortality rate was 4.9% and 5.05%, and adverse events was 48.87% and 69.63%. All had no statistical significance between groups. Adverse events were found to favor the APBI arm. Recurrence rate was significantly less in the Suitable group with an odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI [1.56, 4.67], favoring it over the Unsuitable group.

CONCLUSION

APBI was comparable to WBRT in terms of recurrence rate, breast cancer-related mortality rate, and adverse events. APBI was not inferior to WBRT and showed better safety in terms of skin toxicity. Patients classified as suitable for APBI had significantly lesser recurrence rate.

Increased Risk for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma after Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

The suitability criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and The Groupe Européende Curiethérapie European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) have significant differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single institution retrospective review of 946 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy and APBI intracavitary brachytherapy from 2003 to 2018. Overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 60.2 months. Median age was 68 years (46-94 years). The majority of patients had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease (94%). There were 821 (87%) cases of invasive ductal carcinoma and 68 cases (7%) of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The 5-year OS, BCSS, RFS, and IBTR were 93%, 99%, 90%, and 1.5%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, ILC (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6; p = .008) and lack of nodal evaluation (HR, 6.9; p = .01) were risk factors for IBTR. The 10-year IBTR was 2.5% for IDC and 14% for ILC. While the ABS and ASTRO criteria could not predict IBTR, the GEC-ESTRO intermediate risk group was associated with inferior IBTR (p = .04) when compared to both low risk and high risk groups. None of the suitability criteria was able to predict RFS.

CONCLUSION

These results show that APBI is an effective treatment for patients with invasive breast cancer. Expansion of the current eligibility criteria should be considered, although prospective validation is needed. Caution is required when considering APBI for patients with ILC.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In a large retrospective review of 946 patients with early breast cancer treated with partial mastectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) intracavitary brachytherapy, this study demonstrates durable local control. Patients deemed unsuitable or high risk by the American Brachytherapy Society, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines were not at increased risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), suggesting that expansion of the current criteria should be considered. Importantly, however, these results demonstrate that caution should be taken when considering APBI for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma, as these patients had relatively high risk for IBTR (10-year IBTR, 14%).

Five-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation: A single-institution retrospective review of 289 cases

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to describe our institutional experience with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter brachytherapy with high-dose-rate. We report 5-year survival outcomes, cosmesis, and treatment-related toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This included a retrospective review of patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by APBI at our institution from 2004 to 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were evaluated. Median followup was 72 months. Median age was 70 years. APBI was the only primary treatment in 86.2% of cases with early-stage breast cancer and a second conservative treatment in 13.8%. The implant was performed postoperatively in 213 patients (73.7%) and intraoperatively in 76 (26.3%). The most common radiation schemes were 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy and eight fractions of 4 Gy. Elderly or frail patients (10%) received a single 16 Gy dose. Of the 289 patients, 215 met Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology criteria for APBI; in this group, late side effects included Grade 2 (G2) fibrosis (14.8%), skin discoloration at the catheter points (8.8%), and telangiectasia (0.5%). The cosmetic result was considered excellent or good in 88.3% of cases. Five-year local control, disease-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival rates were 98.9%, 96.7%, 99.1%, and 95.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Local control and survival outcomes at 5 years of followup in this group of well-selected patients were excellent, with low rates of treatment-related toxicity. These findings confirm the safety and effectiveness of APBI, even in elderly and frail patients. These results provide further support for the clinical use of APBI in suitable patients.

Intrafraction motion monitoring to determine PTV margins in early stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant partial breast SABR

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To quantify intra-fraction tumor motion using imageguidance and implanted fiducial markers to determine if a 5 mm planning-target-volume (PTV) margin is sufficient for early stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A HydroMark© (Mammotome) fiducial was implanted at the time of biopsy adjacent to the tumor. Sixty-one patients with 62 tumours were treated prone using a 5 mm PTV margin. Motion was quantified using two methods (separate patient groups): 1) difference in 3D fiducial position pre- and post-treatment cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) in 18 patients receiving 21 Gy/1fraction (fx); 2) acquiring 2D triggered-kVimages to quantify 3D intra-fraction motion using a 2D-to-3D estimation method for 44 tumours receiving 21 Gy/1fx (n = 22) or 30 Gy/3fx (n = 22). For 2), motion was quantified by calculating the magnitude of intra-fraction positional deviation from the pretreatment CBCT. PTV margins were derived using van Herkian analysis.

RESULTS

The average ± standard deviation magnitude of motion across patients was 1.3 ± 1.15 mm Left/Right (L/R), 1.0 ± 0.9 mm Inferiorly/Superiorly (I/S), and 1.8 ± 1.5 mm Anteriorly/Posteriorly (A/P). 85/105 (81%) treatment fractions had dominant anterior motion. 6/62patients (9.7%) had mean intra-fraction motion during any fraction > 5 mm in any direction, with 4 in the anterior direction. Estimated PTV margins for single and three-fx patients in the L/R, I/S, and A/P directions were 6.0x4.1x5.9 mm and 4.5x2.9x4.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a 5 mm PTV margin is sufficient for the I/S and A/P directions if a lateral kV image is acquired immediately before treatment. For the L/R direction, either further immobilization or a larger margin is required.

A comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial brachytherapy as per GEC-ESTRO, ASTRO, updated ASTRO, and ABS guidelines

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes of women treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB-APBI) with risk groups defined by Groupe Européen de Curie-thérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), updated ASTRO, and American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) guidelines and to elucidate the most appropriate guideline that could differentiate outcomes among its risk groups.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred forty women underwent MIB-APBI during July 2000 to March 2013. Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes (local control [LC], disease-free survival [DFS], cause-specific survival [CSS], and overall survival [OAS]) stratified by the risk groups proposed by the aforementioned patient selection guidelines were carried out on a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 114 months, 10-year LC, DFS, and OAS were 90%, 81%, and 83.5%, respectively, for the entire group. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC rates for risk groups by ESTRO, ASTRO, updated ASTRO and ABS guidelines. The 10-year DFS and OAS for GEC-ESTRO low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group was 75%, 88%, and 60% (p = 0.02) and 86%, 93%, and 62% (p = 0.001), respectively. Ten-year DFS and OAS in the ABS 2018-acceptable and ABS 2018-unacceptable group were 78% and 67% (p = 0.01) and 88% and 69% (p = 0.001), respectively. No significant difference in any of the outcomes was observed with risk groups suggested by ASTRO or updated ASTRO consensus guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the current patient selection guidelines for APBI could differentiate LC (main APBI endpoint) among its risk groups, whereas GEC-ESTRO and ABS guideline could differentiate DFS and OAS.

Patterns of Recurrence Among Higher-Risk Patients Receiving Daily External Beam Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation to 40 Gy in 10 Fractions

Purpose

The 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guidelines for the use of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) define “suitable,” “cautionary,” and “unsuitable” populations for this adjuvant breast radiation therapy technique. We sought to determine whether patients in the cautionary group exhibited adverse outcomes after APBI compared with their suitable counterparts.

Methods and Materials

We identified 252 consecutively treated patients from a single institution with in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer who underwent APBI between 2008 and 2017. Treatment technique was uniform throughout the population, consisting of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy to 40 Gy administered in 10 daily fractions.

Results

One hundred seventy-eight patients (70%) were classified as suitable, 69 (27%) as cautionary, and 5 (2.0%) as unsuitable. Because unsuitable patients were few and had no recurrences, they were excluded from analysis. At a median follow-up time of 3.9 years, 97.2% of patients were free of recurrence. Four patients (1.5% overall; 3 suitable and 1 cautionary) experienced ipsilateral in-breast recurrences, and 1 cautionary patient developed an ipsilateral regional recurrence in an axillary lymph node. There was no significant difference in the rate of ipsilateral breast recurrence (2.4% vs 1.0%) between cautionary and suitable groups.

Conclusions

Local recurrences are rare among guideline-defined cautionary patients with in situ or invasive breast cancer treated with APBI delivered via daily 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy to 40 Gy. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, no significant differences in local control were noted between cautionary and suitable patient groups. Further study is needed to characterize long-term disease outcomes among various risk groups.

A Single-Institution Experience in the Preoperative Selection of DCIS Patients for IORT using the ASTRO Consensus Guidelines

Purpose

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a form of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is controversial given the limited evidence to support its efficacy. However, it remains an attractive option for low-risk patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), who derive a small absolute benefit in local control with standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We examine how the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) APBI consensus guidelines (CG) may be applied to the preoperative selection of patients with DCIS for IORT and determine treatment outcomes by CG group.

Methods and Materials

We identified patients with biopsy-proven pure DCIS enrolled in an institutional prospective registry IORT database using the Zeiss Intrabeam^® device between September 2013 and February 2017. Based on available preoperative clinicopathologic information, patients were deemed suitable, cautionary, or unsuitable for IORT according to the ASTRO CG. Change in CG group based on final pathologic diagnosis was determined, and additional therapy was recommended for unsuitable patients. Outcome in terms of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was determined.

Results

A total of 61 DCIS lesions in 60 patients were treated with IORT. Preoperatively, 21 patients (35%) were suitable and 36 (59%) were cautionary. Four (6%) were unsuitable because of lesion size but declined WBI. Final pathologic diagnosis changed the CG grouping of 10 patients (16%) because of either occult high-grade disease in 2 (3%) or close/positive margins in 8 (13%). Ultimately 12 patients total were considered unsuitable, of whom 8 (66%) accepted additional WBI after IORT. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was identified among 2 suitable, 1 cautionary, and no unsuitable patients.

Conclusion

Further investigation is necessary to refine selection of patients with DCIS who may be optimally treated with IORT alone. High acceptance of additional therapy among unsuitable patients resulted in excellent outcomes. The use of biomarkers in addition to traditional clinical and pathologic factors may help to better select patients for IORT.

Reducing the dose of gadolinium-based contrast agents for DCE-MRI guided SBRT: The effects on inter and intra observer variability for preoperative target volume delineation in early stage breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the effects of reducing the dose of contrast agent (CA) in a DCE-MRI scan on inter- and intra-observer variability in the context of MRI-guided target volume delineation for stereotactic body radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer patients. This is in hopes of reducing risks to patients due to findings of residual CA in brain and bone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients receiving neoadjuvant radiation therapy were enrolled. Five observers delineated the gross target volume (GTV) using DCE-MRI for guidance. 14/23 patients received the full clinical dose of CA and 9/23 received half. Clinical target volumes (CTV) were created through a 0.5 cm uniform expansion. Several metrics were used to quantify the inter and intra-observer reliability including differences in delineation volume and the reliability coefficient.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the volume, though half contrast patients had a lower median for both the GTV and CTV (difference of 0.26 cm³ and 1.27 cm³, respectively). All indicated a high degree of agreement between and within observers for both dose groups. However, the full dose group had a greater inter-observer variability, most likely due to the full CA causing more pronounced enhancement in the periphery.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the dose of contrast agent did not significantly alter inter- or intra-observer variability. These results have prompted our centre to reduce the dose of gadolinium in all patients enrolled in the SIGNAL trial.

A Single Institution Retrospective Comparison Study of Locoregional Recurrence After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using External Beam Fractionation Compared with Whole Breast Irradiation with 8 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) was developed to address disadvantages of overall treatment time and potentially unnecessary radiation associated with whole breast irradiation (WBI). We report updated results of our single institution study using an external beam APBI regimen with a median follow-up of 8 years.

METHODS

A total of 290 APBI patients with AJCC Stage 0-II breast cancer were compared with 290 WBI patients with matched tumor characteristics. Toxicities were scored based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). Cox regression models were used to predict likelihood of freedom from ipsilateral failure.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8 years in the APBI group and 7.5 years in the WBI group. In the APBI group, there were 18 (6.2%) ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), 13 (72%) had elsewhere failures (EF), and 5 (28%) had local failures (LF) with a median time to failure of 64.1 months. In the WBI group, there were three (1.0%) IBTR; one (33%) was an EF and two (67%) were LF with a median time to failure of 91 months. APBI was 4.6 times more likely (hazard ratio 4.57, 95% confidence interval 1.3-16.2, p = 0.02) to have an IBTR than WBI after adjusting for age, tumor size, histology, grade, and estrogen receptor status. Fatigue, erythema, and desquamation toxicities were significantly less in the APBI group then the WBI group.

CONCLUSIONS

IBTR rates were higher in external beam APBI group compared with WBI, but APBI had fewer toxicities. Clinicians must weigh the risks and benefits of APBI when making a recommendation for partial breast irradiation after lumpectomy.