Wrong to be Right: Margin Laterality is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy

Long-term Oncologic Impact of Positive Anterior and Posterior Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the anterior/posterior status of positive surgical margin (PSM) on long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 391 consecutive PSM patients after radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2007 excluding cases with multiple location PSM or lack of anterior/posterior status data. The oncologic impact of anterior-PSM and posterior-PSM were examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 115 cases (29.4%) with apex-PSM, 257 cases (65.7%) with peripheral PSM, and 19 cases (4.9%) with bladder neck PSM. Among the 257 peripheral PSM cases, 58 cases (22.6%) were with anterior-PSM, 174 cases (67.7%) were with posterior-PSM, and 25 cases (9.7%) were with both anterior and posterior PSM. Over a median follow-up of 12.6 years, patients with anterior-PSM, especially those with low to intermediate Gleason score (≤7), showed a biochemical recurrence (BCR) prognosis similar to those with apex-PSM. In contrast, patients with posterior-PSM showed significantly higher BCR risk on both univariate and multivariate analyses when compared with those with apex-PSM. No impact on metastasis-free survival or overall survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found that prostate cancer patients with anterior-PSM showed a more favorable BCR prognosis similar to those with apex-PSM when comparing to patients with posterior-PSM. Our study results may help physicians to choose different treatment options for patients diagnosed with different PSM status including considering further adjuvant treatment for patients with posterior-PSM.