1
|
Adenis A, Samalin E, Mazard T, Portales F, Mourregot A, Ychou M. [Does the FLOT regimen a new standard of perioperative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer?]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:54-60. [PMID: 31980145 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
FLOT-4 study recently reports that in patients with gastric cancer, perioperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracile, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT regimen) increases survival over standard ECF/ECX regimen (epirubicine, cisplatine and 5-fluorouracile [or capecitabine]). Does this study, make FLOT a new standard of perioperative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer? Seven hundred and sixteen patients were included into that randomized study. Thirty seven per cent and 46% of the patients received the full planned treatment in the ECF/ECX group and in the FLOT group, respectively. The primary aim of FLOT-4 was met as FLOT significantly reduced the relative risk of death vs. ECF/ECX (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.94; P=0.012). Median survival is increased by 15 months with FLOT (50 months vs. 35 months). FLOT also provided better complete resection rates, better complete pathological response rates, and better disease-free survival than ECF/ECX. FLOT is more likely associated with the following adverse events: diarrheas, leuco-neutropenia (including 51% of severe ones), infections (including 18% of severe ones), and peripheral neuropathy. On the contrary, ECF/ECX provided more likely severe nausea and vomiting, severe anemia, and thromboembolic events. Overall, the number of patients with related serious adverse events (including those that occurred during hospital stay for surgery) was similar in the two groups, as was the number of toxic deaths and postoperative deaths. FLOT should be regarded as the recommended perioperative chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer or adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction. However, some doubts remain as regards of its use in the daily practice for unselected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Adenis
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France; IRCM, Inserm, Université Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France.
| | - Emmanuelle Samalin
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Anne Mourregot
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Institut du cancer de Montpellier, 208, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier, France; IRCM, Inserm, Université Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou C, Ma T, Shi M, Xi W, Wu J, Yang C, Zhu Z, Zhang J. Dose-finding study of modified FLOT (mFLOT) regimen as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019; 85:113-119. [PMID: 31691079 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03982-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of modified FLOT regimen (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) for treating Chinese patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach. METHODS Chinese patients with untreated advanced or metastatic stomach adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Docetaxel (D), oxaliplatin (O) and leucovorin were administrated intravenously on day 1. Fluorouracil (F) was administrated continuous intravenously on day 1 for 48 h. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. The start doses of docetaxel and oxaliplatin were 40 mg/m2 and 65 mg/m2, respectively. Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design. Total 6 dose levels were set to determine the MTD and RD. Fluorouracil and leucovorin were given as fix doses at 2200 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2, respectively. Adverse events that occurred in the first 2 cycles were recorded to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The primary endpoints were MTD and RD determination. RESULTS A total of 18 patients were treated in 5 dose levels. DTL occurred in one patient of level 4 (grade 3 hypophosphatemia). Other 3 patients were enrolled in level 4 and no DLTs were observed. In level 5, 2 patients suffered grade 4 neutropenia after first cycle of treatment and were defined as DLTs. Therefore, level 5 (D/O/F: 50/75/2200 mg/m2) was defined as MTD and level 4 (D/O/F: 45/75/2200 mg/m2) was defined as RD. Common adverse events in first two cycles were nausea, anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia and anemia. For 16 patients assessable for tumor response, 7 patients had partial response (43.7%) and 5 experienced stable disease. Disease control rate were 75% (12/16). Two patients underwent conversion operation after 6 cycles of treatment. One pathological complete response (case in level 3) and one pathological partial response (case in level 2) were observed. Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.9-5.9 months) in 14 patients. CONCLUSIONS The RD of modified FLOT regimen in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer was docetaxel 45 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 75 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 2200 mg/m2 on day 1 of every 14-day cycle. Its efficacy will be assessed by further phase II study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenfei Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Tao Ma
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Shi
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenqi Xi
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Junwei Wu
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Chen Yang
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenggang Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.,Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Corvera C, Das P, Denlinger CS, Enzinger PC, Fanta P, Farjah F, Gerdes H, Gibson M, Glasgow RE, Hayman JA, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Jaroszewski D, Johung KL, Keswani RN, Kleinberg LR, Leong S, Ly QP, Matkowskyj KA, McNamara M, Mulcahy MF, Paluri RK, Park H, Perry KA, Pimiento J, Poultsides GA, Roses R, Strong VE, Wiesner G, Willett CG, Wright CD, McMillian NR, Pluchino LA. Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:855-883. [PMID: 31319389 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 603] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histology in Eastern Europe and Asia, and adenocarcinoma is most common in North America and Western Europe. Surgery is a major component of treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer, and randomized trials have shown that the addition of preoperative chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery significantly improves survival. Targeted therapies including trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and pembrolizumab have produced encouraging results in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary team management is essential for all patients with esophageal and EGJ cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers focuses on recommendations for the management of locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and EGJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David J Bentrem
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Farhood Farjah
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael McNamara
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | - Haeseong Park
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Kyle A Perry
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Robert Roses
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schokker S, van der Woude SO, van Kleef JJ, van Zoen DJ, van Oijen MGH, Mearadji B, Beenen LFM, Stroes CI, Waasdorp C, Jibodh RA, Creemers A, Meijer SL, Hooijer GKJ, Punt CJA, Bijlsma MF, van Laarhoven HWM. Phase I Dose Escalation Study with Expansion Cohort of the Addition of Nab-Paclitaxel to Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOx) as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma (ACTION Study). Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11060827. [PMID: 31207904 PMCID: PMC6627561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11060827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
First-line triplet chemotherapy including a taxane may prolong survival in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. The added toxicity of the taxane might be minimized by using nab-paclitaxel. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the feasibility of combining nab-paclitaxel with the standard of care in the Netherlands, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx). Patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma received oxaliplatin 65 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid on days 1-14 in a 21-day cycle, with nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 8 at four dose levels (60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/m2, respectively), using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation phase, followed by a safety expansion cohort. Baseline tissue and serum markers for activated tumor stroma were assessed as biomarkers for response and survival. Twenty-six patients were included. The first two dose-limiting toxicities (i.e., diarrhea and dehydration) occurred at dose level 3. The resulting maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 80 mg/m2 was used in the expansion cohort, but was reduced to 60 mg/m2 after three out of eight patients experienced diarrhea grade 3. The objective response rate was 54%. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 8.0 and 12.8 months, respectively. High baseline serum ADAM12 was associated with a significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.011). In conclusion, albeit that the addition of nab-paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 to CapOx may be better tolerated than other taxane triplets, relevant toxicity was observed. There is a rationale for preserving taxanes for later-line treatment. ADAM12 is a potential biomarker to predict survival, and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandor Schokker
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephanie O van der Woude
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jessy Joy van Kleef
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Daan J van Zoen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Martijn G H van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Banafsche Mearadji
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ludo F M Beenen
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Charlotte I Stroes
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Cynthia Waasdorp
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R Aarti Jibodh
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Aafke Creemers
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sybren L Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gerrit K J Hooijer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harada K, Lopez A, Shanbhag N, Badgwell B, Baba H, Ajani J. Recent advances in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma patients. F1000Res 2018; 7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1365. [PMID: 30228868 PMCID: PMC6117861 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15133.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies and has a dismal prognosis. Therefore, multimodality therapies to include surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy are needed to provide advantage. For locally advanced GAC (>cT1B), the emerging strategies have included preoperative chemotherapy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and (occasionally) postoperative chemoradiation in various regions. Several novel therapies have been assessed in clinical trials, but only trastuzumab and ramucirumab (alone and in combination with paclitaxel) have shown overall survival advantage. Pembrolizumab has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on the basis of response rate only for patients with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or if PD-L1 expression is positive (≥1% labeling index in tumor/immune cells in the presence of at least 100 tumor cells in the specimen). Nivolumab has been approved in Japan on the basis of a randomized trial showing significant survival advantage for patients who received nivolumab compared with placebo in the third or later lines of therapy. The cure rate of patients with localized GAC in the West is only about 40% and that for metastatic cancer is very poor (only 2-3%). At this stage, much more target discovery is needed through molecular profiling. Personalized therapy of patients with GAC remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Inserm U954, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, 5 allée du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Namita Shanbhag
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
| | - Jaffer Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|