1
|
Ghali H, Dugan MM, Aflatooni S, Boby A, DePalo DK, Laborde J, Choi J, Ahmed AF, Zager JS. Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:9150-9158. [PMID: 39174837 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16039-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023. RESULTS A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helana Ghali
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michelle M Dugan
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Shaliz Aflatooni
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aleena Boby
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Danielle K DePalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of General Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - José Laborde
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Junsung Choi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Altan F Ahmed
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kolb M, Forschner A, Artzner C, Grözinger G, Said I, Dittmann H, Seith F. Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) and Chemosaturation Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (CS-PHP) for Metastasized Uveal Melanoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4942. [PMID: 37894309 PMCID: PMC10605323 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Even with liver-targeted therapies, uveal melanoma with hepatic metastasis remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients treated with either SIRT or CS-PHP. We included 62 patients with hepatic metastasized uveal melanoma (n = 34 with SIRT, receiving 41 cycles; n = 28 with CS-PHP, receiving 56 cycles) that received their treatments between 12/2013 and 02/2020 at a single center. We evaluated their response according to the RECIST 1.1, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after the initiation of the first cycle of the liver-directed treatment using Cox regression, adjusted via propensity score analysis for confounders, including the amount of hepatic involvement. The disease control rate was 18% for SIRT and 30% for CS-PHP. The median (range) of PFS was 127.5 (19-1912) days for SIRT and 408.5 (3-1809) days for CS-PHP; adjusted Cox regression showed no significant difference (p = 0.090). The median (range) of OS was 300.5 (19-1912) days for SIRT and 516 (5-1836) days for CS-PHP; adjusted Cox regression showed a significant difference (p = 0.006). In our patient cohort, patients treated with CS-PHP showed a significantly longer OS than patients treated with SIRT. CS-PHP might therefore be preferable for patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Kolb
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Christoph Artzner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
- Institute of Radiology, Diakonie Klinikum Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
| | - Ines Said
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Helmut Dittmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Ferdinand Seith
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Tubingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (M.K.); (C.A.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trivedi DB, Aldulaimi N, Karydis I, Wheater M, Modi S, Stedman B, Karavias D, Primrose J, Pearce N, Takhar AS. Liver resection for metastatic uveal melanoma: experience from a supra-regional centre and review of literature. Melanoma Res 2023; 33:71-79. [PMID: 36409208 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma (LMUM) requires multimodal approach. This study describes evolution of liver resection for LMUM, reviewing current literature and institutional outcomes. Records of patients referred to the Melanoma Multi-Disciplinary Team between February 2005 and August 2018 were reviewed. All publications describing surgery for LMUM were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Thirty-one of 147 patients with LMUM underwent laparoscopic liver biopsy, and 29 (14 females) had liver resections. Nineteen liver resections were performed locally [7 major (≥3 seg), 14 laparoscopic] without major complications or mortality. Overall survival positively correlated with the time from uveal melanoma to LMUM (Spearman's rho rs = 0.859, P < 0.0001). Overall and recurrence-free survivals were comparable following R1 or R0 resections (OS 25 vs. 28 months, P = 0.404; RFS 13 vs. 6 months, P = 0.596). R1 resection cohort had longer lead-time (median 100 vs. 24 months, P = 0.0408). Eleven publications describing liver resection for LMUM were identified and included in the narrative review. Surgery for LMUM is safe and complements multidisciplinary management. Despite heterogeneity in literature, time from diagnosis of uveal melanoma to LMUM remains a key factor affecting survival after liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharmadev B Trivedi
- Department of General Surgery, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, Warwickshire
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Natasha Aldulaimi
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Ioannis Karydis
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Matthew Wheater
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Sachin Modi
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Brian Stedman
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Dimitrios Karavias
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - John Primrose
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Neil Pearce
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Arjun S Takhar
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garg T, Shrigiriwar A, Habibollahi P, Cristescu M, Liddell RP, Chapiro J, Inglis P, Camacho JC, Nezami N. Intraarterial Therapies for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143351. [PMID: 35884412 PMCID: PMC9322128 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided locoregional therapies play a crucial role in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transarterial therapies consist of a group of catheter-based treatments where embolic agents are delivered directly into the tumor via their supplying arteries. Some of the transarterial therapies available include bland embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), selective internal radioembolization therapy (SIRT), and hepatic artery infusion (HAI). This article provides a review of pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural aspects of each therapy, along with a review of the literature. Newer embolotherapy options and future directions are also briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar Garg
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (T.G.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Apurva Shrigiriwar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA;
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mircea Cristescu
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Division, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Robert P. Liddell
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (T.G.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Julius Chapiro
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA;
| | - Peter Inglis
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Juan C. Camacho
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA;
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Associates of Florida, Sarasota, FL 34239, USA
| | - Nariman Nezami
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
- Experimental Therapeutics Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Estler A, Artzner C, Bitzer M, Nikolaou K, Hoffmann R, Hepp T, Hagen F, Eigentler T, Forschner A, Grözinger G. Efficacy and tolerability of chemosaturation in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma. Acta Radiol 2022; 63:577-585. [PMID: 34034537 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211019808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma still have a poor outcome. PURPOSE To evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response predictors in these patients treated with chemosaturation by percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (CS-PHP). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between June 2015 and March 2020, a total of 29 patients (median age 69.7 years; age range 30-81 years; 60% women; median BMI 25.7 kg/m2; range 18.7-35.3kg/m2; 1-6 procedures per patient) were treated with 53 CS-PHPs. All patients received cross-sectional imaging for initial and follow-up examinations. Baseline tumor load, extrahepatic tumor load, tumor response, PFS, and OS were assessed. Non-parametric statistics were used. RESULTS After the initial CS-PHP, a partial response was observed in 11 patients (41%), stable disease in 12 patients (44%) and progressive disease in 4 patients (15%); two patients died before the response was evaluated. After initial CS-PHP, median OS was 12.9 ± 7.4 months and median PFS was 7.1 ± 7.4 months. OS after one year was 50%. After the second CS-PHP, median PFS was 7.9 ± 5.7 months. Seven patients had a liver tumor burden >25%, associated with a significantly shorter OS (6.0 ± 2.4 vs. 14.1 ± 12.7 months; P = 0.008). At the time of first CS-PHP, 41% (12/29) of the patients had extrahepatic metastases that did not affect OS (11.1 ± 8.4 months vs. 12.9 ± 13.6 months; P = 0.66). CONCLUSION CS-PHP is a safe and effective treatment for the hepatic metastatic uveal melanoma, especially for patients with a hepatic tumor burden <25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Estler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Artzner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Hoffmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Hepp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Hagen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gerd Grözinger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dewald CLA, Warnke MM, Brüning R, Schneider MA, Wohlmuth P, Hinrichs JB, Saborowski A, Vogel A, Wacker FK. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan in Liver-Dominant Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: The German Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010118. [PMID: 35008282 PMCID: PMC8749811 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) delivers high-dose melphalan to the liver while minimizing systemic toxicity via filtration of the venous hepatic blood. This two-center study aimed to examine the safety, response to therapy, and survival of patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) treated with PHP. A total of 66 patients with liver-dominant metastasized uveal melanoma, treated with 145 PHP between April 2014 and May 2020, were retrospectively analyzed with regard to adverse events (AEs; CTCAE v5.0), response (overall response rate (ORR)), and disease control rate (DCR) according to RECIST1.1, as well as progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). With an ORR of 59% and a DCR of 93.4%, the response was encouraging. After initial PHP, median hepatic PFS was 12.4 (confidence interval (CI) 4–18.4) months and median OS was 18.4 (CI 7–24.6) months. Hematologic toxicity was the most frequent AE (grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia after 24.8% of the procedures); less frequent was grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicity (increased aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) after 7.6% and 6.9% of the interventions, respectively). Cardiovascular events included four cases of ischemic stroke (2.8%) and one patient with central pulmonary embolism (0.7%). In conclusion, PHP is a safe and effective salvage treatment for liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma. Serious AEs—though rare—demand careful patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia L. A. Dewald
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-511-532-3421
| | - Mia-Maria Warnke
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Roland Brüning
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Martin A. Schneider
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, 21033 Hamburg, Germany; (M.-M.W.); (R.B.); (M.A.S.)
| | - Peter Wohlmuth
- Biostatistics, ProResearch, Asklepios Hospital St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Jan B. Hinrichs
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
| | - Anna Saborowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (A.S.); (A.V.)
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (A.S.); (A.V.)
| | - Frank K. Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30623 Hannover, Germany; (J.B.H.); (F.K.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Öcal O, Eldem G, Karagoz AH, Kılıçkap S, Yalcin S, Balkanci F, Peynircioglu B. Initiation of Chemosaturation With Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion Program in Interventional Radiology Department. Cureus 2021; 13:e17880. [PMID: 34660079 PMCID: PMC8502519 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Chemosaturation with percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a relatively new minimally-invasive liver-directed therapy, which aims to deliver high-dose chemotherapy into the liver with low systemic side effects. Initial studies showed promising results, especially in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. But unfamiliarity of the interventional radiologists prevents its widespread implantation in clinical routine. This study aimed to outline how to initiate a PHP program and report initial results. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent chemosaturation with PHP in our institution between March 2016 and February 2017 and their follow-up results till October 2018. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, clinical and imaging results, and complications were evaluated. Additionally, modifications regarding infrastructure and procedure techniques were described. Results A total of three patients (two females and one male) with a mean age of 59 underwent six PHP procedures. The primary disease was colorectal carcinoma in one patient and uveal melanoma in two patients. The technical success rate was 100% and the mean melphalan dose was 190.8 mg. No procedural death was observed. Patients were hospitalized for a mean of 3.3 days after procedures. Grade 3 and 4 complications were seen after 50% and 33.3% of procedures, respectively. Two patients showed partial response and the other patient showed stable disease after procedures. Mean hepatic progression-free survival was 10.8 months. Overall survival from the first procedure was 14.8 months in our cohort. Conclusion Our results show that chemosaturation with PHP offers a promising minimally invasive treatment option in patients with unresectable liver metastases. The technical challenges of PHP can be easily handled by an experienced interventional radiology (IR) team. It is a relatively safe procedure and its toxicities are usually hematological and can be manageable with close surveillance and appropriate medical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Öcal
- Radiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TUR
| | - Gonca Eldem
- Radiology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TUR
| | - Ayse H Karagoz
- Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TUR
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bethlehem MS, Katsarelias D, Olofsson Bagge R. Meta-Analysis of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion and Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184726. [PMID: 34572953 PMCID: PMC8469397 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Isolated hepatic perfusion is one of the available treatment options for patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. This is an open surgical procedure where the liver is isolated from the circulation and perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent. A modern development is the minimally invasive percutaneous hepatic perfusion, where the liver is endovascularly isolated and then perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent through a catheter in the arterial system. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to compare these modalities in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, complications and response. Abstract Background: Uveal melanoma is the most commonly occurring primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and patients have a high risk of developing metastatic disease, mostly in the liver. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a liver-directed therapy for patients with liver metastases. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a minimally invasive technique, is available as well. PHP benefits from the fact that the procedure can be repeated and therefore possibly offers better survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of nine articles reporting on eight studies were included in the analysis. Individual survival data were extracted from each study. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 months for IHP and 17.3 months for PHP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months for IHP and 9.6 months for PHP. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 10 months for IHP and 9.5 months for PHP. The complication rate and 30-day mortality rate were 39.1% and 5.5% for IHP and 23.8% and 1.8% for PHP. Conclusion: There was no difference in OS or PFS between IHP and PHP for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases, but patients have significantly less of a risk for complications and mortality following PHP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn S. Bethlehem
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; (D.K.); (R.O.B.)
- Institute of Clinical Sciences/Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meignan M, Cottereau AS, Specht L, Mikhaeel NG. Total tumor burden in lymphoma - an evolving strong prognostic parameter. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210448. [PMID: 34379496 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), a new parameter extracted from baseline FDG-PET/CT, has been recently proposed by several groups as a prognosticator in lymphomas before first-line treatment. TMTV, the sum of the metabolic volume of each lesion, is an index of the metabolically most active part of the tumor and highly correlates with the total tumor burden. TMTV measurement is obtained from PET images processed with different software and techniques, many being now freely available. In the various lymphoma subtypes where it has been measured, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, and Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, TMTV has been reported as a strong predictor of outcome (progression-free survival and overall survival) often outperforming the clinical scores, molecular predictors, and results of interim PET. Combined with these scores, TMTV improves the stratification of the populations into risk groups with different outcomes. TMTV cut-off separating the high-risk from the low-risk population impacts the outcome whatever the technique used for its measurement and an international harmonization is ongoing. TMTV is a unique and easy tool that could replace the surrogate of tumor burden included in the prognostic indexes used in lymphoma and help tailor therapy. Other parameters extracted from the baseline PET may give an information on the dissemination of this total tumor volume such as the maximum distance between the lesions. Trials based on TMTV would probably demonstrate its predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Meignan
- LYSA Imaging, Henri Mondor University Hospitals, University Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | | | - Lena Specht
- Dept. of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust and School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London University, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carr MJ, Sun J, Cohen JB, Liu J, Serdiuk AA, Stewart SR, Doobay N, Duclos A, Seal DA, Choi J, Zager JS. Over 12 Years Single Institutional Experience Performing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion for Unresectable Liver Metastases. Cancer Control 2021; 27:1073274820983019. [PMID: 33372814 PMCID: PMC8480350 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820983019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with unresectable hepatic metastases, from uveal or ocular melanoma, are challenging to treat with an overall poor prognosis. Although over the past decade significant advances in systemic therapies have been made, metastatic disease to the liver, especially from uveal melanoma, continues to be a poor prognosis. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a safe, viable treatment option for these patients. PHP utilizes high dose chemotherapy delivered directly to the liver while minimizing systemic exposure and can be repeated up to 6 times. Isolation of the hepatic vasculature with a double-balloon catheter allows for high concentration cytotoxic therapy to be administered with minimal systemic adverse effects. A detailed description of the multidisciplinary treatment protocol used at an institution with over 12 years of experience is discussed and recommendations are given. A dedicated team of a surgical or medical oncology, interventional radiology, anesthesiology and a perfusionist allows PHP to be repeatedly performed as a safe treatment strategy for unresectable hepatic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan B Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jinhong Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrew A Serdiuk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen R Stewart
- Certified Clinical Perfusionist, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Navin Doobay
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Duclos
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David A Seal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Junsung Choi
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. Sun is now with the Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dewald CLA, Hinrichs JB, Becker LS, Maschke S, Meine TC, Saborowski A, Schönfeld LJ, Vogel A, Kirstein MM, Wacker FK. Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: Outcome and Safety in Patients with Metastasized Uveal Melanoma. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2021; 193:928-936. [PMID: 33535258 DOI: 10.1055/a-1348-1932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemosaturation percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic melphalan in patients with curatively untreatable liver tumors while limiting systemic toxicity through hemofiltration of the hepatic venous blood. Aim of this study was to investigate the response to therapy, survival and safety of the CS-PHP procedure in patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (mhPFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Adverse events were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5. RESULTS Overall, 30 patients were treated with 70 CS-PHP in a salvage setting from October 2014 to January 2019. In total, ORR and DCR were 42.3 % and 80.8 %, respectively. Overall, mOS was 12 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 7-15) months, and both, mPFS and mhPFS were 6 months, respectively (95 % CI 4-10; 95 % CI 4-13). Adverse events (AE) most frequently included significant but transient hematologic toxicities (87 % of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia), less frequent AEs were hepatic injury extending to liver failure (3 %), cardiovascular events including one case of ischemic stroke (3 %). CONCLUSION Salvage treatment with CS-PHP is effective in selected patients with UM. The interventional procedure is safe. Serious hepatic and cardiovascular events, although rare, require careful patient selection and should be closely monitored. KEY POINTS · CS-PHP is safe for selected patients with liver-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma.. · CS-PHP resulted in hepatic disease control in 80 % of patients.. · Hematologic events following CS-PHP are common but manageable.. CITATION FORMAT · Dewald CL, Hinrichs JB, Becker LS et al. Chemosaturation with Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: Outcome and Safety in Patients with Metastasized Uveal Melanoma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 928 - 936.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan B Hinrichs
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lena Sophie Becker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sabine Maschke
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Timo C Meine
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anna Saborowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leon Jonas Schönfeld
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- 1st Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Frank K Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, MHH, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Höppener DJ, Grünhagen DJ, Eggermont AMM, van der Veldt AAM, Verhoef C. An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:103-123. [PMID: 33220800 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dewald CLA, Becker LS, Maschke SK, Meine TC, Alten TA, Kirstein MM, Vogel A, Wacker FK, Meyer BC, Hinrichs JB. Percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (chemosaturation) with melphalan following right hemihepatectomy in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic uveal melanoma: peri- and post-interventional adverse events and therapy response compared to a matched group without prior liver surgery. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:683-692. [PMID: 33034815 PMCID: PMC7666275 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10057-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate feasibility, frequency and severity of peri-procedural complications and post-procedural adverse events (AEs) in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma or liver metastasis of uveal melanoma and prior hemihepatectomy undergoing chemosaturation percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP) and to analyze therapy response and overall survival compared to a matched group without prior surgery. CS-PHP performed between 10/2014 and 02/2018 were retrospectively assessed. To determine peri-procedural safety and post-procedural adverse events, hospital records and hematological, hepatic and biliary function were categorized using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 (1–5; mild-death). Significance was tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U test. Kaplan–Meier estimation and log-rank test assessed survival. Overall 21 CS-PHP in seven patients (4/7 males; 52 ± 10 years) with hemihepatectomy (grouphemihep) and 22 CS-PHP in seven patients (3/7 males; 63 ± 12 years) without prior surgery (groupnoresection) were included. No complications occurred during the CS-PHP procedures. Transient changes (CTCAE grade 1–2) of liver enzymes and blood cells followed all procedures. In comparison, grouphemihep presented slightly more AEs grade 3–4 (e.g. thrombocytopenia in 57% (12/21) vs. 41% (9/22; p = 0.37)) 5–7 days after CS-PHP. These AEs were self-limiting or responsive to treatment (insignificant difference of pre-interventional to 21–45 days post-interventional values (p > 0.05)). One patient in grouphemihep with high tumor burden died eight days following CS-PHP. No deaths occurred in groupnoresection. In comparison, overall survival after first diagnosis was insignificantly shorter in groupnoresection (44.7(32–56.1) months) than in grouphemihep (48.3(34.6–72.8) months; p = 0.48). The severity of adverse events following CS-PHP in patients after hemihepatectomy was comparable to a matched group without prior liver surgery. Thus, the performance of CS-PHP is not substantially compromised by a prior hemihepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L A Dewald
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - L S Becker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - S K Maschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - T C Meine
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - T A Alten
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - M M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - F K Wacker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - B C Meyer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - J B Hinrichs
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Unresectable Hepatic Metastasis of Uveal Melanoma: Hepatic Chemosaturation with High-Dose Melphalan-Long-Term Overall Survival Negatively Correlates with Tumor Burden. Radiol Res Pract 2020; 2020:5672048. [PMID: 32934846 PMCID: PMC7484678 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5672048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (PHP-M) for hepatic metastasis of uveal melanoma (LMUM) achieves high local response rates, but the individual clinical benefit is poorly defined. We aimed to determine cofactors of response and clinical outcomes including the probability of long-term (5-years) overall survival (OS) in PHP-M-treated patients with LMUM. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological, radiological, and outcome data of 19 patients with unresectable LMUM treated with 43 PHP-M (median 2 PHP-M) between 2014 and 2019. Tumor response and adverse events were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and the Clavien–Dindo classification. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression hazard proportional models were used. Results Of 19 patients, 10 (53%) achieved a partial response (PR) and 9 (47%) had stable disease (SD). There was no progressive disease (PD) and no adverse events exceeding Clavien–Dindo grade IV. Median OS was 16.7 months after the first PHP-M treatment and 26.4 months after initial diagnosis. Low hepatic tumor volume (median of 10 mL vs. 150 mL) was an independent predictor of favorable OS (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.190 (0.041, 0.893); p < 0.05), and female patients were at a lower risk compared with males (0.146 (0.017, 1.240)). Estimates of the overall survival were 0.213 (0.0449, 1) from first imaging (95% confidence interval) to 5 years and 0.793 (0.609, 1) and 0.604 (0.380, 0.960) for 1 and 2 years after chemosaturation, respectively. Discussion. PHP-M for nonresectable LMUV provides a safe and locally efficient liver-directed procedure that offers patients a chance for long-term OS, especially for patients with a low hepatic tumor burden.
Collapse
|
15
|
Yee C, McCoy D, Yu J, Losey A, Jordan C, Moore T, Stillson C, Oh HJ, Kilbride B, Roy S, Patel A, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. Endovascular Ion Exchange Chemofiltration Device Reduces Off-Target Doxorubicin Exposure in a Hepatic Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Model. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2019; 1:e190009. [PMID: 32300759 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2019190009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To determine if endovascular chemofiltration with an ionic device (ChemoFilter [CF]) can be used to reduce systemic exposure and off-target biodistribution of doxorubicin (DOX) during hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in a preclinical model. Materials and Methods Hepatic IAC infusions were performed in six pigs with normal livers. Animals underwent two 10-minute intra-arterial infusions of DOX (200 mg) into the common hepatic artery. Both the treatment group and the control group received initial IAC at 0 minutes and a second dose at 200 minutes. Prior to the second dose, CF devices were deployed in and adjacent to the hepatic venous outflow tract of treatment animals. Systemic exposure to DOX was monitored via blood samples taken during IAC procedures. After euthanasia, organ tissue DOX concentrations were analyzed. Alterations in systemic DOX exposure and biodistribution were compared by using one-tailed t tests. Results CF devices were well tolerated, and no hemodynamic, thrombotic, or immunologic complications were observed. Animals treated with a CF device had a significant reduction in systemic exposure when compared with systemic exposure in the control group (P <.009). Treatment with a CF device caused a significant decrease in peak DOX concentration (31%, P <.01) and increased the time to maximum concentration (P <.03). Tissue analysis was used to confirm significant reduction in DOX accumulation in the heart and kidneys (P <.001 and P <.022, respectively). Mean tissue concentrations in the heart, kidneys, and liver of animals treated with CF compared with those in control animals were 14.2 μg/g ± 1.9 (standard deviation) versus 26.0 μg/g ± 1.8, 46.4 μg/g ± 4.6 versus 172.6 μg/g ± 40.2, and 217.0 μg/g ± 5.1 versus 236.8 μg/g ± 9.0, respectively. Fluorescence imaging was used to confirm in vivo DOX binding to CF devices. Conclusion Reduced systemic exposure and heart bioaccumulation of DOX during local-regional chemotherapy to the liver can be achieved through in situ adsorption by minimally invasive image-guided CF devices.© RSNA, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Yee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - David McCoy
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Jay Yu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Aaron Losey
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Caroline Jordan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Terilyn Moore
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Carol Stillson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Hee Jeung Oh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Bridget Kilbride
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Shuvo Roy
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Anand Patel
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Mark W Wilson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | - Steven W Hetts
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.Y., D.M., J.Y., A.L., C.L., T.M., C.S., B.K., A.P., M.W.W., S.W.H.) and Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences (S.R.), University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-351, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628; and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif (H.J.O.).,For members of the ChemoFilter Consortium, please see the Acknowledgments
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ponti A, Denys A, Digklia A, Schaefer N, Hocquelet A, Knebel JF, Michielin O, Dromain C, Duran R. First-Line Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in Patients with Uveal Melanoma Metastatic to the Liver. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:350-356. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.230870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
|
17
|
Broman KK, Zager JS. Intra-arterial perfusion-based therapies for regionally metastatic cutaneous and uveal melanoma. Melanoma Manag 2019; 6:MMT26. [PMID: 31807277 PMCID: PMC6891941 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2019-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Locoregional disease remains a challenging problem in cutaneous melanoma and uveal melanoma. Arterial-based chemoperfusion strategies enable regional therapy delivery with minimal systemic toxicity. Herein we discuss intra-arterial therapies for in-transit cutaneous melanoma of the extremity including hyperthermic-isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion. We also discuss open (isolated hepatic perfusion) and percutaneous hepatic perfusion techniques for isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma. We review the current state of knowledge with respect to indications, procedural techniques, outcomes and expected toxicities for intra-arterial chemoperfusion for locoregional melanoma metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy K Broman
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marquardt S, Kirstein MM, Brüning R, Zeile M, Ferrucci PF, Prevoo W, Radeleff B, Trillaud H, Tselikas L, Vicente E, Wiggermann P, Manns MP, Vogel A, Wacker FK. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (chemosaturation) with melphalan in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: European multicentre study on safety, short-term effects and survival. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:1882-1892. [PMID: 30255257 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5729-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver tumour with a poor overall prognosis. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a directed therapy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and its efficacy and safety have been shown in different entities. The purpose of this study was to prove the safety and efficacy of PHP in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 15 patients with unresectable iCCA treated with PHP in nine different hospitals throughout Europe. Overall response rates (ORR) were assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST1.1). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic PFS (hPFS) were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier estimation. Adverse events (AEs) and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS Fifteen patients were treated with 26 PHPs. ORR was 20%, disease control was achieved in 53% after the first PHP. Median OS was 26.9 months from initial diagnosis and 7.6 months from first PHP. Median PFS and hPFS were 122 and 131 days, respectively. Patients with liver-only disease had a significantly longer median OS compared to patients with locoregional lymph node metastases (12.9 vs. 4.8 months, respectively; p < 0.01). Haematological toxicity was common, but manageable. No AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred during the procedures. DISCUSSION PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with iCCA, especially in non-metastatic disease. KEY POINTS • Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) offers an additional locoregional therapy strategy for the treatment of unresectable primary or secondary intrahepatic malignancies. • PHP is a standardised and safe procedure that provides promising response rates and survival data in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), especially in non-metastatic disease. • Side effects seem to be tolerable and comparable to other systemic or local treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Marquardt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Roland Brüning
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeile
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Warner Prevoo
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boris Radeleff
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hervé Trillaud
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University Hospital Center, Bordeaux, France
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Department of Radiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Paris, France
| | - Emilio Vicente
- General Surgery Department, HM University Sanchinarro Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philipp Wiggermann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Manns
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank K Wacker
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Regional therapies for locoregionally advanced and unresectable melanoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 2018; 35:495-502. [DOI: 10.1007/s10585-018-9890-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
20
|
Karydis I, Gangi A, Wheater MJ, Choi J, Wilson I, Thomas K, Pearce N, Takhar A, Gupta S, Hardman D, Sileno S, Stedman B, Zager JS, Ottensmeier C. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan in uveal melanoma: A safe and effective treatment modality in an orphan disease. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1170-1178. [PMID: 29284076 PMCID: PMC6033148 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) carries a poor prognosis; liver is the most frequent and often solitary site of recurrence. Available systemic treatments have not improved outcomes. Melphalan percutaneous hepatic perfusion (M-PHP) allows selective intrahepatic delivery of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS Retrospective analysis of outcomes data of UM patients receiving M-PHP at two institutions was performed. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, respectively. RESULTS A total of 51 patients received 134 M-PHP procedures (median of 2 M-PHPs). 25 (49%) achieved a partial (N = 22, 43.1%) or complete hepatic response (N = 3, 5.9%). In 17 (33.3%) additional patients, the disease stabilized for at least 3 months, for a hepatic disease control rate of 82.4%. After median follow-up of 367 days, median overall progression free (PFS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) was 8.1 and 9.1 months, respectively and median overall survival was 15.3 months. There were no treatment related fatalities. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 events were seen in 19 (37.5%) patients and were mainly coagulopathic (N = 8) and cardiovascular (N = 9). CONCLUSIONS M-PHP results in durable intrahepatic disease control and can form the basis for an integrated multimodality treatment approach in appropriately selected UM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Karydis
- Cancer Sciences Academic UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Gangi
- Department of Cutaneous OncologyMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida
| | | | - Junsung Choi
- Department of RadiologyMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida
| | - Iain Wilson
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | - Kerry Thomas
- Department of RadiologyMoffitt Cancer CenterTampaFlorida
| | - Neil Pearce
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | - Arjun Takhar
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | - Danielle Hardman
- Morsani School of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaFlorida
| | - Sean Sileno
- Morsani School of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaFlorida
| | - Brian Stedman
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Christian Ottensmeier
- Cancer Sciences Academic UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
- University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen M, Li Y, Sun X, Zhang B, Li W, Wang S, Zhu X, Li F, Shi L. Grb2-associated binder 2 expression and its roles in uveal melanoma invasion. Mol Med Rep 2017; 16:4577-4582. [PMID: 28791340 PMCID: PMC5646995 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by high metastasis and poor prognosis. A more improved understanding of the metastatic mechanism in UM cells is essential for the design of molecular therapy. Grb2-associated binder 2 (Gab2) has been reported to serve important roles in the progression of various types of human cancer. However, the role of Gab2 in the migration and invasion of UM remains unclear. The present study sought to further assess the expression of Gab2 in UM and the role of Gab2 in the invasion of UM cells. Clinical UM tissue samples and UM cell lines were analyzed using western blot analysis for the expression of Gab2. RNA interference was used to investigate the effect of Gab2 on the migratory and invasive characteristics of UM cells in vitro. The expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)2, MMP9 and fascin in Gab2-knockdown, and control cells were also detected using western blot analysis. A total of 20 clinical UM samples and a subset of UM cell lines were investigated with uniformly high Gab2 expression. In the in vitro experiment, reduction of Gab2 using small interfering RNA inhibited the migration and invasion of UM cells by mediating MMPs, and fascin expression. These data suggest that Gab2 is a useful prognostic marker for UM and a novel therapeutic target for UM metastasis intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meiling Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Yuehua Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, P.R. China
| | - Xiuning Sun
- Department of Microbiology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Baogang Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Gynecology, Zhenjiang Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Zhenjiang 212001, P.R. China
| | - Shuxiao Wang
- Department of Pharmacology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Xuetao Zhu
- Department of Pharmacology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Pharmacology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| | - Lihong Shi
- Department of Pharmacology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|