Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With the Introduction of New Chemotherapeutic Drugs: 10-Year Experience of a Single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center

The evolution of clinical outcomes in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a 10-year experience at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the US. Recent studies have demonstrated survival benefits for FOLFIRINOX (5-FU, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and Gem/nab-P (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel) over gemcitabine. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of mPDAC before and after incorporating these newer regimens into the clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with mPDAC at our institution between 2009 and 2018, who were followed up until December 2019. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to explore predictors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients with mPDAC were included: 122 (31%) were diagnosed 2009-2013 and 272 (69%) 2014-2018. In 2009-2013 cohort vs. 2014-2018 cohort, the median OS and PFS were similar (4 vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.5) and (2.3 vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.41), respectively. Age, ECOG-PS >1, serum albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of real-world data, the median OS and PFS for all patients with mPDAC were equivalent before and after incorporating newer treatment regimens into the clinical practice.

The Appropriate First-Line Chemotherapy Regimen for Incurable Pancreatic Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Consideration of Patients' Overall Survival and Quality of Life

Purpose: For incurable pancreatic cancer, the therapeutic goal is to prolong survival and maintain the quality of life (QOL). Unexpected outpatient consultation (OCT) and emergency hospitalization lead to QOL deterioration. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (nabPTX+GEM) as the preferred first-line regimens. Japanese clinical practice guidelines further recommend GEM and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1). Currently, no treatment strategy considers QOL at any stage during a patient's clinical course.

Methods: In this study, hospital-free survival (HFS), defined as the period without hospitalization and OCT, was introduced as a new indicator of the qualitative aspect of overall survival (OS). We compared OS, length of hospitalization (LOH), OCT, and HFS for the four first-line chemotherapy groups.

Results: No significant difference was observed in the median OS and HFS, nor was there a strong correlation between OS and LOH, based on the four first-line chemotherapy groups. In contrast, there were strong correlations between OS and OCT and between OS and HFS in all first-line chemotherapy groups. The ratio of OCT to OS was similar for mFOLFIRINOX and nabPTX+GEM. S-1 had the lowest OCT-to-OS ratio. The ratio of HFS to OS declined from highest to lowest in the order S-1, nabPTX+GEM, mFOLFIRINOX, and GEM.

Conclusion: Our findings suggested existence of correlation differences between OS and HFS between first-line mFOLFIRINOX and first-line nabPTX+GEM. In addition, a good HFS was obtained with S-1 alone in some cases. In the future, clinical trials for chemotherapy should examine QOL during the entire clinical course.

Traveling for Pancreatic Cancer Care Is Worth the Trip

BACKGROUND

Centralized care for patients with pancreatic cancer is associated with longer survival. We hypothesized that increased travel distance from home is associated with increased survival for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database user file for all pancreatic cancer patients was investigated from 2004 through 2015. Distance from the patients' zip code to the treating facility was determined. Survival was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox hazard ratios (CoxHRs) were determined based on stage of disease, distance traveled for care, and clinical factors.

RESULTS

340 780 patients were identified. In the average age of 68 ± 12 years, 51% were male and 83% were Caucasian. For all stages of cancer, longer survival was associated with traveling farther (P < .001). The survival advantage was longer for Caucasians than African Americans (3.7 months vs. 2.6 months, P < .001) Travel was associated with a 13% decrease in risk of death (P < .001). Even controlling for the pathologic stage, traveling farther was associated with decreased risk of death (CoxHR = .91, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Traveling for care is associated with improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients. While a selection bias may exist, the fact that all stages of patients investigated benefited suggests that this is a real phenomenon.