Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Response to First-Line Therapies for Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Patients Who Are Cisplatin Ineligible

Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) of First-Line Therapies (1L) for Locally Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (la/mUC)

To compare efficacy outcomes for all approved and investigational first-line (1L) treatment regimens for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) with standard of care (SOC), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. A systematic literature review (SLR) identified phase 2 and 3 randomized trials investigating 1L treatment regimens in la/mUC published January 2001–September 2021. Three networks were formed based on cisplatin (cis) eligibility: cis-eligible/mixed (cis-eligible patients and mixed populations of cis-eligible/ineligible patients), cis-ineligible (strict; exclusively cis-ineligible patients), and cis-ineligible (wide; including studies with investigator’s choice of carbo). Analyses examined comparative efficacy by hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), and odds ratio (OR) for overall response rate (ORR), with 1L regimens vs. SOC. SOC was gemcitabine + cis (GemCis) or carboplatin (GemCarbo), cis-eligible/mixed network, and GemCarbo cis-ineligible networks. Of 1906 SLR identified citations, 55 trials were selected for data extraction. The NMA comprised 11, 6, and 8 studies in the cis-eligible/mixed, cis-ineligible (strict), cis-ineligible (wide) networks, respectively. In a meta-analysis of SOC control arms, median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) in months varied by network: 13.19 (12.43, 13.95) cis-eligible/mixed, 11.96 (10.43, 13.48) cis-ineligible (wide), and 9.74 (6.71, 12.76) cis-ineligible (strict). Most differences in OS, PFS, and ORR with treatment regimens across treatment networks were not statistically significant compared with SOC. Outcomes with current 1L regimens remain poor, and few significant improvements over SOC have been made, despite inclusion of recent clinical trial data, highlighting an unmet need in the la/mUC patient population.

Causes of death in female patients with bladder cancer after local tumor excision and radical cystectomy: a contemporary, US population-based analysis

Surgery is one of the most important treatments for bladder cancer, including local tumor excision and radical cystectomy. At present, studies on the causes of death for contemporary survivors, especially women, who have received different surgical treatments are limited. Therefore, the study used a population-based cohort study in the United States from 2000 to 2017 to analyze causes of death for women who underwent local tumor excision or radical cystectomy stratified by demographics and tumor stage. standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated based on general population data. In total, 24,040 female patients who underwent surgical treatments were assessed. Of those 20,780 patients undergoing local tumor excision, 36.6% died of bladder cancer, while 63.4% died of other causes. The risk of death from all causes increased in comparation with the general population (SMR 1.85; 95% CI 1.82-1.87), and the most common non-tumor cause of death was from heart diseases (16.2%; SMR 1.13; 95% CI 1.09-1.16). Among women who receive radical cystectomy, 82.3% of deaths occurred within 5 years after surgery. 66.9% deaths resulted from bladder cancer, and the risk of death from all causes significantly higher than that in the general people (SMR 4.67; 95% CI 4.51-4.84). Moreover, the risk of death from non- bladder cancer causes also increased, in particular, such as septicemia (SMR 3.09; 95% CI 2.13-4.34). Causes of death during bladder cancer survivorship after surgery vary by patient and tumor characteristics, and these data provide information regarding primary care for women during postoperative cancer survivorship.

Head-to-Head Comparison of the Expression Differences of NECTIN-4, TROP-2, and HER2 in Urothelial Carcinoma and Its Histologic Variants

Background

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADC), such as enfortumab vedotin (EV), sacituzumab govitecan (SG), and RC-48, have shown outstanding response rates to local advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, their corresponding target expression characteristics in UC and its histologic variants were unknown.

Methods

We detected the expression of NECTIN-4, TROP-2, and HER2, which are the corresponding targets of ADCs EV, SG, and RC-48 in muscle-invasive UC through immunohistochemistry.

Results

161 consecutive samples from 2017 to 2021 of muscle-invasive UC and its histologic variants were obtained in Peking University First Hospital. Variant histology types included 72UC, 10 squamous carcinomas, 23 glandular carcinomas, 19 small cell carcinomas, 19 micropapillary variants, and 18 nested variants. NECTIN-4 expression was found to be 57/72 (79.2%), 10/10 (100%), 15/23 (65.2%), 4/19 (21.1%), 15/19 (78.9%), and 16/18 (88.9%) in conventional UC, squamous carcinoma, glandular carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, micropapillary, and nested variant, respectively, compared with 65/72 (90.3%), 8/10 (80.0%), 13/23 (56.5%), 3/19 (15.8%), 16/19 (84.2%), and 15/18 (83.3%) of TROP-2, and 26/72 (36.1%), 0, 5/23 (21.7%), 6/19 (31.6%), 5/19 (26.3%), and 7/18 (38.9%) of HER2.

Carboplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation after radical cystectomy in patients with pN1-3 urothelial bladder cancer

PURPOSE

To test the impact of carboplatin-based ACT on overall survival (OS) in patients with pN1-3 cM0 BCa.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1057 patients with pTany pN1-3 cM0 urothelial BCa treated with or without carboplatin-based ACT after radical cystectomy and bilateral lymph-node dissection between 2002 and 2018 at 12 European and North-American hospitals. No patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Only patients with negative surgical margins at surgery were included. A 3:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to predict the effect of carboplatin-based ACT on OS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to display OS in the matched cohort.

RESULTS

Of the 1057 patients included in the study, 69 (6.5%) received carboplatin-based ACT. After PSM, 244 total patients were identified in two cohorts that did not differ for baseline characteristics. Death was recorded in 114 (46.7%) patients over a median follow-up of 19 months. In the multivariable Cox regression analyses, increasing age at surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.06, p < 0.001) and increasing number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of worse OS. The delivery of carboplatin-based ACT was not predictive of improved OS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.04, p = 0.08). The main limitations of this study are its retrospective design and the relatively low number of patients involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin-based might not improve OS in patients with pN1-3 cM0 BCa. Our results underline the need for alternative therapies for cisplatin-ineligible patients.

Bladder cancer: shedding light on the most promising investigational drugs in clinical trials

Introduction: Urothelial cancers (UC) include tumors of the bladder, upper tract, and proximal urethra. Bladder cancer (BC) arises from urothelial cells lining the bladder and accounts for 90-95% of UC. BC is responsible for approximately 500,000 new cases and has a dismal prognosis with 200,000 deaths annually globally. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates are rapidly changing the treatment landscape. Novel therapies are building on this success and are being intensively investigated in clinical trials.Areas Covered: This paper examines the clinical trial data by searching Medline through January 2021 and clinicaltrials.gov and conference proceedings from the latest ASCO and ESMO meetings. We summarize the emerging data from clinical trials and offer insights into mechanisms of novel agents, nuances in clinical trial designs, and future directions.Expert Opinion: Approval of multiple ICIs, Enfortumab Vedotin (EV), Erdatfitinib and switch maintenance strategy with Avelumab, represent major advances in metastatic disease. ICI agents and EV are well poised to move forward for treating the early stages of bladder cancer. Finally, molecular characterization of the tumor offers hope for personalized treatment approaches.

Enfortumab vedotin after PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (EV‑201): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is generally incurable and has scarce treatment options, especially for cisplatin-ineligible patients previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate directed at Nectin-4, a protein highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enfortumab vedotin in the post-immunotherapy setting in cisplatin-ineligible patients.

METHODS

EV-201 is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study of enfortumab vedotin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Cohort 2 included adults (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less who were considered ineligible for cisplatin at enrolment and who had not received platinum-containing chemotherapy in the locally advanced or metastatic setting. Enfortumab vedotin was given intravenously at a dose of 1·25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of enfortumab vedotin. EV-201 is an ongoing study and the primary analysis is complete. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03219333.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 8, 2017, and Feb 11, 2020, 91 patients were enrolled at 40 sites globally, of whom 89 received treatment. Median follow-up was 13·4 months (IQR 11·3-18·9). At data cutoff (Sept 8, 2020), the confirmed objective response rate was 52% (46 of 89 patients; 95% CI 41-62), with 18 (20%) of 89 patients achieving a complete response and 28 (31%) achieving a partial response. 49 (55%) of 89 patients had grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (eight [9%] patients), maculopapular rash (seven [8%] patients), and fatigue (six [7%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 15 (17%) patients. Three (3%) patients died due to acute kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (one [1%] each) within 30 days of first dose and these deaths were considered by the investigator to be related to treatment; a fourth death from pneumonitis occurred more than 30 days after the last dose and was also considered to be related to treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with enfortumab vedotin was tolerable and confirmed responses were seen in 52% of cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. These patients have few treatment options, and enfortumab vedotin could be a promising new therapy for a patient population with a high unmet need.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma Global Development and Seagen.

Impact of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in cisplatin-fit and -unfit patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and toxicity of first-line combination treatment with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine (PCG) for advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) in cisplatin-unfit patients compared with cisplatin-fit patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who received first-line PCG. Using international consensus criteria, patients were classified into cisplatin-fit and -unfit groups. Cisplatin-unfit patients received PCG with adjustment of the cisplatin dose after assessing 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance, without modifying the administration interval.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, 50 patients received first-line PCG, of whom 30 and 20 were classified into the cisplatin-fit and -unfit groups. After a median follow-up of 15.0 months, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.0 and 9.8 months in all patients, 15.0 and 10.0 months in the cisplatin-fit group, and 13.2 and 9.3 months in the cisplatin-unfit group, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-2.54) or PFS (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.74-2.55) between the groups. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 58% (95% CI: 43.2-71.8) and 32% (95% CI: 19.5-46.7) in all patients, and 55% (95% CI: 31.5-76.9) and 35% (95% CI: 15.4-59.2) in the cisplatin-unfit group, respectively. The common grade 3 of 4 adverse events experienced were neutropenia (78%), followed by thrombocytopenia (56%), anemia (46%), and febrile neutropenia (16%). The 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance did not differ significantly between the groups after one, two, or three courses of PCG.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference regarding OS and PFS between the cisplatin-fit patients with a full dose of cisplatin and -unfit patients with cisplatin-dose-adjusted chemotherapy. In select cisplatin-unfit patients, PCG with dose adjustment of cisplatin may be useful for treating advanced/metastatic UC without any significant adverse events or impaired renal function compared with cisplatin-fit patients with a full dose of cisplatin.

Bladder Cancer: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Bladder cancer is a common malignancy in women and is the fourth most common malignancy in men. Bladder cancer ranges from unaggressive and usually noninvasive tumors that recur and commit patients to long-term invasive surveillance, to aggressive and invasive tumors with high disease-specific mortality.

OBSERVATIONS

Advanced age, male sex, and cigarette smoking contribute to the development of bladder cancer. Bladder tumors can present with gross or microscopic hematuria, which is evaluated with cystoscopy and upper tract imaging depending on the degree of hematuria and risk of malignancy. Non-muscle-invasive tumors are treated with endoscopic resection and adjuvant intravesical therapy, depending on the risk classification. Enhanced cystoscopy includes technology used to improve the detection of tumors and can reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive tumors that do not respond to adjuvant therapy with the standard-of-care immunotherapy, bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), constitute a challenging patient population to manage and many alternative therapies are being studied. For patients with muscle-invasive disease, more aggressive therapy with radical cystectomy and urinary diversion or trimodal therapy with maximal endoscopic resection, radiosensitizing chemotherapy, and radiation is warranted to curb the risk of metastasis and disease-specific mortality. Treatment of patients with advanced disease is undergoing rapid changes as immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates have become options for certain patients with various stages of disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Improved understanding of the molecular biology and genetics of bladder cancer has evolved the way localized and advanced disease is diagnosed and treated. While intravesical BCG has remained the mainstay of therapy for intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the therapeutic options for muscle-invasive and advanced disease has expanded to include immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates.