1
|
Sun H, Liu J, Hu F, Xu M, Leng A, Jiang F, Chen K. Current research and management of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma/myofibrosarcoma. Front Genet 2023; 14:1109491. [PMID: 36873946 PMCID: PMC9978151 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1109491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), once termed as malignant fibrous histiocytoma, has always been diagnosed exclusively in clinical practice because it lacks any defined resemblance to normal mesenchymal tissue. Although myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) has been separated from UPS due to its fibroblastic differentiation with myxoid stroma, UPS and MFS are still identified as a sarcoma group in terms of molecular landscapes. In this review article, we will describe the associated genes and signaling pathways involved in the process of sarcoma genesis and make a summary of conventional management, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and some novel potential treatments of UPS/MFS. With the progressive advancements in medical technology and a better understanding about the pathogenic mechanism of UPS/MFS in the coming decades, new lights will be shed on the successful management of UPS/MFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitao Sun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Zhoushan, China
| | - Jilu Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Zhoushan, China
| | - Fangyuan Hu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Zhoushan, China
| | - Meng Xu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Naval Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Zhoushan, China
| | - Ao Leng
- Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Feng Jiang
- Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kefu Chen
- The No.988th hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Zhengzhou, China.,Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology of Ministry of Education and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buldu MT, Wigley C, Kapoor S, Bassett P, Gerrand C. Do frailty scores predict outcome after proximal femoral replacement for musculoskeletal tumours: a case series? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:151-158. [PMID: 34825990 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Frailty has a negative independent relationship with morbidity and mortality. A frail individual has low resilience and adaptive capacity to stressors with unfavourable consequences. The relationship between musculoskeletal tumour patients undergoing surgery and frailty is underrepresented in literature. This study's questions are; what is the prevalence of frailty in patients undergoing surgery for musculoskeletal tumours; what is the correlation between frailty and survival plus secondary outcome measures including length of hospital stay (LOS); can clinicians use frailty scoring to support preoperative decision-making? METHODS Patients over 60 years of age undergoing proximal femoral replacement for musculoskeletal tumours were included and classified as fit, vulnerable or frail using the modified frailty index (mFI), Rockwood and American Society of Anaesthesiologist's physical status classification (ASA) grading systems. Correlation with outcomes including survival and (LOS) was determined. RESULTS 85 patients were identified of mean age 72.6 years. Median follow-up was 18.9 months. The prevalence of frailty ranged between 55 to 76% and the overall median survival in frail groups were 19.8 months with all scoring systems used. Frail patients classified by the Rockwood score had a greater LOS and a trend to reduced survival. CONCLUSIONS There is a high prevalence of frailty in this cohort and frailty scores should be considered when planning surgery as part of holistic care. Moreover, a median survival greater than 18 months in frail patients supports the decision to offer surgery which may positively impact quality of life. Further research to identify the relationship between frailty and outcomes in musculoskeletal tumour patients is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, Retrospective Case Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metin Tolga Buldu
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK.
| | - Catrin Wigley
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - Smriti Kapoor
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - Paul Bassett
- Statsconsultancy Ltd., 40 Longwood Lane, Amersham, Bucks, HP7 9EN, UK
| | - Craig Gerrand
- Sarcoma Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Morii T, Tajima T, Udaka T, Hosogane N, Ichimura S. Impact of comorbidities on oncological outcomes of Japanese patients with high grade soft tissue sarcomas. J Orthop Sci 2021; 26:878-884. [PMID: 32938561 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the invasiveness of standard multidisciplinary approaches used for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma, including surgery with wide margins, intensive chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, evaluation of comorbidities in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma patients is essential. Several previous studies have reported the impact of comorbidities on the survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients. Patient health status differs between nationalities or ethnic groups and only limited data has been reported with respect to the impact of comorbidities on Japanese soft tissue sarcoma patients. METHODS The incidence of each comorbidity, relationship between comorbidities and underlying clinicopathological factors, relationship between treatment status and comorbidities, and impact of comorbidities on disease-specific death in 136 patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma at the authors' institution were analyzed. For the evaluation of comorbidities, the updated Charlson comorbidity index was applied. RESULTS Of the patients, 25% presented with more than one comorbidity. Elderly patients showed a significantly higher incidence of comorbidities (p < 0.0001). Patients with congestive heart failure (p = 0.004), dementia (p < 0.0001), hemiplegia/paraplegia (p < 0.0001), and renal disease (p < 0.0001) showed worse prognosis. Tumor grade (p = 0.01) and updated Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for disease-specific death. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidity status was a significant risk factor for disease-specific death in Japanese patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma. Innovations in comorbidity management may be a means for the improvement of oncological outcomes in soft tissue sarcoma. Given the difficulties in conducting standard randomized control studies in this field, data accumulation from real-world cases appears to be the most practical approach in establishing and applying strategies for the treatment of patients with comorbidities or elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Morii
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan.
| | - Takashi Tajima
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
| | - Toru Udaka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
| | - Naobumi Hosogane
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
| | - Shoichi Ichimura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyorin University, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tagliaferri L, Vavassori A, Lancellotta V, Sanctis VD, Vidali C, Casà C, Aristei C, Genovesi D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Morganti AG, Kovács G, Guinot JL, Rembielak A, Greto D, Gambacorta MA, Valentini V, Donato V, Corvò R, Magrini SM, Livi L. INTERACTS (INTErventional Radiotherapy ACtive Teaching School) consensus conference on sarcoma interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) endorsed by AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology). J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:397-404. [PMID: 33293980 PMCID: PMC7690224 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.98120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the results of INTERACTS (INTErventional Radiotherapy ACtive Teaching School) consensus conference on sarcoma interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy). MATERIAL AND METHODS An international board of multidisciplinary experts was invited to a consensus conference on the state-of-the-art of sarcoma interventional oncology during the 9th Rome INTER-MEETING (INTERventional Radiotherapy Multidisciplinary Meeting), proposing 3 statements for each one speech. At the end of each lecture, the entire group of experts was invited to vote with an electronic device. The preliminary results were presented and discussed at the end of the meeting, during a dedicated session. After the meeting, a survey was distributed within the consensus conference board to share and definitively vote the statements. RESULTS All the invited authors of the consensus conference board completed the final survey. All the 38 statements received more than 70% of agreement, 31 statements (82%) obtained an agreement of level higher or equal to 90%, 6 statements (15.8%) received an agreement level between 80% and 90%, and 1 statement (2.6%) had less than 80% of agreement. CONCLUSIONS The consensus conference demonstrated that interventional radiotherapy must be considered by a multidisciplinary management of patients affected by sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
| | - Andrea Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy,
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Address for correspondence: Valentina Lancellotta, MD, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, e-mail:
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy,
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Former Deputy Chair of Interventional Radiotherapy AIRO working Group – IntraOperative RadioTherapy, Trieste, Italy,
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy,
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele D’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy,
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy,
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine – DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy,
| | | | - Jose Luis Guinot
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain,
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester and Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom,
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy,
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,
| | - Vittorio Donato
- Radiation Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy,
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Department of Health Science, University of Genoa, Italy,
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy,
| | - Consensus Conference Board
- Consensus Conference Board: Rosa Autorino (radiation oncologist, Rome), Carmelo Caldarella (nuclear medicine physician, Rome), Annamaria Cerrotta (radiation oncologist, Milan), Antonino De Paoli (radiation oncologist, Aviano), Vitaliana De Sanctis (radiation oncologist, Rome), Nicola Dinapoli (radiation oncologist, Rome), Vittorio Donato (radiation oncologist, Rome), Martina Ferioli (radiation oncologist, Bologna), Vincenzo Fusco (radiation oncologist, Rionero in Vulture), Maria Antonietta Gambacorta (radiation oncologist, Rome), Domenico Genovesi (radiation oncologist, Chieti), Daniela Greto (radiation oncologist, Florence), Jose Luis Guinot (radiation oncologist, València), Roberto Iezzi (interventional radiologist, Rome), Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa (radiation oncologist, Milan), György Kovács (radiation oncologist, Rome and Lübeck), Valentina Lancellotta (radiation oncologist, Rome), Antonio Leone (radiologist, Rome), Giulio Maccauro (orthopedic surgeon, Rome), Stefano Maria Magrini (radiation oncologist, Brescia), Alessio Giuseppe Morganti (radiation oncologist, Bologna), Michela Quirino (medical oncologist, Rome), Agata Rembielak (clinical and radiation oncologist, Manchester), Umberto Ricardi (radiation oncologist, Turin), Vittoria Rufini (nuclear medicine physician, Rome), Giuseppe Sanguineti (radiation oncologist, Rome), Luca Tagliaferri (radiation oncologist, Rome), Andrea Vavassori (radiation oncologist, Milan), Cristiana Vidali (radiation oncologist, Trieste)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Predictive Value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for Outcomes After Hepatic Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Surg 2020; 44:3901-3914. [PMID: 32651603 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05686-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) on outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS We assessed 763 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC. The ACCI scores were categorized as follows: ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7. RESULTS A multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratios for postoperative complications in ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 0.71 (p = 0.41) and 4.15 (p < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival of ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 1.52 (p = 0.023) and 2.45 (p < 0.001), respectively. The distribution of deaths due to HCC-related, liver-related, and other causes was 68.2%, 11.8%, and 20% in ACCI ≤ 5 group, 47.2%, 13.9%, and 38.9% in ACCI = 6 group, and 27.3%, 9.1%, and 63.6% in ACCI ≥ 7 group (p = 0.053; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. = 6, p = 0.19; ACCI = 6 vs. ≥ 7, p < 0.001; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. ≥ 7). In terms of the treatment for HCC recurrence in ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, adaptation rate of surgical resection was 20.1%, 7.3%, and 11.1% and the rate of palliative therapy was 4.3%, 12.2%, and 22.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The ACCI predicted the short-term and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection of HCC. These findings will help physicians establish a treatment strategy for HCC patients with comorbidities.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang X, Zhang L, Yang X, Yu W, Fu J. Oncologic outcomes of pre- versus post-operative radiation in Resectable soft tissue sarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:158. [PMID: 32576267 PMCID: PMC7310344 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01600-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas demonstrated good local recurrence-free survival rates and survival outcomes. However, the results remained controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for the treatment of resectable soft tissue sarcomas. Methods The electronic database PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were performed from inception till 30 November, 2019. The effect of preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy on resectable soft tissue sarcomas was compared and then assessed. Results A total of 15 studies with 12,813 patients were included, and most of these had acceptable quality scores. Of these, 10 studies reported data on local recurrence. The pooled results indicated no significant differences between preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy groups for local recurrence, with a risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.84 (95%CI = 0.58–1.21). No difference was observed in the overall survival and distant metastasis between the two groups. According to the pooled results, preoperative radiotherapy group showed a significant risk for complications (RR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.36–3.27). Conclusions The postoperative radiation therapy does not increase the local recurrence, overall survival, and distant metastasis, but might result in lowering complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinmiao Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Lihua Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Xiaojing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Weiwei Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Jie Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No.600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
| |
Collapse
|