Regional Variation in Access to Oncologic Care and Racial Disparities Among Cervical Cancer Patients

Disparities in Outcomes following Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Surgical margins following rectal cancer resection impact oncologic outcomes. We examined the relationship between margin status and race, ethnicity, region of care, and facility type. Patients undergoing resection of a stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) between 2004 and 2018 were identified through the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed, with margin positivity rate as the outcome of interest, and race/ethnicity and region of care as the predictors of interest. In total, 58,389 patients were included. After IPTW adjustment, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients were 12% (p = 0.029) more likely to have margin positivity than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Patients in the northeast were 9% less likely to have margin positivity compared to those in the south. In the west, NHB patients were more likely to have positive margins than NHW patients. Care in academic/research centers was associated with lower likelihood of positive margins compared to community centers. Within academic/research centers, NHB patients were more likely to have positive margins than non-Hispanic Other patients. Our results suggest that disparity in surgical management of LARC in NHB patients exists across regions of the country and facility types. Further research aimed at identifying drivers of this disparity is warranted.

Guideline concordant care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by disaggregated Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander groups: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the within-group heterogeneity, Asian American (AA) and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NH/PI) patients are often grouped together. We compared the patterns of guideline-concordant care for locally advanced cervical cancer for disaggregated AA and NH/PI patients.

METHODS

Patients with stage II-IVA cervical cancer between 2004 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database. AA patients were disaggregated as East Asian (EA), South Asian (SA), and Southeast Asian (SEA). NH/PI patients were classified as a distinct racial subgroup. The primary outcome was the proportion undergoing guideline-concordant care, defined by radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, brachytherapy, and completion of treatment within eight weeks.

RESULTS

Of 48,116 patients, 2107 (4%) were AA and 171 (<1%) were NH/PI. Of the AA patients, 36% were SEA, 31% were EA, 12% were SA, and 21% could not be further disaggregated due to missing or unknown data. NH/PI patients were more likely to be diagnosed at an early age (53% NH/PI vs. 30% AA, p < 0.001) and have higher rates of comorbidities (18% NH/PI vs. 14% AA, p < 0.001). Within the AA subgroups, only 82% of SEA patients received concurrent chemotherapy compared to 91% of SA patients (p = 0.026). SA patients had the longest median OS (158 months) within the AA subgroups compared to SEA patients (113 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Disparities exist in the receipt of standard of care treatment for cervical cancer by racial and ethnic subgroups. It is imperative to disaggregate race and ethnicity data to understand potential differences in care and tailor interventions to achieve health equity.

Regional Variation in Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid Use Following the ALPS Trial

Importance

The publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial in February 2016 demonstrated that antenatal administration of betamethasone in the late preterm period (between 34 to 36 weeks of gestation) for individuals with a high risk of delivery decreased neonatal respiratory morbidity. National estimates have suggested the trial did change obstetric practice, but little is known if the evidence was adopted uniformly or equitably.

Objective

To assess regional variation in the use of late preterm steroids after the publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) Trial and to understand factors associated with a region's pace of adoption.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used US natality data from February 2015 to October 2017 from hospital referral regions (HRRs) within the US. Inclusion criteria included live-born, nonanomalous, singleton, late preterm (34 to 36 completed weeks of gestation) neonates born to individuals without pregestational diabetes. This study was conducted from November 15, 2022, to January 13, 2023.

Main Outcome and Measures

HRRs were categorized as either a slower adopter or faster adopter of antenatal late preterm steroids based on the observed vs expected pace of antenatal steroid adoption in a 1-year period after the trial's dissemination. Patient and regional factors hypothesized a priori to be associated with the uptake of late preterm steroids were compared between faster and slower adopters. Comparisons were made using Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression was constructed to identify factors associated with faster adopter status in the postperiod.

Results

There were 666 097 late preterm births in 282 HRRs. The mean (SD) maternal age in HRRs was 27.9 (1.2) years. The median (IQR) percentage of births by race categories in HRRs for patients identifying as American Indian or Alaskan Native was 0.5% (0.2%-1.3%); Asian or Pacific Islander, 3.0% (1.7%-5.3%); Black, 12.9% (5.1%-29.1%); and White, 78.6% (66.6%-87.0%). The median percentage of births in HRRs to patients of Hispanic ethnicity was 11.2% (6.3%-27.4%). In this study, 136 HRRs (48.2%) were classified as faster adopters and 146 (51.8%) were classified as slower adopters. Faster adopters increased their steroid use by 12.1 percentage points (from 5.9% to 18.0%) compared with a 5.5 percentage point increase (from 3.7% to 9.2%) among slower adopters (P < .001). Most examined patient and regional factors were not associated with a region's pace of adoption, with the exception of the regional prevalence of prior preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.48-2.82]) and the percentage of deliveries at 34 to 35 weeks of gestation (aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.47-0.99]) compared with 36 weeks.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, there was widespread geographic variation in the adoption of antenatal steroid administration for late preterm births that largely remained unexplained by population factors. These findings should prompt further investigations to barriers to timely or equitable access to new evidence-based practices and guide future dissemination strategies with the goal of more uniform adoption.