Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

A Randomized Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Paclitaxel-carboplatin as Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Supraglottic and Hypopharyngeal Primaries

This study was conducted in locally advanced supraglottic and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients to ascertain the efficacy and toxicity profile of a two drug combination neo adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) schedule containing Taxane and Platinum; prior to definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (Def CCRT); sixty patients with stage III, IVA and IVB locally advanced squamous cell cancers of larynx and hypopharynx were randomised to two arms. Thirty patients in study group were treated with NACT with Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (AUC 5-7) for 3, 3 weekly cycles; followed by CCRT in the patients who showed at-least a partial response (PR). These patients were compared with the 30 patients of control group who received upfront CCRT. More patients in Study arm developed grade 3 dysphagia (p = 0.001) and mucositis (p = 0.003). Renal, hematogenous and skin toxicities were identical in two arms. At 3 months post treatment complete response (CR) at primary site was 83.3% and 66.6% (p = 0.245) in study and control arms respectively. At 6 months post treatment; 20 patients (66.6%) in the study group and 17 patients (56.6%) in the control group continued to be in clinic-radiological CR (p = 0.20). NACT with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin is tolerated with manageable toxicities in patients with LAHNSCC (Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma), with increased Grade 3 dysphagia and mucositis as compared to patients getting upfront CCRT. A longer follow-up period with a larger sample size is required to further evaluate any statistically significant benefit of adding NACT prior to CCRT.

Chemotherapy and immune check point inhibitors in the management of cervical cancer

Management of locally advanced cervix cancer underwent major change 2 decades back when concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) (with cisplatin alone or in combination) along with definite radiation therapy (external + brachytherapy) was found to be superior compared to radiation alone in a series of randomized trials. Since then CCRT has been the standard treatment approach; this has resulted in 5-year overall survival rate of 66% and disease-free survival (DFS) of 58%. About 30% to 40% of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer continue to have treatment failure. Also, some patients experience early and late side effects of treatment with negative impact on quality of life. To improve the outcome further - recent approaches have explored use of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for 4 to 6 weeks as dose dense chemotherapy prior to CCRT, adjuvant chemotherapy after CCRT in high risk patients. For patients with early stage disease (IA2-IIA), short course chemotherapy prior to surgery is associated with improved outcome in many studies. Bevacizumab- an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor - is associated with improved survival. More recently, addition of treatment with immune check inhibitors (to boost the ability of T cells to destroy cancer cells) have improved responses and survival in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer. Whether these and other similar novel agents targeting molecular pathways could be brought in front line treatment along with cytotoxic chemotherapy along with bevacizumab are potential areas of current research.

Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment through mTOR Inhibition and Chemotherapy as Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The CAPRA Study

Simple Summary

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is dysregulated in 70% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and linked to the tumor microenvironment. This weekly induction treatment combined the mTOR inhibitor everolimus with carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy for locally advanced T3-4/N0-3 HNSCC. In 41 patients, safety profile was favorable and overall response rate was 75.6%. Translational data demonstrated specific target engagement with p-S6K decrease in tumor tissue and pro-immunogenic cytokine release in peripheral blood. Induction treatment with chemotherapy and mTOR inhibitors may provide new therapeutic options and rationale for combinations with immune oncology agents for locally advanced HNSCC.

Abstract

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates cellular functions by integrating intracellular signals and signals from the tumor microenvironment (TME). The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is activated in 70% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and associated with poor prognosis. This phase I-II study investigated the effect of mTOR inhibition using weekly everolimus (30 mg for dose level 1, 50 mg for dose level 2) combined with weekly induction chemotherapy (AUC2 carboplatin and 60 mg/m² paclitaxel) in treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced T3-4/N0-3 HNSCC. Patients received 9 weekly cycles before chemoradiotherapy. Objectives were safety and antitumor activity along with tissue and blood molecular biomarkers. A total of 50 patients were enrolled. Among 41 evaluable patients treated at the recommended dose of 50 mg everolimus weekly, tolerance was good and overall response rate was 75.6%, including 20 major responses (≥50% reduction in tumor size). A significant decrease in expression of p-S6K (p-value: 0.007) and Ki67 (p-value: 0.01) was observed in post-treatment tumor tissue. Pro-immunogenic cytokine release (Th1 cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-β) was observed in the peripheral blood. The combination of everolimus and chemotherapy in HNSCC was safe and achieved major tumor responses. This strategy favorably impacts the TME and might be combined with immunotherapeutic agents.

Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survival Outcomes Following Induction Chemotherapy vs Standard of Care Therapy

Objective

To compare oncologic outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) treated with standard of care (SOC) definitive therapy, consisting of surgery or chemoradiotherapy, vs induction therapy followed by definitive therapy.

Study Design

Retrospective review.

Setting

Academic tertiary care hospital.

Methods

The medical records of patients with biopsy-proven SNSCC treated between 2000 and 2020 were reviewed for demographics, tumor characteristics, staging, treatment details, and oncologic outcomes. Patients were matched 1-to-1 by age, sex, and cancer stage according to treatment received. Time-to-event analyses were conducted.

Results

The analysis included 26 patients with locally advanced SNSCC who received either induction therapy (n = 13) or SOC (n = 13). Baseline demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and median follow-up time were well balanced. Weekly cetuximab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel were the most common induction regimen utilized. Tolerance and safety to induction were excellent. Objective responses were observed in 11 of 13 patients receiving induction. No difference in disease-free survival was found between the induction and SOC groups at 1 or 3 years. However, when compared with SOC, induction therapy resulted in significant improvement in overall survival at 2 years (100% vs 65.3%, P = .043) and 3 years (100% vs 48.4%, P = .016) following completion of definitive therapy. Two patients in the SOC group developed metastatic disease, as compared with none in the induction group.

Conclusions

Induction therapy was safe and effective. When compared with SOC, induction therapy improved 3-year overall survival.

Efficacy of Modified Dose-dense Paclitaxel in Recurrent Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine survival outcomes of women with recurrent cervical cancer who received salvage chemotherapy with modified dose-dense paclitaxel (MDDP) monotherapy (paclitaxel 80 mg/m, administered on day 1, 8, and 15 without day 22).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate cause-specific survival after the first recurrence (SAR) of women with recurrent cervical cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2014. Pooled analyses were performed to examine SAR in women who received MDDP monotherapy (n=17) for any treatment line, compared with those who received salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel-doublet (n=18) and nonpaclitaxel regimens (n=52).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, median SAR was 13.7 months including 63 (72.4%) events. MDDP monotherapy regimen was most commonly used in the second-line setting (35.3%) followed by the third/fourth lines (both, 23.5%). Among the women who received MDDP regimen, there were 6 (35.3%) women who received ≥6 cycles; there was 1 (5.9%) women who discontinued the regimen due to adverse effects (grade 3 transaminitis); regimen postponement was seen in 2 (1.4%) of 140 total cycles; and the response rate after the sixth cycle of this regimen was 29.4% (1 complete and 4 partial responses). On univariate analysis, MDDP usage had the highest 2-year SAR rate (MDDP 54.1%, paclitaxel-doublet 43.6%, and nonpaclitaxel regimens 28.1%; Ptrend=0.044). On multivariate analysis, MDDP monotherapy remained an independent prognostic factor for improved SAR compared with the nonpaclitaxel regimen (adjusted-hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.95; P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that MDDP monotherapy is a tolerable and relatively effective regimen for recurrent cervical cancer.

Meta-analysis of induction chemotherapy as a selection marker for chemoradiation in the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

Many trials incorporate induction chemotherapy (IC) in selecting for organ preservation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). However, few studies examine IC response in predicting for chemoradiation therapy (CRT) response. This meta-analysis aims to determine the predictive accuracy of IC for subsequent response to CRT and overall survival (OS).

DATA SOURCES

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane register.

METHODS

A systematic search identified studies from database inception to October 2016 that used IC prior to CRT as definitive treatment for advanced HNSCC. The sensitivities and specificities of IC response predicting for complete CRT response were calculated, and the results were pooled in a summary receiver operating curve. One-, 2- and 5-year OS data were extracted.

RESULTS

Seven studies (n = 423 patients) were analyzed for response and six (n = 439) for OS. Pooled median sensitivity and specificity of IC response predicting CRT response were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.98) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.00-0.61), respectively. Patients were more likely to respond to CRT given previous response to IC (positive likelihood ratio = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.21-2.11) and less likely to respond to CRT if they failed to respond to IC (negative likelihood ratio = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.07-0.38). At 2 years, good response to IC was a statistically significant prognostic marker with a risk ratio of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.12-1.64).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that patients with poor IC response will have poorer response to CRT and should be directed to other modalities. In contrast, good IC response does not guarantee a favorable outcome to CRT; however, because these patients are likely to have better prognoses, they should be offered salvage therapies of curative intent despite treatment failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA. Laryngoscope, 128:1594-1601, 2018.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in geriatric head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to present our findings on the treatment completion rates and outcomes in geriatric patients with head and neck cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by definitive therapy.

METHODS

Geriatric patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected for this analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated.

RESULTS

Forty-six of 49 patients completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (93.9%). The compliance to local treatment was 73.3% and the median OS was 49.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22.0-77.8 months) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation (n = 15). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for technically unresectable disease, the corresponding figures were 82.06% and 9.0 months (95% CI = 5.9-12.1 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Individualized neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols in geriatric patients have high compliance rates to treatment and the median OS in geriatric patients treated for organ preservation is similar to that of young patients. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 886-892, 2017.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gynaecological cancers - Implications for staging

The management of advanced gynaecological cancers remains a therapeutic challenge. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been used to reduce tumour size, thus facilitating subsequent local treatment in the form of surgery or radiation. For advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, data from several non-randomized and one randomized studies indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is a reasonable approach in patients deemed inoperable. Such an approach results in optimum debulking (no visible tumour) in approximately 40% of the patients with reduced operative morbidity. Overall and progression free-survival is comparable to the group treated with primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is associated with improved survival for women with stage IB2-IIA cervix cancer. There is a resurgence of interest for using short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemo-radiation. Currently, this is being tested in randomized trials.

Comparison of carboplatin-paclitaxel to docetaxel-cisplatin-5-flurouracil induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) has become an accepted induction chemotherapy regimen. However, carboplatin-paclitaxel (CT) regimens have shown comparable outcomes. Here, we compared the outcomes of patients treated with either TPF or CT as induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with Stage III-IV HNSCC. From a database of 803 patients, we identified 143 patients treated with TPF or CT induction chemotherapy between 1999 and 2012.

RESULTS

53 patients and 90 patients received TPF or CT induction chemotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up was 18.9 months. The 1 year locoregional control was 80.5% for CT compared to 55.5% for TPF (HR 0.32, P=.0002). The 1 year progression free survival was 73.2% for CT compared to 60.7% for TPF (HR 0.57; P=.02). On multivariable analysis, CT remained significant for LRC (HR 0.28; P=0.04). TPF induction chemotherapy was associated with worse renal toxicity as measured by peak creatinine increases during induction chemotherapy (P=0.001). TPF was also associated with a trend toward more chemotherapy dose reductions or changes in systemic agents during concurrent chemoradiation (43.4% for TPF vs. 27.8% for CT; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TPF induction chemotherapy, CT induction chemotherapy had at least similar if not better LRC and PFS in patients while having less renal toxicity. Thus, CT induction chemotherapy may benefit patients with locally advanced HNSCC by facilitating adequate chemoradiation regimens that enhanced disease control.

A phase II study of intra-arterial cisplatin with concurrent radiation and erlotinib for locally advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Based on the convenient oral dosing of erlotinib and the promising results of biologic therapy, we undertook a phase II study with 21 patients with locally advanced (T3-4) lesions combining radiation with intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin and oral daily erlotinib for a 7-week therapy.

METHODS

Treatment for the primary tumor and upper neck was given to a total dose of 70 Gy. Chemotherapy with IA cisplatin (150 mg/m(2)) was given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 concurrently with radiotherapy. During the 7-week treatment period, patients were given erlotinib 150 mg/day.

RESULTS

Overall survival is 63 %, and the relapse/persistent disease rate stands at 36.8 %. A total of 15.2 % of serious adverse event was considered related to erlotinib.

CONCLUSION

Our study and several others now demonstrate the feasibility of combining anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with chemoradiation, hint at improved survival outcomes with reduced distant metastatic rates, and suggest that maintenance therapy with anti-EGFR agent may be beneficial.

Efficacy and safety of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation (CRT) using cisplatin-based regimens has become the standard of care in the treatment of squamous cell head and neck cancers (SCHNC). The impact of taxanes as radiosensitizing agents with concurrent CRT regimens is unknown. We therefore retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a weekly cisplatin+docetaxel combination with CRT in locally advanced SCHNC.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with locally advanced SCHNC (39.4% stage IV, 53% stage III, and 7.6% stage II) were assessed retrospectively. Total radiation dose to the PTV of gross disease (primary and/or node) was 70 Gy/ 35 fractions, 5 fractions per week. Minimum doses of 60 Gy and 50 Gy were administered to PTVs of elective high risk and low risk disease, respectively. Chemotherapy (CT) consisted of weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m2) +docetaxel (20 mg/m2) concurrently with RT.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 32-77). Objective response rate was 83.3%. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 75.7% and 78.3%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mucositis (36.4%), nausea and vomiting (12.1%), neutropenia (4.5%).

CONCLUSION

Weekly cisplatin and docetaxel concurrent with RT for locally advanced SCHNC was found tolerable with high efficacy.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel for locally advanced head and neck cancer: toxicities and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and alternative chemotherapy regimens strive to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treatment. Our experience with concurrent IMRT and taxane-based chemotherapy is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients with LAHNC treated with IMRT and concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy with curative intent was performed. The IMRT fractionation regimen consisted of 69.3 Gy to gross disease (2.1 Gy/fraction) and 56.1 Gy to prophylactic nodal sites (1.7 Gy/fraction). Weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 1) were given concurrently to all patients, and 69% received weekly induction with paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC, 2).

RESULTS

Over 90% of patients received the prescribed radiation dose. Ninety-six percent completed five or more cycles of concurrent chemotherapy, with similar tolerability for induction chemotherapy. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was required in 80 patients, with 10 maintaining PEG use >18 months. Acute grade 4 mucositis and dermatitis developed in 2.0% and 4.0% of patients, respectively. No patient experienced nadir sepsis, grade ≥3 late xerostomia, or significant nephropathy or gastrointestinal toxicity. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year locoregional control rate was 83.2% with disease-free survival and overall survival rates of 78.8% and 76.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rates of acute and late toxicities were low, with excellent radiation dose delivery and impressive tumor control at 3 years, suggesting that concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with IMRT is a reasonable therapeutic option for the curative treatment of LAHNC.