Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Presenting PROMIS Scores Associated with Number of Office Visits for Traumatic Hand and Wrist Conditions

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores Are Correlated With Tibial Shaft Fracture Nonunion Following Intramedullary Nailing

OBJECTIVES

To assess trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) in surgically treated tibial shaft fracture patients progressing to union versus nonunion.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with operatively treated tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42-A, B, C) using an intramedullary nail.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

PROMIS PF and PI were compared between patients progressing to union and patients requiring nonunion repair.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients (196 union, 38 nonunion) were included consisting 144 men and 90 women. The mean age of included patients was 40.8 years. A significant difference in mean PROMIS PF between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.005), 3-6 months ( P < 0.001), 6-9 months ( P = 0.003), and 6-12 months ( P = 0.018). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit decrease in PROMIS PF was significant at 3-6 months (OR 1.07, P = 0.028) and 6-9 months (OR 1.17, P = 0.015). A significant difference in mean PROMIS PI between union and nonunion patients was observed at 1-3 months ( P = 0.001), 3-6 months ( P = 0.005), and 6-9 months ( P = 0.005). The odds of developing nonunion for every unit increase in PROMIS PI was significant at 1-3 months (OR 1.11, P = 0.005), 3-6 months (OR 1.10, P = 0.011), and 6-9 months (OR 1.23, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Poorly trending PROMIS PF and PI in the clinical setting is a factor that can be used to evaluate progression to nonunion following tibial shaft repair where imaging studies may lag behind.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are Social Deprivation and Low Traditional Health Literacy Associated With Higher PROMIS CAT Completion in Orthopaedic Surgery?

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) may be used to assess an individual patient's perspective of their physical, mental, and social health through either standard or computer adaptive testing (CAT) patient questionnaires. These questionnaires are used across disciplines; however, they have seen considerable application in orthopaedic surgery. Patient characteristics associated with PROMIS CAT completion have not been examined within the context of social determinants of health, such as social deprivation or health literacy, nor has patient understanding of the content of PROMIS CAT been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What patient demographics, including social deprivation, are associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (2) Is health literacy level associated with completion of PROMIS CAT questionnaires? (3) Do patients with lower health literacy have a higher odds of completing PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the content?

METHODS

Between June 2022 and August 2022, a cross-sectional study was performed via a paper survey administered to patients at a single, urban, quaternary academic medical center in orthopaedic subspecialty clinics of foot and ankle, trauma, and hand/upper extremity surgeons. We considered all English-speaking patients aged 18 or older, including those with limited reading and/or writing abilities, as eligible provided they received an iPad in clinic to complete the PROMIS CAT questionnaire as part of their routine standard clinical care or they completed the questionnaire via a patient portal before the visit. In all, 946 patients were considered eligible during the study period and a convenience sample of 36% (339 of 946) of patients was approached for inclusion due to clinic time constraints. Fifteen percent (52 of 339) declined to participate, leaving 85% (287 of 339) of patients for analysis here. Median (range) age of study participants was 49 years (35 to 64). Fifty-eight percent (167 of 287) of study participants self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American and 26% (75 of 287) as non-Hispanic White. Even proportions were observed across education levels (high school graduate or less, 29% [82 of 287]; some college, 25% [73 of 287]; college graduate, 25% [71 of 287]; advanced degree, 20% [58 of 287]). Eighteen percent (52 of 287) of patients reported an annual income bracket of USD 0 to 13,000, and 17% (48 of 287) reported more than USD 120,000. Forty-six percent (132 of 287) of patients worked full-time, 21% (59 of 287) were retired, and 23% (66 of 287) were unemployed or on disability. The primary outcome of interest was self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion grouped as: fully completed, partially completed, or no part completed. Overall, self-reported PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion proportions were: 80% (229 of 287) full completion, 13% (37 of 287) partial completion, and 7% (21 of 287) no part completed. We collected the National Area Deprivation Index (ADI) score and the Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (BRIEF) as part of the study survey to associate with level of completion. Additionally, patient understanding of PROMIS CAT was assessed through Likert-scaled responses to a study survey question that directly asked whether the patient understood all of the questions on the PROMIS CAT questionnaire. Responses to this question may have been limited by social desirability bias, and hence may overestimate how many individuals genuinely understood the questionnaire content. However, the benefit of this approach was it efficiently allowed us to estimate the ceiling effect of patient comprehension of PROMIS CAT and likely had a high degree of specificity for detecting lack of comprehension.

RESULTS

ADI score adjusted for age was not associated with PROMIS CAT completion (partial completion OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.98 to 1.01]; p = 0.72, no part completed OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.03]; p = 0.45). Patients with lower health literacy scores, however, were more likely to not complete any part of their assigned questionnaires than patients with higher scores (no part completed OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.97]; p = 0.02). Additionally, 74% (26 of 35) of patients who did not fully understand all of the PROMIS CAT questionnaire questions still fully completed them-hence, 11% (26 of 229) of all patients who fully completed PROMIS CAT did not fully understand the content. Among patients self-reporting full completion of PROMIS CAT with health literacy data (99% [227 of 229]), patients with inadequate/marginal health literacy were more likely than patients with adequate health literacy to not fully understand all of the questions (21% [14 of 67] versus 8% [12 of 160], OR 3.26 [95% CI 1.42 to 7.49]; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Within an urban, socioeconomically diverse, orthopaedic patient population, health literacy was associated with PROMIS CAT questionnaire completion. Lower health literacy levels increased the likelihood of not completing any part of the assigned PROMIS CAT questionnaires. Additionally, patients completed PROMIS CAT without fully understanding the questions. This indicates that patient completion does not guarantee comprehension of the questions nor validity of their scores, even more so among patients with low health literacy. This is a substantive concern for fidelity of data gathered from PROMIS CAT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinical implementation of the PROMIS CAT in orthopaedic populations will benefit from further research into health literacy to increase questionnaire completion and to ensure that patients understand the content of the questions they are answering, which will increase the internal validity of the outcome measure.

Variations in 1-year Trajectories of Levels of Pain and Capability After Shoulder Arthroplasty Are Associated With Baseline Mental Health

BACKGROUND

There is variability in the trajectories of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability after shoulder arthroplasty. A better understanding of the degree to which variation in recovery trajectories relates to aspects of mental health can inform the development of comprehensive biopsychosocial care strategies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do pain intensities at baseline and the trajectories during recovery differ between groups when stratified by mental health composite summary score, arthroplasty type, and revision surgery? (2) Do magnitudes of capability at baseline and the trajectories during recovery differ between these groups?

METHODS

We used a registry of 755 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a specialized urban orthopaedic hospital that recorded the mental component summary (MCS) score of the Veterans RAND 12, a measure of shoulder-specific comfort and capability (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, which ranges from 0 to 100 points, with a score of 0 indicating worse capability and pain and 100 indicating better capability and pain and a minimum clinically important difference of 6.4), and the VAS for pain intensity (range 0 [representing no pain] to 10 [representing the worst pain possible], with a minimum clinically important difference of 1.4) preoperatively, 2 weeks postoperatively, and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Forty-nine percent (368 of 755) of the patients were men, with a mean age of 68 ± 8 years, and 77% (585) were treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Unconditional linear and quadratic growth models were generated to identify the general shape of recovery for both outcomes (linear versus quadratic). We then constructed conditional growth models and curves for pain intensity and the magnitude of capability showing mean baseline scores and the rates of recovery that determine the trajectory, accounting for mental health (MCS) quartiles, primary or revision arthroplasty, and TSA or reverse TSA in separate models. Because pain intensity and capability showed quadratic trends, we created trajectories using the square of time.

RESULTS

Patients in the worst two MCS quartiles had greater pain intensity at baseline than patients in the best quartile (difference in baseline for bottom quartile: 0.93 [95% CI 0.72 to 1.1]; p < 0.01; difference in baseline for next-worst quartile: 0.36 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.57]; p < 0.01). The rates of change in recovery from pain intensity were not different among groups (p > 0.10). Patients with revision surgery had greater baseline pain (difference: 1.1 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.5]; p < 0.01) but no difference in rates of recovery (difference: 0.031 [95% CI 0.035 to 0.097]; p = 0.36). There were no differences in baseline pain intensity and rates of recovery between patients with reverse TSA and those with TSA (baseline pain difference: -0.20 [95% CI -0.38 to -0.03]; p = 0.18; difference in rate of recovery: -0.005 [95% CI -0.035 to 0.025]; p = 0.74). Patients in the worst two MCS quartiles had worse baseline capability than patients in the best quartile (difference in baseline for bottom quartile: -8.9 [95% CI -10 to -7.4]; p < 0.001; difference in baseline for the next-worst quartile: -4.9 [95% CI -6.4 to -3.4]; p < 0.01), with no differences in rates of recovery (p > 0.10). Patients with revision surgery had lower baseline capability (difference in baseline: -13 [95% CI -15 to -9.7]; p < 0.01), with a slower rate of recovery (difference in rate of recovery: -0.56 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.079]; p = 0.021). There were no differences in baseline capability or rates of recovery between TSA and reverse TSA.

CONCLUSION

The observation that preoperative and 1-year comfort and capability are associated with mental health factors and with similar recovery trajectories reminds us that assessment and treatment of mental health is best considered an integral aspect of musculoskeletal care. Future studies can address how prioritization of mental health in musculoskeletal care strategies might reduce variation in the 1-year outcomes of discretionary surgeries such as shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Patient Perspectives on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Thumb, Hand, or Wrist Pain and Function: A Survey of 98 Patients

PURPOSE

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an established option to improve pain and function for many orthopedic conditions. Our purpose was to obtain patient perspectives regarding CBT for thumb, hand, or wrist pain and function.

METHODS

Between March and April 2022, we distributed an electronic survey via email to patients in our institution's health system with a diagnosis of arthritic or non-specific thumb, hand, or wrist pain. The survey included the opening statement "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a non-medication option to help manage pain and improve function" and up to 13 questions pertaining to patients' experiences and perceptions regarding CBT. The survey was anonymous and did not collect protected health information. We used descriptive statistics for the findings.

RESULTS

We distributed the survey to 327 patients, yielding a 30% response rate (98/327). Of the respondents, 17 reported already using CBT to specifically help with pain/function. Of these, 15 felt it was helpful and agreed it could help others. Of the subset that used CBT for arthritis, all felt it was helpful. Of the 75 respondents with no CBT experience, 42 indicated "I've never heard of it," 28 responded "I never had it recommended as an option," and 16 marked "I don't know enough about it." Small subsets noted potential personal barriers to CBT implementation, such as cost, time involved, or perceived lack of potential efficacy for themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

A small proportion of patients from our institution with thumb, hand, or wrist pain are utilizing CBT, and the majority finds it helpful.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

While some patients are already substantially benefiting from CBT to improve their thumb, hand, or wrist pain or function, there is a notable opportunity for providers to increase awareness and recommendations for this option.

Patient-Reported Mental Health Outcomes After Single-Digit Non-thumb Traumatic Amputation in Adults

Background

Though traumatic digital amputations are common, outcomes data are scarce. The FRANCHISE study clarified functional outcomes after digital amputation, but little information is available regarding mental health outcomes. The aims of this study were to document patient-reported mental health outcomes after traumatic digital amputation, elucidate the relationship between mental health and functional outcomes, and determine which patient/injury attributes conferred risk of unfavorable mental health outcomes.

Methods

This was a descriptive, retrospective study of 77 patients with history of single digit, non-thumb traumatic amputation. Eligible patients completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, Anger, Anxiety, and Depression computer adaptive tests, and a short questionnaire recorded handedness, demographics, and worker's compensation status.

Results

Correlation across the 3 PROMIS mental health domains (Anger, Anxiety, Depression) was uniformly strong and statistically significant. Correlation between the PROMIS mental health and functional (Upper Extremity and Pain Interference) scores was statistically significant but much weaker. Multivariable analysis revealed younger age and a worker's compensation claim had independent statistically significant predictive value for worse PROMIS Anger, Anxiety, and Depression scores. Female sex was also found to independently predict PROMIS Anxiety.

Conclusions

By identifying patients at increased risk for feelings of anger, anxiety, and depression after digital amputation, anticipatory counseling can be provided. Anger, anxiety, and depression are very likely to coexist in the same patient; when responding to a patient who exhibits 1 element of this triad, the surgeon should be aware that the other 2 elements are likely to be present, even if not obvious.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between people with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis following surgery for traumatic hand injury: a prospective longitudinal study of a multicultural cohort

BACKGROUND

Following traumatic hand injury, few studies have compared outcomes between people with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. This study aimed to compare sub-acute outcomes in a multicultural patient cohort with surgically managed traumatic hand injury with and without a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective, observational cohort study of people with traumatic hand injury presenting pre- surgically to a high-volume hand injury centre in a region of cultural and language diversity was conducted. Participants were assessed face-to-face (baseline) then via telephone (3-months post-surgery) and categorized according to a pre-morbid medically diagnosed mental health diagnosis. Baseline and follow-up assessments included global mental health, and the EuroQol (EQ) 'Health Today' analogue scale (0-100) and health domains. Return-to-work status, complications/symptomatic complaints, and hand function (QuickDASH) were also collected at follow-up. Adjusted analyses-accounting for covariates including cultural identity-were conducted to determine whether 3-month outcomes were associated with a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis.

RESULTS

From 405 eligible patients, 386 were enrolled (76% male, mean age 38.9 (standard deviation 15.6)); 57% self-identified as Australian and 22% had a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis. Common injuries regardless of pre-morbid mental health diagnosis were skin (40%), tendon (17%) and bone (17%) injuries. None were complex mutilating injuries. Seventy-eight per cent of the cohort was followed-up. In adjusted analyses, a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis was associated with lower odds for reporting 'good or better' global mental health (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.23 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.18, 0.47), p < 0.001), 'no' anxiety or depression (OR 0.21 (0.11, 0.40), p < 0.001) and no pain (OR 0.56 (0.31, 0.98), p = 0.04)(EQ domains), and worse EQ 'Health Today' (10 points on average (95%CI -14.9, -5.1, p < 0.001). QuickDASH scores, rates of complications/symptomatic complaints and return-to-work profiles were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reporting worse mental and health-related quality-of-life outcomes post-surgery, people with a pre-morbid mental health diagnosis regardless of cultural identity experienced similar clinical and return-to-work outcomes. Future research assessing the value of screening for pre-morbid mental health conditions on post-surgical outcomes is required and should include people with more complex hand injuries.

A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Promote Musculoskeletal Health: The Creation of the International Musculoskeletal Mental and Social Health Consortium (I-MESH)

Despite increasing recognition of psychosocial factors in musculoskeletal conditions, its impact on reducing the global toll of musculoskeletal symptoms has been only incremental. It is time to bring together clinicians and researchers with heterogeneous backgrounds, unified by a commitment to reduce the global impact of musculoskeletal illness by addressing mental and social health factors. In 2020, we initiated the International Musculoskeletal Mental and Social Health Consortium. Our current key priority areas are: (1) Develop best practices for uniform terminology, (2) Understand barriers to mental and social health care for musculoskeletal conditions, (3) Develop clinical and research resources. The purpose of this paper is to render a call to interdisciplinary collaboration on the psychological aspects of musculoskeletal health. We believe this international interdisciplinary collaboration is pivotal to the advancement of the biopsychosocial model of musculoskeletal care and has the potential to improve the health of individuals with musculoskeletal conditions globally.

The Impact of Social Deprivation and Hand Therapy Attendance on Range of Motion After Flexor Tendon Repair

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of social deprivation and hand therapy attendance on active range of motion (AROM) outcomes following flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary zone I-III flexor tendon repair between November 2016 and November 2020. Area deprivation index (ADI) was used to quantify social deprivation. Medical record review determined each patient's demographic characteristics, injury details, total hand therapy visits, and final AROM outcome. Active range of motion was converted to Strickland's percentage for analysis. Spearman correlation and simple and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess relationships between explanatory variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were a total of 109 patients, with a mean ADI of 53 and mean therapy attendance of 13 visits. Higher ADI and lower therapy attendance were correlated, and each was associated with significantly decreased Strickland's percentage. In the multivariable model, therapy attendance, ADI, zone 2 injury, and age maintained significant associations with Strickland's percentage.

CONCLUSIONS

Socially deprived patients attend fewer therapy sessions and obtain poorer AROM after flexor tendon repair. Social deprivation is likely to contribute to poor outcomes both by its association with decreased therapy attendance and by other potential pathways that make it difficult for deprived patients to achieve good surgical outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

The stigma of digital amputation: a survey of amputees with analysis of risk factors

The purpose of this study was to quantify the stigma associated with digital amputation and examine factors associated with it. One hundred and sixty-four digital amputees completed the Neurological Quality of Life-Stigma questionnaire and a battery of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System instruments. Multivariable analysis examined factors associated with stigma experience. The mean observed stigma score of 47 (SD 8, range 36-64) was similar to the mean value of the normal population. Younger age, a worker's compensation claim and depression were each independently associated with a more severe experience of stigma after digital amputation. Socioeconomic variables, anatomical details and mechanism of injury were not independently associated with stigma. Digital amputation is not highly stigmatizing overall. Surgeons should consider referring at-risk patients to a mental health provider for support during the coping and adjustment process after amputation.Level of evidence: III.

Priorities for Advancing Mental and Social Health Among People Presenting for Care of Musculoskeletal Symptoms : International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care

An international group of clinicians and researchers formed a consortium to advance mental and social health among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care: The International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care (I-MESH). As a first step to organize the work of the consortium, we sought to identify important, appropriate, and feasible interventions to address mental and social health. Members of I-MESH responded to a list of 10 queries intended to elicit mental and social health priorities. Open text answers were analyzed by 2 researchers to elicit individual themes. A modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process was conducted of 32 candidate social and mental health priorities using a 15-person panel of I-MESH members, using 2 rounds of independent voting with intervening discussion via surveys and video teleconferences. Panelists rated each potential priority for importance, feasibility, and appropriateness on a 9-point Likert scale. Top level priorities scored both mean and median greater than 7 in all 3 categories. Second level priorities scored a median 7 or greater on the final scoring in all 3 categories. Candidate priorities were organized into 9 themes: viable business model, coordination of specialty and non-specialty care, actionable measurement, public health/cultural interventions, research, adequate and timely access, incorporating assessment in care, strategies to develop the patient-clinician relationship, communication strategies that can directly enhance health, and support for mental and social health. Twelve top level (met mean and median criteria) and 17 s level priorities (met median criterion) were identified. Implementing evidence-based strategies to efficiently diagnose, prioritize, and begin addressing mental and social health opportunities has the potential for notable impact on both musculoskeletal and overall health. It is our hope that the results of this Delphi panel will generate enthusiasm and collaboration for implementing the mounting evidence that social and mental health are integral to musculoskeletal health.

Check-in Phone Calls Six Weeks and Six Months After Musculoskeletal Specialty Care

Health organizations want to measure patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) longitudinally. Two medical assistants called people selectively at 6 weeks and routinely at 6 months to obtain PROMs as part of routine musculoskeletal specialty care. Only 47% of patients (123 of 263) were reached by phone at 6 weeks and 41% (246 of 594) at 6 months. Spanish speakers were more likely to answer. Eighty-nine percent of people reached at 6 weeks and 76% reached at 6 months were willing to complete PROMs. Speaking Spanish, older age, and fewer symptoms of depression were associated with completing PROMs when reached by phone at 6 weeks. Women and Spanish-speaking patients were more likely to participate at 6 months. The observation that most people do not participate in longitudinal PROM measurement in a system that devotes notable resources in the setting of musculoskeletal specialty care-with some variation by psychosocial factors-suggests that longitudinal PROM measurement may be infeasible. Future work can explore alternative measures of the value of care that account for the large percentage of people that deprioritize care after a single specialty visit.

Factors associated with return musculoskeletal specialty visits

Introduction

Prior studies suggested that a greater number of return visits is associated with greater symptoms of depression and greater symptom intensity.

Methods

All new adult patients presenting for musculsoskeletal specialty care between October 2017 and October 2018 were included. Patients completed the PROMIS Global Health, the PHQ-2, and the GAD-7 as part of usual care.

Results

Accounting for confounders, having a return visit was associated with lower PROMIS Global Health, greater symptoms of depression, and greater symptoms of anxiety.

Conclusions

These findings provide support for the importance of 1) improved coordination with non-specialist referring clinicians, and 2) interdisciplinary care teams.

Level of evidence

Level II, Prognostic.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Orthopaedic Trauma Research

This review describes the development, advantages and disadvantages, and applications of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in orthopaedic trauma. PROMIS is a useful tool for quantifying outcomes in orthopedic trauma. It allows measurement of outcomes across multiple domains while minimizing administration time. PROMIS also reliably identifies clinical, social, and psychological risk factors for poor outcomes across a variety of orthopaedic injuries and disease states. However, PROMIS lacks specificity for certain anatomic regions and validation for mental health outcomes. It also is limited by ceiling effects in certain active patient populations. Orthopaedic traumatologists should be familiar with PROMIS, as its use is increasing and it is a valuable tool that can aid in clinical decision making.

Increased Prevalence and Associated Costs of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Patients Undergoing Sports Medicine Operative Procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of preoperatively diagnosed psychiatric comorbidities and the impact of these comorbidities on the healthcare costs of ten common orthopaedic sports medicine procedures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing 10 common sports medicine procedures from 2007 to 2017q1 were identified using the Humana claims database. These procedures included anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; medial collateral ligament repair/reconstruction; Achilles repair/reconstruction; Rotator cuff repair; meniscectomy/meniscus repair; hip arthroscopy; arthroscopic shoulder labral repair; patellofemoral instability procedures; and shoulder instability repair. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnoses of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Cohorts included patients with ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity (psychiatric) versus those without psychiatric comorbidities (no psychiatric). Differences in costs across groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests, with significance defined as P < .05. Linear regression analysis was used to assess rates of procedures per year from 2006 to 2016.

RESULTS

In total, 226,402 patients (57.7% male) from 2007 to 2017q1 were assessed. The prevalence of ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity within the entire database was 10.31% (reference) versus 21.21% in those patients undergoing the 10 investigated procedures. Patients with psychiatric comorbidity most frequently underwent rotator cuff repair (28%), hip labral repair (26.3%) and meniscectomy/meniscus repair (25.0%%) had ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity. Compared with the no psychiatric cohort, diagnosis of ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity was associated with increased health care costs for all 10 sports medicine procedures ($9678.81 vs $6436.20, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of preoperatively diagnosed psychiatric comorbidities among patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine procedures is high. The presence of psychiatric comorbidities preoperatively was associated with increased postoperative costs following all investigated orthopaedic sports medicine procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective comparative study.

PROMIS is a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients undergoing ACL Reconstruction with Multi-ligament Knee Reconstruction and Repair Procedures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to (1) compare PROMIS with previously validated legacy instruments and (2) to assess between group differences of PROMIS PF-CAT [Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test] for patients undergoing isolated primary ACL reconstruction [ACLR] vs. primary ACL reconstruction with additional ligamentous intervention [MLIK].

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; Prospective Cohort Study.

METHODS

At a single preoperative timepoint, 42 [MLIK] and 73[ACLR] patients completed: Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and Marx Knee Scale. Spearman correlation coefficients (non-parametric data) assessed correlations between PROMIS PF-CAT and legacy PROs [Patient-Reported Outcome instruments]. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed using chi-square tests. Between group differences were assessed (Wilcoxon Rank sum test).

RESULTS

PROMIS PF-CAT for the MLIK cohort [Table 2] demonstrated an excellent-good correlation with SF-36 Physical Function (PCS; r = 0.64, p < 0.01), EQ-5D (r = 0.68, p < 0.01), and KOOS Quality of Life (QOL) (r = 0.68, p < 0.01); good correlation with KOOS ADL (r = 0.52, p = 0.01), KOOS Sports (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), KOOS Pain (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) and WOMAC Function (r = 0.52,p = 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT scores differed for ACL vs. MLIK cohorts (41.9 ± 6.6 vs. 37.6 ± 9.0, p < 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated the fewest floor and ceiling effects [Table 4] versus legacy PRO instruments.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated strong correlations with previously validated PRO instruments and offers a favorable alternative for patients undergoing ACLR with MLIK repair/reconstruction procedures. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT scores were greater for patients undergoing primary ACLR versus MLIK intervention.

Understanding PROMIS

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming increasingly emphasized in health care. Some medical and orthopedic specialties have 1 or 2 primary PROs that are used across the discipline, whereas hand surgery has multiple PROs. The multitude of PROs gives hand surgeons flexibility because each provides slightly different information, but the number of options can present a daunting task when choosing which to use. The latest generation of PROs leverages computer adaptive testing and includes assessments of physical, mental, and social health. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System was funded by the National Institutes of Health to include a comprehensive set of health instruments that are not disease-specific; it has undergone several forms of validation and has been found to be comparable across medical specialties. This article discusses the details of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, how it compares with other outcomes instruments, and how it can be used in practice.