CORR Insights®: The Effect of Postural Pelvic Dynamics on the Three-dimensional Orientation of the Acetabular Cup in THA Is Patient Specific

Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Portable hip navigation systems have been developed to combine the accuracy of cup positioning by large console navigation systems with the ease of use and convenience of conventional surgical techniques. Although a novel augmented reality-based portable hip navigation system using a smartphone (AR navigation) has become available recently, no studies, to our knowledge, have compared commercially available AR navigation with the conventional technique. Additionally, no studies, except for those from designer-surgeon series, have demonstrated the results of AR navigation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does intraoperative use of commercially available AR navigation improve cup positioning compared with the conventional technique? (2) Are operative factors, clinical scores, and postoperative course different between the two groups?

METHODS

In this randomized trial, 72 patients undergoing THA were randomly assigned to undergo either commercially available AR navigation or a conventional technique for cup placement. All patients received the same cementless acetabular cups through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome of the present study was cup positioning, including the absolute differences between the intended target and angle achieved, as well as the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Our target cup position was 40° abduction and 20° anteversion. Secondary outcomes were operative factors, between-group difference in improvement in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the postoperative course, including the operative time (between the start of the surgical approach and skin closure), procedure time (between the first incision and skin closure, including the time to insert pins, registration, and transfer and redrape patients in the navigation group), time taken to insert pins and complete registration in the navigation group, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reoperations. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months, because data regarding the primary outcome-cup positioning-were collected within 1 week after surgery. The between-group difference in improvement in HOOS, which was the secondary outcome, was much lower than the minimum clinically important difference for the HOOS. No patients in either group were lost to follow-up, and there was no crossover (the randomized treatment was performed in all patients, so there was no difference between an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis).

RESULTS

The use of the commercially available AR navigation slightly improved cup positioning compared with the conventional technique in terms of the absolute difference between the desired and achieved amounts of cup abduction and anteversion (which we defined as "absolute differences"; median 1° [IQR 0° to 4.0°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.0° to 7.5°], difference of medians 4°; p < 0.001 and median 2° [IQR 1.9° to 3.7°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.2° to 9.7°], difference of medians 2°; p = 0.001). A higher proportion of cups were placed inside the Lewinnek safe zone in the navigation group than in the control group (94% [34 of 36] compared with 64% [23 of 36]; p < 0.001). Median operative times were not different between the two groups (58 minutes [IQR 49 to 72 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 1 minute; p = 0.99). The median procedure time was longer in the navigation group (95 minutes [IQR 84 to 109 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 38 minutes; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in improvement in HOOS (27 ± 17 versus 28 ± 19, mean difference -1 [95% CI -9.5 to 7.4]; p = 0.81). In the navigation group, no complications occurred in the pin sites; however, one anterior dislocation occurred. In the conventional group, one hip underwent reoperation because of a deep infection.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of commercially available AR navigation improved cup positioning in THA, the improvement in clinical scores and postoperative complication rates were not different between the two groups, and the overall magnitude of the difference in accuracy was small. Future studies will need to determine whether the improvement in the percentage of hips inside the Lewinnek safe zone results in differences in late dislocation or polyethylene wear, and whether such benefits-if any-justify the added costs and surgical time. Until or unless more compelling evidence in favor of the new system emerges, we recommend against widespread use of the system in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅱ, therapeutic study.

Measurement accuracy of the acetabular cup position using an inertial portable hip navigation system with patients in the lateral decubitus position

Accurate cup placement is critical to ensure satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative guidance tools that achieve accurate cup placement in the supine position; however, accuracy in the lateral decubitus position is under debate. A new inertial portable navigation system has recently become available. The present study investigated the accuracy of measurements of the cup position in 54 patients in the lateral decubitus position using this system and compared it with that by a goniometer. After cup placement, cup abduction and anteversion were measured using the system and by the goniometer, and were then compared with postoperatively measured angles. Absolute measurement errors with the system were 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction and 3.9° ± 2.9° for anteversion. The system achieved 98 and 96% measurement accuracies within 10° for cup abduction and anteversion, respectively. The system was more accurate than the goniometer for cup anteversion (p < 0.001), but not for abduction (p = 0.537). The system uses a new registration method of the pelvic reference plane and corrects intraoperative pelvic motion errors, which may affect measurement accuracy. In the present study, reliable and reproducible intraoperative measurements of the cup position were obtained using the inertial portable navigation system.

Accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement and intraoperative leg length measurement in total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study

Background

Complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are frequently the consequence of malpositioned components or leg length discrepancy after surgery. Recently, a new version of a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (New HipAlign) was made available with a change in the method of measuring cup abduction and the addition of a leg length measurement function. The purposes of this study were to investigate cup positioning and to examine the accuracy of leg length measurement with New HipAlign.

Methods

Cups were implanted and intraoperative leg length change was measured using New HipAlign in 60 THAs through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The cup position and radiographic leg length change were determined postoperatively on pelvic radiograph and computed tomography scans. We previously compared cup positioning with a previous version of a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (Previous HipAlign) and conventional surgical techniques. Cup positioning in this study was compared with the results of out previous study using Previous HipAlign.

Results

The mean cup abduction of 40.3° ± 4.9° (range, 26° to 53°) and the mean cup anteversion of 15.8° ± 5.6° (range, 6.7° to 29.5°) were found. The deviation of the postoperative measured angles from the target cup position was 3.7° ± 3.3° for cup abduction and 5.9° ± 3.6° for cup anteversion. 56/60 of the cups were inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Compared with our previous study using Previous HipAlign, there were no significant differences with regard to cup abduction, cup anteversion, the deviation from the target cup position for cup abduction, the value of deviation for cup anteversion, and the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone (P = 0.218, 0.334, 0.651, 0.797, 0.592). The mean difference between the intraoperative and radiographic leg length changes was + 0.8 ± 3.4 mm. There was significant correlation between the intraoperative and radiographic leg length changes (r = 0.804, P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Use of New HipAlign allowed for accurate cup placement and reliable leg length measurement during THA.

Trial registration

Clinical trial is defined as ‘any research study that prospectively assigns human participants or groups of humans to one or more health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcome’ by the World Health Organization (WHO). Because this study is not a clinical trial, trial registration is not needed.