Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review

Effect of continuous nursing on rehabilitation of older patients with joint replacement after discharge

BACKGROUND

Joint replacement is a common treatment for older patients with high incidences of hip joint diseases. However, postoperative recovery is slow and complications are common, which reduces surgical effectiveness. Therefore, patients require long-term, high-quality, and effective nursing interventions to promote rehabilitation. Continuity of care has been used successfully in other diseases; however, little research has been conducted on older patients who have undergone hip replacement.

AIM

To explore the clinical effect of continuous nursing on rehabilitation after discharge of older individuals who have undergone joint replacement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 113 elderly patients. Patients receiving routine nursing were included in the convention group (n = 60), and those receiving continuous nursing, according to various methods, were included in the continuation group (n = 53). Harris score, short form 36 (SF-36) score, complication rate, and readmission rate were compared between the convention and continuation groups.

RESULTS

After discharge, Harris and SF-36 scores of the continuation group were higher than those of the convention group. The Harris and SF-36 scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time, and there was an interaction effect between group and time (Harris score: F intergroup effect = 376.500, F time effect = 20.090, F interaction effect = 4.824; SF-36 score: F intergroup effect = 236.200, F time effect = 16.710, F interaction effect = 5.584; all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the total complication and readmission rates in the continuation group were lower (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous nursing could significantly improve hip function and quality of life in older patients after joint replacement and reduce the incidence of complications and readmission rates.

[Advances in revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type developmental dysplasia of the hip]

Objective

To review research advances of revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

The recent literature on revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH was reviewed. The reasons for revision surgery were analyzed and the difficulties of revision surgery, the management methods, and the related prosthesis choices were summarized.

Results

Patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH have small anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum, large variation in acetabular and femoral anteversion angles, severe soft tissue contractures, which make both THA and revision surgery more difficult. There are many reasons for patients undergoing revision surgery after primary THA, mainly due to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Therefore, it is necessary to restore anatomical structures in primary THA, as much as possible and reduce the generation of wear particles to avoid postoperative loosening of the prosthesis. Due to the anatomical characteristics of Crowe type Ⅳ DDH, the patients have acetabular and femoral bone defects, and the repair and reconstruction of bone defects become the key to revision surgery. The acetabular side is usually reconstructed with the appropriate acetabular cup or combined metal block, Cage, or custom component depending on the extent of the bone defect, while the femoral side is preferred to the S-ROM prosthesis. In addition, the prosthetic interface should be ceramic-ceramic or ceramic-highly cross-linked polyethylene wherever possible.

Conclusion

The reasons leading to revision surgery after primary THA in patients with Crowe type Ⅳ DDH and the surgical difficulties have been clarified, and a large number of clinical studies have proposed corresponding revision modalities based on which good early- and mid-term outcomes have been obtained, but further follow-up is needed to clarify the long-term outcomes. With technological advances and the development of new materials, personalized prostheses for these patients are expected to become a reality.

The Validation of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Host Bone Coverage in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Dysplasia: A Comparison with Intra-Operative Measurements

Several methods have been introduced to measure the host bone coverage of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aims of this study were (1) to validate two-dimensional- and three-dimensional-based host bone coverage measurements by comparing intra-operative measurements, and (2) to determine the minimum host bone coverage for achieving stable cup fixation after THA in hip dysplasia. The clinical outcomes of each patient were evaluated during their final follow-up period using the Harris Hip score (HHS). The coverage of the host bone was analyzed by comparing 2D-based, 3D-based, and intraoperative assessments. The mean HHS was increased significantly from 60.84 ± 14.21 pre-operatively to 93.13 ± 4.59 (p < 0.0001). The host bone coverage ratio measured intraoperatively was 83.67 ± 3.40%, while the ratio measured by 3D CT reconstruction was 82.72 ± 3.59%. There was a strong positive correlation between the intra-operative host bone coverage and the 3D-based one (r = 0.826, p < 0.0001). It is recommended that 3D-based measurements are used to evaluate the host bone coverage after THA in patients with hip dysplasia. In addition, achieving a minimum host bone coverage of 75% is recommended for the attainment of stable cup fixation.

The Role of Global Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty with High Hip Center Technique

OBJECTIVE

The high hip center (HHC) technique has been proposed for the treatment of patients with developmental dysplaisa of the hip (DDH) who have an acetabular bone defect. However, the importance of global femoral offset (FO) in the application of this technique has not been sufficiently appreciated. Our goals were to confirm that the HHC technique is feasible in the treatment of patients with DDH and to assess the function of global FO in this procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using high hip center technique for unilateral DDH at our hospital between January 2014 and June 2019. According to global FO, the patients were split into three groups: increased FO group (increment greater than 5 mm), restored FO group (restoration within 5 mm) and decreased FO group (reduction greater than 5 mm). Patients' medical records and plain radiographs were reviewed. One-way ANOVA was used to compare radiographic outcomes and Harris hip score (HHS). Paired t-test was used to assess preoperative and postoperative HHS and leg length discrepancy. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp was evaluated with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 7.5 ± 1.4 years. The patients' HHS and leg length discrepancy were significantly improved (p < 0.05). In terms of vertical acetabular height, abductor arm, postoperative leg length difference, and acetabular cup inclination, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups. At the last follow-up, HHS was significantly higher in the restored FO group than in the decreased FO and increased FO groups. Trochanteric pain syndrome occurred in 15.0% and Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp in 8.2% of all patients, respectively. Trochanteric pain syndrome, Trendelenburg sign and postoperative limp did not differ significantly across the three groups. One patient in increased FO group underwent revision for dislocation 6 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The HHC technique is an alternative technique for total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular bone abnormalities, according to the results of the mid-term follow-up. Also, controlling the correction of the global femoral offset to within 5 mm may lead to better clinical outcomes.

Effects of different pelvic osteotomy surgeries on acetabular center and pelvic morphology

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of Salter pelvic osteotomy, Pemberton pelvic osteotomy, and triple pelvic osteotomy on the center of acetabulum and pelvic morphology in children with hip joint disease.

METHODS

The data of children treated with Salter pelvic osteotomy (2 males and 14 females with an average age of 2.49 years), Pemberton pelvic osteotomy (4 males and 11 females with an average age of 6.11 years), and triple pelvic osteotomy(4 males and 8 females with an average age of 9.59 years) between January 2011 and December 2020 were collected. After discharge, the outpatient review was followed up for at least 1 year. All patients underwent anterior-posterior pelvic X-ray scanning before surgery, three months after surgery in the first year and every six months after the first year. The following X-ray features were analyzed: bilateral pelvic height (PH), iliac crest inclination (ICI), a horizontal distance of the acetabulum center (HD), and vertical distance of the acetabulum center (VD).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 16.9 ± 4.9 months in the Salter group, 20.7 ± 5.1 months in the Pemberton group, and 18.0 ± 5.4 months in the triple group (all P > 0.05). No significant differences between PH, HD, and VD of both sides on the preoperative AP pelvic x-ray were found. However, at the last follow-up, PH, HD,VD, and ICI increased in the Salter group (all P < 0.05), PH and VD increased in the Pemberton group (all P < 0.05), and VD decreased in the Triple group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Salter pelvic osteotomy may cause pelvic height to increase and the center of acetabulum to move outward and downward. In contrast, Pemberton pelvic osteotomy may cause pelvic height to increase and the center of acetabulum to move downward. Triple pelvic osteotomy only causes the center of acetabulum to move downward.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Crowe III/IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Acetabular Morphology and Reconstruction Techniques

The severe anatomic deformities render acetabular reconstruction as one of the greatest challenges in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for patients with Crowe III/IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Thorough understanding of acetabular morphology and bone defect is the basis of acetabular reconstruction techniques. Researchers have proposed either true acetabulum position reconstruction or high hip center (HHC) position reconstruction. The former can obtain the optimal hip biomechanics, including bulk femoral head autograft, acetabular medial wall displacement osteotomy, and acetabular component medialization, while the latter is relatively easy for hip reduction, as it can avoid neurovascular lesions and obtain more bone coverage; however, it cannot achieve good hip biomechanics. Both techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. Although there is no consensus on which approach is better, most researchers suggest the true acetabulum position reconstruction. Based on the various acetabular deformities in DDH patients, evaluation of acetabular morphology, bone defect, and bone stock using the 3D image and acetabular component simulation techniques, as well as the soft tissue tension around the hip joint, individualized acetabular reconstruction plans can be formulated and appropriate techniques can be selected to acquire desired clinical outcomes.

Femoral Head Autograft to Manage Acetabular Bone Loss Defects in THA for Crowe III Hips by DAA: Retrospective Study and Surgical Technique

Introduction: The pathologic anatomy of Crowe III is characterized by the erosion of the superior rim of acetabulum, with a typical bone defect in its supero-lateral portion. The performance of a total hip arthroplasty requires the management of the acetabular bone defect, and femoral head autograft can be a valid option to optimize implant coverage. Material and Methods: In all, eight Crowe III patients (nine hips), seven of which having unilateral hip affected, and one with bilateral involvement by secondary osteoarthritis in DDH; maximum limb length discrepancy (LLD) of 3.5 cm in unilateral patients. All were operated on by direct anterior approach. Patients were evaluated in terms of clinical, surgical, and radiological (center-edge, horizontal coverage, cup inclination) parameters. Results: Cup placement was implanted with a mean of 39.5 ± 7.5°. Stem alignment showed average 1.5 ± 2.3° in valgus. LLD showed an overall average preoperative of -29.5 ± 10.5 mm at the affected side, with a significant improvement to -2.5 ± 6.4 mm (p = 0.023). The mean initial coverage evaluated like a percentage of the horizontal bone host was 52.1 ± 7.1%, while the mean final coverage at the last post-operative X-ray from femoral autograft bone was 97.0 ± 4.5% with an average improvement of 44.5%. Average CE improved from -9.5 ± 5.2° (CE I) to the immediate post-operative (CE II) of 40.6 ± 8.2°. At the final follow up, CE III showed a mean of 38.6 ± 6.2°, with an average decrease of 2.0°. Discussion: Acetabular bone defect in Crowe III DDH patients undergoing THA by DAA, can be efficiently managed by massive autograft femoral head, which allowed an adequate and long-lasting coverage of the implant, with cup positioning at the native acetabulum.

Cup Overhanging in Anatomic Socket Position or High Hip Center of Rotation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe III and IV Dysplasia: A CT-Based Simulation

Cup overhanging in total hip arthroplasty is a predisposing factor to iliopsoas impingement. In dysplastic hips, cup implantation was simulated in an anatomic hip center of rotation (AHCR) and in high hip center (HHCR). We sought to assess: (1) the percentage of prominent cups; (2) quantify the cup protrusion at different sites on frontal, axial and sagittal views. In 40 Crowe III-IV hips, using a 3D CT-based planning software, cup planning in AHCR and HHCR (CR height ≥ 20 mm) was performed for every hip. Cup prominence was assessed on every plane. HHCR cups were less anteverted (p < 0.01), less medialized (p < 0.001) and less caudal (p = 0.01) than AHCR sockets. AHCR cups were more frequently prominent on at least one plane (92.5% vs. 77.5%), with minimal agreement between the two configurations (k = 0.31, p = 0.07). AHCR cups protruded more than HHCR sockets in the sagittal (p = 0.02) and axial planes (p < 0.001). Axially, at the center of the cup, prominence 6−11 mm occurred in nine (22.5%) AHCR and one (2.5%) HHCR socket. In conclusion, while a routine high hip center should not be recommended, cup placement at a center of rotation height < 20 mm is associated with higher rates and magnitudes of anterior cup protrusion in severe dysplasia.

Morselized bone autograft for high placement of acetabular component closure with hip arthroplasty revision after 3-years screws and cup loosening: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Aseptic loosening in high placement of the acetabular component seriously affects the hip and femoral head loads. Surgery revision is highly recommended with defect closure in previous place.

CASE PRESENTATION

A-40-year-old man came with chief complaint of right groin pain and noticeable leg length discrepancy gait. The first hip arthroplasty through pseudo-acetabulum cup was done three years ago after neglected femoral head necrosis due to eight years of unknown hip dislocation in vehicle accident. On hip x-ray there is a screws and cup loosening, without any sign of infection from blood or from soft tissue which undergoes pathological and mold examination. The patient than assessed with periprosthetic aseptic loosening of hip dextra and simple total hip arthroplasty revision using true acetabulum location was done. The pseudo-acetabulum area closed with morselized bone autograft. One weeks after surgery, the wound healed properly. Hence, the patient sent to the rehabilitation.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Hip arthroplasty revision of aseptic loosening in high placement acetabular component should perform by returning to anatomical acetabular position. Cancellous morselized bone autograft (MBA) was used to closed the defect formed by previous procedure.

CONCLUSION

Revision of hip arthroplasty combined with morselized bone autograft can be considered for high placement acetabular component defect closure to provide better stability and strength in weight loads transfer.

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of the Anatomical Center and High Hip Center Techniques in the Treatment of Adult Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Background. In total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip, there is considerable controversy regarding the placement of the acetabular cup, anatomic center, and upward in acetabular reconstruction. This article explores the efficacy of the anatomical center technique and high hip center technique in the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip. Method. By searching for articles in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang databases, we collected the literature on the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip by anatomical center and high hip center technology and screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials, the quality of the literature in retrospective cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, and the RevMan 5.4 software was used to analyze the extracted outcome indicators. Results. Nine studies were finally included, including one prospective cohort study, eight retrospective cohort studies, two high-quality studies, and six moderate-quality studies. The meta-analysis results showed that the reconstruction of the acetabulum in two positions was significantly different in terms of operation time ( $\text{WMD}=-37$ , 95% CI: -45.25-28.74, $P<0.00001$ ), intraoperative blood loss ( $\text{WMD}=-91.88$ , 95% CI: -108.57-75.19, $P<0.00001$ ), postoperative drainage volume ( $\text{WMD}=80.55$ , 95% CI: -140.56-301.66, $P=0.48$ ), time to ground ( $\text{WMD}=-0.68$ , 95% CI: -1.37-0.0, $P=0.05$ ), Harris score ( $\text{WMD}=-0.04$ , 95% CI: -0.91-0.82, $P=0.92$ ), lower limb length difference ( $\text{WMD}=0.21$ , 95% CI: -0.22-0.64, $P=0.33$ ), WOMAC score ( $\text{WMD}=-1.24$ , 95% CI: -4.89-2.41, $P=0.51$ ), postoperative complications ( $\text{RD}=-0.02$ , 95% CI: -0.06-0.02, $P=0.44$ ), Trendelenburg sign ( $\text{RD}=-0.02$ , 95% CI: -0.02-0.05, $P=0.31$ ), limb lengthening ( $\text{WMD}=0.85$ , 95% CI: 0.61-1.09, $P<0.00001$ ), prosthesis wear ( $\text{WMD}=0.01$ , 95% CI: 0-0.02, $P=0.17$ ), and prosthesis loosening ( $\text{RD}=0.01$ , 95% CI: -0.02-0.04, $P=0.45$ ). Conclusions. The high hip center technique can reduce operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and downtime. The anatomical center technique is superior to the high hip center technique in terms of limb lengthening. Compared with acetabular anatomical reconstruction, there was no significant difference in postoperative drainage, lower limb length difference, postoperative complications, Trendelenburg sign, and prosthesis survival or wear. For DDH patients who are not severely shortened in the lower limbs and have severe acetabular bone defects, joint surgeons can choose to reconstruct the acetabulum in the upper part to simplify the operation, reduce the trauma of the patient, and accelerate the recovery of the patient, and they can choose to adjust the length of the neck and the angle of the neck shaft to maintain the moment arm of the abductor muscle. A ceramic interface or a highly cross-linked polyethylene interface minimizes the effect of hip response forces. To further evaluate the efficacy of the anatomical center technique and the high hip center technique in the treatment of adult developmental dysplasia of the hip, more large-sample, high-quality, long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials are still needed for verification.

John Charnley Award: Deep Learning Prediction of Hip Joint Center on Standard Pelvis Radiographs

BACKGROUND

Accurate hip joint center (HJC) determination is critical for preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty, and commonly used classification systems in primary and revision hip replacement. However, current methods of preoperative HJC estimation are prone to subjectivity and human error. The purpose of the study was to leverage deep learning (DL) to develop a rapid and objective HJC estimation tool on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs.

METHODS

Radiographs from 3,965 patients (7,930 hips) were included. A DL model workflow was created to detect bony landmarks and estimate HJC based on a pelvic height ratio method. The workflow was utilized to conduct a grid-search for optimal nonspecific, sex-specific, and patient-specific (using contralateral hip) pelvic height ratios on the training/validation cohort (6,344 hips). Algorithm performance was assessed on an independent testing cohort for HJC estimation comparison.

RESULTS

The algorithm estimated HJC for the testing cohort at a rate of 0.65 seconds/hip based on features in AP radiographs alone. The model predicted HJC within 5 mm of error for 80% of hips using nonspecific ratios, which increased to 83% with sex-specific and 91% with patient-specific pelvic height ratio models. Mean error decreased utilizing the patient-specific model (3.09 ± 1.69 mm, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Using DL, we developed nonspecific, sex-specific, and patient-specific models capable of estimating native HJC on AP pelvis radiographs. This tool may provide clinical value when considering preoperative component position in patients planned to undergo THA and in reducing the subjective variability in HJC estimation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, level IV.

Postoperative Hip Center Position Associated With the Range of Internal Rotation and Extension During Gait in Hip Dysplasia Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip dysplasia patients is sometimes complex and compromises pathomorphological changes in these patients. However, it remains unclear whether it is preoperative deformities or postoperative structures or anatomic changes during THA that have the most remarkable correlation with the hip dynamic function during gait. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship and propose insights into the surgical reconstruction strategy in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Methods: A total of 21 unilateral hip dysplasia patients received computed tomography scans for the creation of 3D hip models before surgery and at the last follow-up. Acetabular and femoral orientations, hip center positions, and femoral length were measured before and after THA. Hip kinematics of the operated side during gait was quantified using a dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were performed to evaluate the relationship between hip maximum range of motion in six directions and demographics characters and above hip anatomic parameters before and after THA and their changes in surgery.

Results: Pearson correlation analysis found significant correlations with the gait range of motion mainly in postoperative structures, including postoperative hip center positions and acetabulum and combined anteversion. Further multiple linear regression indicated that a laterally placed hip center was significantly correlated with an increased internal rotation (R2 = 0.25, p = 0.021), which together with increased postoperative acetabulum anteversion explained 45% of external rotation decreasing (p = 0.004). A proximally placed hip center was correlated with more extension (R2 = 0.30, p = 0.010). No significant demographic characters or preoperative deformities or surgical changes were included into other multiple regression models.

Conclusion: Strong correlations between postoperative structures, especially hip center positions and gait range of motion in unilateral hip dysplasia patients after THA were found. It indicated that postoperative prosthesis structures, particularly hip center positions had significant impact on the hip gait motion range and should be treated with particular caution in surgery.