Surgical Skill Can be Objectively Measured From Fluoroscopic Images Using a Novel Image-based Decision Error Analysis (IDEA) Score

Nonphysician Evaluators and Recording-Based Tools in Surgical Skill Assessment: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of nonmedically trained evaluators and image- and video-based tools in the assessment of surgical skills in a key orthopedic procedure.

DESIGN

Orthopedic surgeons at varying skill levels were evaluated by their ability to repair a cadaveric bi-malleolar ankle fracture. Nonphysician viewers and expert orthopedic surgeons independently scored video recordings and fluoroscopy images of the procedure through Global Rating Scales (GRS) and procedure-specific checklist tools. Statistical analysis was used to determine if the evaluators and assessment tools were able to differentiate skill level.

SETTING

An academic tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The surgical procedure was completed by 3 orthopedic residents, 3 orthopedic trauma fellows, and 4 orthopedic trauma attending surgeons. The procedure was independently evaluated by 2 orthopedic surgeons and 2 nonphysicians.

RESULTS

Operating participants were stratified by ≤ or >10 bimalleolar ankle fracture cases performed alone (inexperienced, n = 5 vs experienced, n = 5). Expert surgeon viewers could effectively stratify skill group through the GRS for video and fluoroscopy analysis (p < 0.05), and the video procedure-specific checklist (p < 0.05), but not the fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklist. Nonphysician viewers generally recognized skill groupings, although with less separation than surgeon viewers. These evaluators performed the best when aided by video and fluoroscopy procedure-specific checklists. Meanwhile, breakdowns of each tool into critical zones for improvement and evaluator-independent metrics such as case experience, self-reported confidence, and surgical time also indicated some skill differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of using video recordings and fluoroscopic imaging based surgical skills assessment tools in orthopedic trauma was demonstrated. The tools highlighted in this study are applicable to both cadaver laboratory settings and live surgeries. The degree of training that is required by the evaluators and the utility of measuring surgical times of specific tasks should be the subject of future studies.

Fluoroscopic image-based behavior analysis can objectively explain subjective expert assessment of wire navigation skill

Psychomotor skill and decision-making efficiency in surgical wire navigation can be objectively evaluated by analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopic image sequences. Prior work suggests that such image-based behavior analysis of operating room (OR) performance can predict performer experience level (R2  = 0.62) and agree with expert opinion (the current standard) on the quality of a final implant construct (R2  = 0.59). However, it is unclear how objective image-based evaluation compares with expert assessments for entire technical OR performances. This study examines the relationships between three key variables: (1) objective image-based criteria, (2) expert opinions, and (3) performing surgeon experience level. A paired-comparison survey of seven experts, based upon eight OR fluoroscopic wire navigation image sequences, shows that the experts' preferences are best explained by objective metrics that reflect psychomotor and decision-making behaviors which are counter-productive to successful implant placement, like image count (R2  = 0.83) and behavior tally (R2  = 0.74). One such behavior, adjustments away from goal, uniquely correlated well with all three key variables: a fluoroscopic image-based analysis composite score (R2  = 0.40), expert consensus (R2  = 0.76), and performer experience (R2  = 0.41). These results confirm that experts view less efficient technical behavior as indicative of lesser technical proficiency. While expert assessments of technical skill were reliable and consistent, neither individual nor consensus expert opinion appears to correlate with performer experience (R2  = 0.11).

Simulation training to retool practicing orthopedic surgeons is rare

Purpose

Modern surgical practice is continuously changing as technology develops. New techniques are often implemented after a surgeon has made the transition to independent clinical practice. There is therefore a need to 'retool' technical skills. Additionally, practicing surgeons must maintain and develop skills such as leadership, communication, critical thinking, teaching, and mentoring. Our aim was to perform a scoping review to assess the current status of simulation education for practicing Orthopedic Surgeons (OS).

Methods

A 10 year search of PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science was performed with a medical librarian. Controlled vocabulary Medical Subject Headings terms and natural language were developed with subject matter experts describing simulation, training and OS. Two trained reviewers evaluated all abstracts for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not assess simulation education involving practicing OS. Data were extracted from the included full text articles by two reviewers: details of study design, type of participants, type of simulation and role of OS in the educational event.

Results

Initial search identified 1824 articles of which 443 were duplicates, and 1381 articles were further screened. Of these, 1155 were excluded, 226 full text articles were assessed for eligibility and 80 included in analysis. Most were published in the last 6 years and from the United States. The majority (99%) described technical skill simulations (arthroscopy 56%, screw placement 23%, ligament reconstruction 19%). OS were rarely the only learners with 91% studies also having residents participate. OS were the targeted learner in 6% studies. OS provided content validity for 15 (19%) and construct validity in 59 (74%) studies.

Conclusions

Simulation training to educate practicing OS is rare. OS are often used to validate work rather than being the center of an educational endeavor. A refocusing is needed to provide adequate training for practicing surgeons to retool skills as new techniques become available.

Minimally Trained Analysts Can Perform Fast, Objective Assessment of Orthopedic Technical Skill from Fluoroscopic Images

Skill assessment in orthopedics has traditionally relied on subjective impressions from a supervising surgeon. The feedback derived from these tools may be limited by bias and other practical issues. Objective analysis of intraoperative fluoroscopic images offers an inexpensive, repeatable, and precise assessment strategy without bias. Assessors generally refrain from using the scores of images obtained throughout the operation to evaluate skill for practical reasons. A new system was designed to facilitate rapid analysis of this fluoroscopy via minimally trained analysts. Four expert and four novice analysts independently measured one objective metric for skill using both a custom analysis software and a commercial alternative. Analysts were able to measure the objective metric three times faster when using the custom software, and without a practical difference in accuracy in comparison to the expert analysts using the commercial software. These results suggest that a well-designed fluoroscopy analysis system can facilitate inexpensive, reliable, and objective assessment of surgical skills.