Low-energy Gunshot-induced Tibia Fractures: What Proportion Develop Complications?

Deep infections after low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures are frequently polymicrobial and recalcitrant

Objectives

To identify risk factors for developing a fracture-related infection in operatively treated ballistic tibia fractures and to report the microbiologic results of intraoperative cultures.

Design

Retrospective review.

Setting

Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/Participants

One hundred thirty-three adults with operatively treated low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures, from 2011 to 2021.

Intervention

One dose of prophylactic cefazolin or equivalent as well as perioperative prophylaxis.

Main Outcome Measurements

Deep infection rate.

Results

The deep infection rate was 12% (16/134) with no significant difference in injury characteristics, index surgical characteristics, or time to antibiotics between the groups (P > 0.05). Patients who were slightly older (35.5 vs. 27 median years, P = 0.005) and with higher median body mass indexes (BMIs) (30.09 vs. 24.51, P = 0.021) developed a deep infection. 56.3% of patients presented with signs of infection within the first 100 days after injury. Nine patients had polymicrobial infections. There were 29 isolated organisms, 69% were uncovered by first-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis (anaerobes, gram-negative rods, Enterococcus, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus [MRSA]), and 50% of patients developed recalcitrant infection and required a second reoperation where 6 organisms were isolated, half of which were not covered by first-generation prophylaxis (Enterococcus, Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA).

Conclusions

We found a deep infection rate of 12% among ballistic tibia fractures receiving standard-of-care antibiotic prophylaxis. Increased age and body mass index were associated with deep infections. Half became recalcitrant requiring a second reoperation. 66.7% of isolated organisms were not covered by first-generation cephalosporin prophylaxis. Consideration should be given to treatment options such as broader prophylaxis or local antibiotic treatment.

Level of Evidence

IV.

The integration of ortho-plastic limb salvage teams in the humanitarian response to violence-related open tibial fractures: evaluating outcomes in the Gaza Strip

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage by ortho-plastic teams is the standard protocol for treating open tibial fractures in high-income countries, but there's limited research on this in conflict settings like the Gaza Strip. This study assessed the clinical impact of gunshot-related open tibial fractures, compared patient management by orthopedic and ortho-plastic teams, and identified the risk factors for bone non-union in this context.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on Gaza Strip patients with gunshot-induced-open tibial fractures from March 2018 to October 2020. Data included patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes, with at least one year of follow-up. Primary outcomes were union, non-union, infection, and amputation.

RESULTS

The study included 244 injured individuals, predominantly young adult males (99.2%) with nearly half (48.9%) having Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures and more than half (66.8%) with over 1 cm of bone loss. Most patients required surgery, including rotational flaps and bone grafts with a median of 3 admissions and 9 surgeries. Ortho-plastic teams managed more severe muscle and skin injuries, cases with bone loss > 1 cm, and performed less debridement compared to other groups, though these differences were not statistically significant. Non-union occurred in 53% of the cases, with the ortho-plastic team having the highest rate at 63.6%. Infection rates were high (92.5%), but no significant differences in bone or infection outcomes were observed among the different groups. Logistic regression analysis identified bone loss > 1 cm, vascular injury, and the use of a definitive fixator at the first application as predictors of non-union.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the severity and complexity of such injuries, emphasizing their significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Ortho-plastic teams appeared to play a crucial role in managing severe cases. However, further research is still needed to enhance our understanding of how to effectively manage these injuries.

Low energy gunshot injuries: Does removal of retained bullet fragmentation at the time of internal fixation reduce the risk of fracture related infection?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of RBF (Retained Bullet Fragment) removal at the time of long bone fixation on FRI (fracture related infection) rates in low energy GSI (Gunshot Injury) related fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study SETTING: Level 1 Academic Trauma Center INTERVENTION: Retrospective review of the impact of RBFs on the risk of FRI when employing internal fixation in low energy GSI (Gunshot Injury) related fractures. In situations where the injury pattern requires surgical fixation, the question arises as to whether or not the RBFs need to be removed to prevent FRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Whether or not the RBFs removed in our patient population prevented short- and long-term fracture related infection after low-energy gunshot injury (FRI-LGI).

RESULTS

Of the 2,136 GSI related fractures, 131 patients met inclusion criteria, 81 patients underwent removal (R) of RBFs at the time of internal fixation while 50 patients did not undergo any removal (NR) at time of internal fixation. Among the patients who underwent surgical intervention, (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) ORIF was performed in 55 cases (R: 39; NR: 16), and (Intramedullary Nail) IMN was performed in 76 cases (R: 42; NR: 34). The overall rate of deep FRI-LGI was 6.9 % of the 131-patient cohort. We found that removal of RBFs had a statistically significant impact on the rate of deep FRI-LGI when compared to the NR group (p = 0.031). In the RBF removal group, only two patients (2.4 %) developed deep FRI-LGIs, whereas in the NR group, seven patients (14.0 %) developed deep FRI-LGIs. The incidence of early FRI-LGI was higher in the NR group (median 0.6 months) compared to the R group, which was associated with late FRI-LGIs (median 10.1 months) when they occurred.

DISCUSSION

In our study population, we found a statistically significantly increased incidence of deep and early FRI-LGI when RBFs are not removed at the time of extra-articular long bone internal fixation. The presence of retained bullet fragments following internal fixation may pose a risk factor for future development of deep FRI-LGI. We believe a surgeon should use their best judgment as to whether a RBF can safely be removed at the time of long bone fixation. Based on our findings, if safely permitted, RBF removal should be considered at the time of GSI long bone fixation resulting from low energy hand gun injuries.

Antibiotic prophylaxis following low-velocity gunshot fractures: an updated review

PURPOSE

Low-velocity gunshot fractures (LVGFs) are a common type of gunshot-induced trauma with the potential for complications such as infection and osteomyelitis. The effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs remains uncertain, leading to ongoing debate about the appropriate treatment. In this review, we evaluate recent updates on the current understanding of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs, how previous studies have investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs, and the current state of institutional policies and protocols for treating LVGFs with antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs after the last review in 2013. Due to the lack of quantitative clinical trial studies, we employed a narrative synthesis approach to analyze and present the findings from the included primary studies. We categorized the outcomes based on the anatomical location of the LVGFs.

RESULTS

After evaluating 67 publications with the necessary qualifications out of 578 abstracts, 17 articles were included. The sample size of the studies ranged from 22 to 252 patients. The antibiotics used in the studies varied, and the follow-up period ranged from three months to ten years. The included studies investigated the use of antibiotics in treating LVGFs at various anatomic locations, including the humerus, forearm, hand and wrist, hip, femur, tibia, and foot and ankle.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides updated evidence for the use of antibiotics in LVGFs and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines. We also highlight the lack of institutional policies for treating LVGFs and the heterogeneity in treatments among institutions with established protocols. A single-dose antibiotic approach could be cost-effective for patients with non-operatively treated LVGFs. We suggest that a national or international registry for gunshot injuries, antibiotics, and infections could serve as a valuable resource for collecting and analyzing data related to these important healthcare issues.

Epidemiology of ballistic fractures in the United States: A 20-year analysis of the Firearm Injury Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

Ballistic (i.e., gunshot-induced) fractures present unique treatment challenges and can be associated with high rates of complications and considerable morbidity. Large-scale epidemiologic data on these types of fractures are scarce. There is concern that gun-related violence may be on the rise, potentially increasing the burden of ballistic orthopaedic trauma, but there are few contemporary studies on the topic. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the incidence and demographics of patients with ballistic fractures in the United States (US) over the last 20 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive epidemiology study retrospectively analyzed the Firearm Injury Surveillance Study to identify cases of ballistic fractures in the US from 2000 to 2019. Overall and annual numbers of fractures and fracture incidence rates (IRs), patient demographics, incident characteristics, and temporal trends were analyzed. Patients of all ages were included. Ballistic fractures were grouped by anatomic location for comparisons (non-spine axial, spine, upper extremity, lower extremity).

RESULTS

An estimated N = 240,555 patients (n = 8,322 unweighted cases) sustained ballistic fractures over the 20-year study period for an overall IR of 39.2 per 1,000,000 person-years at-risk (PYR). Overall, lower extremity fractures accounted for the largest percentage of cases (45.9%; IR=18.8 PYR), followed by upper extremity fractures (32.8%; IR=13.4 PYR), non-spine axial fractures (16.1%; IR=6.6 PYR), and spine fractures (5.2%; IR=2.1 PYR). Diaphyseal femur fractures were the most common ballistic fractures overall. Nearly three-fourths (71.2%) of all cases occurred in males in the second through fourth decades. The most common injury intent was assault (71.8%) and a majority of patients (71.2%) required hospital admission. Accounting for population growth yielded a significantly increasing incidence of all ballistic fractures over the study period from 15.7 PYR in 2000 to 96.8 PYR in 2019 (average annual percent change=10.3, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the nationwide burden of ballistic fractures in the US has increased significantly in the last two decades. Ballistic fractures are associated with significant morbidity and societal cost, and increasing injury rates highlight the need for future research aimed at better understanding the ideal treatment of these types of fractures and their outcomes.