A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study

Biomedical analysis of four fixation systems in treatment of type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: a finite element analysis

This study aimed to compare the properties and safety of self-designed plates in type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with those of traditional devices via finite element (FE) analysis. We constructed a hangman's fracture FE model from the occipital bone (C0) level to the C3 level. Then, FE models were constructed for the following four fixation systems: an anterior cervical L-shaped plate with four vertebral screws (4-ACLP), or six screws (6-ACLP), an anterior cervical orion plate (ACOP), and a posterior fixation system. A preloaded compressive force of 50 N and a moment of 1.5 N·m were applied to each model under six working conditions. The mobility of the C2/3 segment decreased significantly in four fixation models. In the Mises stress cloud diagram, 4-ACLP showed a better stress distribution in both the bone graft and fixation system than 6-ACLP and ACOP. The resultant force of 4-ACLP was lower but higher than ACOP in axial force. Additionally, the cage in the 4-ACLP configuration experienced the highest stress in the six working conditions. Hence, this novel self-designed plate has the potential to mitigate the operational difficulties, provide sufficient stability, reduce the risk of plate or screw fractures, and improve bone fusion.

An update of interbody cages for spine fusion surgeries: from shape design to materials

INTRODUCTION

Discectomy and interbody fusion are widely used in the treatment of intervertebral disc-related diseases. Among them, the interbody cage plays a significant role. However, the complications related to the interbody cage, such as nonunion or pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, loosening, and prolapse of the cage, cannot be ignored. By changing the design and material of the interbody fusion cage, a better fusion effect can be obtained, the incidence of appeal complications can be reduced, and the quality of life of patients after interbody fusion can be improved.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviewed the research progress of cage design and material and discussed the methods of cage design and material to promote intervertebral fusion.

EXPERT OPINION

Current treatment of cervical and lumbar degenerative disease requires interbody fusion to maintain decompression and to promote fusion and reduce the incidence of fusion failure through improvements in implant material, design, internal structure, and function. However, interbody fusion is not an optimal solution for treating vertebral instability.Abbreviations: ACDF, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Axi-aLIF, axial lumbar interbody fusion; BAK fusion cage, Bagby and Kuslich fusion cage; CADR, cervical artificial disc replacement; DBM, decalcified bone matrix; HA, hydroxyapatite; LLIF/XLIF, lateral or extreme lateral interbody fusion; MIS-TLIF, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; OLIF/ATP, oblique lumbar interbody fusion/anterior to psoas; PEEK, Poly-ether-ether-ketone; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; ROI-C, Zero-profile Anchored Spacer; ROM, range of motion; SLM, selective melting forming; TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or.